You are here

Major Lodging Changes Coming To Yellowstone National Park

Share
More guest rooms are being eyed at the Mammoth Hot Springs Hotel in Yellowstone under the park's proposal for a new lodging concession contract. Photo by David and Kay Scott.

Significant changes are in the offing for lodging operations in parts of Yellowstone National Park, where officials envision tens of millions of dollars of improvements.

The just released National Park Service contract proposal for Yellowstone indicates a number of major changes will take place in the park’s lodging facilities. The contract will run for 20 years and requires an estimated initial investment of nearly $45 million from the selected bidder. Additional outlays of $135 million will be required in a variety of facility improvements.

Xanterra Parks & Resorts, the existing concessionaire, currently operates all nine lodging facilities within the park. Xanterra is operating under a three-year extension that expires in November 2013, when the new contract is to take effect. The park’s other major concessionaire, Delaware North Companies Parks & Resorts, operates 12 general stores that are not part of the newly-issued contract proposal. Delaware North does own three hotels just outside the park’s west entrance in West Yellowstone, Montana.

Alternate Text
Frontier Cabin at Canyon. David and Kay Scott photo.

Major changes are due for a number of the park’s lodging facilities. As an indication of the mammoth size of the park’s concession operation, consider that in 2010 gross revenues of the concessionaire amounted to $86 million, and the Park Service received franchise fees from the concessionaire of more than $2 million. Not surprisingly, the largest outlay by far will be at Canyon, Yellowstone’s biggest lodging complex and the one with the greatest need for upgrading. Other major outlays will be required in Mammoth, Lake, and the Old Faithful area. Another expensive project will deal with the Fishing Bridge RV Park.

The major improvement programs and outlays include:

Mammoth Hotel Area ($6.1 million) - Renovation of the vacant Haynes Photo Shop (south across the parade ground from the hotel) so administrative offices currently in the hotel’s second floor can be moved there. Vacated space in the hotel will be reconfigured into seven additional guest rooms, including one suite, three rooms without private baths, and three rooms with private baths. Construction is to commence in 2015 and is to be completed the next year. In addition, 14 cabins currently used as employee housing will be returned to use as guest cabins, necessitating the concessionaire to acquire employee housing outside the park.

Old Faithful Area ($9.7 million) - Construction of a 77-room employee dormitory so 67 cabins currently used by employees can be returned to visitor use. This project is to commence by 2016 and reach completion by 2018.

Lake Yellowstone Hotel ($16.5 million less $8 million provided by the existing concessionaire) - Retrofitting the hotel for seismic structural stabilization. Expanding deli services (currently a small operation in the east wing) by moving the current hotel administrative services (currently near the lobby in the east wing) to an adjacent boiler building that is to be remodeled and retrofitted for seismic stabilization. This work is to be completed by 2015.

Lake Area ($14 million) - Construction by 2016 of a 60-room employee dormitory as a replacement for the existing dormitory that is to be demolished. The expected cost is $5.4 million. At Lake Lodge Cabins, the proposal calls for rehabilitation of 19 Pioneer cabin buildings, rehabilitation and relocation of 15 additional Pioneer cabin buildings, and relocation of six four-plex Western cabin buildings. The expected cost of Lake Lodge Cabin renovations is $8.6 million.

Canyon Area ($70.5 million) - Construction of five lodges with a total of 407 guest rooms.

Alternate Text
Frontier cabins, Old Faithful area. David and Kay Scott photo.

These include 60 lower-cost rooms with shared bathrooms, 10 suites, and 337 rooms similar to those currently in Dunraven and Cascade lodges that were constructed in 1999 and 1993, respectively. The new lodges will replace 407 guest rooms currently available in cabins that will be taken out. Thus, the number of guest rooms at Canyon will remain unchanged. The plan is to keep approximately 300 guest rooms open during the construction of the five lodges. Construction of the lodges is expected to be completed by 2018.

Fishing Bridge RV Park ($17.7 million) - Replacement of most of the infrastructure, redesign of three loops to handle larger RVs, remodeling of comfort stations and the camper services facility, and construction of a comfort station with showers. Construction is expected to take place in 2017 and 2018 when portions of the RV park may be closed.

In all, there will be a net increase of 88 guest rooms in the park.

The bottom line to all this appears to be that the Park Service has decided the time has come to undertake some long-delayed major projects that will be quite costly. In return, they are allowing the concessionaire (and the park, through added franchise fees) to take in additional revenues with added guest rooms, upgraded guest rooms that will almost certainly be rented at a higher price, a longer season for many rooms, and added food and beverage service that will in some cases be subject to an extended season.

The NPS is also taking the unusual step of allowing a 20-year concession contract, double the length of the typical contract for national park lodging facilities. It would be difficult to entice a concessionaire to agree to all the stipulated construction and renovations using a 10-year contract. The minimum franchise fee under the new contract is 6.8 percent of gross revenues. This seems considerably higher than the same fee under the existing contract that appears to be 2.5 percent based on gross revenues and the franchise fee paid in 2010.

Alternate Text
Pioneer cabin, Lake area. David and Kay Scott photo.

Using 2010 gross revenues of $86 million, the new franchise fee of 6.8 percent would produce nearly triple the amount paid by the concessionaire to the Park Service. Unless the concessionaire operates on narrower margins, it would also suggest the cost of lodging and food will increase to cover the higher fee.

The changes will result in more overnight guests, especially in the Old Faithful area where additional rooms will be made available. Consider the masses of visitors and vehicles in this area with the current room count and then add an additional 67 cabins being released for public use. Additional overnight guests, in turn, will require additional employees. And the beat goes on.

 


David and Kay Scott are the authors of The Complete Guide To The National Park Lodges. Along with updates in their recently released 7th edition of the book is the insertion of full-color images from lodges and settings in the national parks.

Featured Article

Comments

What anonymous says is very true. The park service sets all of the rates, including room rates and how much you pay for food. The conessionaires do not set the rate.


I watch the shows about lodging in the national parks and then check the prices and come away feeling these are only for the well to do citizens. Rooms costing $400.00 a night. We all pay taxes to keep them running but most find it very expensive to get to the park and then the rooms out of reach. At Yosemite to rent a tent with a wood floor ($125.00 a night) is very expensive. These sites must have been paid for a thousand times over. I know some say if you can't afford it then just camp out. Well we have done that and even backpacked for a week but Im just saying that these Parks seem to be way out of line on somethings.


I worked in housekeeping at Canyon in 2006, and cleaned many of the cabins which (I presume) will be going away. At the time, many were deemed unsafe and were condemned, and rightly so. They have been in need of renovating/replacing for quite some time and, in fact, one section of cabins had recently been remodeled. Those (remodeled) cabins were renting for about the same price as a room in Dunraven/Cascade, but to be fair, they were also larger than the other, more dilapidated cabins. Certainly, it's sad that the cabins were allowed to fall into such a state of disrepair, and even more sad if losing those lower-cost housing options prevents people from seeing Yellowstone. But something had to be done. Hopefully people who are able will consider tent camping. My wife and I spent over a week a few years ago camping around Yellowstone and thoroughly enjoyed ourselves, and it was a lot cheaper than even the Canyon cabins would have been.


Why don't they put hostels in national parks? Or maybe there are some already?? Seems like hostels and parks would be a good fit for a certain demographic, no?


There is a hostel in Point Reyes National Seashore. I believe it is the only lodging in the park.


Moonpie:
Why don't they put hostels in national parks? Or maybe there are some already?? Seems like hostels and parks would be a good fit for a certain demographic, no?

Bob mentioned Point Reyes. There is already one in the Marin Headlands section of Golden Gate National Recreation Area. There's one in development in Redwood National Park as well as one nearby. In addition to that, there are hostels extremely close to national parks.

http://norcalhostels.org/files/nr_110215.pdf

There's one near the east entrance to Glacier NP:

http://hiusa.org/eastglacierpark

Yosemite Bug outside of Yosemite NP has hostel accommodations:

http://www.yosemitebug.com/lodging.html


Good point, mkjanssen. As I understand things, the cabins they are planning to demolish were built as "temporary" structures in the 1950s. 60 years later, they're really not safe. I do wish there were a way to replace them with affordable, safe, permanent structures. But with the funding cuts that the NPS has seen in recent years and the staggering level of unmet maintenance needs, I doubt that will be high on the priority list. Still, it is quite sad that, for many, staying in our national parks is simply out of reach.


While it is true that NPS is control freaks, it is also true that the concessionaire invests as little as possible into the properties. Xanterra prefers to let the old properties run down, and uses monies that could be invested in maintaining them for buying new properties instead. There is a continual push for more properties/more contracts on the part of Xanterra. Perhaps Xanterra could have invested in one less contract and instead kept up the cabins?

For instance, at Grand Canyon, the Bright Angel Lodge has been in a state of disrepair for some time. Yet, instead of giving the lodge the necessary maintenance needed- the concessionaire is responsible in part for upkeep- Xanterra has chosen to continually acquire more properties. It is as though the owner of Xanterra is a collector, and has no concern for the actual condition of that which he collects or for those employed therein. (To my knowledge, Mr. Anschutz has only been to the park once since purchasing Xanterra in 2008.) Employees are tired of working and living in broken down facilities, and continually apologizing to guests for outdated and broken facilties which are continually misrepresented by a Central reservations office that will do anything to get a commission. Morale is low as a result of this.

For its part, NPS could better spend the monies they do receive. Why waste so many resources micromanaging? Leave it to the businessman to decide what type and color paint to use, the wattage light bulb, the exact food items on menus, etc. Monies used toward these items could at least contribute to budget woes in other areas, even if they did not resolve them. NPS needs to concern itself more with safety of guests and employees alike- something their concern seems to be lacking in- not micromanaging every detail. Personally, I would liken given NPS a bigger budget to giving a child a bigger allowance simply because they have wasted the one that you gave them in the first place. I need to see the current allowance is being spent responsibly before agreeing to an increase.

NPS might be able to attract a better concessionaire as well if they did not micromange. A concessioanire that had the business ethics to maintain their properties and to not misrepresent themselves. One that had pride in upkeep. I can not imagine most hotel chains- either budget or luxury being willing to tolerate the bullying NPS does to run the park concession. Can you imagine a Marriot, Sheraton, or Disney being told exactly what to put on their menu or what light bulb to use?


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.