You are here

National Park Service Sequestration Update: Closed Campgrounds, Fewer Seasonal Employees, Sunday Closures


Closed campgrounds, Sunday closures of National Park System units, and 900 permanent positions that will go unfilled are just some of the latest details of how the National Park Service is responding to the ongoing federal budget sequestration.

* At Wind Cave National Park in South Dakota, officials said the 64-site Elk Mountain Campground would remain closed. That move eliminates the need for two summer employees to maintain the campground and interpretive rangers to present evening campfire programs, park officials said.

"The sequestration has forced us to make some tough decisions that will impact visitors to Wind Cave National Park," said Superintendent Vidal Davila. "People will have fewer opportunities to tour Wind Cave, the park's primary resource, as a result of less staff."

The 5 percent budget cut also will lead to a reduction in invasive plant control at the park, maintenance of fences and building repairs, science and research activities, natural resource monitoring, and wildlife management programs.

* In Alabama, Park Service officials said the sequestration forces them to close the Tuskegee Institute National Historic Site, Tuskegee Airmen National Historic Site, and the Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail on Sundays until further notice.

* At Voyageurs National Park in Minnesota, the cuts could lead to delays in snow plowing this spring on the Rainy Lake Ice Road, the Kab-Ash Ice Road, and the entrance to the Rainy Lake Visitor Center as park officials look to reduce fuel consumption and overtime pay.

Park officials say that when snowfall occurs before or after regular park operating hours, snow removal will be delayed until personnel report for normal duty hours. If significant snowfall occurs during weekends the Rainy Lake Visitor Center may be closed.

* At Badlands National Park in South Dakota, the 5 percent budget cut equates to a 24 percent reduction in seasonal hires for positions that support interpretive talks and walks, school programs, custodial services, road, fence and building repair and maintenance, science and research activities, natural resource monitoring, and search and rescue operations.

"The seasonal workforce is the heart of the park," said Superintendent Eric Brunnemann. "This sort of loss cuts deeply into our ability to serve the public, something we are dedicated to doing every day."

* Across the entire park system, 900 permanent positions that currently are vacant will not be filled, Park Service Director Jon Jarvis said Friday in a memo to the entire agency.

"In an organization with 15,000 permanent employees, 900 vacant jobs have a profound effect. Every activity will be affected. Some impacts will be immediate, others will accumulate over time," Director Jarvis said. "Fewer law enforcement rangers and USPP officers mean lower levels of protection and longer response times. Fewer maintenance personnel mean that parks may have to close facilities completely when breakdowns occur – and that the $12 billion maintenance backlog will continue to grow."

The memo did not, however, mention how many vacant positions the Park Service has been carrying in recent months.

Director Jarvis said the agency, system-wide, would see seasonal hirings drop by more than 1,000 employees, would furlough some staff in the U.S. Park Police, and would ban all non-essential travel.

"'Essential' travel includes only the following: travel that is critical for health and safety, and travel to attend training required to retain current, mission critical certifications – such as contracting warrants. International travel is cancelled," wrote the director.

Director Jarvis also noted that the most recent continuing resolution to fund the federal government expires March 27.

"We do not know how, or if, the debate on a new continuing resolution will impact the remainder of FY13 or the FY14 budget negotiations. For now, please assume that we will operate for the remainder of the year at the 95 percent spending level envisioned in your sequestration plans," he wrote.


I like:). Refering to Lee's post earlier.

Technically, NPS does not have a choice to pay employees less: unless congress changes the law, it is against the law for them to cut employees' pay

Well, there is a good place to start. How ironic, an example of government playing too big a role in government.

Tomp2, thanks for the information. Lots of NPS locations are out in the country where lower pay might go further. Would that explain some of the pay delta? Also, isn't the NPS the major employer in many locales?

Drones patrolling trails. A very interesting idea. But of course they could talk to hikers. Just attach a loudspeaker.

Reminds me of a true story from many years ago when the Salt Lake City Police Department tried patroling with a couple of ultralight aircraft. One day a little boy failed to come home from school so the mother called the cops. An officer in an ultralight went looking and found a boy matching the description in a playground between the kid's school and home. The cop called the boy's name and told him to go home, right now. A few minutes later a wide-eyed little boy ran into his house all a-dither. His mother asked what had happened and the boy replied, "I was playing in the park and all of a sudden GOD told me to go home!"

And if that doesn't work, there can always be rockets attached to the drone.

What is this, "I'll see your $330,000 outhouse and raise you a $1 million outhouse"?!?

Beyond that, sounds like a book in the making.

there's a long history of expensive outhouses in the National Park Service... here's another:

Not trying to be harsh here but restructuring each parks administration with clear priorities established and an emphasis on consolidation would be a good start on getting a handle on where to make cuts. Not all every single program NPS does is essential or is the way NPS implements high priority programs sacrosanct. It's hard for me to fathom that within a $2+billion budget providing basic visitor services to the public apparently is the last priority and the first to be cut while preserving the overhead infrastructure is number one. If NPS managers can't find ways to restructure and streamline NPS core mission activities within the parks then they shouldn't be managers. The NPS was never intended to be a jobs program for the american people.


Technically, NPS does not have a choice to pay employees less: unless congress changes the law, it is against the law for them to cut employees' pay (except by furloughing and giving unpaid leave days, and furloughed employees are not allowed to volunteer in parks on those days). There are federal GS rules about how different duties and skills map into the GS schedule of pay, and NPS already lowballs many positions.

The Park Service is pretty cheap (in a good way). Lots of folks want to work for NPS, so they can hire at the lowest plausible grade for many positions. Professional scientists (PhDs) are pretty much across the board 1 or 2 GS levels ($10-30K/yr) below what they would be in FWS or USGS, and even more below private sector wages. A large number of interpretive rangers are GS5s & GS7s with BA & MS degrees. I work with an acting chief of natural resources with a PhD who is a GS9, making just over $50K/yr in an expensive part of the country. Much of the "Washington Office" is actually in Colorado: office space is much cheaper, locality pay is a bit cheaper, travel to far flung parks is cheaper, and folks willing to work for less for NPS tend to like outdoor recreational opportunities (Cultural Resources and History are in the DC area). Even the parts of NPS that are top-heavy are top heavy with GS14s & GS15s, not SES.

Managers don't have that much flexibility: all the fine print congress put in the last appropriation bills that funded NPS still applies under the continuing resolutions.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide

Recent Forum Comments