Climate Change and National Parks: A Survival Guide for a Warming World -- Oysters, Icon of the Chesapeake

What impacts might climate change have on Chesapeake Bay oysters? Photo via www.chesapeake-bay.org

Editor's note: This is the sixth excerpt from the National Parks Conservation Association's latest report on how climate change is impacting national parks. This section focuses on how climate change is impacting the Chesapeake Bay in general, and oysters specifically. Home to the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, the health of the bay is being imperiled by the impact of climate change. The entire report can be found at this page.

Whether you call them Eastern oysters, American oysters, Rappahannock oysters, or simply “white gold,” the iconic shellfish plucked from the Chesapeake Bay are a salty delicacy that some think is best served with a dash of horseradish and a squirt of lemon juice. Sadly, it’s a delicacy that is not as abundant as it once was. The Chesapeake once harbored oyster beds so rich and bountiful that they formed reefs. That was the case in 1608 when Capt. John Smith explored the bay and found oysters so thick that ships could run aground on them. The Chesapeake Bay Gateways Network, administered by the National Park System, was established in 2006 to help preserve the rich cultural and natural history of the Bay, including its oystering heritage.

Today, Chesapeake Bay’s oyster population is estimated to be less than one percent of what it was in the 1800s. Although natural oyster beds can still be found in the Chesapeake, their dramatic decline over the years due to pollution, over-harvesting, and disease has had a far-reaching effect on the overall health of Chesapeake Bay. Oysters filter water, feeding on algae and removing pollutants, sediments, and excess nutrients from the water column. Fewer oysters means less water-cleansing by these miniature filtration systems. Once there were enough oysters in the Chesapeake Bay, whose overall watershed represents the country’s largest estuary, to filter all the bay water in as little as a week; these days it takes the resident oysters a year to accomplish the same task. And now climate change has been added to the stresses affecting the oysters. Warming bay waters associated with climate change, particularly in winter months, are responsible for the survival and virulence of a parasite that is killing the oysters.

Compounding the impact of this parasite, Perkinsus marinus (also known as Dermo), have been wide swings in annual precipitation believed to be tied to climate change. And these swings in precipitation have become more lethal as the Chesapeake watershed has become more urbanized. Between 1990 and 2000 there was a 60 percent increase in urbanization of the Chesapeake watershed as agricultural and forested lands were transformed into residential areas. This urbanization directly affected the amounts of phosphorous and nitrogen — usually stemming from the use of fertilizers, but also from vehicle emissions, treated wastewaters, manure, and even septic systems — flowing into the Chesapeake.

Although residential neighborhoods contribute lower flows of nutrients than agricultural lands, they contribute higher levels of nutrients than previously forested land. This nutrient flush is a prime factor in the bay’s troublesome water quality. Higher nutrient levels spur booms in algal growth, which in turn can reduce the bay’s oxygen levels through the buildup of decaying organic matter on the seabed. Precipitation plays a role in determining the flow of nitrogen and phosphorus into the Chesapeake’s waters. During dry years, much of the nitrogen and phosphorous is cached on shore, something that presumably would benefit the bay’s waters. However, when powerful storms return they can flush these large caches of nutrients into the Chesapeake. The particularly wet year of 2003, for example, produced one of the worst instances of nutrient-loading in the bay, leading to oxygen deprivation for oysters and other sea life.

Heavy storms, which many believe are being spurred by climate change, do more than flush nutrients into the bay. Fresh water from the storms also kills oysters. When Tropical Storm Agnes swept the area in 1972, its rainfall killed an estimated 2 million bushels of marketable oysters, as well as most oyster larvae in the Chesapeake. In addition to killing oysters, fresh water runoff from storms typically doesn’t blend well with salt water, so it can inhibit mixing that normally would cycle oxygen into deeper waters. This can result in low oxygen levels (hypoxia) on the bay bottom. Oxygen levels in the bay are also affected as water temperatures warm due to climate change. Warm water holds less dissolved oxygen than colder waters and also leads to higher rates of plant decay that contribute to hypoxia.

SOLUTIONS

What’s to be done? If we stop contributing to climate change we may be able to keep temperatures in the Chesapeake Bay from warming to an even greater extent, further supporting the spread of oyster-killing parasites. Keeping global warming in check might also prevent storms from growing even stronger and increasing the flow of the harmful sediments into the Bay. We must also work to preserve remaining wetlands, marshes, and forests — they naturally filter excess nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment from stormwater, and protect community streams and rivers, and ultimately the Chesapeake. More accurate information from EPA about the Bay’s condition will help leaders at all levels of government identify key habitats to restore and preserve, and make other management decisions that benefit healthy oyster populations.

On top of preserving habitat, communities must make choices to reduce the flow of these pollutants into neighborhood streams. We can choose clean water by reducing fertilizer use throughout the watershed, replacing failing septic tanks, and ensuring all existing septic tanks can withstand sea level rise. We can take measures to slow runoff during storms. If individuals, business owners, and officials at every level of government from Cooperstown, New York to Virginia Beach choose clean water, our local streams will be healthy, and the Chesapeake Bay will once again support an abundant population of this iconic native inhabitant.

We Can Safeguard the Chesapeake Bay and its Oysters from Climate Change

Stop contributing to climate change

The ecological health of the Chesapeake Bay and its oyster populations could decline even further if we fail to reduce carbon dioxide pollution and global warming that is warming the water, aiding the spread of deadly parasites, and contributing to the runoff of harmful pollutants.

Reduce and eliminate existing harms that make oysters more vulnerable to climate change

By better controlling polluted runoff from farms and towns, and by restoring and preserving wildlife habitat surrounding the Chesapeake Bay, we can reduce existing stresses on the Bay’s oyster populations, which could help them cope with changes wrought by global warming.

Adopt “climate smart” management practices

By factoring climate change into existing plans to restore the Chesapeake Bay, resource managers for the Park Service, EPA, and state and local agencies can develop and implement strategies that
attempt to minimize the damaging effects of climate change on oysters, including heavier than usual floods.

Tomorrow: Yellow-Legged Frogs of the Sierra Nevada mountains

Credits:

LEAD RESEARCHER:
Jennie Hoffman, PhD, Senior Scientist, Climate Adaptation, EcoAdapt

ASSISTANT RESEARCHER:
Eric Mielbrecht, MS, Senior Scientist and Director of Operations, EcoAdapt

POLICY ADVISOR:
Lara Hansen, PhD, Chief Scientist and Executive Director, EcoAdapt

WRITTEN BY:
Kurt Repanshek

NPCA GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR THIS REPORT FROM THE FOLLOWING:
Turner Foundation
Merck Family Fund
Ruth and Ben Hammett

Comments

This is going to be tough because when it comes to the Bay, Virginia has some terrible environmental laws. But isn't the real problem with the Bay pollution and not climate change? Or does it all somehow link together?

I remember a couple years ago they were talking about introducing Asian oysters into the Bay to try and bring back at least some type of oyster.

Ranger Holly
http://web.me.com/hollyberry

Oh drat...teach me to begin reding before the page finishes loading. Now I get the connection! Blonde moment

Ranger Holly
http://web.me.com/hollyberry

There are multiple problems. Certainly, the pollution of the bay is a substantial one. With climate change, though, warming waters are allowing the parasite to move into areas where it couldn't previously survive. Add that to the stress caused by the pollution, and it's almost a no-win situation.

There was a report I saw the other day (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/08/03/oysters-on-the-comeback-in-chesapeake-bay-thanks-to-elevated-homes/) that efforts were succeeding to boost oyster numbers by, essentially, creating higher beds for them to grow on. Unfortunately, that doesn't solve the parasite problem. While the pollution can be stemmed, it seems the long-term health of the oysters requires either an oyster that is somehow immune to the parasite, or colder waters that kill the parasite.

Futhermore, NOAA reported the other day that ocean temperatures in July were the highest ever recorded.

The agency said the average sea surface temperature was 1.06 degrees higher than the 20th-century average of 61.5 degrees. Though July was unusually cool in some areas, like the eastern United States, analysts at the NOAA Climate Data Center said the combined global land and ocean surface temperature was 1.03 degrees higher than the 20th-century average of 60.4 degrees, the fifth warmest since worldwide record keeping began in 1880. The agency also said that, on average, Arctic sea ice covered 3.4 million square miles in July, 12.7 percent below the 1979-2000 average and the third lowest on record, after 2007 and 2006. -- NYTimes.

There are large "dead zones" in the Bay due to hypoxia. The bottom of the Bay is a desert in spots. An interesting illustration of this is to see what are called "crab jubilees"; that is, crabs gathering in great piles on the shore to escape oxygen deprived water.

Maryland has invested tens of millions of dollars to fight pollution in the bay; but it's a losing battle. Both Maryland and Virginia has blinders on when it comes to facing the fact that their chicken and hog farms spew their effluvia into the watershed, not to mention urban runoff and industrial waste. Overharvesting, pollution and disease take over when the ecosystem is so weak. There used to be thousands of watermen harvesting oysters in the Bay; now there are fewer than 500. How sad.