Recent comments

  • National Park Quiz 9: The American Revolution   6 years 3 weeks ago

    Bob--

    Now that you have dusted off Harry Yount's name in your previous quiz. can you name the only 5 recipients of the career Harry Yount award for service to the ranger profession? PS--they are all retired save one although he works for another agency.

    Rick Smith

  • NPR on the National Parks   6 years 3 weeks ago

    I'm just happy they are doing the reports at all. If it increases interest & visitation, then maybe these other problems will come to light.

    I am still hopeful, there's still a couple more days of their coverage coming. Maybe they have a wrap-up program covering these admin issues??

    ==================================

    My travels through the National Park System: americaincontext.com

  • Creature Feature: The American Marten   6 years 3 weeks ago

    saw one in the tahoe area recently, it looked at me for a good 30 seconds then took off. it kind of jumped away about 10 ft at a time

  • Former NPS Director George Hartzog Passes   6 years 3 weeks ago

    What an inspiring and charismatic leader! Director Hartzog inspired me to move from Grand Canyon to Washington, DC in 1969 to be part of a new urban initiative. This fateful move led to a most satisfying career, culminating in a lengthy assignment as Director of White House Liaison for the National Park Service. I continued to cherish the opportunity to work with George Hartzog as we served together on the Board of the White House Historical Assn. Just 3 weeks ago we worked together to resolve a policy issue with the White House Endowment Trust. He was engaged and active, brilliantly so, up to the very end. I and many others will truly miss his leadership, his inspiration, and his great stories! Our hearts go out to Helen and to George's family at this time. So long, good friend, and thank you...

  • Prescribed Fire in Grand Canyon National Park Now Out of Control   6 years 3 weeks ago

    With regards to GRCA having been in "high fire danger" when the prescribed fire was ignited ...when planning prescribed fires, in order to attain the desired flame length or heat/unit area that is needed so as to achieve the desired results, it is often necessary to implement the prescription when the fire danger is high. If, as "Lone Hiiker" suggests, "...they (should) only let (these) fire "experts" play with their matches from November to March.", very little in terms of fuels management could be done during winter conditions.

    NOTE: My comments are based on the knowledge/skills/abilities that I gained during more than 35 years of service with the NPS: the majority of those years having been spent in Wildland Fire Management.

  • Prescribed Fire in Grand Canyon National Park Now Out of Control   6 years 3 weeks ago

    Then there was the "Outlet Fire" that closed the Park for quite some time in about 2001. It eventually burned all the way from west of the Lodge to Point Imperial and onto Cape Royal and several hundred acres of National Forest lands in the Saddle Mountain area. The Bridger Fire was a lightning strike on the Park which burned about 50,000 ares of USFS lands. They go all the way back to 1960 and the Saddle Fire which began as a lightning strike near Point Imperial and burned 5,600 acres of National Forest. Most of these fires escape right around June 21st, but no one seems to be paying attention when they leave the office, torch in hand. There have been other "escapes" on the North Rim, many of which never burned all the way to the Forest Service. There have also been many on the South Rim that have threatened the housing area and Tusayan over the years. I doubt that there is aanother National Park with such a history of escaped prescribed fires and escaped lightning fires. Maybe November to March would be a pretty good start to keep them out of trouble. Although as a "Learning Organization" no one gets in trouble any more.

  • Yellowstone National Park Bison Unhappy With Photo Shoot Tosses Pennsylvania Boy   6 years 3 weeks ago

    Some of us have gotten way of topic here ! Another discussion whould be more appropriate for the "let the wildlife roam" topic, which by the way I do support !

    This discussion is about the stupidity and recklessness of some tourists. Why can't the superintendent of Yellowstone set fines for such behaviour ? These people should be fined AND pay for all the emergency services they required. Some people do not pay attention until the issue hits them in the checkbook. Can these kind of rules be made by the local NPS ?

  • Groups Sue Cape Hatteras National Seashore Over ORV Traffic   6 years 3 weeks ago

    I chased a plastic bag that had been picked up and carried by the wind about a half mile down the beach (the wind was quite fierce on the the shore that day) because I care so deeply about my favorite vacation spot. Chances are, I wouldn't put that much effort into it in my own apartment complex.

    My group of travelers and I were completely bummed out when we cruised down there this past weekend, with the intent of doing some fishing at The Point, only to find out that we couldn't get anywhere near it. We assumed that it had to do with wildlife preservation but never once thought that it would pertain to ORVers in particular. We always do a a good once-over before we head out onto the sand to make that everything is in proper running order (moreso because getting stranded in the sand, I imagine is not fun) so it can't be because of car fluids. Exhausts perhaps? No. If that was the case they'd have to shut down The Highway To Swell (NC 12) because that would be a contributor to greenhouse gasses as well. Erosion? Unline agricultural soil, ocean sand is in a constant state of regeneration. If the ocean shore is erroding, I would think it's because of rising tide lines and not because of 25 mph vehicles. Dune Erosion? I have yet to see an ORV attempt one (it's blatantly forboden) but have certainly seen pedestrians hurdle them with disregard for the flood-preventing hills.

    Of course all of these statements are open to criticism but I find it hard to believe that the well-meaning drivers on the beaches (who, by the way are probablly some of the most courteous, cautious drivers one could encounter) are responsible for the decline in bird and turtle nesting and the destruction of the beach.

    P.S. Things change. Nothing stays the same and that includes wildlife habitats and their numbers in population.

  • National Park Quiz 9: The American Revolution   6 years 3 weeks ago

    Rangertoo, your comments highlight at least two quite troubling issues. One is the need to quit perpetuating historic myth. Here at Traveler we want to avoid passing along bad information, so we really appreciate it when you help us sort fact from myth. I really mean that. Another problem is the need to somehow deal with the temporal ambiguity inherent in the concept of site. I'm not sure you can provide us with a hard and fast rule to follow. Site can mean a place where something is located or was located. Hell, it can even mean where something is scheduled to be located ("the future site of...") or should be located ("that would be a great site for ....") In historic context, the site where something happened can mean the precise spot or the general setting. So, just exactly what is it that a national park preserves when it preserves the SITE of something important? I'm getting a headache, so I'm going to stop for now.

  • National Park Quiz 9: The American Revolution   6 years 3 weeks ago

    BTW Bob, love the quizzes. Also, the Freedom Trail from the Bunker Hill Monument to the Common is an easier walk -- all downhill.

    [Ed.: There is a nice map of the Freedom Trail at this site. You can zoom to 50% for greater clarity and and still see the entire trail.]

  • National Park Quiz 9: The American Revolution   6 years 3 weeks ago

    Bob - I was not criticizing, just clarifying. You do a great job with this site and great service to the public in promoting national park issues.

    I do have a hard time with the site/place issue, though. I have been to and worked in Federal Hall and I think the NPS doth protest too much in its effort to justify preserving this former Customs House. I once heard a guide at Williamsburg describe Patrick Henry’s “give me liberty or give me death speech” as having occurred in the room she was in, except it was a recreated building not more than 20 years old at the time. I then got a description of “historic airspace!”

    I think that in the case of Federal Hall, there is nothing there that remains from the original building and that building did not look like the current building. In terms of public understanding, to say the “place” where something happened is to imply the building or edifice in question. I think that one could really only justify place as a synonym for site when it is unbuilt upon land like a battlefield. It would seem odd to visit Grand Central Terminal in New York and say this is the place where Nathan Hale was hanged. It was the site of the farm where he was hanged, but not the place in my mind.
    My point with the signing of the Declaration is just that people misunderstand what “signing the Declaration” means. We celebrate July 4 as the date of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. We do not celebrate its signing. As I noted, it was signed over the course of years. Many signers were not members of the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776 and did not vote for the Declaration (although they obviously supported it and risks their lives just as much by signing it).

    This country has a rich and exciting history. Unfortunately, the public too often confuses history with myth or are just plain wrong about events of the past. In the words of historian Richard Shenkman, “"Not only have (Americans) forgotten what they should remember, but they have remembered what they should have forgotten."

  • Yellowstone National Park Bison Unhappy With Photo Shoot Tosses Pennsylvania Boy   6 years 3 weeks ago


    Well, Ann & Jim, just an example of how the NPS is being politically undermined in this process, in case you did not know it:

    During the Clinton Administration (YES, the CLINTON ADMINISTRATION) the Congress went Republican. That meant Republicans got control of the NPS budget through the Appropriations Committee. The situation got so coercive that the Republican congressional staff member who controlled the NPS budget in the House of Representative tuned the Clinton's own Assistant Secretary for Budget and Administration into a total wimp, to do her bidding, because she could control ALL the money going into all the Department of the Interior agencies, including paying for this guy's office, and his boss' office.

    NPS still had some discretion over its budget in those days. When the brucellosis thing hit, NPS used funds taken from its construction budget to do the scientific analysis for the "EIS," without which NPS would have had no basis to fight the Cattlemen or the States. Here is how that Republican congressional staffer shut the NPS freedom of action down:

    Using the guise of using the "outhouse" cost overrun scandal [ a new-age experimental design of an outhouse that took no maintenance, and was to be a "green" building, and like a lot of experiments went several times over budget to end up costing almost $1 M, a PR disaster but actually a much smaller issue than what it was deliberately made into ], this congressional staffer forced a reorganization of the access to the funding for all projects in all parks. Any discretionary spending was eliminated, and all projects when through this tyrant's hands. Congress set up a commission to recommend how the reorganization should happen, and designated up to half the membership by NPS people. Well, the wimp Asst. Secretary was so intimidated by the congressional staff tyrant that he prevented the NPS from having ANY seats on the commission about how the money would be spent.

    Needless to say, this staffer from Scranton with very little knowledge or park experience micro managed the NPS. No more discretionary funding from project money was availabe to the NPS. That means, when NPS needs to turn on a dime to deal with attacks and challenges, it first had to go through the committee and wait over a year to spend the funding. Even funds raised through fees came through her control, and fee projects took months to approve. The next thing she did was to even get control of FINANCIAL GIFTS TO THE NPS, by insisting that projects funded by donations over a certain amount first needed her permission to go forward. In other words, the Appropriations Committee -- which means this one staffer -- even had control over funds that did not come from tax-payers dollars, and were not appropriated. She had the flimsiest justification that anything NPS takes on may become financially overwhelming and ultimately require bailing out by the appropriations, so she should approve all in advance. And since bureaucrats in Washington who opposed her got investigated and ones who supported her got promoted [example: mary bomar & sue masica] the result is NPS has no real discretionary control any more.

    So, that is what happened to the discretionary source of funding used imaginatively by NPS leaders to take on the brucellosis challenge.

    Have you noticed what happens to Yellowstone superintendents who fight back? Do you not think Senator Thomas and others made Mike Finley learn he was unwelcome? Finley is still young enough to be superintendent, but he is long out of the NPS. How many superintendents have there been at Yellowstone since the '90's?

    Even during the Clinton administration, they couldn't handle the pressure. When the outcry against Babbitt as secretary, who was taking on intrenched interests in the West, got so much that Clinton couldn't handle it (after all, Clinton was on the defensive through most of his Presidency) he even tried to get rid of Babbitt by MOVING HIM TO THE SUPREME COURT ! But they say Babbitt had antagonized so many in the Senate that Clinton learned he could not push Babbitt out that way. But the bottom line is, with the Republicans in conrol of the money, there was little Babbitt could do, and the NPS had virtually no discretion in use of its funding. This kind of micro-management is a new phenom, and it really changes things.

    Or does all this just escape you, that NPS is losing the political power it once had?

    I think NPS would love to fight the Cattlemen head on, and without the environmental supporters, the park would have no leverage at all.

  • National Park Quiz 9: The American Revolution   6 years 3 weeks ago

    Rangertoo: I’m not sure I understand your first point. Guess I’m feeling a little dense today. (Maybe I’ve caught the National Geographic best list disease?) I thought I had my bases covered when I said “…signed in 1776” without specifying day and month. Or were you referring to something else?

    Your comment about Federal Hall National Monument also leaves me a bit frustrated. In my vocabulary, “where” means “site”. If you replace the original building once or twice or a hundred times, that site retains the property of “where."

    Note that the Park Service agrees that "where means site means where." Here is the first sentence of the lead paragraph on the Federal Hall National Monument home page:

    Here on Wall Street, George Washington took the oath of office as our first President, and this site was home to the first Congress, Supreme Court, and Executive Branch offices.

    As you can see, the Park Service charges right in there with a site-specific declaration that doesn't mention the building or buildings -- whether still there or long gone -- in which the events of interest took place.

    OK; enough of the weaselspeak. .” I did tinker a bit with the question stem, and I hope you can live with the new version.

  • Yellowstone National Park Bison Unhappy With Photo Shoot Tosses Pennsylvania Boy   6 years 3 weeks ago

    One other point on this d-2, don't be too quick to put this only on Bush; this process started in earnest under Clinton. In terms of Montana's involvement, it's happened under both Republican and Democratic regimes. This is less about who rules the political machinery and a lot more about who controls the levers of that machinery. In Montana, the livestock industry has disproportionate political leverage based on their numbers and their value to the economy; in the IBMP, they control APHIS. As long as NPS as an agency - regardless of president - does not take a stronger stand against the industry, it's fair to say of it that it's a pawn. It's not a piece exercising it's own power; it's being exercised by someone else. In this case, facts show that livestock interests are controlling the politics and the pawns on the board.

    But, the question remains - what is the relationship of policy that hurts animals and herd units in the winter with what they do in the summer. It still strikes me as hypocritical - not that hypocrites shouldn't speak - to call for tourists to stay away from wildlife when the agencies involved don't do the same and in fact bother them in much more profound ways. Of course, tourists should stay away from bison whether a hypocrite tells you or someone else; however, it does bring to light what else is wrong.

    Jim Macdonald
    The Magic of Yellowstone
    Yellowstone Newspaper
    Jim's Eclectic World

  • Yellowstone National Park Bison Unhappy With Photo Shoot Tosses Pennsylvania Boy   6 years 3 weeks ago

    d-2; then you're telling me that if brucellosis wasn't a cattle disease the Park would still just slaughter at will? I think not. They are killing bison because of the cattle and for no other reason. In my opinion, they are being used by the cattlemen's association, and the Stock Growers, as pawns in the all out war to eliminate any competition for grass. Although this is really the wrong place to discuss the idotic policy of APHIS, it is more about the idiotic practices of tourists, and the Park Service allowing it to go unpunished. A thousand dollar fine per person involved in that 'photo' shoot would be a good start in sending a message to visitors, that there are rules in that Park and they are there for a reason.

  • National Park Quiz 9: The American Revolution   6 years 3 weeks ago

    As I am sure others will point out, the Continental Congress declared independence on July 2, 1776 and adopted a declaration to that effect on July 4. The parchment we now see was then prepared and the first signatures affixed on August 2. Some signatures were placed on it up to years later. John Adams wrote that "The second day of July 1776 will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shows, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more." Unfortunately, Adams was wrong. Americans decided not to celebrate the day we declared our independence from Britain, but rather the day we adopted the paper wording describing why we declared independence. Come to think of it, maybe celebrating the bureaucratic activity instead of the momentous decision itself is an American trait!

    Also, as I am sure you realize, the current Federal Hall National Memorial is on the site of the Federal Hall where Washington was inaugurated. It is not the same building. It was not only the site of the Continental Congress, but the first capital of the United States under the Constitution.

    [Ed.: The Hauptquizmeister has said aaaaaaargh! and is pondering retirement.]

  • National Park Quiz 9: The American Revolution   6 years 3 weeks ago

    The Freedom Trail in Boston does not actually go to Bunker Hill. It starts (ends) at Bunker Hill Monument, but that is actually on Breed's Hill, where most of the fighting of the Battle of Bunker Hill took place. [Ed: Nice catch! The Hauptquizmeister has edited the referenced item to remove the glitch. BTW, the official line is that the Freedom Trail starts at the Boston Common and ends at the Bunker Hill Monument, but visitors can certainly choose to begin at the Bunker Hill Monument.]

  • Senators Pushing To Allow Concealed Weapons in National Parks   6 years 4 weeks ago


    Dear Anonymous:

    I was thinking about your comment " this is not about bears.. . . this is a right of the people. . "

    You make this sound as if a Right does not have a practical basis. All the points were put there in the constitution because they actually MEANT something and were NEEDED.

    Did you hear the Mayor of Chicago rant about the Supreme Court Decision and the rule of law? He seemed to be saying that we have come a ways in our civilization, it was now a body of law, and individual guns alone are no longer required to create 'order.' I think, originally, guns were permitted, among other reasons precisely because of bears and the peoples' need to protect themselves. Also because at the time, we had no standing army.

    Times change. Oliver Wendel Holmes said dishonestly crying "FIRE" in a crowded theater was not free speech. so, just how many theaters do you think actually existed when the Framers wrote "congress shall make NO LAW . . " abridging free speech? Do you think Holmes was right to place the original provision in the context of the current reality?

    Rights exist in the real world. They are not abstractions.

    I just read the thread about the kid being tossed by the bison. I was thinking: what would have happened if the parents had a gun? If they had a gun, "honest" or not, I hate to think what would have happened next.

    Unless you are seeking the right of revolution -- are you?? -- there is no practical basis in today's world for guns in parks. The discharge of weapons, inevitable if guns are permitted, compromises the peace and quite for people and wildlife that are essential to a national park.

  • Yellowstone National Park Bison Unhappy With Photo Shoot Tosses Pennsylvania Boy   6 years 4 weeks ago

    Gee, Cindy and Ann: Please Chill Out ! All this hostility cannot improve your objectivity. Ann, the NPS is NOT just a pawn of the Cattleman Association, as they are boxed in by a hostile Administration in the White House, whose favorite Governors are actively undermining NPS authority. So it is not an easy political environment for anyone to work in, especially people by profession NOT trained to be smart politically. And Cindy, you are a public servant, and need to develop some empathy for people devoted to your park. They cannot all be like you, and it undermines the Service when Rangers appear to be people-hating. Learn to temper your remarks, and try using some gentleness or a sense of humor.

    The enemy are people who don't care, not those who do.

  • Former NPS Director George Hartzog Passes   6 years 4 weeks ago

    HARTZOG OBIT

    Here below is an Obit for Director Harzog, published today.

    Although it smacks of hagiography, the broad scope is accurate.

    At the time of his firing by the Nixon administration, two stories circulated at the time that are different than the one presented below, that personally blames President Nixon. One alternate story was that Haldemann demanded resignations of ALL senior government employees and agency heads, and Hartzog refused to resign, and so was fired. The additional spice in that story is that Harzog was a known Democrat holdover first spotted and moved into the line of succession by Jack Kennedy, and, under President Johnson, Harzog typified the kind of big-government of Johnson that the Nixon administration slowly squeezed out. According to this account, Hartzog was the last Democratic holdover in the Nixon Administration, and it was just a matter of time. The other story was that Harzog had a conflict with another major personality and ego, the Assistant Secretary of the Interior Nat Reed. Hartzog was not used to dealing with anyone other than the Secretary, the President and Congress, and Reed was not about to permit Harzog to go around him. Reed told everybody, in this version, that the superintendent of Grand Tetons NP was "the best in the NPS" and hired Gary Everhardt to replace Hartzog. Everhardt was a fine superintendent, but not up to the battles Hartzog regularly fought with relish. Everhardt surrounded himself with tired former aides to Hartzog (people who were expected to be sent to pasture, but Hartzog's departure saved them) and aides of Reed's. Whether one of these three stories or another, NPS was never to have a powerful and capable Director like Hartzog again.

    Here is the Obit:

    CharlestonPost&Courier / 7/1/2008
    George B. Hartzog Jr.
    COLLETON COUNTY - Former director of the National Park Service, George B. Hartzog, 88, died Friday in the Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington. Despite several years of failing health, he had lost none of the mental powers for which he was noted.
    Under the dynamic leadership of Mr. Hartzog the National Park System doubled in size during his nine-year tenure, which ended in 1972. Hartzog served as director of the National Park Service from 1964 to 1973 - years of national turmoil, but also years that provided a political environment of extraordinary opportunity.
    President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society, Interior Secretary Stewart Udall's aggressive environmentalism, and a Democratic Congress receptive to the cause of the national parks conferred advantages that no director before or since has enjoyed. Hartzog possessed the bureaucratic and political talents to exploit this combination. His most conspicuous achievement was expansion of the National Park System.
    During his nine-year directorate, the system grew by 72 units - not just national parks, but historical and archeological monuments and sites, recreation areas, seashores, riverways, and memorials - more than at any comparable period in its history. Hartzog was especially proud of advancing workplace diversity. Under his guidance the Service gained its first black park superintendent, its first career woman superintendent, its first Indian superintendent, and the first black chief of a major national police force. The Service took on a different public appearance as more women and minorities rose in the ranks to important positions.
    He sought to bring park resources and values to urban populations. New York City's Gateway and San Francisco's Golden Gate national recreation areas took form during his tenure, and he spawned a host of environmental education programs that touched and inspired urban dwellers, especially inner city youth. Hartzog played a critical role in the passage and implementation of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, whose financial, registration, and protective features have saved structures, sites, and entire districts in every state and Indian tribal lands.
    Of enormous consequence, working with Senator Alan Bible, Hartzog played a critical role in laying the legislative groundwork for the selection of "National Interest Lands" in Alaska. Ultimately, when finally enacted by the Congress, the park selections doubled the size of the National Park System.
    Hartzog introduced programs and professional attitudes that made national parks more welcoming to people of color and different economic classes. Recognizing the encroachment of urban crime into the parks, he began the training of rangers in law enforcement. Hartzog's directorate ended abruptly in December 1972. President Richard Nixon, re-elected a month earlier to a second term, fired Hartzog. His political dexterity and intimate relationship with congressional barons discomfited the White House. Also, unknown to Hartzog, one of his superintendents had offended Nixon pal Bebe Rebonzo. The vigorous appeals of Secretary of the Interior Rogers C.B. Morton failed to persuade the president to change his mind. Hartzog told his story in a 1988 boo, "Battling for the National Parks."
    Born on March 17, 1920, and reared in poverty in rural South Carolina, George Hartzog absorbed the compassionate values of family, community, and church - he even became a lay preacher - and carried them with him to his death. Forced to support a family impoverished by a disabled father, he could pursue education only sporadically. With a high school diploma and a few months of college, he applied himself to reading law in the office of a local attorney. That enabled him to gain admission to the South Carolina bar in 1942. After service in World War II as an Army military police officer, Hartzog entered the ranks of government as an attorney and soon found a position in the National Park Service. He did both legal and concessions work in the Washington office and gained management experience as assistant superintendent of both the Rocky Mountains and Great Smokey Mountains national parks.
    Beginning in 1959, Hartzog made his name as superintendent of Jefferson National Expansion Memorial on the St. Louis waterfront, a park that commemorates America's westward expansion. Employing imaginative legal and contract stratagems, he surmounted daunting obstacles to revive the stalled construction of the massive arch, the creation of famed architect Eero Saarinen, that symbolized the gateway to the West. Hartzog's work in St. Louis and on the proposed Ozark National Scenic Riverways caught the attention of Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall.
    The Kennedy-Johnson administration signaled major changes in the federal government, none more so than the National Park Service. The two presidents sought bold changes. Udall thought Hartzog would bring to the job a "new dynamism." He became director early in 1964. Parts of the entrenched bureaucracy disliked and feared the new director and his style. He prevailed with strong, decisive leadership - and a vision to take the national parks places they had never gone.
    He was a workaholic and demanded the same from all who answered to him. He could be an abusive tyrant one moment, and a compassionate, caring friend the next. Whatever his mood of the moment, he cared deeply and personally about everyone in the National Park Service, and he let them know it. Hartzog remained controversial throughout his directorate, both in and out of the National Park Service. But as his achievements multiplied and he emerged as incontestably brilliant, quick-minded, and impressively articulate, he amassed a loyal following that labored tirelessly to further his objectives.
    Former Interior Secretary Stewart L. Udall said, "[Hartzog]... was a consummate negotiator, he enjoyed entering political thickets; he had the self-confidence and savvy to be his own lobbyist and to win most of his arguments with members of Congress, governors and presidents."
    Famed writer Wallace Stegner captured the essence of the man he came to know so well: Hartzog was the "toughest, savviest, and most effective bureau chief who ever operated in that political alligator hole... Among distinguished public administrators he was one of the most distinguished, one of the friendliest, and one of the most honest." For those who worked for Hartzog, even those discomfited by his frenetic pace of change, he is remembered as a great director. In fact, Robert Utley, who served as chief historian of the Service during the Hartzog era, speaks as a historian when he judges Hartzog the greatest director since the founding duo of Stephen Mather and Horace Albright in the years after passage of the National Park Service organic act of 1916.
    Reflecting the apprehension with which field employees greeted the "new dynamism," longtime Park Service deputy director Denis Galvin looked back on his early years: "I was a new park employee when George Hartzog became director. When the peripatetic director visited the park where I worked I found some vegetation to hide behind. I still wound up in New York City as part of his urban parks program. As usual, he was right."
    After his directorate, Hartzog practiced law in the Washington area. He donated his papers and established the George B. Jr. and Helen C. Hartzog Institute for Parks at Clemson University, S.C., which is a major research center for study of the national parks and National Park Service. Hartzog is survived by his wife of 61 years, Helen, of the McLean, Va., residence; also daughter Nancy Hartzog of New Bedford, Mass.; sons George III of Chicago, Ill.; and Edward of New York City; and two granddaughters, two grandsons, and one great-granddaughter. Funeral services will be held Wednesday morning at 11:00 in the Green Pond United Methodist Church.
    Published in the Charleston Post & Courier on 7/1/2008.

  • Natural History: Northern Elephant Seals   6 years 4 weeks ago

    Another good place to see Elephant Seals is Piedras Blancas on the Coast Highway just north on San Simeone. We were there in October, 2007 and there was a lot of seals, mostly young. This was supposed to be the off season. My understanding is that there are seals there all year. Good parking lot right off the highway. I have placed a few pictures at http://famoore.home.att.net/. Nothing fancy, just pictures.

  • Park History: Olympic National Park   6 years 4 weeks ago

    The beauty of the Olympic peninsula is absolutely awesome! No place quite like it. We came here from Iowa & just never could leave. This is a very interesting piece, and I will send the link to my friends & family. Thanks for the information!
    -Cat K

  • “10 Best National Parks”? National Geographic, You Have Got to be Kidding!   6 years 4 weeks ago

    Now you're talking. I've had the pleasure to sample Yoho and, I think, Kootenay. Definitely need to head that way soon for a longer stay.

  • Park History: Mammoth Cave National Park   6 years 4 weeks ago

    We were there in May 2008. There are no more tours on the Green river, the Captain and owner died. The cave tour is awesome. I have never been in a "wet" cave before. There are a lot of caves in the Cave City area, we tried to get four of them in 3 days.

  • “10 Best National Parks”? National Geographic, You Have Got to be Kidding!   6 years 4 weeks ago

    For U.S. travelers, looking north reveals many more great national parks, some worthy of this Top 10 list. Consider the Canadian National Parks of Banff National Park, Jasper National Park, Yoho, Kootenay, and Cape Breton, to name just a few.