Access Fund Condemns Delicate Arch Stunt
Well, I wonder if Dean Potter is still preening about his little stunt the other day? You know, the one in which he soloed to the top of Delicate Arch in Arches National Park. The one that brought quite a bit of criticism down upon his sinewy shoulders.
Climbing forums across the country have been chattering about the pros and cons of Potter's actions, and now the Access Fund, the only national advocacy organization for the climbing community, is adding its criticism.
"The Access Fund does not condone the climb of Delicate Arch and the actions of this individual are not representative of the climbing community," the organization said Friday. "We trust the public will understand that the actions of one person should not condemn the larger community of climbers who are equally appalled by this event.
"The Access Fund urges all climbers to recognize and limit the impacts of their climbing practices on the environment and other users of the land and to respect existing closures. If questionable restrictions arise, climbing advocacy efforts opposing such unreasonable restrictions should follow proper administrative procedures."
Of course, a question that might naturally arise in some circles is if El Capitan and Half Dome in Yosemite National Park, and the Grand Tetons in Grand Teton National Park, and many towering walls in Zion National Park, can be climbed, why not Delicate Arch?
The obvious answer, of course, is that when Delicate Arch finally does decide to turn into a large pile of rubble, hopefully it will be gravity, and not the weight of a climber, that makes that decision. Arches such as Delicate are much more susceptible to outside forces than El Capitan, Half Dome and the other rock edifices I mentioned.
That said, according to the Access Fund, national park officials in Arches and other national parks are reviewing their climbing policies and could place some restrictions as a result of Potter's climb.
If such restrictions are enacted, I wonder if Patagonia, the clothing manufacturer that hails Potter as one of its "alpine ambassadors," will continue to refer to him as one of the "best and most highly respected climbers in the world."
While Potter's certainly one of the best, I'm guessing he's not among the most respected these days.
Visitor Center
Copyright 2005-2011
National Park Advocates LLC
Follow the Traveler
Recent comments
-
Bob Pahre
on
Active-Duty Military Members To Gain...
1 hour 25 sec ago
-
Ranger Rich (not verified)
on
Reader Participation Day: Will Gas...
2 hours 4 min ago
-
Anonymous (not verified)
on
Calls To Expand Units Of The National...
2 hours 9 min ago
-
Lee Dalton
on
List Of "Most Endangered Rivers...
2 hours 32 min ago
-
Badge529
on
Reader Participation Day: Will Gas...
2 hours 42 min ago
-
Kirby Adams
on
Birding In The National Parks: Grab A...
2 hours 48 min ago
-
Grant McCreary (not verified)
on
Birding In The National Parks: Grab A...
13 hours 25 min ago
-
Lee Dalton
on
Active-Duty Military Members To Gain...
14 hours 36 min ago
-
imtnbke
on
View From The Overlook: Mountain-Biker-...
17 hours 4 min ago
-
Mark Mcc (not verified)
on
Keeping Things Quiet In The National...
17 hours 14 min ago


















Comments
Post new comment
All viewpoints, as long as they're constructive, are allowed on the site. But ... the Traveler is not a catchall for viewpoints and discussions that fall outside of the parks or the post at hand. In monitoring comments, we try to restrict those to the topic at hand. Refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.