Recent comments

  • Grand Teton Gets Go-Ahead on Transportation Corridors   6 years 4 weeks ago
    You know, I biked all the way through Grand Teton and back last summer as part of my biker/hiker vacation through Grand Teton and Yellowstone. I felt about as safe as one can expect on those roads in Grand Teton and was happy that there was a shoulder at all. In Yellowstone, there often wasn't a shoulder at all (except for some small stretches here and there), and the upper loop has very narrow roads. Even there, I felt relatively safe, much safer than I do every single day biking in traffic in Washington, DC. Every day, I dodge cars, am forced to weave in and out of lanes, watch out for car doors opening up on me from any direction, dodge pedestrians lunging into the road from anywhere. The serenity I felt in the parks compared to that experience is 1 million percent different. I barely needed my breaks in the parks (except when going down a mountain pass and winds are gusting on you). Even the upper loop in Yellowstone, I felt relatively safe, despite steep and windy roads -- thankfully, the cars also are slowed down a great deal by the steep and windy nature of those roads. The only time I was genuinely worried was coming down Dunraven Pass toward Tower. It was an amazing ride, but I took no chances; I road as close to the middle of the road as I could, in part because it was so narrow, in part because I needed to dictate when cars would pass me, not the other way around (or else I would have risked going over a cliff). However, it was early morning, and there weren't many cars at all. In fact, it wasn't safety I was as concerned with as hypothermia. It was so cold, and going downhill so fast made it even colder. The drivers didn't seem to mind, the few that there were, a few talked with me at Tower Fall, amazed at the speed I was able to go and astounded we ended up at the same place not that many minutes apart. Anyhow, my point is that I felt that Grand Teton, especially, has roads that are biker safe by and large. The shoulders could be widened, and that would help, but by and large, though they are narrow, it's still possible to ride on them. I was actually really surprised to talk to a man working at the pizza place at Leek's Marina who said he was too scared to bike on the narrow shoulders. I thought, "My goodness; if you only knew that you could ride safely through roads a million times worse in the District (or if you want to see unsafe, try riding through Montgomery County, Maryland, which still scares me, though I do it with a mix of road and sidewalk)." That's to say, as an avid biker, one who fights with cars daily and loathes their dominance of the roads, I just am surprised that Grand Teton is the place to fight and win a plan like this. The other thing is that use of the bike path will depend strongly on its quality. If the bike path is bumpy or too narrow, those bikes will go right back on the road. I would. In DC area parks, bikes will use good bike paths; they won't use bike paths that are falling apart or don't absorb shock (especially those of us not plodding along so slowly on mountain bikes). So, a lot will depend on the construction of the path. I think a path is strange; as a biker, I'd prefer a bike lane to a path so long as cars weren't using it as a passing lane (which is why a wide shoulder would undoubtedly do the trick). My only near accident on the trip wasn't in the parks but coming into Jackson. There, the traffic was backed up, and I was passing dozens and dozens of cars on the shoulder. At some point, an RV was ready to move, but I was already just about past it (but not completely). It then lunged to turn right just as I was going by. I got so mad but just missed it by swinging out just far enough to my right. Those who saw it from a nearby store shook their heads and berated the RV driver for being crazy. The danger is always in urban driving or when there is a long line of cars who are not suspecting a fast moving bike on their right. As a biker, I have to take precautions to anticipate almost anything happening. However, for inexperienced bikers, that sort of thing can cause accidents. In the national parks, where there are so few turns, it's not really a problem at all, though. That's where accidents usually happen (cars making right hand turns). In any event, I found this announcement to be a little strange; I live in a very different world.
  • Drought Conditions Putting Squeeze on Everglades   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Right. Shortchange great blue herons. Great egrets. Snowy egrets. Little Blue and Green herons. Reddish egrets. And spoonbills. The hell with all the birds. We've gotta keep "growing!"
  • Segways To Invade Antietam--Updated   6 years 5 weeks ago
    What about motorized scooters? And skateboarders? And what about wagons powered by gray squirrels turning flywheels? But, hey, why not sell the naming rights, too? How about the ABC/Disney Segway Theme Park? And just imagine the millions the good NPS folks at Gettysburg could realize by also selling naming rights.
  • Of Bugs, Buzz Off, And Repellents   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Have you ever tried any natural insect repellent products?
  • Mount St. Helen's National Park?   6 years 5 weeks ago
    It would be a great idea for the NPS to take over Mount St. Helens. I know the Service is strapped financially, but if a place deserves NP status, it's certainly Mount St. Helens. When one mentions that the monument has five visitor's centers, one needs to realize that actually only two of them are within the National Volcanic Monument (Johnston Ridge and Coldwater Ridge, the second of which the Forest Service plans to close). The visitor's center with the most interpretive information is the Silver Lake center which (if it goes the way of other privately held centers such as the wretchedly propaganizing Weyerhauser center) it will become little more than a marketing tool for the association with fewer and less cared-for displays. Mount St. Helens is an important geological & ecological site which the Forest Service has compromised on every turn. It was originally set aside to serve scientists and the public in a better understanding of volcanic rejuvenation, but the site has been compromised again and again in the interests of big business (particularly Weyerhauser). Let me know where to fan those flames to get this moving... this is an idea which deserves attention.
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    One can NEVER have enuf horsepower!!! Yeeeeaaahhhh baaaby!!
  • Segways To Invade Antietam--Updated   6 years 5 weeks ago
    There's something about recreational Segway riding in a national battlefield that strikes me as inappropriate and disrespectful to the memory of those who died.
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Wow - that seems like a lot of horsepower for a sled!
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Yeaahh baby, this is what I'll be ridin' in Yellowstone this winter!!: http://www.brp.com/en-US/Products/SkiDoo/Showroom/MachZX.htm
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Cabela's CEO is an invite, as well as Polaris and Ski-Do Corp....they were inadvertently left off the list.
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Alan, They weren't on the list because they've been exposed as pinko commie hippies... Still laughing, Jim
  • Idaho's Bid For A National Park   6 years 5 weeks ago
    As incredible as SNRA is, it really is incompatible with being a "national park". Its current status seems to work just fine, no need to alter it just to make the NPS feel better. And COTMNM is halfsies with BLM, so they can't have that one either. They could take the NPS chunk and call it a 'national park', but I'm sure they don't want the somewhat incompatible uses that are found on the BLM-managed land. Again, change for change's sake doesn't make much sense. Idaho is a phenomenal state - having a 'national park' just to say they do won't change that. Besides, most of it is already managed by USFS and BLM. The NPS has to take a backseat occasionally.
  • Sleeping Bear: Planning for the Future   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Too bad the interpretive division at Sleeping Bear Dunes is headed by a hack.
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Wait a sec! I don't the CEOs of Kawasaki, Yamaha, Polaris, Ski-Do, etc. on the guest list. What gives? And how about those guys at Cabela's, the outdoors retailer that can't seem to build a new store these days without first getting a plethora of tax breaks?
  • Idaho's Bid For A National Park   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Trish, you must be referring to the political hacks that infest the upper runs of the chain of command at the Interior Department these days. Perhaps you're thinking of Julie A. MacDonald. What's that you say? You never heard of Ms. MacDonald? Read about her here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/30/AR2007033001998.html
  • Mountain Bikers to Seek Access Through Listening Sessions   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Ellis, I guess for me it comes down to the simple aesthetics of national parks, being able to enjoy nature and the natural quiet of the landscape. There are many times when I've come upon moose or bison or elk or deer in the parks while hiking thanks to the quiet nature of hiking. Would that still be the case if trails were opened to mountain bikers, many who head to single tracks for speed and thrills they can't seem to find on dirt roads? Regarding thrills, there are plenty of places to get an adrenalin rush in national parks: Climbing the Grand Teton or Mount Rainier, caving in Mammoth Cave, paddling Yellowstone's lakes, sea kayaking Acadia. Why do we have to introduce mechanical thrills? Beyond that question, how would you propose that mountain bikes be managed in national parks? Would you opt for an even-odd rotation with hikers on existing trails? Perhaps something similar to what they're testing at Big South River? If so, should that also be the rule of the land across Forest Service and BLM trails? How would you keep mountain bikers out of wilderness areas? Would we have to put rangers on bikes to patrol? Would you prefer that a whole new series of mountain-bike only trails be cut throughout the national park system? Where do you draw the line? If mountain bikers can have trail access in the parks, why not snowmobiles? After all, the folks in Yellowstone seem to think snowmobiles are compatible with the park. Why not give them more places to play than simply the Grand Loop? Why not expand personal watercraft use in the parks? Sure, you and I might consider them polluting, obnoxious machines, but some park and seashore officials have allowed them in. I've heard of the studies that mountain bikers cause no more damage to trails than equestrians and hikers. And that may be so. But national parks carry a very different management mandate than national forest and BLM lands, which as I'm sure you know are more focused on multiple-use thrills than parks are. Too, as I noted in the post that started this thread, there are already hundreds, if not thousands, of dirt roads open to mountain bikers in the parks, and many times that many miles of two- and single-track trails in national forests and BLM lands. Why must we introduce more trails in the parks? More than likely we'll never see quite eye-to-eye on this issue. But when you take the existing opportunities into consideration, and the management mandates, I just don't see why there's a need to expand mountain biking throughout the parks.
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Most parks have PLENTY of wilderness...more lodges, restaurants, etc. can and will be built in the frontcountry areas.
  • Idaho's Bid For A National Park   6 years 5 weeks ago
    The NPS can't take care of what it has...why take more land and lock it up for envirowackos & bad-science scientists?????
  • Mountain Bikers to Seek Access Through Listening Sessions   6 years 5 weeks ago
    I don't agree with lumping off-road cyclists with ATV, dirt bikes, and snowmobilers. These users burn fossil fuels, make a lot of noise, and generally cause heavy damage to trails. Any damage done by cyclists is comparable to that of equestrians and hikers. However, I agree with your point regarding the duty of the NPS to "preserve the landscape". Nonetheless, considering one of your arguments against off-road cyclists in the NP is "having to dodge" them, it makes one wonder if this preservation includes a hiker's right to have the trail to themselves? Does it? If not, I think it would be prudent to simply present facts that prove off-road cycling risks the true "preservation" the NPS must maintain.
  • Sleeping Bear: Planning for the Future   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Well of course the focus should be on conservation. That's why the finished product will emphasize recreation.
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Judging from the comments on this article, I wonder just who is reading Traveler's blogs. I thought it would be people who value the parks as important reservoirs of untrammeled, natural and historic resources, but it looks like the people who have commented want more development and commercial operations in the Parks! Parks are the last refuge of the natural world, let's fight to keep it that way. There are other places for all your stores, beds, hotels, RV parks, motorized recreation, etc. I certainly don't want any more of that in the National Parks.
  • Idaho's Bid For A National Park   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Kurt, before we focus on Idaho, let's try to make the National Park Service truly national and get a beach, river, historical site, something, for Delaware.
  • Shepherdstown--The Guest List   6 years 5 weeks ago
    I LOVE IT! We are finally getting our parks back from the environuts!!
  • GM: Co-opting The Parks?   6 years 5 weeks ago
    "Old Faithful" on an automobile could turn out to be false advertising and not a name designed to appeal to men who don't want to be either old or .... Bad jokes, aside...you forgot to list the Toyota Sequoia, the Buick Rainier, and the Ford Ranger.
  • Three Cheers for Kurt Repanshek   6 years 5 weeks ago
    Hear, Hear.

    In part, he's responsible for opening my eyes and inspiring me to start the Trailhead. Oh yeah, his National Parks For Dummies book is one of the 1st I read on the park system.

    Thanks, Kurt!