Climate Change and National Parks: A Survival Guide for a Warming World -- Coral Reefs

A healthy coral reef, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. NOAA photo.

Editor's note: This is the second excerpt from the National Parks Conservation Association's latest report on how climate change is impacting national parks. This section focuses on how climate change is impacting coral reefs in parks such as Virgin Islands National Park, Biscayne National Park, and Dry Tortugas National Park. The entire report can be found at this page.

Coral Reefs of Southern Florida and the Caribbean

Neon-hued parrotfish. Graceful angelfish the size of dinner platters. Delicate sponges that sway in the currents. Coral communities teeming with colorful marine life. Our fascination with the oceans and their denizens has led Congress to include within the National Park System some of the nation’s most incredible and beautiful marine ecosystems. Ninety-five percent of Biscayne National Park, for instance, is underwater.

Venture beneath the surface and you’ll encounter a rich, vibrant ecosystem that contains fanciful sea life ranging from sharks and sea cows to the only living tropical coral reef in the continental United States. Known as the Florida Reef Tract, it is the world’s third-largest reef and wraps from Biscayne on Florida’s eastern shore all the way to Dry Tortugas National Park off the state’s southwestern tip. Within Dry Tortugas you will find a seascape similar to that of Biscayne, with a wide variety of marine life protected within the park’s borders. You will also find a 46-square-mile research natural area that offers an added layer of protection by prohibiting anchoring of boats and fishing which can physically damage coral reefs, while providing an area for unfettered marine ecosystem research. Park managers hope that threatened staghorn corals, which have declined by 99 percent in the park’s waters since 1977, will benefit from these additional protections and expanded research opportunities.

Unfortunately, multiple problems confront coral reefs. Over-fishing can reduce fish species that are critical to coral reef health. In addition, water quality issues and physical disturbances have been long-standing problems. Now climate change threatens to exacerbate these stressors. Both staghorn and elkhorn corals were listed as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act in May 2006, partly due to the threats posed by climate change. Two years later, in November 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service designated part of Florida’s waters and those in the U.S. Virgin Islands, including Virgin Islands National Park, as critical habitat for these two corals.

Designations of critical habitat are important steps in protecting corals, but the human-caused stressors, as well as global stressors such as climate change, must also be addressed. In recent decades there have been signifi cant changes in the coral reef communities of Florida and the Caribbean. More potent and numerous hurricanes and coral “bleach-ing” — a phenomenon in which corals stressed by too-warm water or other stressors turn white as they expel their resident algae — are damaging, if not outright destroying, these valuable ecosystems. The most significant bleaching episode to date in the Florida Keys occurred in 1997-98. Compounding that event were Hurricane Georges and Tropical Storm Mitch, which added to the reef damage.

The extent of damage varies from year to year, but declines in many coral reef habitats have been recorded throughout the Florida Keys in the last two decades. Warming ocean temperatures and disease may have been primary contributing factors to these declines. In Virgin Islands National Park, three months of abnormally elevated water temperatures led to extensive bleaching followed by disease outbreaks that resulted in an average decline in hard coral cover of more than 51 percent during 2005. The future seems bleak, as scientists expect bleaching episodes to become a more frequent calling card of climate change. The latest climate-related threat to coral reef ecosystems is ocean acidification. While the oceans’ capacity to absorb atmospheric carbon dioxide makes them great “carbon sinks,” they are absorbing so much that their pH is decreasing and ocean waters are becoming more acidic.

If left unchecked, this acidification threatens to deprive corals of their ability to create and maintain their calcium carbonate skeletons (acid dissolves calcium carbonate). And it is these skeletons, when assembled in mass, which create the reefs. Along with global stressors such as warming waters and hurricanes are localized man-made stressors, including overuse, sedimentation, water pollution, physical disturbance (i.e., boat groundings), and disease — all of which affect the reefs. Over-fishing takes a toll by culling beneficial fish and invertebrate species that help control algal growth on corals.

The impacts of weakened and dying corals go beyond the somewhat monochromatic and crumbling skeletons left behind by bleaching and other damage. Not only are coral reef ecosystems some of the most diverse and species-rich ecosystems on Earth, but they are huge economic drivers for nearby communities. Biscayne National Park alone generates more than $23 million a year in economic
activity thanks to its visitors, and the entire south Florida region profi ts $4.4 billion annually, along with more than 70,000 full- and part-time jobs, thanks to business associated with these ecosystems. Marinas, charter boats, fishing guides, dive shops, grocery stores, motels, restaurants, and gift shops all benefit from the reefs.

SOLUTIONS

How can we help protect coral reefs, the myriad species that depend on corals, and the economies of coastal communities? Stop contributing to global warming and work to alleviate the local human-generated stressors that may be hurting our reefs’ chances of recovery from bleaching and other adverse effects of global warming. This will not be simple. Some say that even if greenhouse gas emissions dropped back to pre-Industrial levels (below 300 parts per million) in the atmosphere tomorrow, it could take as long as 40 years for a return to normal temperature regimes.

While impacts of climate change, such as warmer waters and more potent storms, can’t be eased overnight, working to reduce the human-related impacts can help lessen the reefs’ vulnerability to climate change. Studies have shown that reef ecosystems with a rich diversity of plants, invertebrates, and fish are more resilient to bleaching and rebound more quickly after bleaching episodes. Helping maintain such diversity are healthy mangrove forests, which serve as nurseries for fish fry that later inhabit reefs as adults. Human-produced stressors include the fertilizers, pesticides, and
toxic substances that stormy weather flushes from coastal areas into the oceans, where the pollution can harm reefs. Through managing healthy populations of fish and combating human impacts the resilience of coral reefs to climate change actually can be heightened.

Understanding the interconnectedness of marine systems and managing them to promote species diversity, as well as minimizing or limiting human-caused impacts (e.g., sedimentation, over-fishing, pollution, physical disturbances), could help coral reef communities cope with the effects of climate change. Altering human impacts by getting stakeholders to realize the problems and work proactively to overcome them can start to pay off almost immediately. Such an approach will require National Park Service managers to work with other governmental agencies and bring together
all stakeholders to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to protect the reefs.

We Can Safeguard Coral Reefs from Climate Change

Stop contributing to climate change.

Coral reefs might not survive if we fail to reduce carbon dioxide pollution that is warming the waters and acidifying the ocean.

Reduce and eliminate existing harms that make coral more vulnerable to climate change

Reducing pollution runoff, sedimentation, over-fishing, and physical disturbances will help corals become healthier and better able to withstand climate change impacts.

Adopt “climate smart” management practices

National Park Service managers can bring together all stakeholders to develop and implement strategies that strengthen coral reef systems, such as restoring mangrove forests that shelter fish that help keep coals healthy, and minimizing human-caused impacts. These strategies should help coral reef communities become more resilient in the face of climate change.

Tomorrow: Salmon of the Pacific Northwest

Credits:

LEAD RESEARCHER:
Jennie Hoffman, PhD, Senior Scientist, Climate Adaptation, EcoAdapt

ASSISTANT RESEARCHER:
Eric Mielbrecht, MS, Senior Scientist and Director of Operations, EcoAdapt

POLICY ADVISOR:
Lara Hansen, PhD, Chief Scientist and Executive Director, EcoAdapt

WRITTEN BY:
Kurt Repanshek

Comments

More potent and numerous hurricanes ... are damaging, if not outright destroying, these valuable ecosystems.

As for hurricanes being more numerous, a recent NOAA publication found that "Atlantic storm counts overall have not changed" and that "the apparent increase in the number of tropical storms and hurricanes since the late 19th and early 20th centuries is likely attributable to improvements in observational tools and analysis techniques that better detect short-lived storms."

"More potent" is still being debated.

Pick your news source:

In the Aug. 13 issue of the journal Nature, climate researchers including Jonathan Woodruff of the University of Massachusetts Amherst show that the frequency of intense hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean over the last 1,500 years has been closely linked to long-term changes in the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and sea surface temperature. The finding could help with hurricane modeling and prediction in the future.

Establishing the link between hurricane variability and climate change over these longer timescales “is a new viewpoint for us,” Woodruff explains. “There’s a randomness to hurricanes. But the fact that we can see trends that rise above that randomness is significant and a bit of a surprise. Our work indicates that hurricane activity has responded noticeably to past climate shifts. When considering future climate change over the next century, our results indicate that measurable changes in hurricane activity could occur, rising above the noise in the system.”

Rather than engaging in an adhominem against Mr. Hockey Stick Mann (oops, I did it anyway) who co-authored the Nature study, I will share what others are saying about this study:

“The paper comes to very erroneous conclusions because of using improper data and illogical techniques,” said Chris Landsea, science and operations officer at the National Hurricane Center. In his criticism, Landsea notes that the paper begins by saying that Atlantic tropical activity has “reached anomalous levels over the past decade.”

This ignores recent work by Landsea and a number of other hurricane scientists who found that storm counts in the early 1900s — in an era without satellites and fewer seaborne observers — likely missed three or four storms a year. The addition of these storms to the historical record, he said, causes the long-term trend over the last century to disappear.

“This isn't a small quibble,” he said. “It's the difference between a massive trend with doubling in the last 100 years, versus no trend.”


The two independent estimates of historical storm activity were consistent, said Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann, the paper’s lead author. Both, for example, pinpointed a period of high activity between 900 and 1100.

“This tells us these reconstructions are very likely meaningful,” he [Mann] said.

What is funny is that with that quote above, Mann is referring to the Medieval Warm Period, something he tried to smooth out in his tree ring study and previous hockey stick graph.


"The levels we're seeing at the moment are within the bounds of uncertainty," said Julian Heming, UK Met Office. "It's been hotly debated, and various teams using different computer models have come up with different answers," he told BBC News.

Rob Korty, an atmospheric scientist at Texas A&M University, said, “We must keep in mind the assumptions in this kind of work require are large by nature.”

More here. This is a hotly contested issue being reported as fact.

At any rate, I'm as skeptical of studies by Mann as I am press releases from PEER. Mann is very fond of using proxies rather than actual observations. In this case, it's sand sediments in ponds. Very dubious.