Submitted by jersu on May 1, 2007 - 2:26am
Describing these exclusive memberships as costly is quite accurate. To be a member at the Breezy Point Surf Club, a family of four would have to pay $1500 for a seasonal membership, PLUS, an additional $3000+ for a typical cabana! If the price tag and exclusivity sound like your cup of tea, make your way down to the club office found inside the Gateway National Recreation Area. Last year, visitation at the Gateway NRA was counted at over 8 million, making it the number 4 most visited site in the whole park system for 2006. For those looking for a little peace and quite, maybe $5 thousand seems like a good deal. I am just amazed to learn that this club operates on public property! I'd love to show up at the security gate with my America The Beautiful Pass to tell the guard I'm just going to do a couple laps around the Olympic size swimming pool. I'm sure that would go over real well.
But, if a beach club isn't your thing, the Post article points out that there are other clubs operating on NPS managed land which may interest you. Do you fancy sailing? Try the Rockaway Point Yacht Club. If you'd rather shoot things, check out the White's Ferry Sportsman's Club. Or if you consider yourself more of the athletic type, see what you can do about getting into the Washington Canoe Club. The Post article claims that membership to the Canoe Club requires two sponsors, a personal interview and a board vote -- no word on whether an ATB Pass is also required.
Park Service spokesman Dave Barna is quoted in the article. He has said that Mary Bomar "has committed us to find out the extent to which these special use permits limit public access, and not to renew any special permits until she can make a determination on whether they limit public access to these areas." Barna adds that, "it's going to take us some time. We have 391 parks on 84 million acres, and we're going to look at every one."
For more information on this story, check in with the National Parks Traveler who scooped the Washington Post by a week with his article on the audit. Nice one Kurt!
Visitor Center
Copyright 2005-2013
National Park Advocates LLC
Follow the Traveler
Recent comments
-
mountainhiker
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
6 hours 6 min ago
-
Jim Burnett
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
9 hours 27 min ago
-
ecbuck
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
9 hours 56 min ago
-
mountainhiker
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
10 hours 7 min ago
-
ecbuck
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
10 hours 9 min ago
-
Amarillobymorning
on
Visiting the Parks: Petroglyph National...
13 hours 38 min ago
-
Amarillobymorning
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
13 hours 42 min ago
-
Lee Dalton
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
17 hours 5 min ago
-
KBenzar
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
17 hours 45 min ago
-
David Crowl
on
Organizations Want Veto Power Over...
18 hours 51 min ago


















Comments
At the same time these parks are claiming poverty when it comes to funding free interpretative services that have always been a hallmark of the national park experience. With entrance fees averaging $25 per park you have to wonder how much longer the paying public will tolerate more for less? I think the recent downward trend in park visitation is an accurate indicator of what that type of business model will ultimately yield.
It's going to take more than podcasts to get the public coming back as regular visitors to these increasingly over-priced, over regulated and elitist parks with their high priced institute tours and over burdensome and meddling mountains of governmental red tape.
National parks have been great for increasing the visitation levels of BLM and Forest Service lands. Keep up the good work green & gray!