You are here

Interior Secretary, National Park Service Director Lament Looming Budget Cuts

Share
A budget sequestration could reduce the ranks of national park rangers this summer and make emergency responses to visitor accidents slow. NPS photo of Grand Teton climbing rangers at work.

Fewer rangers for search-and-rescue missions, closed campgrounds, and possibly more devastating forest fires are facing the National Park Service as a result of the looming budget fiasco, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis said Monday.

If Congress fails to avert the budget sequestration set to arrive Friday, the Park Service will delay plowing in snow-bound parks such as Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Glacier, seasonal hires will be delayed, leading to problems down the road, and some park facilities will be shuttered, the two said during a conference call with reporters.

"This department faces a perfect storm of impact, because we do so much in the summer months, which is so important to tourism here in this country," Secretary Salazar said. "So for us, when you’re looking at this level of cuts, it means impacts to visitors, our ability to fight fires, our ability to do the maintenance, and education, and support the hunting and fishing world which is so much a part of our economy.”

The phone call was just the latest step by Interior and Park Service officials to raise public concern over the opening and operational ability of national parks with the summer travel season just a few short months off.

In late January, Director Jarvis sent a memo out across the system that directed park officials to begin planning for layoffs and reductions in the hours of visitor centers. Then last week another, more detailed, memo of possible closures was released, and park superintendents were given permission to discuss how the sequestration would affect their specific parks.

On Monday the two officials reiterated those potential impacts.

“This will include reduced hours of operation for visitor centers, shorter seasons and closing of campgrounds, hiking trails, and other recreational areas when there is insufficient staff to ensure the protection of visitors, staff and the resources," said the Interior secretary.

Added Director Jarvis, "Great Smoky Mountains National Park will be closing five campgrounds and picnic areas, Blue Ridge Parkway will have to close seven contact stations, and Mammoth Cave will actually have to close a portion of the cave tours because we don’t have the staff to operate that. That could affect hundreds of thousands of visitors.”

To help cope with the cut, which comes atop $159 million in reduced federal funding the past three years, the Park Service already has delayed filling vacant permanent positions.

When a question was raised over how a 5 percent cut could lead to such extensive reductions in visitor services, Director Jarvis explained that, in reality, 85-90 percent of a park's budget is tied up in fixed costs, such as salaries and benefits and utilities, and so that 5 percent must come out of the remaining fraction. Too, he stressed, parks are being asked to exact 5 percent of their entire fiscal year over a period of six months.

"The last little bit of discretionary funding, which often runs arounds 10 percent, sometimes less in the smaller parks, is what you run your summer operation on. That’s your seasonal workfoce, that’s your little bit of discretionary budget that you can make decisions with each year," said the director. "And of course a lot of that varies on weather, how much snow you need to plow or whether you’ve got a lot of trees down in the campground to pick up at the beginning of the season.

"So 5 percent is really a significant hit on the discretionary part of a park’s operating budget. And so we have to figure out how to absorb it, and so it really comes into the front-line visitor services, which is really the thousands of seasonals that we hire every year.”

Alternate Text
In something of a budgetary oxymoron, parks would be allowed to retain entrance fee revenues, but might not have the staff to operate the entrance stations. Kurt Repanshek photo.

To add to that perspective, a 5 percent decrease in the Park Service's budget reduces it to roughly $2.45 billion, which is about what the agency's budget was in 2008. Against that reduction, inflation has driven up the agency's costs in terms of fuel and utilities. And, since nearly six months of the fiscal year have passed, the agency has already obligated about 42 percent of its budget for full-time employee salaries, according to the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.

With those figures in mind, it would take a cut of roughly 60 percent of the agency's seasonal hires, about 6,000 jobs, to achieve the 5 percent reduction this late in the fiscal year.

Though some might view the media event by Secretary Salazar and Director Jarvis as an effort to massage public opinion, their staff pointed out that national parks "are inspirational, provide respite from daily stress, encourage exercise and are just plain fun."

"They are also important drivers of our national economy, especially for the local communities near national parks," the staff added.

To buttress that last point, Secreteary Salazar and Director Jarvis noted both the economic might of the parks, and the impact that will be felt by gateway communities if the sequestration is implemented.

Visitation to the National Park System in 2011 visitors generated $30.1 billion in economic activity and supported 252,000 jobs nationwide, according to a peer-reviewed report released Monday by the National Park Service.

“Places like the Grand Canyon or the Statue of Liberty take our breath away and inspire us with their beauty and history, but our national parks also serve as anchors for our nation’s economy,” said Secretary Salazar. “People who visit parks need transportation, places to stay, and meals to eat – all of which support businesses and provide jobs in local communities.”

The statistics for 2011 are based on the spending of nearly 279 million national park visitors; more than one third of that total spending, or $13 billion, went directly into communities within 60 miles of a park. The numbers are on par with previous years, though last year the park system welcomed about 283 million visitors.

The sequestration would have an immediate economic impact on the gateway communities, said Director Jarvis.

“Yellowstone and Glacier will be delaying the plowing of the roads (by up to a month) to open those up, as much as a month, and that will have a direct impact in the gateway communities around Cody, or Jackson Hole or up in Glacier at White Fish," he said. "The communities there know that their season starts the day the road opens, and it closes the day the road closes. And that can be as much as $1 million a day lost to local economies.

“Grand Teton will be closing the Jenny Lake Visitor Center and the visitor center at the Rockefeller Preserve as well, impacting as many as 300,000 visitors this summer," he added.

Alternate Text
Parts of Mammoth Cave might not have tours this summer due to staffing shortages. NPS photo.

At Yosemite, plowing of the Tioga Road through the park's high country will be delayed, affecting tourism on the eastern side of the park in towns such as Bishop, Mammoth and Lee Vining.

At Mount Rainier National Park, the Ohanapecosh Visitor Center would be closed this year.

“I am concerned about the impact to visitor safety, because there will be a reduction in the number of our rangers in the field this year as a result of these impacts," added the Park Service director. "As we gear up for summer, we hire a lot of summer seasonals, many of them are returning seasonals that have extraordinary skills in fire-fighting, and search-and-rescue, and river running and high-angle work, and if we are not able to hire that seasonal workforce, then clearly our capacity to respond to emergencies will be reduced.

“As a consequence we may be reducing access to some areas because of that concern."

But all these impacts don't need to occur, said the Interior secretary.

“This is certainly an avoidable consequence that just requires the members of Congress to do the right thing," he said.

Comments

I have a great idea. Let's let ec lead the way and set a good example for everyone else.

Cut ec's pay by 50%.

That might lend some credence to what he is telling us.


You don't just reduce everyone's grade by one level. Those grades are classified by the Office of Personnel Management according to strict criteria.

Then "wave the magic wand" and change the criteria. Is that any harder than any of the other Congressional actions necessary?

If you want to reduce the cost of the Federal governmnent, preach to the Congress.

No doubt, that is who is ultimately responsible but Obama is the one pulling Harry's and Nancy's strings.


Cut ec's pay by 50%.

Sure - but I don't have a guaranteed pay. I don't get guaranteed money from the government. I don't have a public funded pension.

Every payment I get is negotiated with my clients and earned on performance.

I'll give up all my government income - how about you giving up yours. Or are you too comfortable living off the public teet?


Living off the public teet. Sheesh. Get better talking points from Tinfoil Hat Central.

I've known a lot of NPS employees. I'm married to one. They are hard working people. Feet on the ground, working hands dirty, good people. Some die on the job - at least one friend of mine has. To some debaters they are debating points, vague faces in theoretical dreams. To me they are Bruce and Kathy and Johnny and Diane. They don't suck at a tit; they build, they educate, they maintain, they preserve. They work.

Go peddle this stupid rhetoric someplace else. A site dedicated to the parks is no place to start chainsawing the parks and their people, just to stroke your fantasies.

-


NPS employees are hard working people and the NPS is important to almost all Americans. That doesn't change the fact that our government spends more than it has, 40% more annually actually. These cuts represent 5% of an annually increasing budget. Cuts will be "painful" but it's ridiculous to assume that government, including the NPS can't survive on only 95% of what they spent last year.

The chicken little screaming done by this deceitful administration is shameful. Most Americans probably won't notice that the government is spending a little less than normal....


And Mike keep in mind it is less than originally budgeted not necessarily less than was spent last year.


"The chicken little screaming done by this deceitful administration is shameful"

How about we amend that to make it a lot more accurate: "The chicken little screaming done by this deceitful administration and deceitful Congress is just politics as usual."


Lee, for once I agree with you. Both sides have staked their position and are defending it, tooth and nail. The difference is that the President is elected to lead this nation. He has stated a number of times that we have to address spending, but like so much of what he says, it's only for mass consumption.... He does not lead, he pontificates. He does not set an example, he scapegoats. He pursues his own idealogical agenda, regardless of needs of the country. The NPS is caught in this as is the rest of the government. There are solutions out there that protect people, agencies and things that are valued, like National Parks units. This president is not interested in those solutions.

His own OMB says his policies are not sustainable. The non-partisan CBO says policies and programs he has put into place will cost much more than anticipated. It's apparent to all that we cannot continue to spend as we have.

What's worse I wonder? The "painful" reductions in spending that are essential to balancing the nations checkbook, or the ultimate failure of the social safety net, national defense and other interests of this nation.


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.