You are here

The Fire Management Program Of The National Park Service: Great Expectations And Limited Results...Why?

Share

Ground fire at Norris Geyser Basin in Yellowstone National Park in August 1988/NPS

Editor's note: In a two-part series, Tom Nichols, who was Chief, Division of Fire and Aviation Management for the National Park Service until his retirement in 2014, examines the agency's guiding fire management plan and the challenges it faces across the National Park System.

A recent article about fire management in the National Park System praised Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks’ wildland fire management program as “America’s most progressive forest management program.” While Kyle Dickman goes on to wonder “why isn’t it being replicated elsewhere?”, the answer isn’t as simple as you might think.

In his article, Fighting Fire with Fire, Dickman suggests the answer to this question can be found in the byzantine agency and interagency fire bureaucracy under which the National Park Service fire management program labors. But more broadly, the fire program is an excellent, and often overlooked, example of the difficulty the NPS faces in translating its philosophy, policies, and mission into results. In short, the degree to which the NPS fire management program falls short in attaining its goals mirrors the struggles the agency experiences in achieving its overall mission “to preserve and protect” park resources.

The roots of the NPS fire management program are found in the 1963 Leopold Report, which noted that the absence of fire can have significant ecological consequences:

When the forty-niners poured over the Sierra Nevada into California, those that kept diaries spoke almost to a man of the wide-spaced columns of mature trees that grew on the lower western slope in gigantic magnificence. The ground was a grass parkland, in springtime carpeted with wildflowers. Deer and bears were abundant. Today much of the west slope is a dog-hair thicket of young pines, white fir, incense cedar, and mature brush—a direct function of overprotection from natural ground fires. Within the four national parks—Lassen, Yosemite, Sequoia, and Kings Canyon—the thickets are even more impenetrable than elsewhere. Not only is this accumulation of fuel dangerous to the giant sequoias and other mature trees but the animal life is meager, wildflowers are sparse, and to some at least the vegetative tangle is depressing, not uplifting. Is it possible that the primitive open forest could be restored, at least on a local scale? And, if so, how? We cannot offer an answer. But we are posing a question to which there should be an answer of immense concern to the National Park Service.

The authors of the Leopold Report point out that the complete suppression of fire in ecosystems that evolved with its influence over thousands of years will result in their degradation. Fire influences every component of ecosystems, including water and air quality, wildlife habitat, plant succession, and soil stability. Altering the fire regime through continuing suppression had, and continues to have, unintended negative consequences for many NPS resources.

Fire occurrence, along with fire frequency, intensity, and severity, can have more significant influences on resources than many other environmental factors combined. Fire exclusion causes substantial changes in wildland fuels characteristics such as species composition, continuity, and loading. Modern wildfire occurring in such altered fuels will burn with intensity far beyond the limits that the ecosystems evolved with and to which they are adapted, which compromises their resiliency.

The Reynolds Creek Fire burned much of the summer of 2015 in Glacier National Park/NPS

The loss of ecologic integrity through fire exclusion, or through unnaturally intense wildfire due to fuel accumulation, is contrary to the NPS mission as stated in its Organic Act: “to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.”

In response to the Leopold Report, and in view of its mission, the NPS established a program to allow lightning-caused fires to burn in specific locations, and to ignite prescribed fires where necessary to restore natural conditions. Beginning in the late 1960s, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks initiated such a program, which has continued with little interruption for nearly 50 years. It should be noted that Everglades National Park had conducted research burns prior to this.

Many other NPS units across the agency, as well as other federal agencies, developed similar programs in subsequent years. This story has been told in many articles and books on the fire history of the United States and the NPS, such as Steve Pyne’s Between Two Fires, Hal Rothman’s Blazing Heritage, and David Carle’s Burning Questions. But in the pursuit of an answer to Kyle Dickman’s question as to why these programs haven’t been fully successful, it is important to note a couple of subtle aspects of the roots of the NPS fire program that are often overlooked in discussions of its history.

First, the fire policy was developed largely unilaterally by the NPS in support of its mission, which is unique among federal agencies. In other words, NPS managers developed NPS fire policies and practices that directly supported the NPS mission. By doing so, the NPS necessarily broke away from an interagency fire management policy which was dominated in the Western states by total fire suppression.

Second, the switch from fire suppression to fire management (defined as a blend of actions including managing lightning-caused fires within designated areas; the use of prescribed fire for hazard reduction and ecosystem restoration and maintenance; and fire suppression) was catalyzed by NPS scientists and natural resource managers with strong interdisciplinary support from rangers, fire staff, interpreters, and superintendents. Given that the stimulus for the change in fire policy and practice was driven primarily by scientists and resource managers, many early prescribed fire programs (e.g., Yosemite and Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks) were housed within the parks’ Division of Resource Management offices (rather than Fire Management offices) until around 1990.

Following the policy change from fire suppression to fire management, the NPS had to figure out how to implement the shift. When one thinks about the NPS fire program, two events often come to mind. In 1988, Yellowstone National Park illustrated vividly the difficulties found in managing, as well as explaining to the media and public, a program that allows some natural fires to burn. And, in 2000, a prescribed fire ignited to restore natural conditions in Bandelier National Monument appeared to escape and burn into Los Alamos. Further information indicated a backfire lit by suppression forces attempting to contain the prescribed fire is actually what escaped and caused the damage to surrounding communities.

The investigative findings following these events reaffirmed the value of the fire management policy, but identified problems in program implementation. As a result, one outcome was substantial funding and staffing increases for the NPS fire program. Approximately 100 permanent jobs were added to the program after the Yellowstone event, allowing many fire positions that had been collateral duty to become full-time, as well as establishment of specialized positions such as prescribed fire specialists. After the 2000 fire season, Congress allocated an additional $1 billion to federal fire agencies’ budgets as part of the new National Fire Plan. The NPS received a portion of that increase, and the fire staff and budget once again increased significantly.

Around 2005, the NPS fuels management program, which funded prescribed fire staff and projects, stood at approximately $33 million, while the preparedness program, which funded fire leadership and operational resources such as engine, hotshot, and helitack crews, also stood at about $33 million. At that time, the NPS fire program contained a rich mixture of highly competent employees involved with fire management operations, planning, environmental compliance, fire effects monitoring, fire ecology research, public communication and education, GIS databases, and smoke management, all in support of fire suppression, natural fire, and prescribed fire operations.

The NPS was funded to a greater degree than ever before to implement a fire management program that supported NPS goals of restoring and maintaining fire-dependent ecosystems and providing protection to fire sensitive resources and communities. In many respects, the funding provided the NPS fire management program with everything it asked for. Yet, in spite of this support, the ecosystem restoration and maintenance piece of the program seems to have stalled, but why?  

Tomorrow: Why has the success of the National Park Service's fire management program stalled?

Tom Nichols retired in 2014 as Chief, Division of Fire and Aviation Management for the National Park Service after a 37-year career. Prior to his position in the national office, he was the Prescribed Fire Specialist for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Fire Management Officer for Yosemite National Park, and Fire Management Officer for the NPS Pacific West Region. Mr. Nichols has a B.S. in chemistry and earth science from the University of California at San Diego, and a M.S. in ecology from San Diego State University. He is married to Barbara Moritsch and lives in Eagle, Idaho.

Featured Article

Comments

The NPS has been a pioneer in accepting and implementing experimental prescribed fire both in the Everglades and Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks. This is in the context though of many of NPS Staff remaining firemanagement charlatans and apathetic toward fire ecological research.
 
The San Jose State University Team of Hartesveldt, Harvey, Shellhammer and Stecker implemented prescribed fire research within selected old growth giant Sequoia stands during the 1960s and their work is one key reason why SEKI has an advanced fire management program today. Clearly, Tom Nichols was an outstanding leadership personality to achieve excellence relative to the failures in other NPS park units.
 
Read to Understand:  Perils of Prescription Fire
 
http://lawschool.unm.edu/nrj/volumes/41/1/02_pyne_perils.pdf
 
During one Fire Management Class held at Marana, Arizona, designed for NPS Managers and Superintendents, one was asked what he wanted from his fire management program:  the reply was "whatever Fire will give us"  When it was pointed out that Fire can give us a "Moonscape" there was still superintendent apathy toward understanding the true meaning of "wildfire on the run."  The Smokey Bear Era was one spelling out the potential devastation caused by fire, but slowly, Drs. Harold Weaver and Biswell among other pioneer fire scientists communicated the ecological values of low intensity under-burning in more open mixed conifer Sierran and Cascadian forests.
 
Now, we are faced with the reality of changing climatic regimes meaning more intense fire behavior and more difficulty containing fire or even implementing prescribed fire under warmer, dryer fuel conditions. The old growth forest fragments now surviving in national parks are being changed by stand replacing fires even those when containment action is undertaken.  Within Crater Lake NP Forests, less old growth forest lives today even knowing such intense old growth stand replacing historical fires occurred on Greyback Ridge over 115 years ago.
 
When Dr. Stephen Pyne was working at Yellowstone NP in 1985, developing a plan to evolve out of a total fire suppression organization into a fire management program linked to fire knowledge in the adjacent national forests, his proposal was ignored by YELL Management.  During the summer of 1988, the world witnessed the results of little serious fuel moisture monitoring of early summer fire  ignitions when small fires could have been contained (staff calling them "natural and ecologically important" without consulting USFS Fire Scientists early)  providing critical time for them to exponentially grow under surprisingly dry fuel moisture conditions.   
 
Sadly, The NPS has failed in many parks by promoting fire management charlatans to key natural resource positions.  Some Park superintendents have little understanding or respect for Scientific Research and applied scientific project implementation. They tolerate programs as long as they do not become controversial fearing politically negative reporting.  After all, when your key focus as superintendent is to put your time in at the highest graded executive managerial levels prior to a very well paid retirement, Why Play with Fire ?
 
Now, after 30 years since Dr. Alston Chase published, Playing God in Yellowstone, 1986, once a banned book in YELL, it's time to reconsider the errors of past managers and implement a new era of  "Playing God as Respected  Fire Managers"


One recommended prerequisite to understand Earth's Fire and Human Cultures, is to Listen carefully to the prolific cultural fire author
Stephen  Pyne tell the Story:
 
http://longnow.org/seminars/02016/feb/09/fire-slow-fire-fast-fire-deep/


Thank you Traveler for the informative series on  prescribed fire. 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.