Did Mount Rainier National Park Leave Contractor Holding The Bill?
There are few things as bad as doing some work for someone and then not getting paid what you believe you're owed. Such a scenario has developed around the renovated Paradise Inn at Mount Rainier National Park, and a roofing contractor says he might have to lay off 40 workers if he doesn't get paid soon.
But while Sterling Exteriors, of Tacoma, Washington, maintains the Park Service owes it $215,000, Park Service officials say the general contractor for the job, the John Korsmo Construction, also of Tacoma, is responsible for the bill.
Sterling Exteriors put the cedar shake roof on the inn. However, owner Doug Vieselmeyer maintains Park Service architects miscalculated how big the job really was, and he invested an additional 4,000 square feet of cedar shakes -- and the necessary labor -- to complete it.
Visitor Center
Copyright 2005-2011
National Park Advocates LLC
Follow the Traveler
Recent comments
-
Anonymous (not verified)
on
Sale of Plastic Water Bottles Banned At...
1 hour 15 min ago
-
Anonymous (not verified)
on
Search Continues For Mountain Lion That...
1 hour 16 min ago
-
Anonymous (not verified)
on
Court Rules That Sequoia National Park...
3 hours 49 min ago
-
Anonymous (not verified)
on
Search Continues For Mountain Lion That...
4 hours 7 min ago
-
Bob Janiskee
on
National Park Mystery Spot 35: What...
4 hours 10 min ago
-
George Durkee (not verified)
on
Court Rules That Sequoia National Park...
4 hours 51 min ago
-
Christen (not verified)
on
TRACK Trails Offer Nationwide Weapon...
4 hours 57 min ago
-
desk-bound parky (not verified)
on
National Park Mystery Spot 35: What...
4 hours 58 min ago
-
Bob Janiskee
on
National Park Mystery Spot 35: What...
5 hours 3 min ago
-
imtnbke
on
Court Rules That Sequoia National Park...
5 hours 47 min ago


















Comments
It is doubtful this is a 'Parks issue'. The building trades - and many other businesses, like logging - use the General Contractor and Sub-Contractor model. The roofing-contractor would most likely have no relationship with the Park whatsoever - his agreements were with the GC.
Unless there is some major, unusual detail that alters the overall picture, this is a fracas between the roofer and the General Contractor ... with the roofer putting up a smoke-screen and fabricating media-interest by seemingly dragging the Park into it.
Post new comment