You are here

Glacier National Park Officials Decide to Remove Grizzly Bear Family From Park

Share

Glacier National Park biologists are trying to track a sow grizzly that will be removed from the park to protect backcountry travelers. This is an unrelated NPS photo of a grizzly sow and her cub from Yellowstone National Park.

A grizzly bear sow who has no fear of humans, and who seems to be teaching her cubs not to be afraid of them, will be removed from Glacier National Park, Superintendent Chas Cartwright has announced.

The 17-year-old sow and her two yearlings have repeatedly entered backcountry campsites in the park during the past five years, according to the park.

“Unfortunately, this entire family group of grizzly bears has become overly familiar with humans," the superintendent said Wednesday. "Park resource personnel have worked to keep this bear and her
offspring in the wild for five years, but given her recent display of over-familiarity in combination with her long history of habituation, we have determined that the three grizzlies pose an unacceptable threat to human health and safety; and therefore, must be removed from the park.”

The bears have been closely monitored in recent weeks. The decision to remove the bears came only after a thorough review of events and the bears’ overt “conditioned” behavior toward human contact, according to a park release.

Glacier’s Bear Management Plan and Guidelines specifies that conditioned bears that display over familiarity must be removed from the park. While there are no zoos currently willing to take adult bears, park officials will make an effort to capture the yearlings and relocate them to the Bronx Zoo in New York; however, at this time the priority is to locate and remove the female.

Several documented encounters in July indicate that the female is highly conditioned to humans as defined by the park's Bear Management Plan and Guidelines. That, coupled with the female’s history of human interaction dating back to 2004, led park managers to determine that the bear poses an unacceptable risk to public safety and must be removed. Park rangers are currently working to locate the bears in the park’s backcountry in the vicinity of Cut Bank Valley.

Glacier's bear management policy is to maintain natural population dynamics and, to the extent possible, promote natural behavior in the presence of humans. So far in 2009, two separate incidents have been documented where the female grizzly has exhibited behavior that could be classified as “repeatedly and purposefully approaches humans in a non- defensive situation,” the park said.

The female has frequented the Morning Star and Old Man Lake backcountry campgrounds, both in the Two Medicine/Cut Bank area repeatedly for the last five years. During that time, the female grizzly has produced two sets of cubs. Throughout this time, both the mother and her offspring have approached hikers, forcing them off trails, have come into cooking areas while people yelled and waved their arms at the bears, and sniffed at tents during the night, the park reported. Numerous efforts have been attempted to haze them and aversively condition the bear and her young to avoid human interactions, but those efforts have been unsuccessful.

Aversive conditioning is the application of negative reinforcement aimed at behavior modification. Rangers have used noise, Karelian Bear Dogs, and other non-lethal stimuli to encourage the grizzly to keep away from humans and backcountry campgrounds.

The grizzly bear is protected by the Endangered Species Act, and as such, every effort was made to deal with the bear’s conditioning to humans in a non-lethal manner.

“Glacier National Park’s Bear Management Plan and Guidelines are dynamic management tools that receive periodic international peer review," Superintendent Cartwright said. "The plan and guidelines clearly state the conditions of how we manage Glacier’s bear populations, both black and grizzlies. These tools also reflect the best available knowledge and management techniques that bear managers can employ. This decision [to remove the family of grizzlies] is the result of Glacier’s ongoing coordination with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the agency charged with administering the
Endangered Species Act.“

Comments

Unfortunate but necessary. She has probably just gotten too many easy meals over the years. Our bad


This is BS!!! Maybe we shouldn't have backcountry camping sites...maybe we should just leave the animals alone and let them live!!! It was humans leaving food around and probably feeding this bear that has caused its behavior. Why do they have to suffer for our huge mistakes


What a wonderful life those cubs will have caged up in a stupid zoo!


Is there some reason that the bear and her cubs can't be relocated to a remote part of Alaska? I too am troubled by grizzly cubs born in the wild being relegated to a life sentence in a zoo through no fault of their own.


@ R. Stefancik:

Yes, the genetic differences. It would not be wise to mix gene pools between the Rocky Mountains and Alaska. So maybe it would be an option to neuter the bears before moving them outside their natural range. But then they would be useless for the population.


MRC,

Thanks for your reply. As a pathologist who has studied biology, genetics, and zoology while an undergrad, I was most of the time led to believe that genetic diversity was a good thing. Do you know of specific instances where the introduction of genetic "strangers" has harmed a wild population? It would seem that inbreeding would lead to more dire consequences as harmful recessive traits would be more likely to manifest themselves in a given population. I know this has been an issue with the wolf populations at Isle Royale NP, but I also realize that is a much smaller population. Just wondering.


@ R. Stefancik:
With your excellent background you should be able to deduce yourself why it would be harmful to move a Rocky Mountains Grizzly to Alaska, where she could reproduce. Small hint: We are talking about a protected specie in protected areas.


In defense of R. Stefancik: many pathology and even general biology programs do not require courses in population genetics or evolution, and some such courses are badly taught & superficial.

The general concept is local adaptation: geographically disjunct populations may have genes for locally adaptive traits. You generally don't want to mix genes across populations and thus risk losing locally-adapted genes.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.