Recent comments

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    As a South Dakota born citizen, Mount Rushmore is a fitting monument to make a declaration that immediate change and action is needed to prevent global climate catastrophe. The point of the action is clear: What monument will we leave for future generations?

  • Survey Says National Park Service Is Far from the Best Government Agency to Work For   5 years 19 weeks ago

    My interview mentioned above is for a LE position. Do you guys think that a full time LE position is worth persuing? Or am I going to end up working for another gov agency with nepotism? How many hours does a LE ranger normally work? I'm getting out of a career where I make around 70k but work 60 hours a week. To me the trade off between a life and money just isn't worth it.

    Any thoughts?

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Kurt, I'm a skeptic, which means I haven't decided. To me, the science is highly questionable and even more questionable is the political massaging going on from the left, the government, and the media. I admit that it's possible humans arewarming the planet, but there is a mountain of evidence to the contrary. But for a moment, let's assume that humans are warming the planet; then what? Is government the answer? History has shown otherwise. There are far better ways to go about fighting this perceived threat than coercive government measures, a tax on production, and the possibility of increased political and corporate corruption and collusion in carbon trading. Better ways include letting the free market allocate resources toward climate change technology and flipping the switch and individuals divorcing themselves from carbon creation. However, the liberal urban elite feel guilty about the high standard of living they enjoy, but instead of giving it up (who can blame them?), they demand action, mainly in the form of coercive government control and taxes which disproportionately harm the poor and middle class. If "you" should happen to fall into that demographic, try not to take it personally. This comment, however, is directed at you: Certainly as a journalist you learned to avoid logical fallacies such as argumentum ad populum, an appeal to the majority. The majority of people on the planet once believed the Earth was the center of the universe. Just because a majority believes something, that don't make it so.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Greenpeace is well known for staging the wild & wacky. I live near D.C. and they routinely show up at protests, usually costumed as the critter of the hour. Their favorite activities include the usual march and chant, street theatre, blocking Metro stations at rush hour, bizarre stunts, and burning effigies. It's all very entertaining but often seems shallow and shrill. There's so much hullabaloo the true message gets lost. And what we need now is clarity. The IPCC report spells it all out very well without all the extra noise.

    Greenpeace could have gotten a good photo op at Mt. Rushmore and gotten their point across without risking life and limb. I'd be interested to know how they managed to bypass security; it seems someone did his homework. I hope we can all agree that what they did was colossally stupid and reckless in the extreme.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Once again the enviornmentalist have shown how far out of touch they are. They scream and whine file frivolous lawsuit because the bleeding heart liberals have set up so they can do it at no cost to them. They are destroying the world with their stupidity. If they as I am were conservationists and wanted to use our natural resources in a proper way we would all be better off.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Jim, I agree that people should have the right to voice their opinions, but shouldn't that be done in a place that they are responsible for? Why do they, or anyone who does something similar, think it is ok to use public dollars, public places, or other places that I happen to pay for? I am a conservative and think everyone should choose their places carefully for their protests. If they would have fallen, they would have sued the US for their injuries. Fair? I think not.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Frank, are you still a school teacher? Where's your analytical, open-minded approach?

    As for the AP story, how could a 2007 report be reported on by the AP in 1997? Furthermore, the language I offered you came from the latest IPCC website and is not interpreted by anyone else but rather from the horse's mouth, as it were, so it's not been filtered or massaged.

    As for your link about IPCC admitting they could be wrong, my reading of that site you linked to seems to indicate you're taking things a tad out of context to forward your position. Rather, the author of that post -- Roy W. Spencer -- makes that inference, which you repeat. Again, massaging the message. Frankly, I don't think you could find any scientist who would guarantee something 100 percent, unless it's that they'll die some day, and then they would make that posthumously via a close relative.

    More specifically to the 90% likelihood that humans are driving climate change, here's a tidbit from www.realclimate.org (granted, from February 2007):

    The conclusion that large-scale recent warmth likely exceeds the range seen in past centuries has been extended from the past 1000 years in the TAR (Third Assessment Report), to the past 1300 years in the current (ie. 4th assessement) report, and the confidence in this conclusion has been upped from “likely” in the TAR to “very likely” in the current report for the past half millennium. This is just one of the many independent lines of evidence now pointing towards a clear anthropogenic influence on climate, but given all of the others, the paleoclimate reconstructions are now even less the central pillar of evidence for the human influence on climate than they have been incorrectly portrayed to be.

    Finally, first you imply that I'm a hypocrite, and now imply that I'm a fundamentalist. Or, to cover your bases, you're using the editorial "you," and not directing it directly at me. But I digress. I think the science is well-founded that humans are driving climate change; right now we're mainly quibbling over the percentages.

    As I noted in an earlier comment, If you believe that tens of thousands of scientists are colluding in a massive conspiracy, nothing anyone can say is likely to dissuade you.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    God bless these brave Greenpeace folks.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    "Frank, please tell me that I'm confused..."

    You're confused. Try to find a class on Austrian economics at your community college to help enlighten you. Or better yet, save the money and read Rothbard.

    Kurt, a 2007 UN (IPCC) report in 1997 showed, according to the Associated Press, that "[w]orld sea levels will keep rising for more than 1,000 years even if governments manage to slow a projected surge in temperatures this century blamed on greenhouse gases...". I misspoke and retract "global warming" and insert "some of global warming's predicted effects".

    The methods you quote from the UN all require heavy-handed central planning, coercion, and is largely one big pipe dream (we are technologically many decades away from replacing fossil fuels). This is feel-good, non-scientific, greenwashed mumbo jumbo.

    And finally, IPCC admits that they could be wrong about humans causing global warming. If you are unwilling to admit that humans are not causing global warming, then you are a fundamentalist. And fundamentalists of any stripe pose a significant danger to liberty.

  • Reader Participation Day: What Would You Like to See Added to the National Park System?   5 years 19 weeks ago

    My comment relates to the wilderness areas associated with many national parks. I love backpacking in these wilderness areas. In the last few decades however, the wilderness areas have been invaded by packtrain operators. Packtrains carry 20 to 40 persons into the wilderness. These people know little about living in the wilderness, therefore they are messy and do not take care of their food. As a result, the wilderness areas have become overpopulated with scavenging bears.

    I would like all pack and riding animals banned from wilderness areas. This would greatly reduce the human impact on these wilderness areas.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    >>the IPCC determined it is likely that nothing we do now can stop or even slow future warming.<<

    Frank, got a source for that? Here's what I found on the IPCC site:

    Renewable energy resources can play a key role in meeting the growing energy demand while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As shown in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, in association with energy-efficiency measures, they can make a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation as early as 2030.The Special Report on “Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation” aims to provide a better understanding and broader information on the mitigation potential of renewable energy sources: technological feasibility, economic potential and market status, economic and environmental costs&benefits, impacts on energy security, co-benefits in achieving sustainable development, opportunities and synergies, options and constraints for integration into the energy supply systems and in the societies. It will also assess resources by region and impacts of climate change on these resources.

    That certainly sounds like it's highly likely we can turn things around....if we have the desire;-)

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    The global warming cult almost rivals the geocentric views held by the holy [Catholic] Church during the Dark Ages. Galileo was punished. Are global warming skeptics next?

    Frank, please tell me that I'm confused when I interpret this to mean that you're suggesting that those who disagree with the IPCC will be subjected to the sort of horrors that my church perpetrated during the Middle Ages or that you're comparing those with your belief to Galileo. I'm hoping this is hyperbole on your part...

    And I would pose another question: Ignore the idea of human-caused climate change, and the predictions of global doom, then ask yourself: Should we be blowing up the Appalachian mountains in search of cheap coal, a fuel that is cited as a cause of climate change? Can we afford to? Is the stopping of mountaintop removal mining, something that I know all too well, having lived my life among it (the Kingston/TVA ash spill last December was less than a half-hour drive from home), not worth our time and attention?

    If cap and trade, and the resulting decrease in carbon-belching, mountain-destroying, filthy coal plants, stops Big Coal from running roughshod over Appalachia, then more power to President Obama. I'll pay through the nose for the safety of my friends and neighbors rather than watch our land blown up and our homes swept away by toxic sludge again.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Doctrines indeed. The global warming cult almost rivals the geocentric views held by the holy Church during the Dark Ages. Galileo was punished. Are global warming skeptics next?

    Since Kurt is "fairly comfortable with the IPCC's conclusions", logically, he must denounce the cap and trade bill because the IPCC determined it is likely that nothing we do now can stop or even slow future warming.

    Cap and trade is a production tax, one we can ill afford.

  • Reader Participation Day: What Would You Like to See Added to the National Park System?   5 years 19 weeks ago

    An Ancient Forest National Park is proposed for Northern California and Southern Oregon to biologically join together wilderness areas, roadless areas, a national recreation area and wild and scenic rivers into one cohesive land management unit for the protection of ancient forest plants, animals and fish. The proposal is to set aside a solid block of land approximately 2.5 million acres from the Rogue River in Oregon to the Trinity River in California. It will forever allow the free migration of species from the coast and Redwood National Park to semi arid inland canyons. The park would include already established wilderness areas and already designated critical wildlife areas along with unprotected roadless areas. Very few of the acres included are private land and most of it is very steep and uninhabited. The area proposed as Ancient Forest National Park is vast, but for the survival of species in this era of climate change and major fires, it needs to be. There has to be room for the constant change in habitat types that comes with what is truly wild. The Kalmiopsis area was burned almost in its entirety in one summer season and much of the Trinity Alps forests burned in two summer events, and the Marble Mountain Wilderness was half burned the summer of 2008 along with the Ukonom Creek and Dillon Creek Roadless areas. There is no time to waste because climate change is happening right now and animals and plants and fish in this ancient forest are stressed. In fact, outside of the park proposal, much of what was here when white-man came to the West is now gone for good. The Ancient Forest National Park would include the most rugged and scenic remnant of what was a coast to coast wilderness not long ago. The reason this area has survived in tact is because people have fought and fought again for its preservation. A major part of the landscape proposed as Ancient Forest National Park has been set aside in a piecemeal fashion with no thought given to species migration.

    It's time to join all those pieces together now.

    Please visit http://www.ancientforestnationalpark.org/

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    And by the way, has anyone actually "proved" that there is man made global warming besides the guy that invented the internet?

    I'd say that most readers of this site would view a global warming "non-believer" as a sort of modern day Philistine. Man-made (oh, I mean non-gender specific "human created") climate change is just one of the many new quasi-religious doctrines of the post-modern era that sit at the right hand of the politically correct Gods, along with worship of the nation-state and the infallibility of mob ruled democracy. The mere questioning of these doctrines is an invitation to ridicule and worse.

  • Reader Participation Day: What Would You Like to See Added to the National Park System?   5 years 19 weeks ago

    I used to live in Colorado, but now live in Maine (where I grew up), so have a good perspective on both of those areas. I would love to see more of the Colorado and Utah's Bureau of Land (Mis)management (BLM) lands added to our national park system, as well as some Forest Service lands. There are so many areas, especially around Moab and in Southern Utah, that are being very poorly managed by these agencies. These areas are very fragile, and are unique and valuable habitat, and scenically they can't be beat. Management may improve with our new administration, but it can then be poorly managed again by a subsequent one. National Park status would confer additional protections beyond what they have now.

    I don't think that a Maine Woods National Park is the best way to preserve our Maine woods. Currently it is managed with varying degrees of competence and incompetence, depending on the current landowner (mostly paper companies and REITs masquerading as paper companies). But the national park system does not manage remote lands very well either, bringing in lots of roads, RV camping areas, etc... In Maine we have Baxter State Park, which is managed very well, with resource protection being the primary focus and recreaation a secondary focus. I would like to see this expand considerably to encompass the lands currently under consideration for the Maine Woods National Park.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    People looking for attention do stupid things sometimes. And by the way, has anyone actually "proved" that there is man made global warming besides the guy that invented the internet?

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Beamis, while I appreciate the elevated stature you've given me -- "Even Kurt Repanshek is on board..." -- I think you've taken my declaration just a tad out of context. That context, if you read my entire comment, does contain a dose or two of sarcasm. That said, yes, I'm fairly comfortable with the IPCC's conclusions given the global scrutiny they receive.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Al Gore says this battle is the same as fighting Hitler, so what's wrong with using four dead American presidents in granite to take up the cause against such a readily apparent EVIL? Even Kurt Repanshak is on board with his recent declaration that "I've pledged blind faith to the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, a scientific body comprised of some of the best scientific minds in the world, one that is said to reflect the consensus of the international scientific community, one that publishes reports -- based on peer-reviewed studies, mind you -- only after they are gone through line by line and word by word and approved by all member countries."

    What more do you need? This is a fight against a global evil. Get on board or live with the guilt of your inaction for the rest of your life. It would be like anti-Nazis hijacking a New York Yankees game in 1939 and spreading a banner across the scoreboard to bring attention to the impending Holocaust in Nazi Germany. You'd say "what does enjoying baseball and Lou Gehrig have to do with Hitler?". The very fate of the Jews in Nazi occupied Europe would have depended on your awareness and support. So what gives?

    Is this any different? Or is it even more of a grave threat to human existence?

    After all we're talking about the fate of a planet! So you say Mount Rushmore is off limits????!!!!

    REALLY?????

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Looks like the protest worked; we're all talking about it. I'm not a fan of Greenpeace (not because they are too far left, but because they often are very poor at solidarity with other groups - see "Whale Wars" for a good example) but good for them. Since Mt. Rushmore is about "tourist dollars and honoring expansionist leaders," then I don't really see the harm. I suspect they thought the place relevant because it has to do with presidents, and they were getting a message to the president.

    Absurd in most respects? You bet. That's what the voice of reason has been reduced to on a lot of questions of injustice. People protest and raise their voices loudly, obnoxiously, and provocatively when they feel there is no real conversation, no real seat at the table for what's right.

    Jim Macdonald
    The Magic of Yellowstone
    Yellowstone Newspaper
    Jim's Eclectic World

  • Reader Participation Day: What Would You Like to See Added to the National Park System?   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Interesting topic. A little while back I read a book called "Cities of Gold" where the author (D. Preston) traveled through the southwest re-tracing (or attempting to) Coronado's journey beginning in SW Arizona to Pecos. In it he talks with a lot of people in the southwest, and I have to admit I gained some appreciation about why there is opposition to some of the federal agencies' management of lands there. The complaints in this case seem primarily directed at the USFS, but I think they apply to other agencies too. In general I would say I sympathized with some specific complaints about management, but also generally about how it impacts an entire lifestyle for people out there. Now of course someone's lifestyle has to be balanced against other concerns too, such as conservation/preservation of what could otherwise be lost forever. We also have a guy at the National Park Travelers' Club who's working on a new ethic of management within the BLM that sounds like it strives to be more attentive to local concerns while still achieving some preservation. If that's more realistic than for example making it a national park, then maybe that's a good thing to go that route. I don't know too much of the details, but check out "The National Landscape Conservation System" for more info.

    That said, Google "rock crawling" and you'll see something that concerns me a lot. I'm from Wisconsin and needless to say I don't think we have this activity where I come from (though we do have our own challenges), but I think I can safely say that such high impact activities run counter to the goals of conservation in the minds of many and I think there are things which are so high impact that you might just want to say no, but I'll see if any rock crawlers here can make their case...

    But in any case, NPS management does invariably mean more people coming to visit. While USFS may have some different rules and a different ethic, they also mean less visitation which may sometimes be a good thing.

    As for Mount St. Helens, I am not quite sure about all that NPS management would entail, but I thought that it actually had too many visitors centers already, including several private ones which have their own pros and cons. But I don't necessarily think that the one that closed was needed. How many visitors centers do you need telling of the day of the eruption? I thought the main VC there was pretty nice, although some of the exhibits looked a little old (but so did Mt. Rainier, which I think now has a new VC that was about to open when I was there). So if there could be genuine opportunities to enhance or expand the public's access as far as hiking and other such activities, or if better conservation there would have great benefits, that would be great. But as far as interpretation of the disaster, I think the current visitors centers do a fine job, even if the one managed by the logging company is a bit slanted toward promoting logging, which irked me a bit.

    I also think that the USFS does a nice job at the Mendenhall Glacier. Most people would assume I am sure that that one is indeed an NPS site. So in general if there will be genuine benefits to switching management away from the forest service to the park service, I'm all for it, but I don't think we should assume that it will necessarily make a big or worthwhile difference.

    Also thanks to Kurt, I enjoyed your Everglades update in Audubon mag. It was good to finally hear some good news after everything I had read over the last few months seemed to suggest that progress was being scaled down significantly.

  • Updated: Greenpeace Climbers Arrested for Climate Change Protest at Mount Rushmore National Memorial   5 years 19 weeks ago

    They should protest quietly in their own homes! Mt Rushmore has nothing to do with the President nor his stance on global warming. Mt Rushmore is about tourist dollars and honoring expanisionist leaders. And, it won't even be hurt by global warming.

  • Yosemite National Park Returns To Square One on Yosemite Valley Plan   5 years 19 weeks ago

    I was in Yosemite over the holiday weekend. I didn't go to the valley because it is so crowded, it's just not enjoyable at all. Tuolumne is the place. (Don't tell anyone). The reason it is so nice is because there is almost no lodging there. There's the small tent lodge at Tuolumne Meadows and the Tuolumne campground. There's one small store and hamburger stand. As a result, it's much nicer. No souvenir stands, no movie theater, no hospital, courthouse, art gallery, none of the strip mall mentality of the valley services. The less 'stuff' the better. I hope the new Merced Plan strips Yosemite Valley to the bare essentials.

    The only intrusion on the pleasantness were the large groups of motorcycles that roar through en masse.. Why does the park allow this? It's a park, not a speedway.

  • Reader Participation Day: What Would You Like to See Added to the National Park System?   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Yeah, MRC - Jumbo Rocks is a great site, and I really love Joshua Tree.

    I don't mean to suggest that NPS-managed land doesn't include back country areas - I have enjoyed various parks across the US very much (both front-country and back-country). I am not anti-NPS, and have really enjoyed the visitor accommodations and the backcountry at places like Mount Rainier, Denali, and Yellowstone (to name but a few).

    My comment arose in response to a discussion of a specific parcel of BLM-managed land, and the suggestion that it should have been NPS managed, instead. My experience is that I can access low-impact back-country camping options more easily, without requirements for reservations or exorbitant fees, with fewer people and less development, on BLM-managed land than on NPS-managed land. Since that kind of camping experience is important to me, I mean to ask what the perceived advantages of NPS management are over BLM management.

    My biggest concern about BLM management is the issue that Kurt raised - mineral leases, or other energy leases. I always get sad when people propose massive solar installations in the southwest on this "unutilized land", for example.

    So, I appreciate the NPS conservation ideal, but I certainly prefer the BLM management model to the NPS management model from an end user perspective. Wouldn't it be great to figure out how to get the best of both worlds? The low-hassle factor of the BLM, with the perpetual conservation ideal of the NPS?

  • Social Networking Site Pushes Petition for a "Maine North Woods" National Park   5 years 19 weeks ago

    Blackwater Falls is a state park but a lot of the area surrounding it is National Forest. The USFS was underfire a few years ago for wanting to clear-cut parts of that forest which holds several endangered species.