You are here

Around The Parks: A Blurring Of National Park Lines

Share
The National Park Service, and its employees, should not be blamed for the parks' closure.

Around the country, as the partial government shutdown moves into its second week, taxpayers angry with the closure of national parks are showing their disgust through civil disobedience, mockery, and anger directed at the National Park Service.

The national park idea, long recognized as America's best, is being degraded and disrespected as the result of a much different idea—using the parks as leverage to try to gain the advantage in a political donnybrook.

Many of the government functions impacted by the shutdown, while important, simply don't have the same media interest—or impact on the general public—as closure of the national parks. It's hard to generate a compelling news photo based on the interruption of airliner safety inspection or suspensions of some FDA food safety inspections. Hang a closed sign on the entrance to the Grand Canyon, however, or put a belligerent congressman face-to-face with a ranger at the World War II Memorial on the National Mall, and you have plenty of fodder for the prime-time network news.

The result is an agency and its employees caught in the middle of a fight it didn't create—or want.

Some critics are driven by anger over loss of income from the parks' closure. Others by disgust with Obama administration. Still others seemingly by the belief that the federal government has no right to close the parks. In the end, however, it's the rangers on the ground who are seen as the "face" of the shutdown.

Some Republicans in Congress, particularly in the House, blame the administration for the parks' continued closure, pointing out that that chamber voted to restore funding for the Park Service, among some other agencies and programs. But that legislation was tied to a demand that the Affordable Care Act be scaled back. Some protesting the parks' closure staged an "occupy" movement of Zion National Park last week, a protest that reportedly drew fewer than two dozen.

Many more turned out at Acadia National Park, where they simply walked around barricades to spend a beautiful fall afternoon on the park's Carriage Roads. One of those visitors was involved in a backcountry accident, and the resulting rescue severely taxed the limited resources of a park in "shutdown mode."

Alternate Text
At Acadia National Park this week, many cyclists routinely ignored the "closed" signs at the Carriage Roads. Rebecca Latson photo.

No doubt other parks saw visitors ignore the closure signs. There's even a "movement" encouraging people to enter the parks while they're closed.

In Florida, word that the waters of Everglades and Biscayne national parks were being closed led to ridicule of the Obama administration for "closing the ocean." However, the waters adjoining those two parks are as much part of the parks as the Thorofare region of Yellowstone National Park is part of that park, as the Tuloumne Meadows area is of Yosemite National Park, as the Maze is of Canyonlands National Park, and as the Cataloochee Valley is of Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

Too, Biscayne counts approximately 40 keys, or islets, within its watery landscape. That seascape, which comprises 95 percent of the park, also holds historic shipwrecks and fragile coral reefs that have suffered in the past from poachers of history. Those of Everglades hold vital habitat for fisheries.

When those parks were created, the Park Service was charged with overseeing those resources, and with reduced ranks spurred by the failure of Congress to pass a Continuing Resolution to keep the government funded, the agency is sorely lacking the manpower to monitor those areas.

"Whether units of the NPS are historic buildings that can be physically closed by closing a door, or parks with entrance stations able to close with a staff person speaking to visitors or by pulling gates across roads or in the case of some of our nation's most sacred sites, from the Lincoln Memorial to the Jefferson Memorial to the new WW ll Memorial that do not have physical doors or gates to close - these places are all a part of the National Park System whether they have a structure to close or they are sites without a defined entrance point such as the Lincoln Memorial," said Joan Anzelmo, a former park superintendent and now a member of the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.

"The NPS is responsible for them and they are on federal lands. If left unstaffed in ways the public can see -- and more importantly in the ways the public can't see -- these places will not be preserved the way the agency has been directed to do by Congress," she added. "Congress can't direct the agency on one hand to protect the parks (all of them) so they are unimpaired for the future generations and then suddenly just say never mind- let them be open or let some of them be open. The U.S. National Park System has been an exemplar to the world and parks and the employees should not be played as pawns by Congress."

Regarding the situation at the National Mall, where attention has been focused on access, in particular, to the World War II Veterans Memorial, Ms. Anzelmo pointed to the status of all of the Mall's memorials as icons of our nation ... and also as potential targets for those who wish to do our country harm.

"I worked the shutdown in '95 and '96 and remember there were barricades placed at the Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials in that shutdown. Fast forward these 17 years and the security concerns area thousand times what they were in the innocent 1990s especially at the iconic locations such as the National Mall and Memorials in Washington, D.C.," she said. "
There are many behind-the-scenes security-related components, including staff (uniform and plain clothes) that are in place to protect these sacred sites and the millions of people who visit them. When you furlough the vast majority of the workforce due to no appropriation you suddenly reduce the capacity to safely protect the sacred sites themselves and to protect the visitors who wish to visit them. This is very serious business in present day times."

That the National Park System has become a pawn in Congress's malfeasance is unfortunate, regrettable, and unnecessarily places the rangers, and the public, at risk.

Featured Article

Comments

Whoa, whoa, whoa, EC, you're throwing an unanswered question back at me as a question because you can't answer it??

Being in the property business, I'm guessing you know that leases don't always cover all costs, particularly when it comes to maintaining a facility as large as an inn and the grounds it is set on. If you recall from my two-part series last fall, just because a building is leased out by the Park Service doesn't mean the agency doesn't incur upkeep costs.

/2012/12/national-park-lodging-whos-taking-care-these-buildings-part-i22557

/2012/12/national-park-lodging-whos-taking-care-these-buildings-part-ii22599

And then there are the costs associated with the salaries of rangers who respond to emergencies that might be tied in with the inn in some fashion.

Bottom line: unless you can procur the Park Service's line-item facilities budget for the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Pisgah Inn that prove your point, my guess is your claim that the inn runs wholly without any government funding in some form or fashion is off-base.

As to the House's request for a one-year delay, can you document that the administration's move to delay the corporate mandate by one-year was unconstitutional, or is that just rehashing a GOP talking point? A lengthy article in The Atlantic back in July dismissed such talk after interviewing several constitutional experts and examining court rulings.

Nor is the one-year delay of the employer mandate an affront to the Constitution, as Professor Michael McConnell and Congressional Republicans insist. The relevant text requires that the President "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." Scholars on both left and right concur that this broadly-worded phrasing indicates that the President is to exercise judgment, and handle his enforcement duties with fidelity to all laws, including, indeed, the Constitution. As McConnell himself notes, both Republican and Democratic Justice Departments have consistently opined that the clause authorizes a president even to decline enforcement of a statute altogether, if in good faith he determines it to be in violation of the Constitution. But, McConnell contends, a president cannot "refuse to enforce a statute he opposes for policy reasons." While surely correct, that contention is beside the point.

As to whether the House's attempt to delay implementation of the ACA for a year on the outside chance it might control both chambers by then, no, that's not evil. Politically motivated and shrewd, absolutely! And I'm sure the Democrats would try the same thing if they were in a similar position.

What I regret is that there are so very, very few "statesmen/women" in Congress to bring some sanity to the body.


I'm a bit confused why you're in favor of the House bill to delay the "personal mandate" but you object to the President delaying the corporate mandate.

Either both should be delayed or neither. My preference would be to eliminate both.

I though delaying or dismantling the ACA was what this whole fight

You thought wrong. It came down to two issues: Make Congress play by the same rules and let individuals get the same break as corporations. That is what your dem heros voted against.


unless you can procur the Park Service's line-item facilities budget

Which you know is impossible in this "most transparent" adminsitration as the Park Service refuses to provide such line item budgets..

my guess is your claim that the inn runs wholly without any government funding in some form or fashion is off-base.

Until you can show that government funds are required, I feel comfortable in my claim.

And then there are the costs associated with the salaries of rangers who respond to emergencies that might be tied in with the inn in some fashion.

What, as opposed to the cost to the rangers that are standing there preventing folks to come in? Be honest, which of those cost are higher?


Missed this one on the last response

can you document that the administration's move to delay the corporate mandate by one-year was unconstitutional

Congress passes the laws. It is the obligation of the Executive Branch to execute the laws. The Executive Branch is not Constitutionally allowed to choose which laws it does and does not enforce. Delaying the Corporate mandate is contrary to the law passed. For the Executive branch to not inforce this Constitionally passed law is Unconstitutional.


RickB, interesting comment. I agree, it is important to evaluate the sources of information one receives. It is difficult at times . Many news sources are owned by mega corporations, Fox News ( Murdock), for one and the list goes on. It is all very complicated, but much that is presented in the mainstream media is closely monitored by the top management of the corporate owner. There are some notable exceptions, PBS, Democracy Now, etc. Was reading an interesting article mentioning the "Economists" Democracy Index, which rates some democratic countries above the United States on its index bar based based on the fact we allow for paid political adds. These nations classify paid political ads as propaganda and bar them. These same nations invest heavily in public media to insure a broader range of voices and a deeper political analysis.

It goes onto to say we need to recognize the dangers of a system in which voters get their information not from a free press, but from a money and media complex that seeks to maintain the free flow of cash into its coffers and of course to protect the agendas of those providing the cash. In my own view, there is much truth here, the never ending slurry of political ads are truly foul and misleading. Hard to even watch many of them.


Justin - I have no clue what your argument is

Not sure I know how to make it any simpler. It doesn't use any big words, and the syntax is pretty simple. If you could point out which part of it you don't understand, I might be able to clarify it for you.


If you could point out which part of it you don't understand,

Any. Rather than dancing, perhaps you would like to state ( restate) it now. My guess is you will continue to dance and reference back to unspecified posts and comments. But I look forward to you making and standing by a specific position. Stating your view on 1: Congress should live by the rules of the public and 2: If the corporate mandate is delayed so should be the indivudual mandate, would be a good start.


Are you saying that you don't understand or don't remember the very argument you're addessing with your questions? Either way, that's a pretty bizarre line of inquiry, ecbuck. My argument, and our discussion through which it is elaborated, that you keep re-invoking is clearly expressed in the comments for the story "Around The Shutdown: Lodging Blues, Apologize To The Ranger, Oil Keeps Flowing." (The average readability score for my argument shows that a tenth grader could understand it. So, I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say you have no clue what it is.) If you want to point out which parts of it you don't understand, I can clarify them for you, and we can get this conversation back on track.


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.