You are here

Investigation: National Park Service Long Ignored Preservation Laws In Desecrating Sacred Ground At Effigy Mounds National Monument

Share
Alternate Text
Footers 4 feet deep were sunk into a mound for a boardwalk. Since this photo was taken, the footers were cut even with the mound top./NPS

Ancestral burial grounds and ceremonial mounds at Effigy Mounds National Monument in Iowa considered sacred by a dozen Native American tribes were desecrated by National Park Service managers who "clearly knew what they were doing was against the law" during a decade-long campaign of building boardwalks and trails across the monument grounds, according to a voluminous investigation.

Though news of the actual damage to archaeological sites in the national monument surfaced in 2010, details of the just-unearthed investigation point to a longstanding disregard or ignorance of state and federal laws created to protect this country's archaeological resources.

Phyllis Ewing, who as the monument's superintendent was ultimately responsible for the work, was transferred to a position in the regional office not long after the desecration came to light. Earlier this year she was fired, a move she reportedly is challenging. Tom Sinclair, the monument's maintenance chief under Superintendent Ewing who was its de facto cultural resources compliance officer, also is no longer with the National Park Service.

Working to right the Park Service's image with area residents and members of the Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska, the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma, the Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma, the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin, the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, the Upper Sioux Community of Minnesota, the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community in the state of Minnesota, the Lower Sioux Indian Community in the state of Minnesota, the Prairie island Indian Community in the state of Minnesota, the Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa, the Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska, and the Sac and Fox Nation of Oklahoma is Jim Nepstad, who was appointed superintendent at the monument in 2011.

"Even before I got to the park we acknowledged to people that we had some bad things happen at Effigy Mounds and that a lot of it was the result of poor or non-existent communication, whether that was with the SHPO (State Historic Preservation Office) or the tribes or with the general public, even amongst the staff of the park. That was going to be the one thing that I was going to work on," Superintendent Nepstad said Saturday during a phone call. "By being open and transparent, I think, admitting to what happened, not trying to blindly defend it, I think we've been able to make quite a bit of progress."

The matter resurfaced Saturday when documents obtained by Friends of Effigy Mounds and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility through a Freedom of Information Act request were made public. Key was the 703-page investigative report compiled by National Park Service Special Agent David Barland-Liles that traced problems back to 2001. 

Tim Mason, a seasonal ranger at Effigy Mounds for 19 years and currently head of Friends of Effigy Mounds, had worked to bring attention to the matter for years. In 2010 he asked the Interior Department's Office of Inspector General to look into the matter, only to be told "the issues raised would be better addressed by the National Park Service."

On Saturday during a telephone call he said he couldn't understand why the National Park Service allowed the illegal acts at the monument to go on for so many years.

"That is the most perplexing question of the whole malfeasance," he said, charging that Superintendent Ewing and Chief Sinclair were focused on "empire building" through the projects. "They were left to run wild for years and years."

National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis had no comment on the matter, his spokesperson said Monday.

While Special Agent Barland-Liles didn't file a formal report, according to PEER, he did present it to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, where a decision was made not to prosecute either Ms. Ewing or Mr. Sinclair, said Superintendent Nepstad.

The agent's investigation, built on interviews with monument and regional office staff, memorandums, personnel documents, and budget documents, provided a paper trail leading to Ms. Ewing and Mr. Sinclair. That trail indicated that park staff failed to conduct the required archaeological assessments and consultations with state and tribal officials before proceeding with the projects. In some cases, the documents show, compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act was done after the fact.

In one interview, the associate regional director for cultural resources in the Park Service's Midwest Region Office told the special agent that, "We've tried to understand how a park could behave so badly...Wherever they had a chance to screw up, they did." The official, whose name was redacted from the document, added that the various projects "destroyed" the park and that it would take decades to repair the actual damage as well as the Park Service's reputation.

The Midwest Region's cultural resources specialist told Special Agent Barland-Liles that, "Effigy Mounds went to the extreme and did whatever they wanted to do. ... There was clear intent to circumvent the law by people who are at a high enough level to know better. I can't explain why they did what they did but they clearly knew what they were doing was against the law."

Effigy Mounds National Monument was established in 1949 specifically to protect and preserve more than 200 Native American mound sites along the Mississippi River, some of which date back almost 2,000 years. Among the mounds are "31 effigy mounds in the shapes of birds and bears. These mounds are examples of a signifiant phase of mound-building culture, commemorating the passing of loved ones and the sacred beliefs of these ancient peoples," Park Service manuals note.

During Superintendent Ewing's tenure, an estimated $3 million worth of boardwalks, trails, and other infrastructures were built without the required archaeological assessments, the investigation shows. In some cases, boardwalks were built over a road more than 100 years old that dated to the Mississippi steamboat era and along and over mounds; landscape contractors used mechanical augers to dig holes near the visitor center atop potential archaeological sites before surveys were done, and; had, against regional directives, buried Native American remains unconnected with tribes associated with Effigy Mounds into the monument's Three Mounds.

In the wake of the construction in 2007 of a shop building, one of the monument's rangers asked Chief Ranger Kenneth Block if the requisite archaeological assessments had been done.

"As I think you had suspected, the building was simply put up with no thought to get ARPA (Archaeological Resources Protection Act) approval BEFORE construction," the chief ranger replied in a letter.

An October 2009 letter from then-Regional Director Ernie Quintana to Superintendent Ewing questioned her approach to projects that could disturb archaeological resources. A site evaluation by an associate regional director "determined that there were several major violations of the NHPA from 2001 through 2007," wrote the regional director. "Specifically, the (evaluation) found the park did not follow the compliance procedures of NEPA or Section 106 of the NHPA in building new trails, replacing trail bridges, building a maintenance structure, and constructing an interpretive exhibit. These violations were exacerbated by the fact that they had major, adverse impacts to cultural landscapes and a strong likelihood of having adverse impacts to  aboriginal American Indian structures that the park was established to protect."

A Park Service memorandum following a meeting with tribal representatives in November of that year noted that the tribes "were fairly angry about the boardwalks, and one (representative) even asked why ancient cemeteries should be treated as places to walk your dog. A tribal representative who participated in some (General Management Plan) sessions said they did not like the boardwalks but they had been told that NPS considered them necessary. Several tribal representatives felt that damage has been done and their views would not be considered."

Superintendent Ewing, in her interview with Special Agent Barland-Liles, said she didn't realize proper compliance steps weren't being taken until the on-site evaluation by the associate regional director in 2009. Although records obtained by the special agent showed the superintendent had received some training on Section 106 requirements, she told him, "I really didn't know all these rules" required of superintendents and that she left compliance matters to Chief Sinclair.

In his interview with the special agent, Mr. Sinclair said he could not recall ever officially being designated as the monument's cultural resources compliance officer, and that he wasn't aware of all the procedures that needed to be followed when projects might impact archaeological sites. When asked what advice he would give to the U.S. Attorney's Office on the matter, he responded, "Have mercy."

 

Alternate Text
A hole was dug into a burial mound at the monument to "repatriate" remains from Native Americans despite their lack of ties to the site/PEER

Among the documents that surfaced with the investigation was an archaeological damage assessment made by a cultural resources management specialist from Buffalo National River. In it that specialist, Dr. Caven Clark, noted damage 2010 from construction of a boardwalk into the the Nazekaw Tenace area of the monument along the Yellow River. The path of the construction, which involved placement of 216 4-foot-deep holes dug for footers, went across the top of a mound, Dr. Clark noted. In a related memo from March 2011, Special Agent Barland-Liles recounted an interview he had with the historic preservation officer for the Sac and Fox Nation of Oklahoma who told him she couldn't understand why the park would build a boardwalk into the Nazekaw Tenace area, saying it was "just wrong."

"Why would they think we would want that there," said the tribal officer, whose name was redacted from the report.

In January 2010, Mr. Quintana, who retired in 2011, wrote Park Service Director Jon Jarvis to inform him that the staff at Effigy Mounds "has been seriously at odds with the intent of the National Environmental Policy Act, and National Park Service policies pertaining to conservation planning and decisionmaking."

While Superintendent Ewing lost her authority under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act over such projects, Regional Director Quintana told the investigator he didn't fire her because he didn't think she had any "devious desire to do something wrong."

From his viewpoint, Superintendent Nepstad said what occurred at Effigy Mounds will be a lasting lesson for the Park Service.

"The actions themselves that led to all of this were unfortunate. I don't think the agency is trying to hide that," he said. "Everybody is disappointed with what happened at Effigy Mounds, and quite frankly it really, truly, and I say this with utter sincerity, it is going to be used, the case history surrounding the activities at Effigy Mounds, are going to be used as a teaching tool all across the National Park Service. The agency in all likelihood will be putting a blue ribbon team together to exhaustively go over what happened here. And what were the root causes, where were the contributing factors, what were the lessons learned that we can teach anybody that works for the National Park Service, whether it's at the park or region or Washington office level to prevent this kind of a thing from ever happening again anywhere."

Although impressed with Superintendent Nepstad -- "He's really wearing a white cowboy hat. He's one of the good guys." -- Mr. Mason said that regaining the Park Service's reputation at the monument will be a challenge.

"I was really proud of being a ranger and my role there. This has really stained, put a bad taste in a lot of people's mouths," said Mr. Mason, who added that the friends group wants the National Park Service's Washington office to "fast-track allocations from D.C. directly to the regional office, this calendar year, for no other purpose to remove all the illegally constructed boardwalks and decks. Clean that park up." 

Featured Article

Comments

ebuck, what I appreciate most about your posts is the spirit of populism. There is another form of measurement you might appreciate in Washington,DC,  in addition to the contributions to labor unions. You should see the wall-to-wall spread of "think tanks," and 'charities,' and associations that have flooded massive amounts of mostly I reportable support dollars. But I think you smart enough and sometimes even disarmingly honest enough to recognize represent the both new Right conservative groups and 1% business leadership. All of whom are skilled and indefatigable craftsmen able to place twists and turns in the CFR that are welcomed by mammoth Christmas bonuses. I used to work on K St. and 17th, but my certain knowledge and confidence in your understanding is further reinforced by a cousin who was Chairman of TWO major top 10 corporations. He was being hit on constantly for many obfusticating layers of these devices for donations. Including the Left, but as I am sure you would understand, overwhelmingly of the Right.  

My personal and legal experience informs me -- as it MUST you -- that regulations are a basic corporate technique to avoid liability.

Plus, with billable hours, attys and consultants for Rightist and corporate accounts are compensated more if they dream up and push regulatory devices the clients didn't even think they needed until this army of predators convinced them they could not live without. The same is true for staff to non-profits like NRA , not because they actually believe 2nd Amend rights are actually threatened, but because keeping everyone in a lather masquerades as indispensability.

So, as once again ebuck, you have piped us away from the primary issue of the health of parks to your favorite corner of topics, I think in one of your flashes of disarming honesty you will concede that our Capital has been transformed since Mr. Reagan from a city of neighborhoods and dinner parties to a sort of running of the Bulls of expense account wielding Rightist flunkeys at restaurants and Clubs. Now DC has strips of buildings in every direction that look like Legos, the right-wing consultant version of the Quonset huts of WW II workers. Don't go to DC if you have sanity to preserve, but if you do go and if any objectivity remains, you will hear from the conversation everywhere that it is a Rightist monoculture. The labor unions are there to create the illusion of political diversity.

    


No d-2 - I don't believe "our Capital has been transformed since Mr. Reagan from a city of neighborhoods and dinner parties to a sort of running of the Bulls of expense account wielding Rightist flunkeys at restaurants and Clubs."  In fact the list I provided Kurt earlier shows that when it comes to political dollars, the leftists dominate the field.  Nor do I believe the "right" as a group have pushed for more regulations.  Certainly there have been nominal Republicans that have done so and they have rightfully been catagorized as RINOs.  In fact it is the rise of such "Republicans" which has given emergence to a true conservative movement known as the Tea Party

Further, I not believe that dollars are the dominant determinate of policy. Instead I lay it on voter apathy and ignorance. 

 


d-2 --

 

Your experience matches mine.  Back before the fools with the tri-corner Lipton-bag hats, in my misguided youth, I was a conservative activist in D.C. I enjoyed expense account lunches at the Palm with oil company lobbyists, dated an NRA lobbyist, even had an hour or two of bliss once with a good time gal provided by an oil company lobbyist making her 'thank you' rounds on an election eve. This was in the glory days of Ford moving towards Reagan, and I met both men. Names and faces I knew then have helped guide policy to aid the businesses and profits of the right wing ever since. To me this isn't history or "document that" or 'show me the links' or whatever - this is people I shared a glass of scotch with, many of whom are still pulling strings.

 

I didn't stick around more than a few years. I developed a conscience, both personal and social, and evolved.  

 

Let's get back to the parks, though. Driving up a pot-hole filled dirt road yesterday to look at a glacier was a more rewarding experience than all those old memories.


So Rick, it sounds to me like Monica L.  may have surpassed you in the DC experience category.  Maybe we should check her conscience epiphany at this point.   

BTW:  Has anyone seen anyone in this administration, anyone on a raft trip, Mule ride, wilderness experience that might show the least bit of real fondness for these great places  beyond Gov't employees unions, radical environental groups and their votes and political contributions?  Please don't count all the Federal owned (and private) golf courses. Even Dick Cheney had more involvment with nature, fly fishing  and in other endeavors although, he needed to improve his hunting skills at one point.   

Yep, I'm going with Monica and her analysis of character in high places:).


Just an FYI, so far the top spenders in the lobby game are Chambers of Commerce. The list can be found here: http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2014&indexType=s.

ec, your list was of political donors, not lobbyists. When discussing lobbying, providing a list of political donors doesn't provide pertinent information.

In spending on lobbying, it doesn't seem to be a red or blue thing; it is a business thing. Pharmaceutical companies, Insurance companies, Defense contractors, Electric Utilities...

****

In reading the report, I am struck by a couple of things:

"[redacted] discussed the implication that EFMO did not deserve a fully committed and professional superintendent."

"[redacted] was sending false reports to the regional office..."

So, it seems that the Peter Principle was not at work here.  Ewing intentionally lied, misrepresented, and acted with malice. I find it fascinating that, in the face of the evidence against her, she is fighting her firing, claiming she is a scapegoat.

 


When discussing lobbying, providing a list of political donors doesn't provide pertinent information.

Actually, my discussion was about too many regulations.  It was Kurt that introduced lobbyest.   And yes, lobbying is a red and blue thing but goes well beyond "business" to include environmental groups, labor unions and advocates for thousands of causes.  But, there is nothing wrong with that.

Do you think those businesses were lobbying for more regulation of their business?


Jarvis is a disgrace to the American public. Thanks to those who drug this desecration into the light (both on the ground and in the media), and in being honest about the episode, at least the new Superintendent got off on the right foot.


Jarvis is a cancer on the NPS.  No doubt about it.  And all his cronies like Dale Ditmanson just followed his crooked lead.  But what can be done?  What will be done?  Nothing.  Absolutely nothing.

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.