America's Great Outdoors Report Carries Lofty Goals That Need Widespread Support For Success

With a White House speech President Obama summoned the country to work together to improve the health of America's landscape and reconnect one and all to its rivers, mountains, forests, and meadows.

Though bold and lofty in its vision, with chapters devoted to youth, communities, both public and private lands, and heritage, the Obama administration's detailed report on how to reconnect the country to its outdoors landscape is threatened to be undercut by today's fiscal and political realities.

America's Great Outdoors: A Promise to Future Generations is reverential in its stated mission to not just reconnect but firmly cement today's and tomorrow's generations to a clean, healthy, and fully functioning landscape. The magnitude of the 110-page report justified its official release with a White House setting in which President Obama invoked not only President Theodore Roosevelt and Rachel Carson but also Thomas Jefferson and FDR in explaining the significance of the American landscape to the nation's population.

Though the ingredients for the report came from more than 51 public listening sessions held coast-to-coast that drew more than 10,000 participants and produced more than 105,000 comments, the hard work is only just beginning to bring this vision to life.

At a time when national parks are being pressured by outside development, when alpine landscapes are sprinkled by the winds with heavy metals, pesticides, and even dust, when forests are being feasted upon by bark beetles, and climate change is threatening wild lands and wildlife alike, the pulse of American attitudes -- we want to be outdoors, we want the outdoors to be accessible, we want the landscapes to be desirable to our children -- reflected in the report is timely.

But at the same time, many in Congress are not in the mood for adding new programs or expanding budgets, and America's Great Outdoors touches on programs that are not without cost.

Costs in both dollars and community acceptance. At a time when some locals at Cape Hatteras National Seashore, Big Cypress National Preserve, and Golden Gate National Recreation Area are chafing at rules and regulations the National Park Service implemented to protect plants, animals, and birds, the report points out that, "Today, we recognize that to protect ecosystems, watersheds, and wildlife, conservation must take place across large landscapes. This requires collaboration among landowners, public land agencies, and local communities."

How willing will the requisite collaborators be?

In dollars and sense, the report calls for full-funding of the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which is "a primary source of federal funding for states and federal agencies to protect and conserve America’s national treasures and to promote outdoor recreation."

But as President Obama was discussing the report, some members of the House of Representatives were proposing steep cuts -- to less than $60 million according to some reports-- in that fund, which carries $900 million when fully funded.

Desires by the Republican majority on the House Natural Resources Committee to whittle away at the country's environmental laws and regulations also could hamstring the goal of America's Great Outdoors.

The president is well-aware of the mood on Capitol Hill, but he refused to accept that in these difficult times the country should not invest in its landscapes, its environment, its youth.

“In 1786, Thomas Jefferson described the view from Monticello: ‘How sublime to look down into the workhouse of nature,’ he wrote. ‘To see her clouds, hail, snow, rain, thunder, all fabricated at our feet,'" said President Obama. “To most Americans at the time, Jefferson’s experience was a familiar one. The vast majority of the continent was wilderness, no matter where you lived you didn’t have to travel far to find acres of open fields and unspoiled forests.

"But in the years that followed, Americans began to push westward, and cities sprang up along river banks and railroad tracks. The nation grew so fast that by 1890, the census director announced that he could no longer identify an American frontier," the president continued. "“And yet, in the midst of so much expansion, so much growth, so much progress, there were a few individuals that had the foresight to protect our most precious national treasures, even in our most trying times. So at the height of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln agreed to set aside more than 60 square miles of land in the Yosemite Valley. Land he had never seen, on the condition that it be preserved for public use.

“Teddy Roosevelt of course, our greatest conservation president, wrote that ‘There’s nothing more practical in the end than the preservation of beauty. Even FDR, in the midst of the Great Depression, enabled the National Park Service to protect America’s most iconic landmarks. From Mount Rushmore to the Statue of Liberty," he said. “So conservation became not only important to America, but it became one of our greatest exports as America’s beauty shone as a beacon to the world, and other countries started adopting conservation measures because of the example that we have set."

The goals of America's Great Outdoors are largely obvious.

* Reconnect all generations, but especially kids, with the outdoors.

“These days our lives are only get more complicated, more busy. We’re glued to our phones and our computers on end," said President Obama. "We see our kids spending more and more time on the couch. For a lot of folks, its easy to go days without stepping on a single blade of grass. At times like these we have to ask ourselves, ‘What can we do to break free from the routine and reconnect with the world around us? What can we do to get our kids off the couch and out the door?”

* Be sure that recreational access does not tip the cart when it comes to environmental preservation and stewardship.

"Increasing recreational access must be balanced with the preservation and stewardship responsibilities of the federal land management agencies," the report notes early on. "Each federal land management agency has specific preservation and stewardship responsibilities based on their mission and additional designations such as Wilderness or Wild and Scenic Rivers. Increased recreational access is an important goal of the AGO and a priority for the American people, but it must be developed in ways that are consistent with and appropriate for the specific authorities of each agency."

* In tackling this mission, include not just federal lands but state and local properties, even private lands where possible.

"... in a time when America’s open spaces are controlled by a patchwork of groups, from government to land trusts to private citizens, it's clear that conservation in the 21st century is going to take more than what we can do here in Washington," stressed the president. "... meeting the new test of environmental stewardship means finding the best ideas at the grassroots level. It means helping states, communities and non-profits protect their own resources. And it means figuring out how federal government can be a better partner in those efforts."

The report's narrative noted how difficult this will be.

"Today, we recognize that to protect ecosystems, watersheds, and wildlife, conservation must take place across large landscapes. This requires collaboration among landowners, public land agencies, and local communities," it reads. "Each year about 1.6 million acres of our working farms, ranches, and forests are lost to development and fragmentation. We also face the reality of a warming planet and need to
manage our lands and waters to adapt to these changes. And there is even greater appreciation for the importance of recreation and of the role of public and private lands in providing places for Americans to experience."

* Grow new connections with the land through education.

"Many listening session participants observed that their experiences in nature and at historic places occurred early in their lives through formal and informal education," the report said. "These experiences inspired a lasting connection, and for some, lifelong careers and commitment to service in the outdoors. Cultivating a stewardship ethic through education will produce the next generation of scientists, conservationists, naturalists, farmers, ranchers, forest landowners, anglers, rangers, entrepreneurs, and community leaders who value nature and outdoor experiences."

* By preserving public lands, we benefit society, and wildlife.

"The nation’s mountains, prairies, forests, coasts, deserts, lakes, estuaries, and rivers also provide essential ecosystem services that benefit all Americans. Public lands contain important watersheds that supply drinking water to millions," the report notes. "These lands also sequester significant amounts of carbon annually, thereby reducing atmospheric greenhouse gases. Many of America’s most iconic wildlife species—bison, elk, and grizzly bears, among them—greatly depend on public lands for survival.

"Likewise, federal lands and waters sustain people, providing recreation, relaxation, and renewal. Be it a hike, bike, or horseback ride along a local trail, a family ski vacation, a visit to a historic or cultural site, or a weekend fishing or boating trip, access to the great outdoors through our public lands and waters improves our quality of life, while also bringing economic benefit to local communities."

The report is a guide to achieve these goals, the president said.

“We’ve laid the foundation for a smarter, more community driven environmental strategy. To make it easier for families to spend time outside no matter where they live, we’re going to work with cities and states to build and improve urban parks and waterways and make it easier to access public lands," he said. "To encourage young people to put down the remote or the video games and get outside we’re going to establish a new Conservation Service Corps so they can build a lifelong relationship with their natural heritage.

“To help set aside land for conservation and to promote recreation, we’re proposing to fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund for only the third time in our history, and we’re intending to pay for it with existing oil and gas revenues, because our attitude is if you take something out of the earth, you have a responsibility to give a little bit back to the earth," President Obama said.

“So these are the right steps to take for our environment, but they’re also the right steps to take for our country. They help spur the economy, they create jobs by putting more Americans back to work at tourism and recreation, they help inspire a new generation of scientists to learn how the world works, they help Americans stay healthier, by making it easier to spend time outside, and they’ll help carry forth our legacy as a people."

In ending, the president pointed to the words of Rachel Carson, a scientist, writer, and ecologist who in the 1960s raised the American consciousness about the harm chemicals were doing to our environment.

“The great Rachel Carson once wrote that, ‘The real wealth of the nation lies in the resources of the earth. Soil, water, forests, minerals, wildlife. Their administration is not properly and cannot be a matter of politics. It’s something more than politics,'" said the president, adding that the sentiment previously had been voiced by Jefferson, Lincoln, and Roosevelt. "It’s a call that’s driven generations of Americans to do their part to protect a small slice of the planet. And it’s a call we answer today.”

Comments

Call me stupid, but I'm really not seeing anything in this report that will get kids out into the woods in any meaningful numbers.

This appears to be a major waste of money. Nothing is stopping kids from getting outside right now. Throwing more money at this issue isn't going to solve anything.

It's just like throwing more and more money at education, with the only result being lower test scores.

My parents never took us hiking or to visit any parks growing up. I discovered hiking and the outdoors late in my senior year in high school - all on my own.

Like most initiatives what will make a difference is where the money is spent.

Following a career with the National Park Service I am now a volunteer naturalist and board member at the Boxerwood Nature Center in Lexington, Va. This non profit provides curriculum based based outdoor environmental programs for preschool through middle school students from three jurisdictions. The school systems are struggling for funding and Boxerwood depends on grants and donations to exist. Federal grants have dried up endangering the survival of any such programs for children. Past grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA, and other sources are gone. Facilities like these provide a necessary and safe habitat close to home for children to get a first experience with the outdoors and then develop an interest in exploring and supporting National Parks.

This is just one example in the non profit/private world of where funding could be used to directly advance children's involvement in the outdoors. There are many struggling groups like this out there.

I know the National Park Service is working to very limited potential in providing programs and opportunities for children in the parks. This would be another place that funding would be of great impact placing Park Rangers in classrooms and in the field enhancing the number and availability of programs oriented toward school children.

I agree just throwing money is not the solution. If it would be directed toward the right types of programs we could impact a future generation.

Sounds very admirable Bruce. these are the kinds of programs that need the funding and it should come from the stock piles sent to buy more lands!!!!

Education of our kids is top priority, second is experiences.

Without either we might as well be communists...

Interesting, I've been involved with young people, the physically challenged, troubled adults, not troubled adults and watch them somehow make the decision, sometime years after the seed was planted, to climb on a mule and go down the Grand Canyon. I've been in this conversation before but I've seen so many miracles with my riders that I'm not likely to quit. I've had many parents talk there kids (one way or the other) into it, most were excited with the mere mention of actually doing what the likes of Presidents and a million others have experienced. What I've seem are miracles...and on almost a daily basis. The Canyon is awesome no matter what but getting people to commit and experience it takes a little more equity involvement. We're talking about getting people out of ruts whether it's electronically tuned in kids, recovering war heros (some disabled), regular people, kids at real risk having gotten into bad stuff. You put them on a mule and take off down into the Canyon for an overnight ride and witness the transformations that take place in your guests and it stays with you forever. From people that have been everywhere and done everything I receive letters commenting that the adventure was the BEST thing they have ever done! I believe these are the lessons that we're looking for here, right?
Well, this opportunity has been all but eliminated here at the Canyon. I believe this needs to be revisited and corrected.
You may hear the excuse that they don't have the funding to continue the 100+ year old Iconic ride but that is not the issue. With 2010 funding and windfall stimulus dollars the funding and direction has been away from maintaining what most identify as something synonymous with the Grand Canyon. The Rides have been cut by 75%. They need to be restored.

Matt makes a good point. Why does the U.S. Gov't continue to purchase more land that they can't manage?

To Matt's point, they are effectively diverting funds from the programs discussed above (by other commenters) to purchase more lands. The result now is an even larger amount of total land mass that is under-funded and mis-managed.

Is there anyone in the Federal Gov't with any common sense? Or, even any business experience?

Smoky, MATT,

BINGO!

To even bring more reality they are not only increasing the budget to buy more land by 360 million, but they are cutting maintenance and construction budgets by 81 million.

To open your eyes to the actuality of what this means I will simply say this. "With no money to build that bridge, clear that path, or even patch that road there can be no access and organizations like the National Parks Conservation Association win by removing people from the equation!"

Matt - I am aware that there have been recent moves by certain groups trying to increase the number of Wilderness Areas, that also have the intention to effectively block people from entering those Wilderness Areas using the tactics you described.

Are you saying the NPCA is trying to do the same thing with national parks? Do you have any details on what plans they have, or how they plan to execute their objectives?

Thanks!

What would fuel Matt's statement is the willingness (NPS and the connected private partners) to use most any argument to get to the "preferred alternative." What was a windfall year for funding to NPS those same objectives (reduced access) were being implemented.
It's a condition that seems to run throughout NPS, apparently.

Ron Saunders brought made a very intuitive comment on another NPT topic:
Efforts to Regulate Off-Leash Dog Use at Point Reyes national Seashore

Bob, I think the reality again is that the "use groups" do not wish to deprive God's creatures of anything. they simply want to share it. The vast majority love the birds, including the Plovers ( though it may be getting difficult in light of current conditions). Then you have those that, instead of a primary effort toward sharing, would prefer to eliminate people and their pets from the equation. Now i know that is a broad statement and there are degrees and exceptions but, if you truly face the facts , you can see it. many of us do.

I could do with all the "Lofty" words. There is precious little proof that these are anything other than lofty benefits only those positioned along the path to eventually those that have to pay for it. Good dose of reality and learn to live in it would be appreciated instead of the verbal drugs that gentle, eventually disappoint, then kill the hope hung out there like a carrot.

I wish I could send you some funding to correct my writing skills, Kurt. I meant, I could do without all the "Lofty" words. :)

Why, Green, just click on the "Help Sponsor the Traveler" logo when it rotates through our "Friends of the Traveler" box in the upper right-hand column. Donations are always appreciated!

And we could really use some of those funds to hire a proofreader...the things that slip by....sigh.

Keeper, I'm sympathetic, I really am. And I know you're right when you say,

"Bob, I think the reality again is that the "use groups" do not wish to deprive God's creatures of anything. they simply want to share it."

I know. They are well-meaning people who want a chance to enjoy these special places.

The problem for those of us who tend to be on the other side of these issues is this: we get the spectacular, wild, protected areas because they have *not* been used by people yet. When they get the NP designation, and then we build roads to them, and trails in them, and then start to build the bridges for more access, and so on, and so on -- then they aren't any more what they were saved to be.

The 90% or so of US land outside the national parks and the wilderness areas is already being "shared" to death.

So how do we keep the special places special? I'm open to other ideas, but one time-proven way is to make it hard to get there: don't build the roads, don't pave the dirt roads, don't build the trails, the parking lots, the visitor centers, the outhouses, the campgrounds.

Got another idea?

I appreciate your post, Bob. Interesting set of questions. I'll get back to you after I get out of the Canyon this evening. That's where I go to get relief from all these questions, LOL!

Bob,
One thing to consider is what one persons idea of "special" is and that another persons ideas are will conflict. Not once but every single time!

That is where compromise without restriction needs to take place. If i do not want to visit an area of the park that is congested I will go to another area. The issue is that those areas that we wish to get away to are being closed or are too becoming congested so we go somewhere else. Without roads, trails etc... people will get there.

Bob,
Suggestions? There are certainly many ideas in the mix on the Parks/Visitors relationship. What I've seen evident in some in leadership, environmental groups and some in public is that these great places have attained idol status which leads to an actual separation from the most poignant and life changing experiences for young and old. I believe these experiences and the atmosphere that allow them to happen can be retained and supported by top leadership and especially the foot soldiers that have the most contact with National Parks benefactors.
I'm a letter submitted to another NPT article comment that really articulates the blessings received by visitors, employees both NPS and concessionaire that, in plain words make us better. In this case the opportunity revealed itself on a Mule Ride in the Grand Canyon by a single mother of young teen twins, remarkable!

Dear ______,

I've been thinking a lot about our experience with the canyon. I know it was incredible for both my kids, but perhaps especially for Joshua. Last year this time, Joshua was experiencing severe anxiety, was pulled out of school, and had become nearly suicidal. I know that sounds unbelievable for a then 11 year-old, but it was very intense and very scary. We got help for him (medical and otherwise), and he is making progress by leaps and bounds. I tell you this to let you know how huge it was for Joshua to be able to do this. He was awake at 4 a.m. that morning of the mule ride, sure that he, or one of us, was fated to die that day on those mules. He was sobbing nearly hysterically and I began to doubt whether this was going to be possible and if I was doing the right thing. I helped him get back to sleep and by later that morning, the worst of it was gone, but by no means completely disappeared. I can't thank you enough for helping him (and me!) through that. It was a real breakthrough for him, one we'll never forget and one that has and will continue to make a lasting difference in his life. How incredible to get these things at the age of 12! Thank you again.

I've been reflecting on my own experience with the canyon too. What an amazing 30 hours, from Thursday morning to Friday afternoon. The canyon itself has become a powerful metaphor for me. Something happened to me over that day and a half. Something like a crevice opened up for me, and I was somehow inside of it and yet an observer of it, all at the same time. Like what I saw looking out over the canyon, the space I saw and felt within myself was deep, vast, and huge. At the bottom was the groundedness of the river - solid and strong, and at the top was the etherealness of the sky - weightless and fleeting. That heightened sense of awareness that the canyon blessed me with, combined with many of the things you said and did, and just your presence itself - gave me a perspective I hadn't had before. In any case, the result of all this was that I saw things differently - things about my childhood, my marriage, and myself. Somehow, the canyon and you achieved, seemingly without effort, what many hours of psychotherapy, books and occasionally medication, could not. Some of what I saw was painful, some of it was bittersweet, but it came with such an exhilarating and almost intoxicating sense of clarity. And I've decided I'll take clarity, even if it's painful, over ambiguity any day. It was that kind of clarity that seems to set the truth right smack in front of you, gives you wings and says "go now, you're free". I have you, and the canyon, to thank for that. Words really are inadequate to express my gratitude - but you and the canyon have been on my mind and I appreciate this opportunity to express some of it to you with this letter. It comes from my heart. I have no doubt that, while you love your work and feel blessed to be there, you are also providing something for people that is truly breathtaking and spectacular (and I don't just mean the views of the canyon). You are part of something that can make a valuable difference for people. I hope you never lose sight of that. Well, I've probably rambled on longer than I should. Wish we were there!
Again deep thanks,
Gillian

What a letter. I have no doubt a great many of us can identify to some degree with the writer. Cudos to Keeper and those like him. I have been to the canyon and can understand. Wish I had been able to take that Mule ride but time did not allow. Maybe some day. Lets urge the continuence of that experience for all.
I can't help but mention that the experience described by the writer of that letter immediately made me think of the Outer Banks of North Carolina. Especially a Sunrise or Sunset at the Point at Hatteras. Standing in the surf with a pole in my hand. Doesn't matter if it's 4th of July or New Years Day and 30 degrees. You feel so alive and your troubles feel so far away. And you know God is out there just over the horizon. Right there if you need him, you can just reach out and touch Him. His creatures are everywhere, swimming around you, flying over you, scampering along the shore. And the surf is sometimes loud, but there is this silence at the same time. The sun may be warming you and cotton ball clouds adrift in the sky. Your toes in the sand and breeze in your face. Yes, it's Heavan, right here on Earth. And you are there. And you have this feeling that you can't explain or describe. And you are so happy to have someone with you to share it and wish everyone could experience what you are feeling.
50 years and that feeling has never changed. Yes, there is a God.

Got to go,
Ron (obxguys)

To Ron Saunders and friends, "ROCK ON!"
K