You are here

A View From The Overlook: Nudity And The National Parks

Share

Summer is coming in. The days are getting longer, and lake, sea, and river water are getting warmer.

This leads to a desire on the part of some national park patrons to take off their clothes and a similar number of fellow taxpayers to complain about nudity, with the hapless park ranger in the middle. This can lead to problems.

So, why do people do this?

“Because they’re depraved, left-wing libertines who probably voted for Obama!” you snort testily.

Not necessarily. Some skinny dippers are Republicans.

President Theodore Roosevelt and his favorite appointee, Gifford Pinchot, chief of the Forest Service, enjoyed swimming nude in natural pools in Washington’s heavily wooded Rock Creek. One day they invited the French ambassador to join them. The ambassador accepted the invitation. Once at the pool, the three men stripped to the buff—or almost.

President Roosevelt pointed out to the Frenchman that he had forgotten to remove his gloves.

“Mais non!” the ambassador explained. “We might meet ladies!”

A Bipartisan Affair

So, if nude bathing is a bi-partisan affair, why is it a problem in the national parks?

Well, it is perceived as prejudicial to “decency and good order” by an always vociferous and outraged percentage of park-going taxpayers. You see, among some patrons, national parks are seen as museums of public virtue as well as natural museums.

That is, the park ranger is expected to enforce the sort of public decorum that was the prevailing social code in the 1950s, if not Roosevelt’s time.

This can lead to problems. Not the least being that our easily embarrassed government has had a surprisingly difficult time in legally determining what is prurient and what is not.

Americans of a certain age can recall the less than successful literary criticism efforts of the U.S. Post Office and the U.S. Customs Service in regards to the works of D.H. Lawrence, Henry Miller, James Joyce and others. No one, not even Supreme Court justices, could agree on what was “lewd and lascivious.”

However, literary works require a degree of imagination on the part of both writer and reader. Nudity, by definition, leaves nothing to the imagination. Therefore it should have been simple for even the dullest federal legal hack to come up with a regulation against nudity.

Apparently the task is more difficult than it looks, neighbors. The best that our bashful federal government could come up with was 36 CFR, Chapter 1, National Park Service, Part two, Resource Protection, Public Use, and Recreation.

2.34 Disorderly Conduct

a. A person commits disorderly conduct, when with intent to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence, or knowingly or recklessly creating risk thereof, such person commits any of the following prohibited acts:

1. Engages in fighting, or threatening, or violent behavior.

The regulation is already broad enough to fine Jeff Davis for starting the Civil War, but we are now closing in on the nitty gritty, as in:

2. Uses language, an utterance, or gesture, or engages in an act that is obscene, physically threatening, or menacing or done in a manner that is likely to inflict injury or incite an immediate breach of the peace.

Fix that “Obscene, physically threatening, or menacing” bit in your mind’s eye; we’ll get back to it later.

3. Paragraph 3 concerns noise, which will not concern us (Unless you have a howling nude on your hands).

4. Creates or maintains a hazardous or physically offensive condition.

Now we are beginning to hit pay dirt, neighbors! Not only was he/she buck nekked to begin with, he/she refused to put on clothes and skedaddle when advised to do so by a federal peace officer!

CFR 36 and subtitles are basically what the park has to work with, unless they choose to enforce state or local regulations, which some do.

Holier Than Jarlsburg!

Now, you don’t have to be Lord Blackstone or the ACLU to figure out that these regs have more holes than Jarlsburg cheese.

Using CFR 36, the NPS is guaranteed bad publicity even if it wins the court case, as it will be denounced by the New York Times in one of its patented editorials sneering down on the grubby, small-town morality of out-of-touch federal flunkies. In addition, there will be a TV interview with Ms. Rainsong Moonglow, the defendant in the case, who will state in her best little girl voice, that there is nothing “obscene” or “menacing” or “offensive” about the human body, and she certainly did not “threaten” anyone with her nude body.

Ms. Moonglow (and her lawyers) will have a point. The whole regulation seems to imply a sort of compulsive automatic meltdown on the part of onlookers who are supposed to be “reasonably prudent” as the legal lingo goes.

So what to do? Well now, the folks over at Cape Cod National Seashore (CACO) have come up with their very own regulation (the only NPS unit to do so, by the way) that defines nudity without the pejorative sexual hysteria of CFR 36.

Cape Cod National Seashore

7.67 (e) Public nudity, including public nude bathing by any person on federal land or water within the boundaries of Cape Cod National Seashore is prohibited. Public nudity is a person’s intentional failure to cover with a fully opaque covering that person’s genitals, rectum, or female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola when in a public place.

“Public place” is any area of federal land or water within the Seashore, except the enclosed portions of bathhouses, restrooms, and public showers or other public structures designed for similar purposes, or private structures permitted within the seashore, such as trailers or tents. This regulation shall not apply to a person under ten years of age.

Well now! CACO got right to the point in defining nudity! No hysterical shilly shalling!

(I particularly liked the part about the “point immediately above the areola”; it shows the CACO lads have done some research!” Also note that there is no value judgment placed on somebody’s rectum, genitals, or breasts; there is nothing “obscene” or alarming. This omission should keep the New York Times and the local TV station at bay.

On the other hand, why not just ignore the nudes? Well, that sort of depends. If they are off on a secluded, seldom visited area of the park or beach, or a remote hot springs, there is an argument for “out of sight, out of mind.”

However, as Ranger Rick Smith, late of Yosemite, pointed out to me, sometimes there is an exhibitionistic factor involved, as at Yosemite in the '70s when “freaking out the straights” with nudity was a popular sport among some of the countercultural types of that era. Rick would patiently explain to them that Yosemite was a vast park with literally hundreds of ponds and pools where one could go naked without disturbing anyone.

When In Doubt, Ask A Ranger

I recall sitting in Rio Grande Hot Spring in Big Bend National Park one moonlit night with my good friend Mike Stafford formerly of the Martinez, California, police department (and a Theodore Roosevelt look alike!). The hot spring required a half-mile hike through the Chihuahuan desert, so it was unlikely that anyone would be bothered. Certainly none of the University of Texas kids (It was spring break), though they all seemed to have forgotten their swimsuits.

“Is this legal?” Mike asked.

Well, I didn’t know. “When in doubt, ask a ranger!” is always good advice.

So I asked the district ranger who was sitting in the pool across from me. She wasn’t wearing her badge, Stetson or anything else, but she was a woman of considerable authority.

“PJ,” she sighed, “I reckon it’s probably not, but you know, it’s about the least of the things I have to worry about!”

So, should we care? Perhaps former Park Service Director George Hartzog should have the last word.

According to Hartzog, “The fun in nearly all the recreation area parks will center on and in water. That reminds me of something that happened not long ago (July 1966) in Lake Mead National Recreation Area. On motor boat patrol one day, a young ranger passed an island on which he saw a dozen pretty girls sunning more of themselves than American custom usually approves. His duty was clear and he landed. “It turned out to be a French chorus line from a Las Vegas show,” he reported. “Despite the language barrier, I finally gathered that if they showed up for work with pale strap marks on their suntans, they would be in trouble.”

Hartzog concludes by saying, “Since no official report of the incident ever arrived on my desk, I didn’t ask how it ended."

PJ Ryan is a retired 30-year NPS veteran having served at Jewel Cave National Monument, Bandelier National Monument, Navajo National Monument, Bryce Canyon National Park, Petrified Forest National Park, Joshua Tree National monument, John Muir NHS, Jean Lafitte NHP and the Washington Office of the NPS. You can read more of his thoughts on the parks at Thunderbear.

Comments

God created us in his image, then decided to send us here naked without reservation. He instilled in each of us the common sense necessary to cover ourselves from heat, rain, cold etc. as needed. He never said that wearing clothes was mandatory, his son sent some of his deciples out to preach in the nude. When St. Peter went fishing, he did it in the nude, as that made more sense. Jesus said onto Peter, upon this rock we build our church, whatever you loose on earth will be loose in heaven, whatever your bind on earth, will be bound in heaven. 

Live and let live makes sense to me, especially when the nudists have made an effort to hide themselves from others who may be offended. To lable someone a sex offender for the rest of thier life for committing lewd sexual acts makes sense. But to lable them that way for life, for merely being nude while swiming, fishing, hiking, boating, sun bathing, washing the car, pulling weeds, planting a garden, mowing the lawn, camping or taking a dump in a secluded area, or anything not done in a lewd sexual mannor is morally and socially unconsionable.

Pope John Paul II indicated that being nude void of lust while on earth is still in keeping with God's desire. It is when we intend to do harm to others that we cross the line. Live out the ten commandments, coupled with the "do on to others as you would have them do onto you", sentement, so we can all be happy here on earth with each other. Jesus asked his deciples to lead by example, if St. Peter thought for an instant that working as a fisherman in the nude was the wrong example, would he have done it. If Jesus thought for an instant that sending his deciples out to preach in the nude would frustrate his father God, would he of done it. I think not, what say ye. Peace be with you, my friends...   

 


Gunnison Beach at Sandy Hook National Seashore has been a legal clothing optional beach for many years without any problems.  


We wouldn't need to worry about so many laws if people would just show others some common courtesy. I have the right to do many things but do my best to be respectful of others and not to offend or inconvenience them. It should not come as a surprise to anyone that many people are offended by public nudity in this country so doing so is only trying to create a problem. It is quite another matter if you are off in a secluded area with a reasonable expectation of privacy and someone stumbles upon you. I also think it's pretty apparent who doesn't care about offending others and who excercises basic common courtesy.


I think Nudity SHOULD be allowed, and it is up to the Naturist to be modestly-discreet about area, and the stumbler-uponer, to stumble away- or otherwise be non-freaked-out.

The rangers could warn the Family man, "beyond Bear Pond, you may encounter nudists, so be forewarned..." While telling the nudist, "you should be okay as long as you are BEYOND BEAR POND.."

If an area is set aside where nudity is celebrated/tollerated, they may say away from the Passport Cancellation Statipon, until clothed.


Get outside of the parks! I'm in NW Montana, and there are literally millions of acres you can wander nude, with little chance of ever running into others. There are many lakes you can camp at nude, as many are in very remote areas.  


In the eventwb54 decides to run for president, he/she has my vote.


Show me how anyone anywhere was ever harmed in any way by seeing a member of their own species without artifical adornment. "OMG! I saw an actual human being in its natural state. I'm scared for life!" 

Many people claim to rely upon the Bible for their aversion to nudity. There are three people in the Bible who do get into trouble regarding nudity. However, it's not the nude person who gets into trouble. It's the person who had a problem with nudity.


Two months ago I called a forest ranger in Manchester, Vermont, to ask if nudity is legal in Green Mountai National Forest. The answer was that National Forests follow the laws of whatever state any particular forest is in. She added that since Vermont has no state law against nudity, neither does Green Mountain National Forest. That's as direct an answer as one can get.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.