You are here

Congresswoman Calls For Investigation Into Handling Of Dog Regulations At Golden Gate National Recreation Area

Share

A congresswoman from California has called on the Interior Department's Office of Inspector General to look into "improper and potentially illegal" actions by National Park Service employees involved in development of a Dog Management Plan at Golden Gate National Recreation Area.

Park Service officials earlier this week placed a hold on the off-leash regulations, both because members of Congress had asked for a waiting period on approval of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and because a former employee had used personal email for official communications related to the Dog Management Plan planning process. The agency said it would conduct an independent inquiry into whether personal email was used in a manner that is at odds with applicable laws and policies, and if so, whether its use affected the planning and rulemaking processes. 

Park officials also wanted to delay action on the FEIS so they could review these emails to see if they were pertinent to a Freedom of Information Act request targetting the decision-making process.

U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier, a Democrat representing San Francisco, on Tuesday announced that she had asked the Inspector General's Office to look into the use of a personal email account during the planning process.

“I am shocked, but unfortunately not surprised to find out the leadership of the (Golden Gate NRA) conspired to mobilize opposition to counter the voices of citizens with whom they disagreed," the congresswoman charged. "The emails, uncovered through the FOIA process, reveal that the personal email account of a high-ranking NPS (Golden Gate) employee was used to deliberately hide a preordained decision to orchestrate a campaign to mobilize citizens opposed to off-leash dog areas. Their actions corrupted what should have been a fair and impartial public process. That is why today I called on the Inspector General to immediately, fully, and openly investigate this breach of the public’s trust. I also am calling on the NPS to rescind the Dog Management Plan because of the tainted process.”

According to the representative, the personal emails that the Park Service publicly released this week "clearly show that this employee was using his personal email to inappropriately coordinate with special interest groups. Examples ... include:

"1. The employee sent documents to advocacy groups, and told them to respond only to his home email address. The employee marked this correspondence CONFIDENTIAL.

"2. The employee solicited particular viewpoints to submit public comments.

"3. The employee may have engaged in prohibited grassroots lobbying by advising advocacy groups on how to communication with Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi.

"4. The employee coordinated with groups on their advocacy materials.

"5. The employee advised advocacy groups on media strategy."

Rep. Speier said she wanted the IG to investigate the matter because "an internal inquiry staffed by NPS employees cannot be truly independent as the NPS claims."

Comments

Thank you Representative Speier. As a native San Franciscan I grew up walking my dogs on the beaches of San Francisco. I have been involved in the Dog Management Plan through two beloved dogs' lives. The process has been a sham since inception. At each meeting the tone of the NPS has been condescending and ineffectual. We have written letters, marched, contributed to the legal fees, raised funds for  "dog showers"-which by the workmanship of the GGNRA contractors mostly did not operate. I have been accosted by rangers to instruct me that my dog should not nibble beach grass on the beach. Each version of the "Plan" has dismissed our needs as daily users of Ft. Funston and Crissy Field and responsible dog owners. None of the findings in the FOIA surprise me one bit. The GGNRA has restricted our urban open space tremendously. The restrictions to "protect" the Snowy Plover are overreaching. Lets be clear, this is a non-nesting bird whose numbers were depleted in the early 1900's by hungry people.No data has ever proven dogs were involved and yet huge swaths of Ocean Beach and Crissy Field are now off-limits to humans and dogs.  In my youth we ran and played in the bluffs of Funston-my son does not have this opportunity. Our dogs are well cared for and well exercised and our spirits soar as we enjoy the beach,rain or shine, every day. I am grateful for all the volunteers, attorneys and lawmakers who are standing up to the NPS. In turn,I am greatly saddened that the Federal employees have so disrespected the citizens of San Francisco.  

Anne ODriscoll


Congressional Oversight of the GGNRA has been a hallmark request of Ocean Beach Dog for quite some time: http://oceanbeachdog2.home.mindspring.com/id23.html

Thomas Roop

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.