You are here

Cellphone Towers In Yellowstone National Park: A Flaw In The National Park Service Mission?

Share

When the National Park Service was created nearly a century ago, its mission seemed straightforward: to preserve the landscape for the enjoyment of today's and tomorrow's generations. As the agency nears its centennial, is there a need to recommit to that mission?

Those who believe so might point to ever-increasing fees across the National Park System, efforts to create deeper channels for boats at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, and ongoing snowmobile use in Yellowstone National Park.

But there also are groups that believe the Park Service should indeed re-examine its mission statement and focus a bit more on recreation in the parks and working with businesses that reflect an element of the human landscape in the parks, such as the oyster farm at Point Reyes National Seashore.

If you follow the writings and musings of Michael Frome, the man whom the late Gaylord Nelson said had no literary peer when it came to arguing for "a national ethic of environmental stewardship," you'll sense his belief that the Park Service needs to focus more on the environmental landscape of the park system.

That message was inherent in Mr. Frome's recent thoughts on the approval of a cellphone tower near Lake in Yellowstone.

Cellphone service originating from inside the boundaries of Yellowstone has been limited to the Mammoth, Old Faithful, Canyon, Tower-Roosevelt, and Grant developed areas. The Lake developed area is the one additional location in the park where park managers determined cellphone coverage could be added under the park’s 2008 Wireless Communications Services Plan Environmental Assessment and its associated Finding of No Significant Impact.

In July the park received permission to erect a tower near Lake. The new cellular site is to be located next to a buried water tank on a 100-foot rise above the Lake Administrative Area and 700 feet below the top of the Elephant Back Ridge. This site already has access via an existing service road and is near existing electric and phone lines. Antennas will be configured to minimize spillover coverage into Yellowstone’s backcountry.

In the September edition of his Portogram, Mr. Frome laments that decision.

"Changes made in response to comments were incorporated into a Finding of No Significant Impact. No significant impact — so the park administrators said. As they see it, the developed areas, with electric wires, phone lines, lots of automobiles, gas stations, hotels, commercial gift shops and sewage treatment, are 'sacrifice areas,' otherwise known as popcorn playgrounds or tourist ghettos," he writes.

"Before coming, you think of Yellowstone the way it is in the nature series on television. The Park Service tells you to unplug your ears and connect with nature — but when you arrive you can check your e-mail, the state of your stocks, and feel the conveniences of home," continues Mr. Frome. "Perhaps park administrators might have chosen not to allow those towers in the first place. They might have determined this was a strictly commercial service using public resources and public land, and that the signals the towers emit can spill into and pollute hiking trails away from developed areas.

"They might have decided that since hotels in the park get along without television, they can make it without wireless Internet service. When people come to Yellowstone, it’s one of the special times in their lives. They want to hear the splash of geysers and feel themselves in harmony with natural forces that over the centuries created the thermal features, peaks and canyons. That is what they come here for, and not having that sound drowned out by somebody conversing via cell phone."

As Mr. Frome goes on to argue against the cell tower, he says national parks "are presumed preserved to reflect the original America. Many National Park Service personnel want it that way. They care deeply, feeling their mission is to encourage us to embrace a lifestyle that treads lightly on the earth, and that doing so adds richness to all of our lives. They ought to be able to defend their park areas from overuse and misuse with a clear conscience. To deplete or degrade the visible physical resource does something to the invisible spirit of place as well."

To further drive home that point, Mr. Frome points to Zane Grey's 1925 book, The Vanishing American, in which "Nophaie most loved to be alone, out in the desert, 'listening to the real sounds of the open and to the whispering of his soul.”

"In short," Mr. Frome concludes in his column, "instead of treating a national park like any other place, the park professionals ought to say, 'If you can’t do without your cellphone or laptop or tablet, don’t come here!'”

Comments

Another fine comment from Dr. Runte. Thank you.


I like railroads; however, they were banned from the parks as too loud and too intrusive.

But cell phones are neither. The call here was to not allow cell phones because that isn't the proper way for someone to enjoy a park. Who are you to tell someone else how to enjoy a park?


Kurt,

If it were my call, I wouldn't increase the debt ceiling under any circumstances. But it is not the debt ceiling that is the issue for the parks, it is the continuing resolution. The house has agreed to fund everything but Obamacare. Those that oppose what the House has sent to the Senate are willing to shut down the government for that one sacred cow even though ACA funding could be addressed in follow up actions. And I will remind you, all funding bills must originate in the House - which in itself makes Obamacare unConstitutional.


ec, I realize the debt ceiling and CR are different, but they're playing them off one another.

The House seemingly would jeopardize billions of dollars in terms of higher interest rates and related economic calamity -- furloughed workers, economic activity lost -- because it refuses to seek a solution to America's health care problems.

Perhaps if the House agreed to toss away its own government-funded health care plan and go into the market like the rest of us their overtures might be worth considering...You've always been quick to quote the Founding Fathers. Are you familiar with the following that James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers?

"[T]hey can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788732466560457908092159485777...


Kurt - The House is agreeing to fund EVERYTHING else. One item it wants to defund. And no it doesn't refuse to seek a solution, it wants a solution that will work. More Americans don't believe the ACA is the right solution than believe it is:

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/15/20506193-poll-obamacare-re...

Perhaps if the House agreed to toss away its own government-funded health care plan and go into the market like the rest of us their overtures might be worth considering.

I'm with you on this one. And perhaps if the Senate didn't have exemptions from Obamacare, their overatures might be worth considering.

Perhaps you are aware of the movement for a 28th amendment.

http://www.petition2congress.com/3093/proposed-28th-amendment-to-united-...


So ec, what's their solution? What are they doing to reach a solution?

28th Amendment sounds great...though it should be tweaked to limit senators to two terms and representatives to four....


They may have opinions on how you should live but they have no interest in putting it into law.

Unlike all those liberals for DOMA and against de-criminalizing marijuana, to name two obvious examples. EC, have you entirely missed the Culture Wars of the last forty years? (But I'm not sure how the parks have a place in this discussion.)


There are people like me that think the ACA did not go far enough. I think they need to let Obama Care play out, and then fix it and make it better rather than scrap it. Why spread propaganda about it other than to sway opinion polls before we even impement it. When ever there is that much money spent in the private sector to stop something, it definately makes me think the propaganda is not in the best interest of the average person. There are many lies out there that scare people into believing it should be stopped. So I do not believe the polls sway my opinion.


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.