You are here

Interior Secretary Jewell Calls On Congress To Step Up For Conservation...Or President Obama Will

Share

In an address last week to the National Press Club, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell called on Congress to become more conservation-minded.

Washington politics are infuriating, disappointing, enlightening, and entertaining. They rarely are dull. That is obvious based on what has transpired since October 1, when the federal government ran out of money.

* We saw a 16-day closure of the National Park System initially spurred by House Republicans...who then castigated National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis for how the parks were shuttered.

* We received a 208-page report from U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma, that blamed the current state of the park system largely on those in Congress, but also on Park Service management.

* Most recently, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell called on Congress to support President Obama's broad conservation agenda...or the president will use his executive powers to move forward on parts of it.

In a speech last week before the National Press Club, the Interior secretary pointed to the value of public lands when it comes to climate change, clean air and water, and local economies. She talked about preserving these lands for generations yet to be born, of the need to "think about what conservation legacy we will leave for the next 50 years, for the next 100 years."

In short, she urged Congress to put up or shut up.

"The real test of whether you support conservation is not what you say in a press conference when the cameras are rolling, but whether you fight for it in the budget conference," Secretary Jewell told those at the Press Club gathering.

Some figurative fighting began last week almost immediately after Sen. Coburn issued his report, Parked! How Congress' Misplaced Priorities Are Trashing Our National Treasures, sections of which questioned the appropriateness of some units of the park system, such as Isle Royale National Park in Michigan. That immediately spurred bipartisan backlash from that state's congressional delegation, which pointed to the park not only as a breathtaking landscape but a key economic timber for area communities.

Which brings us back to Secretary Jewell's speech, which drew praise from the National Parks Conservation Association and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees, two groups that were critical of Sen. Coburn's take on the parks.

“With less than three years before the centennial of our National Park System, we agree with Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell that Congress should adopt a rational budget that recognizes the value of national parks, conservation and their economic contribution to communities nationwide," said Theresa Pierno, NPCA's acting president. "We also agree that there is a need to improve the balance between conservation and energy development on our public lands and to continue to protect important new natural and cultural areas as national monuments.

“Secretary Jewell’s strong statements on the value of conservation to our nation and to our future are welcome, and should be heeded. The Secretary was correct that, in the wake of the federal government shutdown, the real test of congressional support for national parks, park visitors, and local park economies will be the outcome of the budget conference now occurring between the House and Senate," Ms. Pierno went on. "The administration’s response to that conference and the president’s budget proposal for FY 2015 will also be tests. The National Parks Conservation Association calls on Congress to end the mindless sequester cuts and restore critically needed investments in our national parks and public lands. We also call on the administration to propose a budget for FY 2015 that takes meaningful, bold steps to restore and renew our national parks and ready them for their second century."

Coalition officials issued a short, but definitive, statement endorsing the secretary's speech: "CNPSR fully endorses the programs she outlined and her eloquent defense of the nation's national parks, public lands and the overall work of the Department of the Interior. Secretary Jewell is thinking big and that is befitting for the Department Head that stewards the vast majority of the nation's public lands."

While leading Republicans in Congress likely will give little merit to the Interior secretary's speech, they might focus on her mention that President Obama "is ready and willing to step up where Congress falls short" when it comes to conserving public lands as wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, units of the National Park System, or in some other protected form.

To buttress that point, Secretary Jewell said that "(I)n the coming weeks and months, I will be meeting with communities and evaluating opportunities where action can ensure that our nation’s stories and landscapes are honored, celebrated and preserved for the generations to come."

Her road trip likely will draw ire from U.S. Reps. Doc Hastings, R-Washington, and Rob Bishop, R-Utah, who in particular have been highly vocal in the past with their opposition to the president wielding his executive power to create, for example, national monuments.

The ongoing partisan rancor, which has led to congressional grandstanding, poses a great danger to the country's conservation movement if it's allowed to overwhelm positive steps that are being made.

Among currently pending legislation that would further conservation across the country are:

* H.R. 139, the Udall-Eisenhower Arctic Wilderness Act that would preserve the Arctic coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, as wilderness.

* H.R. 145, the Central Idaho Economic Development and Recreation Act that would create more than 333,000 acres of wilderness in Idaho.

* S. 1294, the Tennessee Wilderness Act, which would create more than 19,550 acres of wilderness in Tennessee

Unfortunately, these measures' chances of passage are gauged by govtrack.us as being slim or none.

Here's hoping that Congress shows some rare statesmanship in guiding the affairs of the country.

Comments

Sorry about the Whack-a-mole imagery, Kurt. Rather than indulge in a lot of self righteous explanation about just how off base me being a handout kinda guy is - years and years of thousands of hours per year donating medical skills to my community isn't a taker - I'll walk away from this one. None of this personality stuff has a damn thing to do with the NPS or Traveler.


More wilderness, less mountain biking... We need less wilderness.


Because 5% of the U.S. is too much. (2.7% of the contiguous 48 is also too much.)


how do you explain Ted Cruz promising to make "all available resources" from the federal government following the West Texas fertilizer plant explosion after voting against federal aid for Hurricane Sandy victims?

Easy - He promised all "available resources" i.e. those that already existed and were to be available anywhere in the country for such unforseen events. He voted against the Sandy federal aid because the bill included vast amounts of "pork" that were totally unrelated to Sandy emergency relief. In his call for "available resources" he didn't tack on "Smithsonian repairs, upgrades to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration airplanes, and more funding for Head Start" all which were included in the Sandy bill.


From my own less than expert opinion of the vote to open the parks, I believe Mr. Runte is correct. The broader issue, on weather the senate should have followed suit, is. in my own opinion, that they should not have done so. The minority in the House of Representatives brought the debacle on, the damage is done, and I personally place the blame squarely on the house. Unfortunately, it looks like the game is to be played again, while thousands of dedicated public service officials , local gateway communities, etc, will pay the price. This does not even begin to to cover all the other agencies, employees, citizens, etc. that lost also. Thank you Secretary of Interior Sally Jewel for standing up to protect our public lands and make those additions that are necessary for environmental or historical reasons.


18% of total spending.

Near record lows and that for a funtion that is specified in the Constitution. Don't disagree it should be scrutinized, but the absolute level is certainly not out of line.


The fact that DOD cannot produce an auditable financial statement and is years off from doing so, is the point.


Even some Tea Party members aren't above a serving of pork back home.

Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) is firmly in the Tea Party camp, but despite his calls to "cut wasteful spending" has been leading the charge for increased spending on a very dubious addition to the National Park System.

Here's just one news report: "A Texas congressman is behind efforts to turn former President George W. Bush's boyhood home into a national park."

"U.S. Rep. Mike Conaway, a Republican who is calling for cuts to wasteful spending as the sequester sets in, successfully requested a 'reconnaissance survey' of the 1,400-square-foot home in the West Texas oil town of Midland."

"The survey, price tag as much as $25,000, is a first step in making the 1950s Bush family home into a unit of the National Park Service."

I'm the first to agree that the $25,000 for the study is a small sum as federal spending goes, but as the story notes, Rep. Conaway hopes it's just the first step in an expanding federal role (and expense) on behalf of a new Bush "national park" site.

The key point here not the amount, but as another sad example of political hypocrisy when it comes to "cutting government spending." The rule seems to be, cut as long as it doesn't apply to the politician's personal projects.

His Tea Party bio says Conaway "worked with George W. Bush as the Chief Financial Officer for Bush Exploration. Mike developed a lasting friendship with President Bush as together they learned what it takes to run a business."

Sounds like he also learned what it takes to bring home the pork.


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.