Recent comments

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Actually, the murders you likely are trying to associate with Yosemite occurred outside the park. And you and many others continue to broadly -- and wrongly -- assume that folks who don't want to see concealed weapons in the parks are anti-gun and anti-2nd Amendment. Quite a few gun owners are opposed to the proposed rule change.

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Fact- CCW holders are in most part law abiding people.
    Fact- Criminals are do not care what the law is.
    Fact- If the Law states, No Firearms in National Parks who will follow the Law.
    Fact- Murders on the Appalachian Trail and In the Yosemite Park in the years past and more crimes elsewhere (parks are safe??????)
    Fact- Anti Gunners don't like or accept facts!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • This Park Nourishes Its Forest Service Roots   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Great write-up Jim. And, thanks for pointing out the agency relationship between F.S. and NPS. I hadn't even heard of this park and should have.

    rob mutch

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Frank C:
    ... "it is their [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed" ...

    Why do you gun rights folks always refuse to look at the historical context in which the original statements of the Bill of Rights were made?? The "tyrants" at that time were the British, a completely separate government seeking to abolish our nation.

    If you feel your own government is acting as a tyrant you are inherently devoted to overthrow of the government you claim to be a loyal citizen of.
    Sounds crazy, right? But that's where the logic of your argument leads.

    Keep your damn guns at home where they belong.

  • Hikers, Bikers and National Parks   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Give the IMBA an open mile into the National Parks they will bring down an mountain with erosion...in time.

  • Why You Should Not Store Food in Your Car at Great Smoky Mountains National Park   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Why should the guy videotaping be fined? I'm the one who videotaped this while vacationing in the Smokys. This is a documantation of what happenned. Animals are unpredictable. Its not like I helped the bear break into the car or the bear was acting up for the camera. There were many people standing close by, and startling the bear may have been the worse thing to do. I'm just glad nobody was hurt. I was nervous about being so close to the bear but their were a buffer of bystanders between me and the bear. I know I could out run the bystanders. The rangers ended up moving the bear far away from people. Hope you enjoyed the video.

  • Hikers, Bikers and National Parks   6 years 2 weeks ago

    This may not be good for hikers with exclusionary tendencies - - but it IS good for the NPS and the promotion of healthy alternatives to motorized recreation. Expanded appreciation for what the NPS can offer to legitimate trail users, such as hikers, bikers, and equestrians, can only improve the overall NPS mission.

  • Hikers, Bikers and National Parks   6 years 2 weeks ago

    The NPS should not allow bikes on trails within the national parks. There are so many places that mountain bikers can ride, we do not need to open up the parks to bikes as well. There need to be some places that we can go for slow, contemplative travel on foot, and bikes definitely destroy the experience for hikers. Not only that, bikes cause massive erosion and scare wildlife.

    What no one seems to mention is that when bikes are banned, it does not mean that bikers are banned. They are still welcome to travel on foot with the rest of us.

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Jay, if you don't trust an interest group, and I'm not a member of the NRA, you should look to the founders who made statements like, "it is their [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed". I don't leave the defense of the Bill of Rights and Constitution to interest groups, nor should park rangers who take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. Defending the Constitution should be the interest of every American, not just groups of Americans. And defending the other nine amendments in the Bill of Rights against tyranny is impossible without the second.

    The issue is not the use of guns in backcountry, allowing indiscriminate carrying of weapons in parks, or poaching, because the proposed legislation would not legalize these actions. The issue revolves around allowing law-abiding citizens who have gone through an expensive and extensive process (which includes criminal background check as well as gun safety training) of applying for a receiving a concealed weapons permit to carry a concealed weapon on federal public lands under the Department of the Interior's purview.

    You mention that you don't feel comfortable around people with guns in the backcountry (how would you even know if they're concealed?), but a little discomfort is a small price to pay for preserving the integrity of the Bill of Rights.

  • Hikers, Bikers and National Parks   6 years 2 weeks ago

    I am still going to stand on the platform that thinks that it is time for the National Parks to offer mountain bike trails. I have been hiking on numerous BLM trails, National Forest trails, state park trails that are shared use with moutian bikers and have personally seen that it works -and I am never the one of the bike! It's time, ladies and gentleman.

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Questions for so-called advocates of the Second Amendment:

    Why would a anyone ever need a gun when visiting a National Park?

    Self defense against wild animals? Shooting a protected animal would certainly violate established wildlife protection laws.
    Self defense against humans? ANYONE could claim self defense for a shooting without any witnesses...
    Roughly two/thirds of NPS sites are cultural or historical in nature; should concealed weapons be allowed in these many Federal buildings?

    Personally I could care less whether or not a US citizen chooses to own legal firearms and keep them on their own property. But I just don't understand why a gun owner would ever need one on vacation in a National Park.
    I wish that gun owners would stop whining about their "violated" personal rights and spend that energy on the broader spectrum of real human rights violations that plague our society.

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    You can debate guns or no guns till the cows come home. The bottom line is our constitutional rights will be and are going to be restricted and sadly licensed after 911 changed all the rules.

    It seems the enemy has suceeded in changing America They didn't do it alone however! They did it with the help of history ignorant well meaning Americans who become activist just to have a cause to fight for.

    All you good Republicans and maybe even a few Democrats who support the Second Amendment need to make more noise in Washington. I voice my beliefs!

    Not being able to carry a licensed firearm in the wide open spaces of a National Park is the last resort. We do need to be aware however that this could be a security issue in a parks congested public spaces.

    Codification of the right to keep and bear arms into the Bill of Rights was influenced by a fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule

    How many of you reading this knows a well meaning, voting, citizen who thru igorance of US history supports a cause that reduces our constitutional rights?

    We need more history taught in public schools.

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    It would be nice if each park put a system -- maybe something like Zion -- in place to limit car pollution in the park. It didn't seem to have a significant impact on tourism when I was there. Also, what on earth could the use of hand guns be in a protected park provide? I personally don't feel comfortable backpacking around and running into people that have guns. I live in IL so concealed weapons are illegal here, but I'm not afraid of them when I'm out in the open in legal states. I do feel a little uncomfortable people have guns in the back country that have no use for them but to shoot them off, or potentially kill protected wildlife. I imagine it's a principle issue about guns rights, but it's difficult to trust an interest group's explanation.

  • Shenandoah National Park Ranger Roy Sullivan Set the World Record for Being Hit by Lightning   6 years 2 weeks ago

    I am amazed there has not been a book written about Roy and his life. The story is absolutely fascinating if not absolutely tragic. I there any other information on Mr. Sullivan?

  • The Monkey Wrench Gang: Coming to a Theater Near You?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    I'm a long time fan of the Monkey Wrench Gang and have always wondered if and when a movie would come out. I was just searching around this evening to see if anything was in the works. It's great to hear that it may be coming out but if it's this year wouldn't there have been some previews out and about by now? Also, what is with that cast??? McConaughey is the only one in the correct age range for the characters. I could see him play Hayduke OR Seldom Seen. I could imagine him playing a good crazy GW Hayduke:-) Goodman could play a great Bishop Love too now that I think about it. But the others?? Who would Dreyfuss play? Or who would Nicholson play? I think they're both too old for Doc Sarvis. And Elizebeth Shue is gorgeous and all, underrated as an actress but really she's a bit old to play Bonnie. Abbzug was only in her early to barely mid-20's. I do hope that this cast isn't confirmed yet. I think they could do better.

    You all agree? Disagree??

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Take heart Fred. Gun sales in the post-election era are up over 20% nationally.
    I'm not sure if that's good for Obama or not........

  • Bush Administration: Slash and Burn on The Way Out of Office?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Kurt, while I appreciate and understand fully you obligation to temper these political reports while trying to remain at least some bit objective, I, not maintaining any affiliation with the press, and thereby not making any effort to maintain neutral, have just a few issues with the above article.....

    1)it's relatively easy to castigate the outgoing administration for its seemingly heavy hand on that landscape.
    Seemingly heavy-handed? How 'bout brass-knuckled, or horse shoe in the glove?

    2)Now, presidents certainly can do what they want, and this president hasn't made any secret of his oilman roots or his catering to the extractive industries

    And THIS is exactly what's wrong with the system as it currently is managed. Pandering is a crime in most states, but in politics is "business as usual". Double standards are meant to be corrected, not tolerated.

    3)Also impacting the public lands experience are the administration's push to allowed concealed weapons in national parks, its decided favoring of off-road vehicle enthusiasts and the extractive industries when it came time for the BLM to update six resource management plans in Utah, the decision to overlook science and public opinion on the Yellowstone snowmobile issue, and the administration's fiscal drain on not just the National Park Service but also the U.S. Forest Service.

    Speaking of pandering..........

    4)"One key difference, is that the Obama administration may be acting with much higher congressional and public support than the current administration."

    Who cares, if as you say, the president isn't beholden to anyone anyway?

    5)[/i]"Things have been very polarized in this country. And I think when you have one side that has sort of refused to even look at that middle ground, and that’s your government, then I think it really does polarize your citizenry,"[i]

    Not polarized enough to get the typical spineless, lethargic American off their arse and actively seeking the type of change the system needs to be serviceable in the 21st C. Big problem here in America today. We believe our own propaganda. We still are operating under the illusion that we are the world leaders, the best in everything, which hasn't been true for going on 50 years now. We've become complacent in our lives and our system of government. The downfall of our attitude is that with complacency comes stagnation, and with stagnation comes decay. Our elected officials recognize this, and feed the complacency knowing that in so doing, the public is effectively removed from inflicting any dangerous thought or suggestion concerning modification of the power base. Throwing the dog a bone, as it were, is the most sure-fired method of maintaining total control over the masses. The economy in the toilet? Throw the dog a bone, a rebate check which by the way, you'll owe half of the sum back come next April 15. Save the banking and auto industries, with taxpayer funded bailouts. Cut interest rates and restrict credit availability such that you're screwed if you try and place money into savings accounts or instruments, the stock or bond markets, or virtually anything save overseas investments, but on the OTHER hand, nobody can borrow money at today's low interest rates to stimulate the economy unless you have an absolutely spotless credit history, which means you really don't need to borrow money for much anyway.

    Just remember folks, BOTH you're ever-lovin' political parties created the current situation. An elephant may be currently in the head office, but the company board is a jack-ass majority, who in essence have the final say over matters of the day. Back one or the other and you're part of the problem, NOT the solution.

    But we in this country don’t seem to have the desire or ability to learn the easy way.

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    IF this rule change does take place, you can be SURE that the Obama administration will work TIRELESSLY to strike it down. We now (on Jan 20) have in place the most gun-hating government in more than 33 years.

  • A Sad Sign of the Times: NPS Promotes Body Armor Options To Rangers   6 years 2 weeks ago

    SO WHAT? What's the big deal if National Park Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, all State Park Rangers, Fish and Game Wardens and everyone else who does some form of law enforcementout out in woods, fields or desert wears level II or III vests and carries OC-10, batons, revolvers, semi-auto pistols, shotguns, M-4's or even full automatic weapons in the trunk. They have a NATURAL right to protect themselves against the increasing number of poachers, dope growers, meth cooks, illegal aliens, smugglers, miscellaneous criminals and all the other @#$%bags who are aware that Rangers and other conservation personnel (not to mention visitors) are often unarmed and a long ways from help.

    After all (Mr. and Ms. overly sensitive America), simply seeing someone wearing body armor or a gun shouldn't be a cause for neurotic fear - it's not the gun, it's the person carrying it that decides if the gun will be used for good or evil purposes. All the personnel above are at least minimally trained to unholster a weapon only when necessary, and also only to fire when stopping an aggressor from performing "grave bodily injury or death." This kind of training is as basic to law enforcement academies as learning your ABC's is in elementary school.

    Hunters are another group of people who receive firearms safety training, along with people who get CCW's, although they do receive less training (and you can't get enough training!)

    But if seeing a law enforcement officer in full uniform wearing body armor carrying a gun out in the woods makes you feel uncomfortable, educate yourself about guns and firearms training to get over it - knowledge is power.

    If that doesn't work, go see a shrink (or turn off liberal / sensationalist media - they are the modern sensitizing source of gun and all other fear of violence phobias).

  • Whatever Happened to That Rule Change To Allow You to Pack Heat in National Parks?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    I guarantee you that cars have a larger environmental impact in parks than concealed weapons, yet why do I never hear of a ban on cars due to environmental impacts?

  • Bush Administration: Slash and Burn on The Way Out of Office?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Pappt:Try to read between the lines in what Kurt has written here. It's easy for you to attack me without commenting on some of the truthful facts that Kurt presents here...with his blog. Believe it or not, I do volunteer for many environmental causes and have done much volunteer work for the U.S. Forestry Service...yes, planting trees. And, I'm not afraid to admit that I'm a professional tree hugger as well. Sounds to me Pappyt your some pseudo mouth piece for more drilling in our National Parks. Kurt, has produced prime examples what has happen from extensive oil drilling close to our National Parks: The ugly visual stacking of oil rigs so many miles apart, the water contamination in the ground water table, and of course, the horrible scaring of the landscape. Not a pretty picture to view from the National Parks perspective...is it? In regards to my lifestyle, I practice the art of permaculture (a form of conservation gardening) and drive a relatively old truck that carry's my horticulture work, and at least try to "live green", that I'm sure infuriates the living hell out of the right wing nuts. Yes, I even make my own coffee! What's your excuse for polluting?

  • Bush Administration: Slash and Burn on The Way Out of Office?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Annonymous needs to chill and understand that technology now permits an oil rig next or miles from a park...with minimal impact. Annonymous uses electricity, drives a car, watches TV, goes to the grocery store, etc. but it is someone else's fault for the environment's problems. Since he doesn't want to take responsibility himself/herself he blames Bush. I'll bet Annonymous is driking coffee at Starbucks, connected to internet via WiFi, reading the NY Times, and getting ready to protest the 2nd Amendment.

    Chill Annonymous. volunteer for a summer on a National Park Fire crew, be a volunteer in a park, try to understand the real problems the parks face and stop spreading your uninformed elitist BS.

  • Bush Administration: Slash and Burn on The Way Out of Office?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Kurt, thanks for giving reference through your comment "check this site" which provides us with the prestigious Pro Pubica (journalism in the public interests). A good source for up-to-date information regarding many of are pertinent and grave issues facing this country today.

  • Updated: Dueling Judges Push Yellowstone National Park Snowmobile Limit Back to 720 Per Day   6 years 2 weeks ago

    I am a frequent visitor to Yellowstone and would endorse nothing that truly threatened that ecosystem. However, this NON issue displays how far the fanatical left will go to pursue agendas that have no basis in scientific fact and challenge the outer limits of common sense. Yellowstone is 3500 square miles, roughly seven times the land area of the City of Los Angeles, California (470 square miles). The area of Yellowstone is almost exactly the same as the area of our two smallest states (Rhode Island and Delaware) combined. It is over 50 times the size of Washington, D.C. from where the learned Judge Sullivan issues his legal rulings.

    Can you imagine what would happen if someone would propose a federal regulation that limited the number of motor vehicles in any of those places to 500 per day? Can you imagine the public reaction to a judge who ruled that limiting the number of motor vehicles to 500 in any of those places still created an unacceptable risk to the environment? I would suggest that if such a ruling were forthcoming, its author would be declared insane and measures commensurate with that declaration would be forthcoming.

    Allowing 5,000 snowmobiles a day is not going to harm one pine needle on one tree. No animal going to be more endangered by a snow mobile that they are in the summer months when 90-year-old men drive 80 foot motorhomes around corners on Dunraven Road. (For those left-wingers without a sense of humor, this is what is known as sarcasm).

    If these groups backing these insane regulations are truly environmentalists, why don't they really do something about it and figure out how to eradicate the blister rust and European beetles that are devastating the whitebark pine in the Park and surrounding areas? The answer is fairly obvious: It's a lot easier to hold up a protest sign, smoke a lot of dope, file frivilous lawsuits and get well-intentioned but blissfully ignorant people to donate unconscionable amounts to ridiculous causes so that those who are incapable of holding down real jobs can continue to live off the good intentions of the terminally ignorant rather than to solve complicated real problems in the real world. (How's that for a run-on sentence).

    P.S. I have never ridden a snow mobile in my life but I can also see through these transparent tactics. These people do not understand the difference between National Parks, which were designed so that humans (even those not from the "enlightened" left) can enjoy and interact with nature and Wilderness areas (where human impact is designed to be next to zero). Their "agenda" is to first eliminate snowmobiles, then eliminate motor homes, then eliminate personal auto travel so that if we want to see Yellowstone we have to ride tour buses filled with AARP members while listening to the propaganda of the tour bus driver who was indoctrinated by the same people who endorse lawsuits of this nature.

    Should that day ever come, I intend to organize the "Million Motor Home March". We'll surround Washington D.C., start up make-shift buffets (where we all can eat) and play our Lawrence Welk records over loud speakers (a certifiable form of torture) until they come to their senses and repent.

    Seriously, folks, let's keep the snow-mobilers on the plowed roads. Employ enough law enforcement to keep the rednecks from harassing the bison (both mentally challenged creations of the Almighty, no doubt) and devote those millions in all of the 501(c)(3) corps to causes which really will protect and preserve the beauty and unique qualities of Yellowstone for generations to come.

  • Bush Administration: Slash and Burn on The Way Out of Office?   6 years 2 weeks ago

    Yap, with heavy fire in the belly until the little man leaves office. Not medicine Roger...just get rid of the cancerous tumor that has been ruining this country for the past eight years. I'm sure a lot of us will feel whole better as well. The sooner the better! Where's your passion or compassion for the environment...around a oil rig next to the National Parks!?