You are here

Updated: Alaska 'Gunners' Wipe Out Wolf Pack From Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve

Share

Helicopter-borne Alaskan predator control agents have killed an entire wolf pack from Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, prompting the National Parks Conservation Association to call for "immediate suspension" of the program near the national preserve.

National Park Service officials, meanwhile, are wondering why the shooters killed two radio-collared wolves, as the Park Service had an agreement with Alaska Fish and Game officials that collared wolves would be spared as they were part of a long-term study of wolf behavior in the preserve.

“We have meetings set tomorrow with state Fish and Game officials to ask that question," John Quinley, the Park Service's assistant regional director for communications and partnerships, said Thursday evening from his Anchorage office. "Basically, 'How did this happen? You’re two days into the (predator control) program and it’s already gone against the agreement that we thought we had pretty well in place, that was easy to understand.' We’re interested in how that fell apart so fast.”

The four wolves from Yukon-Charley's Weber Creek pack were killed Wednesday in the Fortymile area on the northwest side of the national preserve, the Park Service official said.

“We’ve been studying wolf populations in Yukon-Charley for 16 years and have a long data-set to understand the population dynamics," Mr. Quinley said. "These wolves are a value scientifically and they’re a value for visitors. Our position has been that we want to do all we can to maintain the naturally functionally ecosystems, which is a value of the Alaska parklands that you don’t find everywhere else.”

NPCA officials issued a statement Thursday saying "state gunners in helicopters killed the entire Weber Creek wolf pack from Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, including two collared wolves from a 16-year National Park Service scientific study."

"NPCA calls for the immediate suspension of the state’s wolf eradication program in and around Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve until the Park Service is fully satisfied that the biological integrity of Yukon-Charley wolf packs can be evaluated and a healthy population of wolves can be ensured," the parks advocacy group added.

The shootings of the pack came despite a Park Service request that no wolves from the nine packs denning in the preserve be shot due to this year’s high natural winter mortality, NPCA officials said. Park Service officials said the killings of the radio-collared wolves was the result of some sort of miscommunication.

“It seemed like fairly clear communication to us that they weren’t supposed to shoot wolves with collars," Mr. Quinley said. "Maybe that wasn’t as clear to somebody, but it’s definitely a concern to us.

"The number of wolves that in packs which spend considerable time in the preserve is now getting down lower than we would like it to be. I think we were at 30 (individuals), and we’re at 26," he added.

Compounding the problem is that harsh conditions this winter killed 38 percent of the preserve's wolves, a percentage that Mr. Quinley said was "on the high side of normal."

The shootings come less than two weeks after a particularly contentious Alaska Board of Game meeting when it comes to wolves and national parks. While the board was asked at one point to expand a no-take wolf buffer zone in an area surrounded on three sides by Denali National Park and Preserve, the board completely removed the buffer. And the state agency also did away with a regulation that required Alaska game officials to obtain Park Service permission before they conduct any predator control on parklands.

The second action, though, likely will have little affect on park lands, said Mr. Quinley, as the Park Service maintains authority over wildlife in those areas. "Our rules," he said, "prohibit the manipulation of one species to benefit another."

For Alaska game officials, though, the preference is to do away with predators so there is more game for hunters, said Mr. Quinley.

“They want to grow more moose and caribou," the Park Service official said. "They want to do it here in the Fortymile country, they want to do it south of Denali in those game management units. ... There’s a high interest in state Fish and Game and the Board of Game to grow moose and caribou for hunters, both local hunters or those from Anchorage, Fairbanks and the lower 48.”

Friends of Animals has called for a boycott on tourism travel to Alaska this year because of the Game Board's decision to do away with the buffer zone.

Comments

Wolves. weird creatures huh? They are omnivorous, like us. they hunt whent they need to, and even though some might not eat all the kill, or kill for fun, whats to say they aren't like us? We do so much of the same things. So wheres the difference? They need to eat, so they hunt. Is it their fault when they come near our pets and livestock? Nope. We are the ones to put food so close, and pen it up so it can't get away.If i was a hungry wolf, and I saw an animal easy picken', I'd take it to.


Hunters dont take sickly animals . Most want a trophy to hang up, who cares. I can see having to hunt to eat what you hunt ,but to take game and leave most of the carcass there is stupid. Also animals hunt to survive do we?


Alaskan wilderness should be expanded.
NATIONAL parks belong to the nation....

This comment was edited. -- Ed.


For the record, the pilots and "gunners" were not given that particular pack's frequencies. In addition to that this particular pack had their collars for less than a year and were well outside of the park's boundaries. It was a screw up by a bunch or parties and the NPS and AKFG should hold equal responsibility.


For the record, "Read a Book," we ran a story detailing the miscommunication that was attributed for the shooting of the collared wolves.

/2010/03/national-park-service-alaska-game-officials-publicly-settle-differences-over-wolf-killings5613


You folks are a bit scary - to tell you the truth. I see no retractions here, noting that after the Park Service and AK dept. of Fish and Game looked into the problem, that the wrong radio tracking frequencies were issued to the helicopter crews.You seem to take joy in religiously ranting , rather than researching your facts.
There is no wolf or bear eradication policy, nor plan to have one, in the entire State. Yes, there are plans for intensive management, but the end result of these plans lead to higher levels of both prey and predator species. I know you are unwilling to accept this as fact, but the numbers are hard to ignore, as is already proven in the areas where these programs have been in place for several years.

I'm sincerely sorry I wasted a part of my short life reading this drivel...


I live in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and we now have a thriving wolf population and cougar seem to be doing pretty good too. I'm a woman who has always utilized the woods and what it had to offer. Yes, I hunt, but never violate; I fish, kayak, camp and have a great love of the outdoors. Everything has it's place. While I was growing up we never had wolves or cougar, so I never had to feel the need to arm myself going out in the woods, because most of the time I'm out there by myself. Times have changed here. This is how I look at things. If you go out in the woods and there are these types of predators you have to make a conscious decision if you want to take a walk alone, or take your kids out picking berries, or fishing from a shoreline. People just need to be open their eyes and use common sense. Don't believe what everyone is saying and check things out for yourself. Now if I see sign that there are a lot of predators in a certain area, I'll go somewhere else and do what I like to do. We have a lot of lakes and rivers here. I don't feel the need to wipe out the whole population. I certainly don't applaud any hunter that hunts from the air. You call that hunting, not me, I call that slaughter. Where's the game in that? Do I think there needs to be a balance, sure, but that should be for the people who live in the area to decide that. What would you do if you were in that situation and it was your backyard? Hey, what do I know, I'm just the average person who tries to do what's right. Do you? What if you had a cougar looking in your patio door eyeing up your child? What if you were out for a walk with your dog and wolves attacked and kill it? Things are not always black and white, there's a gray area too. I don't want any species wiped out, but I want my family to be safe too. Makes for quite the controversy doesn't it?


I don't think any wolves should be killed because they are on the brink of extinction anyways. That is all I have to say.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide

Recent Forum Comments