You are here

Cellphone Towers In Yellowstone National Park: A Flaw In The National Park Service Mission?

Share

When the National Park Service was created nearly a century ago, its mission seemed straightforward: to preserve the landscape for the enjoyment of today's and tomorrow's generations. As the agency nears its centennial, is there a need to recommit to that mission?

Those who believe so might point to ever-increasing fees across the National Park System, efforts to create deeper channels for boats at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, and ongoing snowmobile use in Yellowstone National Park.

But there also are groups that believe the Park Service should indeed re-examine its mission statement and focus a bit more on recreation in the parks and working with businesses that reflect an element of the human landscape in the parks, such as the oyster farm at Point Reyes National Seashore.

If you follow the writings and musings of Michael Frome, the man whom the late Gaylord Nelson said had no literary peer when it came to arguing for "a national ethic of environmental stewardship," you'll sense his belief that the Park Service needs to focus more on the environmental landscape of the park system.

That message was inherent in Mr. Frome's recent thoughts on the approval of a cellphone tower near Lake in Yellowstone.

Cellphone service originating from inside the boundaries of Yellowstone has been limited to the Mammoth, Old Faithful, Canyon, Tower-Roosevelt, and Grant developed areas. The Lake developed area is the one additional location in the park where park managers determined cellphone coverage could be added under the park’s 2008 Wireless Communications Services Plan Environmental Assessment and its associated Finding of No Significant Impact.

In July the park received permission to erect a tower near Lake. The new cellular site is to be located next to a buried water tank on a 100-foot rise above the Lake Administrative Area and 700 feet below the top of the Elephant Back Ridge. This site already has access via an existing service road and is near existing electric and phone lines. Antennas will be configured to minimize spillover coverage into Yellowstone’s backcountry.

In the September edition of his Portogram, Mr. Frome laments that decision.

"Changes made in response to comments were incorporated into a Finding of No Significant Impact. No significant impact — so the park administrators said. As they see it, the developed areas, with electric wires, phone lines, lots of automobiles, gas stations, hotels, commercial gift shops and sewage treatment, are 'sacrifice areas,' otherwise known as popcorn playgrounds or tourist ghettos," he writes.

"Before coming, you think of Yellowstone the way it is in the nature series on television. The Park Service tells you to unplug your ears and connect with nature — but when you arrive you can check your e-mail, the state of your stocks, and feel the conveniences of home," continues Mr. Frome. "Perhaps park administrators might have chosen not to allow those towers in the first place. They might have determined this was a strictly commercial service using public resources and public land, and that the signals the towers emit can spill into and pollute hiking trails away from developed areas.

"They might have decided that since hotels in the park get along without television, they can make it without wireless Internet service. When people come to Yellowstone, it’s one of the special times in their lives. They want to hear the splash of geysers and feel themselves in harmony with natural forces that over the centuries created the thermal features, peaks and canyons. That is what they come here for, and not having that sound drowned out by somebody conversing via cell phone."

As Mr. Frome goes on to argue against the cell tower, he says national parks "are presumed preserved to reflect the original America. Many National Park Service personnel want it that way. They care deeply, feeling their mission is to encourage us to embrace a lifestyle that treads lightly on the earth, and that doing so adds richness to all of our lives. They ought to be able to defend their park areas from overuse and misuse with a clear conscience. To deplete or degrade the visible physical resource does something to the invisible spirit of place as well."

To further drive home that point, Mr. Frome points to Zane Grey's 1925 book, The Vanishing American, in which "Nophaie most loved to be alone, out in the desert, 'listening to the real sounds of the open and to the whispering of his soul.”

"In short," Mr. Frome concludes in his column, "instead of treating a national park like any other place, the park professionals ought to say, 'If you can’t do without your cellphone or laptop or tablet, don’t come here!'”

Comments

Alfred Runte,

I am addressing you, in the manner you identify yourself, but I became curious, seeing others refer to you as Dr. I'm a good researcher...

It is one thing that it turns out you hold an advanced degree as a Historian, and I effectively lectured you on the discipline. The facts were unknown to me, and it was unintentional.

But it is another thing, that academia does not equally value & reward all those who acquire professional status & credentials.

In my experience, Sir, this is often a reflection of limits & foibles within the institution, and tends not to correlate with the qualifications, value or contributions of the individual. That appears to have been the case here.

Personally ... those of my instructors & professors who found it necessary to keep close tabs on the petroleum industry employment scene, or cultivate a base at an odd Liberal Arts school ... typically were the people who made being on campus & in the classroom worthwile for myself and other students.

I look forward to exchanging views & exploring topics with you, here on the Traveler.

Ted


Is this another battle of the moderns and the ancients? It's always the same dialogue between those who espouse a view that parks should only be enjoyed the way they've always been and those (like me) who are okay with a bit of change so long as it does not really impact the central goal of conserving those landscapes.

Clearly, that lone antenna won't damage the landscape. Frankly, if that antenna happens to harm your solitude or enjoyment of the park, I only see two solutions: 1) staying home in your room where nobody will interfere with your solitude or 2) hike further in the park to see less people.


Moderns versus ancients is right. If you are bothered by the antenna then we should have requested that they hid it better. If you do not like to hear people talk on their phones, go take a hike, literally, go take a hike and within minutes you are away from the crowd. My kids rarely talk on their phones because a text is easier for their friends to respond when they can. I also wondered about Sec. 3 of the Act when it says; "He may also grant privileges, leases, and permits for the use of land for the accommodation of visitors in the various parks, monuments,..." is cellular service an accomodation of visitors. The last sentance of section 3 says excludes Yellowstone but I am not sure if that refers to the whole section or just grazing livestock.


Furthermore, the Act is not a bible that's set in stone. It should be, and it is already, reinterpreted over time.


You were going good until that one Zeb. Laws - like our constitution - shouldn't be "reinterpreted" They should be follow to the wording and original spirit and intent. If that original spirit and intent is no longer desired - then change the laws, don't redefine what they mean as it takes too few to "reinterpret".


You were going good until that one Zeb. Laws - like our constitution - shouldn't be "reinterpreted" They should be follow to the wording and original spirit and intent. If that original spirit and intent is no longer desired - then change the laws, don't redefine what they mean as it takes too few to "reinterpret".

I'm pretty happy that the Constitution was "reinterpreted" so that Brown v. Board of Ed is the law of land, not Plessy v. Ferguson. (The Constitution is always being interpeted and reinterpreted; it's the very reason we have a Supreme Court.)


it's the very reason we have a Supreme Court

No Justin, we have the Supreme Court to apply the law of the land, not to make new law. You might want to check into the "separation of powers". But then that may prove nonsensical to you.


not to make new law

Who said anything about "mak[ing] new law"?


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.