Lack of public education and illegal entry were blamed Tuesday when officials at Ozark National Scenic Riverways were confronted with a report that said they are not properly caring for the national treasure.
Chief of Interpretation Faye Walmsley also questioned the contention in American Rivers' Most Endangered Rivers report that there are hundreds of miles of illegal horse trails and 10 times more river access points for all-terrain vehicles than had been planned for the scenic riverways.
"There are some disputes I have," Chief Walmsley said when presented with the numbers.
The American Rivers report released Tuesday morning portrayed the scenic riverways in Missouri as being strangled by poor National Park Service management. Since 1984 all-terrain vehicles have created a dusty, spaghetti bowl network of trails, some that lead down into the Current and Jacks Fork river corridors and onto gravel bars used by canoeists and other boat campers, states the report.
Additionally, horse use of the park has gotten out of control; while there are only 23 miles of designated equestrian trails in the park, "National park management allows equestrian use on any unpaved roads and trails, and there are now more than 250 miles of horse trails and 80 places where horses cross the rivers in the park, which harm water quality with erosion and manure."
Chief Walmsley, however, questioned those numbers. Regardless, she said off-road use of ATVs in the park was illegal, as was horse use beyond those 23 miles of trails.
"ATVs are not authorized in the park. They’re only allowed on county roads," she said. "So, those in the park that are not on a county road, they’re running their ATVs illegally.”
While Chief Walmsley acknowledged that the park's law enforcement rangers couldn't be everywhere in the park at all times to look for illegal uses, she was of the opinion that the main issue was educating the public as to what they could do in the scenic riverways and where.
Since 2006 the park has been working on a new general management plan, one that will outline ways to manage recreation in the scenic riverways and also evaluate areas for possible designation as official wilderness. Revisions to that draft are ongoing, and officials hope to have a version for public review later this year, Chief Walmsley said.
While the Park Service describes the scenic riverways as home to "two of America’s clearest and most beautiful spring-fed rivers," the American Rivers report paints a decidedly different image.
In 1984, there were 13 developed river access points and public campgrounds. Today, there are more than 130 vehicular river access areas, many characterized by a maze of unmanaged dirt roads that send untold amounts of sediment into the river. Virtually all gravel bars (used for canoe and boat camping) are subject to invasion by all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and other vehicles. The vehicles destroy vegetation, and contribute to severe erosion and harm water quality.
This is not just the case of a national environmental organization filling out a list. The scenic riverways' local friends group has been working to highlight the various threats to the Current and Jacks Fork rivers as well, stating quite bluntly that "(M)ismanagement of Ozark National Scenic Riverways has degraded Missouri’s premier National Park."
According to Friends of Ozark Riverways, when the unit was added to the National Park System in 1964 to specifically protect a "wild river system," river access points were planned to fall roughly 15-20 miles apart down the length of the Current and Jacks Fork rivers. Today there are more than 130 access points, or almost one every mile along the 134-mile riverways, the group notes.
"This explosion of access has downgraded the user experience and seriously damaged resources. It is virtually impossible to find a secure refuge from motorized vehicles anywhere in this park," the friends group notes on its website.
Horse use in the scenic riverways also is leading to high E. coli levels in the rivers, according to the group.
Even the most recent data from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources Water Protection Program shows that E.coli levels in the lower seven miles of the Jacks Fork have been increasing since 2002. E.coli levels have been linked to increased horse waste in the river and its tributaries. These rivers, the Jacks Fork and the Current, are supposed to be of the highest water quality in Missouri. Their high quality for recreation, especially for swimming in the national park, must not be degraded. In 2002 at river mile 4.5 the annual E.coli geometric mean was 26 and ... in 2009 it was 116. We must reverse this alarming trend.
Groups supporting the Friends of Ozark Riverways in its campaign to reserve these trends include:
* Missouri Coalition for the Environment
* Missouri Parks Association
* Missouri Wilderness Coalition
* Ozark Fly Fishers
* St. Louis Adventure Group
* St. Louis Canoe and Kayak Club
* Missouri Archaeologial Society
* Environment Missouri
Comments
ALL HAIL KING MERRYLAND!!!
I'm right there with ya bud. Simple brains tend to create the most complex problems mainly through ignornace. And this was so easy to avoid it should make one ill to believe that a situation such as this could occur in a "sophiticated" society such as we purport to be.
You've got my vote your royal Highness. Oops, no votes in the kingdom. Sworn allegiances only. My bad.
Your humble servant, LH
How about Congress woman Emerson? This river is in her district and she sits on the Interior committee that has oversight of NPS..Looks like she is part of the problem!
Studebaker, you are correct. Congresswoman Emmerson has fought many a battle against the best interests of conservation. She is from a very red district and is most likely secure in her position. Lot's and lots of political pressure has come down on the NPS from federal, state and local governments.
Im concerned there wont be any Current river in a very few years for anyone to enjoy. The solution would have to be so drastic and complex that it probably will not happen. The streams running into the current such as Big creek or Ashley and many more, are polluted by cattle in the creeks, as a result manure and fly spray are washing down.
Horses are a huge problem now, erosion and pollution are the result, same goes for illegal ATVS. Down on the lower part of the current its the big thing to see who can have the most hp behind their boat and joy ride, the waves are incredible.
of course everyone enjoys canoeing but the traffic is killing the river, this rivers pristine waters and great fishing are advertised all over the world. And now comes a practice the park service does that ive watched for years, the spreading of chat and gravel on access points after a flood, tons of it go washing down the river the next flood and so more is spread. All the deep holes are being filled in.
What about the so called mud dog salamanders we used to have, ugly but harmless, and the sculpines are disapearing, several species of the water are gone. I remember a time when we could drink the water in the Current.
It boils down to the fact that something should have been done along time ago, I just pray that its not too late The line between enjoyment and destruction has got too thin for the Current River.
The answer is community involvement. If we wait for our elected officials to solve these kind of problems we will continue to be greatly disappointed. If there are unauthorized horse crossings and atv accesses in the park-get a group of river cleanup volunteers to post signs and man these areas during peak times. The rangers have no hope of controlling the issue by themselves. But with the community behind them they can begin to make a difference. I know this is not an easy task, the question is...is the river worth it? Surely we have some law enforcement river lovers who recognize the problem as well. A uniform says volumes to those who would break the law when they believe they are not being watched.
the answer is community involvement, the rangers cannot do it by themselves and we will be greatly disappointed if we continue to wait for our elected officials to solve this problem or any other
Lone Hiker I think you need to get your facts straight! There are not 250 miles of equestrian trails within the park boundaries nor are there 80 river crossings. My family maintains the majority of this trail system and I can accurately say that this is untrue. There are about 250 miles of trail within the trail system near Eminence, however, the majority of these trails lie outside the park boundary on State and privately owned property. The park has no authority over these areas, nor should they!! There are approximately 10 equine river crossing within the entire NPS boundary which includes Jacks Fork and Current Rivers. I believe that this is an insignificant number in comparison to the number of miles these rivers cover. While you may not enjoy sharing the river with other user groups, it is not your decision to make and I don't believe the misuse is nearly as rampant as environmentalists would like everyone to believe.
Marty again another commenter who doesn't have a clue! There are not "many" horse operations on the Jacks Fork river and I very much doubt that you had to wait for "hundreds" of horses to cross for you to be able to float. What I hear you saying is that YOU can't enjoy yourself in the way YOU feel you should be able to because there are other users enjoying the rivers also. Well, guess what, that's not going to change. With over a million visitors to this park each year I'm pretty sure the .8% that can be attributed to equestrian users is not the main issue. Since you enjoy floating have you counted how many floaters and swimmers use the river in comparison to the number of horses you have actually witnessed in the length of your float? I wonder if this could have any impact, if there is actually a problem!!