A View From The Overlook: The Advantages Of National Parks

Alternate Text
A program at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park launched in 2010 works with under-privileged high school students to introduce them to the array of sciences exploredin the park. NPS photo.

“What good are national parks?”

This is a question often raised by the Tea Party wing of the Republican Party when faced by non-utilitarian public land use.

It is an interesting question. The first answer is the John Muir answer; that national parks are “good” in and of themselves; that they are not required to be economically valuable.

The idea that plants and animals are spiritually valuable and soul nourishing was first proposed by the first century naturalist, Jesus Christ, who famously observed “Consider the lilies of the field; how they grow, they toil not, nor do they spin, and yet I say onto you that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.”

The quote (Luke 12:23-40) was undoubtedly made in response to the Judean Sheep and Goat Association’s claim that God had given them the right to overgraze the Holy Land (This doesn’t show up in the Bible, but it should!).

Now we are not inferring that the Tea Party Republicans are the Anti-Christ, but you might want to check your congressman for the Mark of the Beast!

The second answer to the question of the value of national parks takes the dilemma by the horns and states boldly that the parks ARE economically valuable; that you CAN make money off them; that is, folks who show up to “Consider the Lilies” are going to need something to eat and a place to sleep, as well as a souvenir of their “Considering,“ and you can make money selling these goods and services to them.

This is not quite as spiritual an answer as that of Christ or John Muir, but it has a powerful appeal to the local chamber of commerce. Indeed, the presence of the NPS arrowhead or a patch of dark green or pink on a road map, indicating the presence of a national park unit, is much sought after by most of the normal parts of the United States.

The NPS brand on a piece of property, large or small, is sort of the touristic version of the “Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval.” The park patron is assured of first-rate museum exhibitry and a friendly, knowledgeable staff that will leave the patron with the feeling that his time, tax dollars and admission fee were well spent. A sizable segment of the traveling public views visiting NPS sites as virtually a patriotic duty, making sure to get their NPS Passports stamped, and encouraging their children to work to acquire the Junior Ranger badges offered at most sites.

All of these activities precipitate money into the surrounding communities. Everyone, particularly normal Republicans, likes this. This helps to make national parks a rare bi-partisan issue that most people can get behind. (Readers will recall the recent frantic efforts of Utah, Arizona and other “red States” to re-open parks closed by the government shutdown.)

Battling Poverty With Parks

It is also helpful that many national park units are located in what President Lyndon Johnson called “pockets of poverty.” These are generally rural areas with declining industries such as mining, logging, or marginal agriculture, with low educational outcomes and a high proportion of jobs that are seasonal in nature and close to minimum wage when available.

Some of these “pockets of poverty” are pretty big pockets, such as much of Appalachia and the Ozark Plateau. In other cases, NPS units butt up against or are surrounded by Native American reservations where unemployment and alcoholism is in the high double digits.

NPS units in these “poverty pockets” constitute a sort of small economic oasis for the local population. NPS jobs, even when seasonal, generally pay more that the going rate and are among the few jobs in the community guaranteed not to be outsourced to China.

This brings us to the third advantage of National Parks: the presence of the NPS staff. The rangers, interpreters, maintenance, and administrative folk are a great resource (and role model) for the surrounding community. They provide vital backup and support in law enforcement, medical first response, fire and natural disaster assistance, and education They are intelligent, well-educated, well-trained, outgoing persons with a broad worldview due to the nomadic nature of the NPS life style.

They are also well paid (at least by poverty pocket standards). This allows them the luxury of working only their NPS jobs, rather than several low paying jobs to make ends meet. This in turn, provides the luxury of spare time, which they often invest in volunteer work for the community. Using the bases of schools, churches, service organizations such as Rotary or Lions, youth groups such as the Boy & Girl Scouts, these NPS volunteers do provide reinforcement to the community, for the betterment of the locals and the mission of the NPS.

Park personnel and spouses often assist after school in tutoring or coaching sports. Now, we are not implying that every NPS bureaucrat is some sort of Lord or Lady Bountiful, bestowing wisdom on the surrounding yokels as in a Department of Interior version of “Downton Abbey.” But the NPS staffers do have an effect on the community and it is usually positive.

Alternate Text
Some of the program's students are involved in interpretive programs. NPS photo.

Let us consider one such example of NPS effect on a “pocket of poverty” located on the Big Island of Hawaii.

“But”, you say, “Hawaii is a tropical paradise! No one can be miserable! It’s against the law!”

That may be the case in the Kona district of the Big Island, where all the famous resorts and beaches hold sway. But it is not so in the Ka’u district, an agricultural area that abuts Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. The Ka’u District is economically depressed.

Why is this the case? Breaks of the game, neighbors! The Hawaiian sugar industry collapsed due to the “deregulation” that forced Hawaiian sugar to compete on the world market. In such cases, Bangladesh wins every time.

The big Ka'u plantations like C. Brewer shut down, as did all but one in the rest of the Hawaiian Islands. This left a lot of folks out of full time work.

Now perhaps they should have all moved to North Dakota to get in on the oil boom, but they didn’t. Some were able to transition into the developing Ka'u Coffee industry, others settled into tropical torpor, subsisting on welfare, subsistence wild pig and goat hunting, part time or odd jobs, supplemented in some case by a little pakalolo (marijuana) farming; for recreation there was surfing, music, and hanging out with buddies.

It is not a bad existence; nobody starves or dies of exposure in Hawaii. “Poverty is a warm weather sport” as one acquaintance put it.

It was, however, a very limiting role model for the children. Indeed, such children are known as “at risk,” particularly to the crystal meth problem, the “drug of boredom” in rural America.

Parks As Educators

The astute principal of the Ka’u High School perceived that Hawaii Volcanoes National Park and its rangers have the ability to help the students gain self-esteem, to learn more about the homeland they love, and to set goals for acquiring professions and higher education

At roughly the same time, visiting anthropologist Dr. Joan Rubin and her retired NPS husband contacted a major figure in the Ka’u district, Julia Neal, who in addition to being a crusading local newspaper woman, was actively involved in promoting the Pahala community.

What to do?

“When in doubt, ask a ranger.”

So the three presented a plan to Cindy Orlando, superintendent of Hawaii Volcanos National Park, who thought it an interesting challenge. It was especially timely since the park was interested in greater outreach with the surrounding communities.

Cindy asked Interpretive Park Ranger Kupono McDaniel if he was interested in the plan to involve the Ka’u students in the park by training them in the various NPS disciplines. Indeed, Kupono was interested in helping the “at risk “youth of Ka’u, but knew it would be a challenge for both sides.

National parks and the National Park Service are resolutely middle class. For example, “volunteering in the parks,” that is, working for nothing, is pretty much a middle class concept. Since the Ka’u kids were not middle class, that concept would have to be shelved for the time being; “Only a chump works for nothing!”

So, Kupono instituted the “GS-1 Ranger.” At the bottom of the GS ladder, there are no prerequisites for the GS-1 position other than to show up breathing. Humble as it was, the GS-1 paid $10 an hour. Not bad pay for a Ka’u kid.

Alternate Text
Students learn about the geologic forces at play in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. NPS photo.

In addition, the park provided a training program and uniforms. The uniforms were the real deal. If they passed the training course, they would wear the same uniforms as regular park rangers. For the first time in their young lives, they would feel and be important. It would prove to be a heady feeling.

Thus was born the Youth Ranger Internship Program. Ostensibly, the Ka’u kids were being hired and trained as seasonal rangers. In reality, they were being introduced to middle class values. There was the concept of the alarm clock; you didn’t shut it off and roll over; if you were expected to be at a certain place at a certain time, you were there, not just the first time, but always. The job came first; you didn’t drop it, because there was something “interesting” happening on the other side of the island. Above all, you would talk to strangers, look them in the eye, and answer their questions.

To many, if not most, of the Ka’u Kids, talking to strangers was primordially terrifying. Six-foot-tall Hawaiian surfer kids who had no fear of a 20-foot wave were reduced almost to tears by the prospect of talking to middle aged Iowa farm couple.

“What will they ask? What will I say?” were the fearful questions.

“Don’t worry! We will teach you,” said Kupono.

At Path Out Of Poverty

And teach and instruct they did. Training this fourth year of the program started on April 4, 2013, with 45 youth from Ka’u, Pahoa, and Kea’au public high schools, as well as the Hawaii Academy of Arts and Sciences. There were short courses on how the volcano worked, the more common native plants and their uses, conservation values, teamwork and, of course, Hawaiiana; the rousing history and legends of the Hawaiian and Polynesian peoples. Practice on how to impart this newfound knowledge to others followed.

The Nature Conservancy, the powerful private conservation organization, got involved and took the Ka’u kids on overnight camp overs on their land. A local philanthropist provided a van to take the kids to the national park (Incredibly, few of the kids had ever visited the park; that, they thought, was for Haoles).

Those who completed the training program, 33 in all, were assigned to all six of the divisions of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park; Interpretation, Natural Resources, Cultural Resources, Maintenance, Protection, and Administration. They then worked the summer of 2013 under the supervision of their ranger-mentors.

So, bottom line, was the Youth Ranger Internship Program a success? Seems to be the case. Let’s take the interns in the Interpretive Division. One by one, after much mentoring and critiquing, and considerable trepidation, every Youth Ranger Interpreter eventually gave his/her maiden interpretive talk. It was invariably well received, often with applause. Success begets success: half-remembered stories from grandparents were recalled—and researched, and incorporated into other talks. The kids began proposing ideas—always a good sign.

Over at Natural Resources Division, Youth Ranger Intern Grace Tredinnick was having the time of her life.

Alternate Text
Some students are immersed in the park's botany, which includes this Uluhe Frond. NPS photo.

In a letter written at the end of season, she stated: “Before I started working at the park, I never knew how diverse and beautiful the native species in Hawaii are because so many of them are uncommon outside the park…I would encourage anyone looking to start a career in conservation to check out this program. It is a perfect transition to adulthood from high school and gives everyone who participates in it a step up in the real world. In addition to that, it is a wonderful atmosphere. Everyone is so helpful and happy. I don’t think I’ve ever met an unhappy park ranger, and I knew I was happy to be there the entire time. I looked forward to every day.”

Before the program, college seemed as unrealistic as a trip to Mars for the Ka’u kids. Now it seemed a feasible idea, as there was a goal, to be a resource manager, or a park ranger. They would need a degree. There was now a reason. The high school guidance counselor could now do his job of removing obstacles to these goals.

The State of Hawaii was very much interested in the success of Native Hawaiians. You could go to the University of Hawaii tuition-free if you had Hawaiian blood. There are grants and scholarships available to those who have the will. The park staff at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park helped nurture that will. Just one of the many advantages of national parks.

Comments


are left to draw their own conclusions about party positions,


Then they should identifing them as such rather than claiming them as fact.


literally shouted down that person. While claiming to revere our Constitution, these Tea Party operatives were actively denying others of their First Amendment rights.


Gee Lee - and Democrats have never done that? LOL By the way, while such behavior is deplorable - if it actually happened, there is no First Amendment protection from individuals.


We don't need debating point 'citations' for online squabbles.


Of course you don't Rick, you are quite happy with people making things up so they can demonize conservatives. BTW Rick, you hate the oil and gas companies so much, did you send back the $900 check you received because of their activities in your state?

For an interesting ethnography of the Tea Party, out of UNC/Vanderbilt:

http://perrin.socsci.unc.edu/perrin-tepper-caren-morris-cultures-of-the-tea-party-asa-2011.pdf

Kurt, how about some editorial discretion over the ridiculous lede to this article?

PJ wrote a perfectly fine exposition on a few particular merits of the Parks, including an interesting program at Hawaii Volcanoes Park.....and then tacked on an overbroad, unmerited, and unnecessary political diatribe on the front end for good measure?

Are we just trying to bait an all-but-pointless political flame war?There are, of course, more than a few "regulars" on each side who are looking for any opening for an argument.

I work in politics for a living, and have some pretty opinionated views of my own. But this is just shameful. Why does everything need to be a debate?

I tend to enjoy PJ's provocative op-eds, but on this one I think I agree with Countryman. The opening reference does seem a bit adscititious (especially when there are indeed some "regulars" waiting around for any pretext at all to register some wild political resentment).

For those who feel that PJ's remarks about Republicans were gratuitous, may I offer some history? Rather than depend upon my memory, I'm going to pull extensively from Bill Everhart's book Take Down Flag & Feed Horses. From Chapter 18 "Like a Salmon Swimming Upstream."

"The difference between the old and new Park Service is that we have so little to laugh about now . . . " [a former NPS associate director] There is little consensus that George Hartzog presided over the last -- and some might say the best -- years of the old Park Service and that the old Park Service came to an end when he was dismissed by Richard Nixon in 1972. His firing began the politicizing of the Park Service and broke a tradition as old as the agency. -- pages 211 - 212

Following the swearing in of the first director, Steve Mather, the interior secretary had remarked, "By the way, Steve, I forgot to ask you -- what are your politics?" Mather was a well-known Republican, and it was the secretary's way of saying that he could rest easy in the Democratic administration of Woodrow Wilson. For more than half a century that custom was respected, and no director was fired or removed for partisan reasons. Incoming presidents rewarding supporters with choice positions kept hands off the Park Service. -- page 212

Nixon had good cause to mark Hartzog. Victor by a thin margin over Hubert Humphrey in 1968, he hadn't felt secure enough to oust all hold-over bureaucrats. Hartzog was spared -- the only interior agency chief to survive -- after it became apparent that he was highly regarded in Congress. . . . . H. R. Haldeman, Nixon's chief of staff, described in the The Ends of Power how Nixon planned to bring all government agencies under his personal control, placing White House loyalists in key positions after the 1972 election. The tape from which Haldeman quoted reveals the petty vidictiveness of Richard Nixon. "Knock them the hell out of there . . . any Goddam thing. Clean the bastards out . . . Take that Park Service, they've been screwing us for years." page 212

Nixon personally gave the order to fire Hartzog, provoked in part by a trivial incident. It involved his long-time companion, Bebe Rebozo, Rebozo's brother-in-law, and a boat dock at Biscayne National Park off the south coast of Florida that Rebozon and Nixon considered their private property until George ordered it opened to the public. "I was told the only thing Rebozo asked of Nixon in 1972 was that I be fired," George said. -- page 212

Nixon replaced him with a thirty-four-year-old underling, Ronald Walker, a White House advance man deemed qualified for the position because he had visited several parks. -- page 212

It would have been a miracle if Park Service people had not become disillusioned and discouraged during the repressive years under Reagan and Bush [George H.W.] -- page 214

Everhart goes on to trace the actions of presidents Reagan and George H. W. Bush. He tells us of revenge firings and reassignments of Park Service directors, regional directors, and even park superintendents who dared try to stand up against political pressures that were causing damage to parks.

For many of us, the memory of what happened under the presidency of George W. Bush is still fresh. Remember Paul Hoffman's attempt to secretly rewrite the NPS management guidelines? (Everhart's book was published before GWB was in office.)

It's no wonder that the saying "There are very few NPS people who vote Republican" is so true.

Get Everhart's book and read it carefully. Maybe you'll begin to understand. By the way, Bill Everhart was the National Park Service historian for a number of years.

Thank you Lee, will get the book on kindle.

Thanks for sharing that, Lee. Politics at its ugliest.

I didn't know that Nixon was a member of the Tea Party. Thanks for the totally irrelevant info.

I see. So pointing out the history of Republican antipathy toward national parks even before the advent of the Tea Party is irrelevant.

Okay. If you say so.

But will you at least make an effort to read the book?

Yeah, Nixon (who was not a Tea Party member) was a real enemy of the parks:

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=3125

And yes someone's thoughts on a President from 40 years ago is irrelevant when discussing the Tea Party.

If you say so . . . . .

Just remember that Nixon, moreso than most other presidents, spoke with a forked tongue. He did and said what he thought was politically expedient, not necessarily what was right. In some cases, results were good. In others, however . . . . . .

Again, read the book. Then decide. And remember, too, that the Tea Party is just one recent branch of the GOP. The party's history is relevant if you are to understand the Big Picture.


The party's history is relevant if you are to understand the Big Picture.


While there certainly are individual moments and people that can be criticized, I am quite proud of the Republican history. But, it is not relevant when trying to defend a hatchet job on the Tea Party.

Thanks for posting Lee. Your patience and resiliance in responding to EC is indeed remarkable.

Unfortunately, I find that repetitive squabbling about political points of view undermines the overall quality of National Park Traveler discussions. Commentary seems to get controlled by a prominent few. It reminds me of the old days when Ranger X and Beamis would frequently dominate NPT discussions.

Thank you Kurt for including PJ Ryan of "Thunderbear" fame as a regular contributor to the Traveler from his "View from the Overlook." Thank you PJ for another excellent article. You sure know how to incite controversey amongst your readers.


Unfortunately, I find that repetitive squabbling about political points of view undermines the overall quality of National Park Traveler discussions.


Then perhaps you should suggest to PJ that he not start his articles with political hatchet jobs. He could have omitted the first six paragraphs and would have had a fine, uncontroversial piece.

You're right, Owen. Trying to reason with ec is really an impossible waste of time. I think I have way too much extra time on my hands.

You have my permission to slap me upside the head if I get suckered into another endless discussion.

The American Taliban will eventually self destruct if they continue as they are, so not to worry.