You are here

National Park Service Promotes Parks As Economic Engines

Share
Alternate Text
National parks generated $26.5 billion in economic activity last year. Zion National Park contributed $185.5 million/Deby Dixon photo of Zion Canyon

"This property is of no value to the Government."

"...if it cannot be occupied and cultivated, why should we make a public park of it? If it cannot be occupied by man, why protect it from occupation? I see no reason in that."

How times have changed.

Those two statements, the first from U.S. Sen. John Conness in 1864 as he urged the chamber to protect the Yosemite Valley, and the second from Sen. Cornelius Cole in 1872 in opposing legislation to create Yellowstone National Park, painted two of the more glorious units of today's National Park System as worthless tracts of land. Today they are viewed as part of a $26.5 billion economic engine that supports 240,000 jobs and countless businesses, large and small.

While Sen. Conness had to persuade his colleagues that Yosemite was worthless, and Sen. Cole believed Yellowstone to be worthless, today the National Park Service points to the economic worth of the parks.

'œNational parks are often the primary economic engines of many park gateway communities,' Park Service Director Jon Jarvis said last week in announcing the fiscal impacts of the park system. 'œWhile park rangers provide interpretation of the iconic natural, cultural and historic landscapes, nearby communities provide our visitors with services that support hundreds of thousands of mostly local jobs.

"... The big picture of national parks and their importance to the economy is clear,' the director added. 'œEvery tax dollar invested in the National Park Service returns $10 to the U.S. economy because of visitor spending in gateway communities near the 401 parks of the National Park System.'

Lodging is the biggest business in the park system, generating $4.4 billion in economic activity last year, notes the report, 2013 National Park Visitor Spending Effects, Economic Contributions to Local Communities, States, and the Nation. Next in line, not too surprisingly, is dining and drinking (yes, bar drinking), which contributed $2.9 billion.

In 2013, NPS visitors spent a total of $14.6 billion in local gateway communities while visiting NPS lands. These expenditures directly supported over 143 thousand jobs, $4.2 billion in labor income, $6.9 billion in value added, and $11.2 billion in output in the national economy. The secondary effects of visitor spending supported an additional 94 thousand jobs, $5.0 billion in labor income, $8.8 billion in value added, and $15.3 billion in output in the national economy. Combined, NPS visitor spending supported a total of 238 thousand jobs, $9.2 billion in labor income, $15.6 billion in value added, and $26.5 billion in output in the national economy.

Which park system unit contributed the most to that total? The Blue Ridge Parkway, which generated nearly $1 billion ($999.3 million) in business last year, according to the report, followed closely by Great Smoky Mountains National Park with $943.2 million.

The report also noted that overall visitation to the parks was down in 2013, in large part due to the partial government shutdown in October, and due to ongoing impacts from Hurricane Sandy, which swept up the Eastern Seaboard in October 2012.

What was not part of the report, but which would be equally important in assessing the overall value of the National Park System, would be an analysis of the ecological worth of the parks. What value are the forests that act as air and water filters? How important to the nation are the flora and fauna protected by the parks? Let's measure the ecological, and economic, value of coastal wetlands and barrier islands at places such as Everglades National Park, Gulf Islands National Seashore, and Assateague Island National Seashore, that not only provide critical habitat for shorebirds, waterfowl, and fish, but also serve as storm buffers. 

If the Park Service feels it must tout the dollar-impact of the parks to generate Congressional and public support, it could similarly bolster that argument by defining the "natural capital" that resides in the park system.

"Nature has provided ecosystems and their benefits to us for free. However, perhaps because this capital has been provided freely to us, we humans have tended to view it as limitless, abundant, and always available for our use, exploitation, and conversion. The concept of an ecosystem as natural capital can help us analyze the economic behavior that has led to the overuse of so much ecological wealth. If we can understand this behavior better, then perhaps we can find ways to manage and enhance what is left of our natural endowment. -- Edward B. Barbier, Capitalizing on Nature, Ecosystems as Natural Assets.

 

Featured Article

Comments

Eric, you even admit that you like to travel to National Parks. Nature is what people are seeking, and the National Parks are some of the best areas for nature in our country.  There are also many that don't have great acess to natural areas near their homes.  One of the reasons the Smokies region is so popular is that there is around 2 million acres of protected forest in the region from the Cohutta Wilderness up to Southern Virginia.  It's one of the few spots, outside of the Everglades, and some may argue the Adirondacks where you can find anything considerable in size that is protected.  After Orlando, DC, and NY, this area is one of the most popular tourist destinations in the Eastern US, and viewing pure nature is part of that draw.  If these mountains were not protected like that, not many would travel here, as much. Southern West Virginia doesn't have much National Forest, nor a tourist industry, but the terrain is somewhat similar. It's a definite contrast between the two areas.


The parks do spend a lot of time showcasing the importance of ecology, protection of endangered plants and animals, and the value in preserved nature.  I take it many here don't follow the various National Park pages on their social media pages, because that's 99% of their posts.


I'm with Kurt. I'm an idealist. There are things that I  believe in because they are the right thing to do. The National Parks are one of those things. I believe that it is a judge of a nation how much it invests in things that are worthwhile for themselves, with no tangible [dollarable] return.

 

How to pay for them? Oh, there is a long list of ways. After taking care of every veteran, divert some of the money wasted on wars over the past couple of decades and spend it on the parks. Take back the tax breaks given to the oil companies and insurance companies and such, and spend it on the arts. Take back the tax free status of churches and spent the millions gained on feeding the poor and healing the sick and infirm. The parks, like kittens and butterflies, are their own excuse.


I believe that it is a judge of a nation how much it invests in things that are worthwhile for themselves, with no tangible [dollarable] return.

Well said, Rick.  Better than my post above.


Take back the tax breaks given to the oil companies and insurance companies and such,

LOL  Ignorance is bliss.


At CHNSRA the NPS has recently changed policies have negatively impacted economic prosperity of the villages contained within the park. A 35+% decline has been mostly attributed to excessive beach closures. The recent changes include the most popular beach destinations are closed to ALL access during the prime tourism season resulting in dozens of businesses closing, layoffs, and more. The economic engine at CHNSRA has been broken and so has the promises of the NPS. 


NPS stats indicate visitation is only off 4 percent year-to-date through June. Where did you get the 35 percent figure, Beach?

YTD 2014: 933932

YTD 2013: 973,078

https://irma.nps.gov/Stats/SSRSReports/Park%20Specific%20Reports/Monthly...


Beach, NPS shows 2003 visitation at 2.6 million, though 2002 was 2.9 million. Still, using your 35 percent figure, it doesn't work with 2002 figures compared to last year's 2.2 million. (35 percent of 2.9 million is a bit over 1 million)

Nevertheless, how do you differentiate drops in visitation caused by NPS regs and that caused by hurricanes and Highway 12 washouts?


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.