You are here

Committee: Keep Mount St. Helens Out of the National Park System

Share

Mount St. Helens. USFS photo by Dennis Lapcewich.

After roughly a year of reviewing scenarios, a committee tasked with determining whether Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument should remain a U.S. Forest Service property or be turned over to the National Park Service has reached its conclusion: Keep the National Park Service away from the mountain.

While an economic report last fall touted the benefits of a "Mount St. Helens National Park," the committee made up of locals living around the volcano decided restrictions the Park Service might place on the destination would be too distasteful. Specifically, they voiced concerns about limits on hunting, fishing, and off-road vehicle travel.

Talk of transferring Mount St. Helens National Monument from the U.S. Forest Service to National Park Service arose back in July 2007 after the cash-strapped Forest Service announced it was going to close a visitor center in the monument, which the Forest Service has managed since it was designated in 1982.

The economic study, prepared for the Mount St. Helens Advisory Committee by the Environmental Law Clinic at the University of Washington, said, in part, that as a national park the mountain would be better funded and have a higher national profile, thus attracting more visitors.

Under the NPS, Mount St. Helens is likely to enjoy more stable and potentially more bountiful funding. In addition, the prestige associated with designation as a National Park would attract a greater number of visitors. The economic benefits of such a designation would ripple through surrounding communities, and Washington State. Although redesignation may result in some minor use restrictions, these concerns can be mitigated, and any such loss almost certainly would be outweighed by the potential benefits.

The report goes on to add that the Park Service would be the best agency to see that the Mount St. Helens is protected geologically, ecologically, and culturally, while at the same time providing the public and scientists opportunities to "observe the natural recovery of a devastated environment."

"These purposes require both protection of the Mount St. Helens landscape, as well as development of access to the educational and recreational opportunities the mountain has to offer," wrote the authors. "We conclude in this Report that these dual goals would be best achieved if Congress placed Mount St. Helens under the management of the National Park Service . The NPS has the appropriate mandate, the appropriate funding mechanisms, and the appropriate management experience to properly balance the competing interests of use and preservation to meet the goals that Congress established and the promise that Mount St. Helens holds for future generations."

The advisory committee, meanwhile, believes the future of Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument could best be handled by the Forest Service if a new highway ran north from the monument to Randle, Washington; if the monument's budget was boosted, and; if overnight lodging was provided both at the now-closed Coldwater Ridge Visitor Center and elsewhere in the immediate vicinity.

Comments

Well, that sucks. I disagree with the conclusions, however I'm at least glad the locals are the ones who made the choice rather than some office full of D.C. windbags.

I only hope the decision was made honestly and not through undue influence peddling (like by mining firms who promise jobs in exchange for destroying the landscape & polluting the rivers).

=============================================

My travels through the National Park System: americaincontext.com


I too am disappointed by what I see as a short-sighted decision by the local committee. The eruption of Mt. St. Helen's is an iconic event in our Nation's history, and it seems to be a very notable omission from the National Park System.


Part of the ORV opposition to NPS management is the strong local snowmobile lobby. They routinely ride to the crater rim from the south, even a bit beyond: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004346469_webfall13m.html
At least there is now a non-motorized corridor for climbers and skiers.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.