You are here

A View From The Overlook: Safety Issue

Share

The National Park Service and other federal law enforcement agencies have always had a guarded, nervous relationship with the National Rifle Association, and with good reason.

The 4.5-million-member NRA is the largest armed entity in the world; larger than the American army, larger even than the Chinese Army, and is vociferously truculent in assertion of its rights.

True, there are some NPS rangers who are duly ordained life-members of the NRA and who support it enthusiastically and religiously (the NRA does indeed have some aspects of a religion).

Other rangers are not so sure. One ranger, who shall remain anonymous, as he is still making a living with the NPS, had this to tell me:

“PJ, early in my NPS career, I became a firearms instructor. As part of that training and in order to gain certification, I was required to join the NRA. I was furious and complained to my supervisor. My peers looked at me like I was some wild-eyed commie.

"After joining the NRA, I received an amazing amount of NRA propaganda, including subscription to two of their publications. It was very instructive to experience the materials that were sent to their members. I now understood why they hold the severe positions that they do and how they become so rabid about these issues; total mind-bending propaganda similar to what might have been seen in World War II Germany. I know it sounds extreme, but after you read their publications, I am confident you will agree," Ranger X told me.

One person who apparently agreed with Ranger X was the 41st President of the United States, George H.W. Bush. Unlike Ranger X, President Bush was an NRA True Believer; a life member. However, Bush resigned his life membership. What happened?

Among other things, what happened was Wayne La Pierre, “spokesperson” for the NRA.

It seems that Wayne spoke.

Well, you say, that’s what “spokespersons” are supposed to do, right?

Except in the case of Wayne. Not a bad person, Wayne was sort of like your Uncle Fred.

Every family has an Uncle Fred. A decent enough chap, but there are certain things that send him into raging, crazy tirades. Uncle Fred believes that the Democrats are putting fluoride into the water supply to turn everyone into liberal zombies. Therefore, everyone at Thanksgiving dinner is warned not to mention (A) Democrats (B) Fluoride or (C) Water.

In the case of Wayne, some of the trigger words that will set him off are (A) federal agents (B) guns (C) gun control and of course, (D) the Second Amendment.

La Pierre had a dim view of federal agents before the April 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 federal employees, including four commissioned federal law enforcement officers. Just days before the bombing he compared federal agents to some kind of fascists in a letter soliciting support for the NRA in its opposition to gun-control legislation.

“What did Wayne say that was so bad?” you ask.

Basically, Wayne said that the federal law enforcement officers were “Jack-booted thugs.”

After the bombing, President Bush resigned his life membership in the NRA with the following letter to La Pierre.

“…. Al Whicler, who served on my Secret Service detail when I was Vice President and President, was killed in Oklahoma City. He was no Nazi. He was a kind man, a loving parent, a man dedicated to serving his country and serve it well he did.

"I am a gun owner and an avid hunter. Over the years I have agreed with most of the NRA’s objectives, particularly your educational and training efforts and your fundamental stance in favor of owning guns.

"However, your broadside against federal agents deeply offends my own sense of decency and honor and it offends my concept of service to country. It indirectly slandered a wide array of government law enforcement officials who are out there, day and night, laying their lives on the line for all of us…”

Well said, Mr. President!

Now among the “wide array of government law enforcement officials” are the National Park Service's commissioned law enforcement park rangers, who don’t wear Jackboots and are not thugs. (Wayne may have watching too many old World War II movies on TV.)

Now, one of the problems of protecting the public is the “Security Bubble Illusion,” the fondly and widely held belief that somewhere, someplace, somehow, there is a ” Camelot of Safety,” an enchanted place where Nothing Bad Can Happen.

This is often described as being some rural village in the “Heartland" ---until, of course, something really horrific happens there.

Another “Camelot of Safety” is America’s National Parks where John Muir’s injunction to “Climb the mountains and get their good tidings!” is expected by the gentle and naive to cure even potential mass murderers of their desires.

Unfortunately, that is not in the mountains’ job description. Since humans visit national parks; this means the potential of random violence exists in even the smallest, most bucolic historical park. Even something as mundane as a dog off a leash can escalate into murderous violence. This was exactly the case at Pu’uhonua O Honaunau National Historical Park in Hawaii, and cost a responding park ranger his life.

More recently, Ranger Margaret Anderson was killed in Mount Rainier National Park on January 1, 2012, by a paranoid fugitive who was headed up the mountain toward the heavily used Paradise Visitor Center. The killer’s intentions are not known, but they were unlikely to have been pleasant. The killer’s plans were disrupted and in the ensuing manhunt, Mount Rainier itself exacted the ultimate vengeance.

There is no “Camelot of Safety” in national parks. Things happen. Last year, a mountain goat improbably gored a visitor to death.

So, with the smarmy oleaogeness of a crooked undertaker, the National Rifle Association offered a plan to protect the patrons of the national parks from dangers both animal and human.

How? Well, the NRA believes that everyone who visits a national park should potentially be armed and dangerous (to the bad guy or “bad” animal of course)

Now this is the kind of bizarre idea that normally shows up in publications like THUNDERBEAR, which the NPS can ignore.

Unfortunately, the NPS cannot safely ignore the NRA.

Using malleable congresspersons who, for whatever reason, agreed with their position, the NRA put sufficient pressure on the Department of Interior and the NPS to reverse a nearly 100-year-ban on firearms carry in the national parks.

To be sure, since parks were often adjacent to U.S. Forest Service or other public land where hunting was permitted, bringing unloaded, cased, and/or disassembled firearms through a park was OK. That all changed when the gun people won the right to carry fully operational, fully loaded guns in the parks, the rationale being defense against dangerous animals or people. (One envisions Wayne LaPierre being enveloped by an Everglades Python!)

Do the NPS Resource Management folks agree? Generally speaking, no.

The wildlife management folks understandably believe that their years of education and experience in animal behavior trump the knowledge of a used car salesman with the price of a Glock pistol.

The wildlife rangers point out that bison often manage people with false or bluff charges when us pesky two leggers get too close. However, the charge can become a real one if 9 mm rounds irritate the bison.

Some Yosemite National Park bears adopted a clever mugging strategy. While they would not directly attack a backpacker, they would seize the bottom end of the backpack and hold on. This is a Tug O’War that no human can win. The hiker is forced to abandon his pack.

Seems like a clear case for Mr. Glock or Mr. Colt, doesn’t it? Nope, the NPS believes that the bear should learn human avoidance, but not by dying, and the NPS would much prefer that you use the very effective bear sprays.

Ah, but what about the human predator? Again, the law enforcement ranger spends hundreds of hours in training, and later with that stern teacher, Experience, in learning when to shoot and when not to shoot. They prefer that you leave these decisions to the ranger.

“But what if there is no ranger available?” you ask. What if you are hiking a dark and lonely trail 20 miles from civilization and you come upon a strange and suspicious character, possibly a liberal or maybe even a Democrat, coming down the trail, directly toward you! What are you going to do? Shouldn’t you have the ability to shoot him?

Well, an actual and similar situation happened to David Michael Keane, son of the present president of the NRA. In the year 2002 The 21-year-old Mr. Keane was driving the George Washington Memorial Parkway, a unit of the National Park Service. An aggressive driver cut off Mr. Keane. There was not a park ranger in sight (never around when you need ‘em!) So young Mr. Keane hauled out his legal 9mm semiautomatic and fired one shot at the offending driver. The bullet shattered the rear window and lodged in the headrest of the driver’s seat. (Not bad shooting from a moving vehicle!)

Bullets are strange things, once fired they cannot be recalled and they change lives forever. The aggressive driver was not injured (except for being scared out of his Okole, as the Hawaiians say). David Michael Keane on the other hand, could not unshoot that single bullet and it changed his life. He was arrested on December 5, 2002, pled guilty and was sentenced to ten years in federal prison where he was to learn anger management and the manufacture of interpretive signs for the NPS.

Something to think about.

Comments

Thank you Kurt for the rewrite. With the letter being written before the bombing, it is clear he wasn't saying in that letter that the agents got what was coming to them. But obviously that hasn't stopped Lee from conceding the truth.

Are some federal agents "jackbooted thugs". Probably. The then recent Waco Massacre may have been in his mind when he wrote that.


Still no success at finding the actual text of the NRA's 6-page letter from 1995. But did find this AP article:

NRA Official Defends Strong Anti-Government Rhetoric
JIM ABRAMS , Associated Press

AP News Archive May. 1, 1995 12:08 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) _ The National Rifle Association will continue its crusade against law enforcement ``abuses'' and stands by recent statements that federal agents can intimidate and even murder law-abiding citizens, a senior official of the organization says.

NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said Sunday there was unity within the nation's largest gun-owners group on the need to fight alleged abuses by agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and protect the right to bear arms.

He said it was unlikely the NRA's stand on gun control would be affected when ``the two most sensational crimes in America'' were the result of a bomb, in Oklahoma City, and a knife, in the O.J. Simpson case.

LaPierre's group has been criticized for a recent fund-raising letter that said that in the Clinton administration, ``if you have a badge, you have the government's go-ahead to harass, intimidate, even murder law-abiding citizens.''

It referred to federal agents as ``jack-booted government thugs'' who ``seize our guns, destroy our property and even injure or kill us.''

Asked on NBC's ``Meet the Press'' program whether such rhetoric was excessive in light of the Oklahoma City bombing, LaPierre replied: ``That's like saying the weather report in Florida on the hurricane caused the damage, rather than the hurricane.''

He defended the strong language, saying, ``Those words are not far, in fact they are a pretty close description of what's happening in the real world.''


ec is constantly using terms like "pure fabrication" without providing any evidence that something said by someone else was fabricated.

I'm just asking him to do the same thing he demands of others. Provide some documentation that whatever it is, is indeed "fabrication." Methinks he is guilty of a lot of fabrication himself.

One thing I can say for him, though, he sure is accomplished at dodging and weaving. He'd make a great professional politician.


ec et al, the chronology of the La Pierre letter assailing federal agents as "jack-booted thugs" and the Oklahoma City bombing was skewed as originally laid out; the letter came out just days before the bombing. After the bombing, La Pierre appeared on Meet the Press and the question of whether his offensive letter might have encouraged the bombing was raised.

The section pertaining to La Pierre in the column has been restructured to reflect the timing of the events.

As to whether La Pierre was demonstrating integrity in apologizing is subject to interpretation. “If anyone thought the intention was to paint all federal law enforcement officials with the same broad brush, I’m sorry.” Does that mean he thinks some of them are?


Of course it is defellows. Its like me claiming that Lee said Kurt's mother wears army boots and then asking him to "prove" he didn't say it. It is a favorite tactic of the progressive.

I am satisfied that it is proven in that neither he nor PJ, or any body else, can prove that the statement was made. Pure speculation and irresponsible at that. Lapierre had enough integrity to come out and apologize for the remark he did make. Too bad PJ can't do the same here.


"Pure fabrication." Okay, prove it.

Isn't proving something was not said sort of the equivalent of "Did your wife have any black and blue marks when you quit beating her?"


"Pure fabrication." Okay, prove it.


"No amount of documentation or reasoned thought

And that is what you have delivered - "no amount"

It's pretty clear from the full text of former President Bush's letter to the NRA that the President drew the same conclusion as PJ from LaPierre's comments about federal agents.

Hardly. Bush was upset with the comments about fed agents in general, particularly so after the Oklahoma Bombing. He never, however, said nor implied that LaPierre felt the agents killed "got what was coming". Becasue LaPierr never said nor implied it. Pure fabrication.

Let's put the ban in for now. Then, 20 to 40 years from now,

And what do you expect a 20 to 40 year ban will deliver that is any difference than a 10 year ban? After 40 years of no effect, you will want a 100 year ban to see what happens. I assume you are familiar with the definition of insanity often atttributed to Einstein.


National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide

Recent Forum Comments