Visitor Center
Copyright 2005-2009
National Park Advocates LLC
Follow the Traveler
Recent comments
- Lynn Berk on Is This the Most Unique Job in the National Park Service?
6 hours 36 min ago - lacey on The Pacific Northwest Trail Will Establish Important Linkages
7 hours 34 min ago - Marshall Dillon on True Tales From the National Parks: Get Me Off Devils Tower!
9 hours 35 min ago - beschundler on National Park Service Director Jarvis Reminds Employees To Be Ethical in All They Do
10 hours 2 min ago - Bruce on True Tales From the National Parks: Get Me Off Devils Tower!
12 hours 8 min ago - Bruce on Backup Maintenance Could Take the Traveler Down Tonight
12 hours 27 min ago - Edmund Fitzgerald Service on History Abounds in the Waters Surrounding Isle Royale National Park
12 hours 44 min ago - y_p_w on True Tales From the National Parks: Get Me Off Devils Tower!
15 hours 3 min ago - haunted hiker on National Park Service Director Jarvis Reminds Employees To Be Ethical in All They Do
15 hours 35 min ago - Kurt Repanshek on True Tales From the National Parks: Get Me Off Devils Tower!
15 hours 42 min ago









Anonymous (not verified)
If the population was too high to support them, then a natural reduction is better than a planned hunt. It seems the mechanism to adjust population to the terriortory by natural means is in effect.
Many animals die from distemper. If you want a wild population that means you do not vaccinate.
Vaccination in human population areas by leaving out food with rabies vaccination is done to reduce rabies in rabbits, foxes and skunks to name a few and to reduce the possibilty of contamination into pets such as cats and dogs.
In a park are it is not ecofriendly to vaccinate wild animals.