Visitation Statistics for 2010 Released

The Statistical Abstract 2010, which provides a wealth of visitation statistics for National Park System units, is now available.

The Public Use Statistics Office, which manages a program for collecting, auditing, and analyzing visitation data provided each month by individual National Park System units, has released the Statistical Abstract 2010. The 74-page document, which details National Park System visitation in 2010 as well as forecasts for 2011 and 2012, is available as a pdf file.

This Natural Resources Data Series publication provides visitation statistics that are broken down by NPS unit, region, state, and several other categories, including unit type and population center type. Also included are 11 tables (routine fare) and five figures (very legible).

This well-organized abstract is a treasure trove of attendance data that is about as accurate -- all things considered -- as you might reasonably expect. The standard caveat applies, though; you just naturally have to be cautious when using attendance data. It's probably not a good idea to put too fine a point on it.

While users will typically consult this statistical abstract on an as-needed basis, seeking this or that attendance figure as circumstances demand, data hounds (like yours truly) will want to take time to dig into it for interesting comparisons and odd facts or projections.

As your eyes sweep over the stats, question after question leaps to mind. The statistical abstract shows that visits to Mississippi's national parks declined by nearly 45% last year. Why was that? Recorded attendance at Arkansas' Pea Ridge National Military Park surged by almost 68% (to 115,128) last year. Was that solely because the park switched from hand counting to using a traffic counter? Last year the number of backcountry stays in Yosemite National Park was nearly triple that of Yellowstone National Park. Wow; I wouldn't have guessed that! And so on.

Try it for yourself.

Comments

Post new comment

All viewpoints, as long as they're constructive, are allowed on the site. But ... the Traveler is not a catchall for viewpoints and discussions that fall outside of the parks or the post at hand. In monitoring comments, we try to restrict those to the topic at hand. Refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may insert videos with [video:URL]
  • Non-breaking spaces will be converted to normal spaces
  • Tags allowed: a, em, strong, cite, code, ol, ul, li, dl, dt, dd, p, br, img, blockquote, embed, div, span, iframe, b, i
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.