You are here

Coalition To Protect America's National Parks Has List Of Suggestions For Trump Administration

Share

Investments in the National Park System, from whittling away at the $11.9 billion maintenance backlog to adding personnel and forging strategic partnerships, are among the suggestions the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks has forwarded to the Trump administration.

The Coalition, made up of more than 1,100 former National Park Service employees, laid out the suggestions in a transition paper for the new president. In prefacing its suggestions, the Coalition pointed out that the national parks carry an estimated $32 billion economic benefit to local communities, and that tourism expenditures support more than 295,000 jobs.

The Coalition's suggestions contained in the paper are:

Invest in Park Infrastructure

A major reinvestment in our national parks is long overdue. High visitor demand and aging infrastructure is catching up with the park system. The service has a staggering inventory of 86,000 assets, many of them priceless treasures, and manages over 84 million acres of land.

Much of the existing park infrastructure is over 50 years old. The cost of rehabilitation or replacing visitor facilities, water systems, roadways and bridges, and restoring historic properties is estimated in the billions of dollars. The fact is - funding for the parks has not kept pace with the growth in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the expansion of the park system now numbering 417 park units, and the increases in visitation.

There are significant opportunities to develop innovative funding approaches including public/private partnerships, skilled job training programs, and leveraging funding from the philanthropic sector. However, public investment is an essential part of rebuilding the infrastructure of our parks. Such an investment would provide multiple benefits: supporting the tourism industry that is lifeblood of many states and local communities, providing jobs in both the construction and specialized crafts sector, and leaving a tangible legacy for future generations.

Recommendations:

  • Tackle non-transportation infrastructure needs by increasing appropriation over 3 years to a total of $750 million.
  • When the Highway Trust Fund is reauthorized, the National Park Service portion should be raised to $750 million.
  • Protect the investment in park infrastructure by doubling the budget for repair, rehabilitation and cyclic maintenance from $200 million to $400 million annually.
  • Take advantage of the public/private partnerships opportunities presented by the historic leasing program as a way to rehabilitate historic buildings that are a significant portion of the park system’s deferred maintenance inventory.

Protect and Maintain Our Parks

As the popularity of the parks as a tourism destination rises, the agency must respond to challenges beyond just investing in infrastructure. More national park rangers are required to meet the needs of visitor use and protection as well as to respond to emergencies and a prolonged fire season. Additional maintenance staff is needed to prevent future deterioration of park facilities and to care for any new investments. The people and funding to meet these needs have been lost in all park areas of operation -maintenance, interpretation, resource management, and visitor protection. Since 2001 the National Park Service operational budget has been reduced by approximately $500 million dollars. At the park level this translates into a loss of park staff of approximately 1,500 fulltime employees.

Recommendation:

  • Propose restoring staff levels to, at a minimum, their FY 2010 levels, more than 10% above 2015 staffing levels.

Partnership Opportunities

The National Park Service has an opportunity to leverage the park experience by effectively using its longstanding programs that support the work of its state partners as well as private landowners and community conservation organizations. The NPS can use its iconic brand, its powerful interpretive messages, and its many well-regarded partnership programs to offer healthy outdoor recreation, tell America’s stories, and enhance economic vitality in states and local communities.

For these reasons it is important to fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund. Funded from offshore oil and gas receipts, non-taxpayer dollars, this program assists in the conservation of critical federal lands for resource conservation and supports state partners in the planning and development of parks and other recreational assets. In our national parks these funds can be used to acquire inholdings and fill in mandated park boundaries to protect resources and benefit the visiting public. At the state level, the fund has leveraged millions of dollars, created thousands of local parks, and conserved land for outdoor sports and public recreation.

Recommendation:

  • Full funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund to complete national parks and to support state initiatives for open space conservation and recreation.

Fully and Permanently Fund the National Historic Preservation Fund 

The Historic Preservation Fund uses receipts from offshore oil and gas receipts, non-tax payer dollars, to partner with States and Tribes to provide cost effective preservation strategies. This includes the Historic Tax Credit, which over the past three decades has created 2.3 million jobs, leveraged $117 billion in investment, and rehabilitated more than 41,250 buildings. Investments in historic preservation help conserve historic properties and revitalize both our urban and rural communities.

Recommendation:

  • Full funding for the Historic Preservation Fund to help recognize, preserve, and utilize our nation’s historic resources for community revitalization.

Pass Program Legislation and Fund the National Heritage Areas

The National Heritage Area approach has a 30-year track record of developing strong regional partnerships for resource conservation and community prosperity. Today there are 49 National Heritage Areas from Alabama to Alaska. Program legislation has been introduced with bipartisan support for over a decade and now is the time to make a push for its passage.

Recommendations:

  • Funding should be maintained at the congressionally appropriated levels of $19.3 million in FY 2017 with increases in the future to support the growth of the program.
  • Support the passage of program authorization for National Heritage Areas.

Support Strategic Partnerships Around Recreation and Trails

Programs like the National Scenic and Historic Trails and the Rivers, Trails and Conservation program reach out and connect partners across the country around the idea of recreational access and resource conservation.

Recommendation:

  • Target the benefits of this program to work with partners at federal, state and local level to improve community recreation and resource conservation.

Effective Leadership and Development

As the National Park Service enters a new century of protecting and managing our nation’s precious natural and cultural resources, clearly dramatic Human Resource and training/development changes will need to be instituted to meet future needs, continuing to ensure our nation’s national parks continue to be “America’s best idea.” Our recommendations are as follows:

Hire and Develop a Workforce Reflective of the Strength and Diversity of America

Analyze current workforce and devise methods for transitioning to a workforce reflective of the country’s diversity. Reinstate the HBCU partnerships. Establish partnerships to transition hiring practices. Support and develop new hires by grounding in NPS law, regulations and policy, as well as overall orientation to NPS.

Ensure Supervisors and Managers Receive Necessary Fundamental Training/Development

Identify areas of development to include essential Human Resource management/regulations, grounding in law/ regulations/policies, to enable managers to provide the training/development to their employees, continue new Superintendents course/roundtable, expanding to include potential future leaders. Provide employees with overall mission and purpose training (currently Park Rangers receive significant training, but exclusively in law enforcement).

Provide Orientation Training for All Employees to Include Mission and Purpose, as well as Expectation of Employees

Park Superintendents and Managers have been elevated without basic knowledge of leadership responsibility, government, laws, regulations and policies covering the National Park Service and other environmental laws. This knowledge should be instilled at the beginning of employment and throughout one’s career and required when one is considered for supervisory and leadership positions.

Review Organizational Structure

Consolidating specialty functions at the Central Office level has proven counterproductive. Review the organization and revamp to ensure human resource, administrative, investigative functions are close to the field level. This will allow the immediate addressing, investigation and correction of problems within the organization.

Zero Tolerance means Zero Tolerance

Clearly, this has not been the policy with current management. Managers are responsible for disciplining and removing employees for misconduct and poor performance using appropriate tools. All managers need to receive training/ development to equip them to address and correct employee misconduct/poor performance.

Utilize Partnerships to Achieve Goals

The Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks, as well as other organizations (Outdoor Afro, Next 100 Coalition, Hispanic Access Foundations, Latino Outdoors, etc.), are natural partners for achieving leadership and development excellence. The Coalition is comprised of many senior (retired) NPS managers who are able to mentor and develop new managers and provides short-term coverage for vacant managerial positions.

Ensure Director, Regional Directors and Senior Leaders Understand Expectations

The senior leadership of the National Park Service should be setting the example of bold leadership. Resources should and must be protected. Laws must be followed. These expectations must be reinforced in future management.

Featured Article

Comments

Come on, people.

Where is the thrill? Why no sense of uplift? There is no vision in this piece.

Who writes this stuff? Who possibly is the audience? It is so full of jargon, foggy outcomes.  Read just about any sentence.

Nearly every cloudy point is then climaxed by a funding request.  Every agency wants more money.  Lists like this make eyes blur in Congress or the White House or the Secretary's office.   

The point is not to ask for the money. The point is to lay out a program so exciting that decision makers really get caught up in the ambition to make things happen. No one dumps money on an agency for nebulous, jargony goals. But the real decision makers are happy to spend when they can see a decisive change happens because of what they do. 

But it does not look like this is written for anybody who can make things happen. It looks like it is written to themselves. With all the Interpretive talent in the NPS there must be someone who can make it sing.

And Megaera and some of the writers are wrong that a National Park program cannot command support from this congress or this Secretary or this President. The guy says he wants 'to make America Great Again.' And he can't be inspired to give the parks a lift? Parks give you the easiest headline of any US Government agency. They are like the postcard of American greatness.

and ECBuck is wrong about checks. A one hundred dollar check, to organize the right event with the right group of constituents can always turn the right Congress man or woman around.

And Eugene H Edwards makes the same tired and wrong old statement about new park. That is not where the money is. 


I would suggest that the Administration, and the President, tell the truth. For a change. It is hard to work on expectations with a pathological liar in charge.


Many good points there, d2.  Especially the idea of leading with exciting ideas.  But these days, exciting ideas have to compete with Reality TV and big sporting events to meet the short attention spans of too many Americans.


d-2 You are absolutely Mr. Sunshine.  So you think adding Stonegate was a great idea or a plum for the New York congressman?


My wish list is for IRAN to give back those plane loads of Gold and International Currencies (Billions) that the previous POTUS sent over under cover of darkness and without Congress authorizing, to NPS.  Great idea, no?  All they're using it for is to kill Americans, Jews and share power in Syria with that nasty Putin.  Trumps's friend, right.  LOL.  

NPS, better get your own house in order.  Trump will help whether you like it or not.


Well Lee Dalton, you are right about Reality TV. But for a government agency, the parks punch way above their weight. Whenever there is a Govt shutdown, you see parks on TV. Even the Tea Party congressmen to get the attention they weren't getting during the shutdown had to act out on the National Mall at the WW II Memorial and try to call out a Ranger, just to get screen time.

Same thing when Republican committees tried to recover their reputation with women.

To exploit sexual harassment, with all the agencies and the military services as potential strawdogs,  who to pick as a target?  By calling out only 1/100th of the 410 national parks as hotbeds of harassmen, otherwise anonymous sleezeball committee chairmen with single digits approval ratings can get headlines from coast to coast by saying the whole park service has "toxic culture!"

And when Trump wanted to announce he actually had substantive policy positions in his platform, he actually went to Gettysburg to read a briefing paper.

And even if Rick B. is on to something about lies, pathological or strategic, as more Americans cry out for simple honesty there will be nothing more genuine than the national parks.

 


Well Eugene H Edwards, you seem to think parks are like shopping malls or (jeepers, you actually said this !) like retail stores ! Set 'em up or shut 'em down based on your business plan? 

Or when you bring up "Stonegate" [sic] [actually Stonewall], now you are sounding like the real issue is you just don't like that National Monument, maybe you don't like the History it represents or the untold story it tells?? Is that actually the problem, Eugene H Edwards?

And do you really know anything about whether the local congressman really was the driver behind declaring this National Historical Landmark a National Monument?

Because, just guessing here, my guess is you and trailsadvocate are, like the radical Right and Dr Runte, just using the "no money" rationalization as a phony cover for just not liking a Park System that tells the WHOLE story of American History.

Because parks are nothing like Radio Shacks, it will dazzle you to learn. Parks express Meaning that matters to the American people. Place matters to people, there is something holy in the meaning of places that get to the essence of what it means to be American.

because Stonewall will probably end up costing about 3 FTEs, out of the 70,000 jobs in the Department of the Interior. And if you look at the actual funding box the NPS is in  "Interior and related agencies" that includes the Smithsonian, the National Endowment of Arts & of the Humanities, the US Forest Service, and more. 3 FTEs is nothing. The park will not need to pay anything new for a superintendent or bookkeeper because it is managed by the group that already manages all the national parks in Manhattan like Grants Tomb or Alexander Hamilton's house or TR's birthplace. The NPS will not need to own the building or operate the building. 

And as far as who wanted it: years ago the NPS pushed to assess its national significance and established as a Landmark.  It might have gone right past you, but since 2004 when George Bush tried to emphasize opposition to "Gay Marriage " there has been a nationwide backlash from LGBT people and those who think they have been treated unjustly, and Stonewall represented to those people the determination not to take it any more.

and thus like "Brown vs Board of Education " or the "Everglades" or "Gettysburg", these parks represent turning points in American History where neglected stories or resources or definition of justice turned fundamentally.

And although the insights of many including Eugene H Edwards that establishing a park is just another retail decision to set up another outlet, to the Americans who see deep meaning in American History or Sense of American Places, each park is an irreplaceable part of the essence of who we are and what got us this far.

PS: Just in hopes that truth matters, trailsadvocate, The USA did not give Iran American money. America locked up money Iran had deposited in America, until Iran agreed to stop building atom bombs. They agreed to stop and to let us check to make sure they did stop, and we released the money that we hmeld over their heads until they agreed.

 

 

 


There are aspects of NPS that I and many others find troubling.  I, like most on here atribute these wild places to transformational and resatorative experiences whether the wild places are Parks or not.  I have a couple of generations of DNA in my veins that have great attachment to and contributions to the National Parks.  I just don't fall into the modern Liberal, often "extreme" narrative when throwing derogatory descriptions toward people that have a great deal more equity, personal and otherwise in operating in and with nature.  Altogether to much politics and political operatives, with exceptions, making careers and their own fortunes driving a narative that is in the big picture hurtful to people and the country.

The Iran agreement:  Does anyone really believe the agreement will stop the bomb building and the threats to Americans, the Middle East and especially Israel?  Believe also there was ransom paid, not with American Dollars but with foreign currencies because Obama would have had to get Congress to agree, can't have that.  Im refering to the US sailors that Iran hyjacked.  I guess we have our own facts but there is real out there.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.