You are here

Legislation Could Force Bicycles Off Roads In Some National Parks

Share

Cyclists on one-way scenic drive near Jenny Lake in Grand Teton National Park. Wouldn't it be nice if all the park roads could be so accommodating? Bob Janiskee photo.

Serious road cyclists do not often dally about when they're out for a ride, instead preferring to dance on the pedals at speeds of 20 mph and more. While they can easily do that on many National Park System roads, legislation pending in Congress could force them onto paved paths now enjoyed by walkers, folks with strollers, those in wheelchairs, and others not zooming along.

The legislation, whose main intent is to reauthorize federal highway funding and safety construction projects, dictates that "(T)he Secretary of the appropriate Federal land management agency shall prohibit the use of bicycles on each federally owned road that has a speed limit of 30 miles per hour or greater and an adjacent paved path for use by bicycles within 100 yards of the road."

In other words, according to Darren Flusche, a policy analyst with the League of American Bicyclists, cyclists who enjoy cruising roads in places such as Rock Creek Park in Washington, D.C, or Grand Teton National Park, could be forced off the roads in those parks and onto paved paths.

"If you write into federal transportation legislation that bicyclists are somehow unfit -- because again, the clause is called 'Bicycle Safety' -- it’s a really, really bad message to send that sharing the road with bicyclists above 35 mph is dangerous," said Mr. Flusche, who hasn't been able to determine who added the clause to the bill. "If you can write in a clause that says bicyclists have to use side paths if there’s one available, that kind of implies that maybe bicyclists shouldn’t be on the road at all. And so it’s really a dangerous precedent that we’re seeing."

Cycling is very popular in national parks, from Cape Cod National Seashore to Grand Teton National Park and on west to Mount Rainier National Park. At Cape Cod there's a great trail network that ties into bike paths in surrounding communities, and Grand Teton officials in recent years built a multi-use path to offer cyclists some protection from ponderous RVs and other vehicles.

At Yellowstone National Park, as in Grand Teton, there's a window early in the spring when the park roads are open to cyclists, but not to wheeled-vehicles, and many road bikers see a great challenge in riding the Going-to-the-Sun Road in Glacier National Park end-to-end.

While information on which parks have paved paths running parallel to their roads, and within 100 yards of those roads, is difficult to find, Rock Creek Park is one, says Mr. Flusche.

"It’s a major commuter route for drivers to get in and out of the city because it’s a park. It doesn’t have that many intersections where you have to stop, and so it’s a convenient commuter route for drivers. But it’s also a national park, so there’s also lots of recreational riders and transportation bicyclists," he said. "And there is a path, parallel to the road, for much of the length of it, and a lot of people would say that bicyclists should just be on the path.

"Beach Drive is the main road in Rock Creek Park, and many bicyclists use Beach Drive just to get their workouts and to get to and from work," continued Mr. Flusche. "Being forced on the path would really be killer for those bicyclists who are higher speed bicyclists. They’re almost going 30 mph themselves, and wouldn’t really be able to practically share that path with people taking a stroll or more recreational cyclists who are going slower pace. As it is, the path already tends to get overcrowded."

Another park that draws cyclists to its roads is Valley Forge National Historical Park, which has paved pathways.

“They are open to bikes now, but they’re shared paths with pedestrians, and women with babystrollers. They get pretty crowded on weekends. It works, because not all bicyclists use it, especially the guys who ride very fast," says Deirdre Gibson, the park's chief of planning and resource management. “It could cause a carrying capacity problem for us if road bikers were compelled to use parallel trails.”

National Park Service officials -- who the league maintains doesn't want bicyclists in the parks -- had no comment on the proposed legislation, saying they would comment if asked to testify on it. In the meantime, the League of American Bicyclists hopes to find a sympathetic senator who would work to remove the clause.

"We’re trying to target Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, hoping we can build support in those states to have that clause removed. A lot of Western states have a lot of federal land," said Mr. Flusche. "Whether or not they have bike paths on them is a different question. Certainly, anywhere where you’re used to riding on federal land there’s a threat that at some point you might get pushed off if a trail develops."

The league has created a petition page on its website to fight the clause.

Comments

sounds to me like you cut them off.  is it legal to pass on the left that close to an intersection?


I don't know why I always read the thread posts: they are inevitably
depressing, full of ignorant and hateful opinions based almost entirely
on anecdotal evidence, and sadly reflective of the state of critical
thinking and policymaking amongst our relatively privileged population.
Where do I even start to respond to the people complaining above?
[Note: I ride 2000+ miles a year for both commuting, recreation, and utility, in both rural and urban areas.]
1.
Just because some bicyclist cut you off or ran a stop sign or was
wearing something you thought should indicate better riding habits,
doesn't mean your unfortunate experience should shape a national policy.

2. Bicyclists are mostly relegated to roads because they are
considered vehicles and it is illegal to ride them on the sidewalk. I
would be happily open to correction on this, but as someone who has
ridden a bicycle for 35 years, this is my experience. It isn't just that
cyclists riding on roads need to "let you pass" - it is also that you
as a motorist pass when it is safe. Which means that you might have to
slow down for a moment. As an aside, riding double-file in a way that
impedes traffic is never okay.
3. I have ridden cross country on several interstate highways
(50, 70, 40, etc.). While I prefer to ride in the shoulder, this is not
always safe or feasible. If you ever get out of your car and look, you
would notice that the shoulders are repositories of glass and wire and
nails and lots of other objects that are not friendly to bicycles. From
time to time, we have to edge out into the road, which hopefully we do
safely (probably because we're using mirrors). As a driver, you might
make allowance for this fact by moving over in the .5 seconds that it
takes you to pass a cyclist.
4. Cyclists generally don't think
they have a God-given right to flaunt traffic laws, despite your damning
anecdotal evidence to the contrary. I don't run red lights, but I treat
stop signs like yellow lights. I don't think I deserve this: it is a
cost-benefit analysis that I run when I ride my bicycle every day,
because that is my mode of transport, which dramatically loses its
efficiency if I stop at every stop sign in my fair city. I see stop
signs being run safely every day by biyclists making the same
calculation. It isn't a consipiracy, and just because someone got hit or
hit you, doesn't make it true of cyclists across the board. Or should I
generalize about all drivers because of the two that have hit me by
running red lights? I didn't think so.
5. Honestly, I don't see
that there is a problem with cyclists on park roads, having ridden many
of them myself without incident. If both cyclists and motorists followed
rules and acted considerately, everything would be fine. Do you know
what would increase injuries? Forcing cyclists onto crowded multi-use
paths (MUP) full of pedestrians with small children and pets, often
using walkers or wheelchairs, who have no idea how to safely and
responsibly use a MUP and who are paying more attention to the scenic
grandeur than to their exact position in space. In my considerable
experience, this is where problems happen, and this is why we don't
allow bicyclists on sidewalks. This is why the Golden Gate Bridge has a
bicycle side and a pedestrian side.

[This comment was edited to remove gratuitous remarks. Ed.]


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.