- Essential Guides
- Essential Guide To Paddling The Parks
- Essential Park Guide, Winter 2013-14
- 2013 Essential Fall Guide
- Essential Friends + Gateways Magazine
- Friends Groups And Gateway Communities Support Parks
- Friends of Acadia
- Trust For the National Mall
- Gateways To Retirement
- Blue Ridge Parkway Foundation
- Boone's High Country
- Glacier National Park Conservancy
- Best Kept Secrets
- Grand Canyon Association
- Natchez Trace Compact
- High Tech Tools For Parks
- Pigeon Forge, Gateway to Smokies
- West Yellowstone, Gateway to Geysers
- Secret Sleeps
- Yellowstone Park Foundation
- 2012 Essential Friends
- Ensuring Excellence in the National Parks
- Essential Friends: The Flip Book
- Friends of Acadia
- Friends of Big Bend
- Blue Ridge Parkway Foundation
- Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Glacier National Park Fund
- Grand Teton National Park Foundation
- Shenandoah National Park Trust
- Yellowstone Park Foundation
- Partner With Traveler
Interior Department Releases Preferred Plan for National Mall
The nation's front yard, frayed, rutted, and overwhelmed by millions of feet and years of neglect, is going to be given a much-needed makeover if the Interior Department can figure out how to raise at least $650 million, and likely quite a bit more, for the work.
The National Mall and its collection of memorials and monuments long has been treasured by Americans and visitors to Washington, D.C. Although the site only covers about 684 acres, it received an estimated 22 million visits in 2008—more than twice the annual visits for large parks such as Yellowstone, Yosemite and Grand Canyon combined. But, as with much of the rest of the National Park System, the National Park Service never quite has had enough money in its annual budgets to stay atop the mall's needs.
After a long planning period, one that involved nearly 30,000 comments and input from 11 cooperating agencies and three regional governments, the Interior Department on Tuesday released its preferred alternative, one that carries a rough price tag of $606 million-$648 million.
That price, though, was based largely on 2008 costs, and, Interior officials note in the Final Environmental Impact State, "specific costs would be determined in subsequent, more detailed planning and design exercises. More specific estimates would also consider the design of facilities, the identification of detailed resource protection needs, and changing visitor expectations. Actual costs to the National Park Service will vary depending on if and when the actions are implemented, and on contributions by partners and volunteers."
So, what's in the preferred alternative? Here is an abridged version of the highlights as taken from the FEIS:
* Under the preferred alternative the National Mall, as the premier civic and symbolic space for our nation, would be respectfully rehabilitated and refurbished so that very high levels of use could be perpetuated and the needs of all visitors and users could be met in an attractive, high quality, energy-efficient, and sustainable manner. Its memorials and landscapes would be protected, with large areas of open space as defining features of the historic landscape. The designed historic landscape would evolve, and its value over time would change, reflecting significant national events. Contemporary uses would be accommodated while respecting the planned historic character and visions of the L’Enfant and McMillan plans. The intent would be to establish a sense of place and an overall identity for the National Mall, creating a rich, coherent pedestrian environment that would complement and balance the natural environment, the combination of formal and informal features, and national commemorative works. The National Mall would be emphasized as a year-round destination where the beauty and variety of every season would enhance visitor experiences.
* Union Square. Some of the most important changes would be made at Union Square. A restored Ulysses S. Grant Memorial would be the focal point of a symmetrical and formally laid out civic square based on historical precedents.
* The Mall. Lawns and elm trees would be improved and protected. Compacted soils would be removed and replaced with engineered soils capable of better withstanding intensive use. Additional scientific study would be undertaken to examine the health of the elm trees and soil conditions on the Mall, and to identify appropriate levels of use and protection.
Washington Monument and Grounds
* A new multipurpose facility on the Washington Monument grounds on the northwest corner of 15th Street and Independence Avenue would offer food service, retail, information, education, integrated exhibits, restrooms, and performance space. This pleasant location below the level of roads would allow a facility to be oriented to views of the monument and would help muffle traffic noise. The landscaping plan for the Washington Monument Grounds approved in 2003 would be updated and implemented. Views of the monument and the north-south vista between the Thomas Jefferson Memorial and the White House would be protected and improved.
West Potomac Park (North of Independence Avenue)
* Constitution Gardens. Constitution Gardens would be a restful, high-quality, multipurpose visitor destination that would provide food service and opportunities for entertainment and enjoyment, as well as a place to relax as visitors tour the National Mall. The lake would be rebuilt to be self-sustainable, with potentially a nonpotable, sustainable water source. Urban recreational activities, such as fishing or model boating, would be offered.
* Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Additional seating would be provided in the vicinity of the memorial for contemplation and rest.
* Lincoln Memorial and Grounds. Restrooms within the Lincoln Memorial would be expanded within the building footprint. A ceremonial use would be developed for the Watergate steps. An architecturally compatible restroom would be added in the vicinity of the south refreshment stand.
* Korean War Veterans Memorial. On the west side of the memorial the walks would be widened to accommodate changing circulation patterns and group visitation.
* Ash Woods. The U.S. Park Police stables would be rebuilt and the area redesigned to be compatible with the historic character and quality of the National Mall. The paddocks would be made part of the visitor experience, with educational exhibits about the Park Police and horse patrols.
West Potomac Park (South of Independence Avenue)
* Tidal Basin Area. A sense of arrival at the Tidal Basin would be created by redesigning pedestrian circulation and parking. Around the Tidal Basin high-quality recreational experiences would be provided for strolling, sightseeing, bicycling, and boating. Pedestrian lighting would be installed in a manner that would not impact the evening lighting ambience of memorials.
* Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial. New visitor use patterns would be assessed, particularly after the new Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial opens. A small food service and restroom facility could be provided near Ohio Drive, if warranted by demand.
* West Potomac Park Riverfront. Where feasible, a sustainable, vegetated shoreline would be established along the Potomac River. In other areas stone-faced walls would provide space for seating, fishing, and enjoyment of the river or perhaps nodes for water taxi service or for launching small, hand-carried watercraft (such as canoes or kayaks). Walks would be improved and additional seating provided. Bicycle lanes or trails would be developed along Ohio Drive.
* Thomas Jefferson Memorial and Grounds. The adjacent seawalls would be restored or
rehabilitated, as recommended by engineering studies. No special event stage, roof, or walls would be allowed to obstruct the view to the White House from the north plaza. The parking area south of the memorial would be redesigned to accommodate demonstrations and special events. Utilities would be provided.
For all the details, and a collection of photos, head to this site.