You are here

House Oversight Committee Investigating Bryce Canyon National Park's Monumental Tweet

Share

With all of Washington, D.C.'s political intrigue -- the commercialization of the White House, the administration's mysterious connections to Russia, and President Trump's ability to be both landlord and tenant on a government property -- why is U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz so curious about the planning and forethought that goes into a Twitter tweet?

No, the Utah Republican is not sifting through the president's Twitter feed. Rather, his attention was caught by a seemingly innocuous tweet from Bryce Canyon National Park in Utah, where the staff was thrilled on December 29 to welcome the country's two new national monuments, Gold Butte in Nevada and Bears Ears in Utah.

Was that tweet simply a spur-of-the-moment shout-out, as many tweets are, or did the park staff have advance notice of the designations by President Obama? And if they did, wonders Congressman Chaffetz, how much advance notice?

We're not talking state secrets here. But hey, none of the other national parks in Utah tweeted the news on December 29, although the Traveler did the day before, when the announcements were made. And while the writing was clearly on the wall regarding the new monuments, we didn't get advance word.

The issue with Rep. Chaffetz is that this tweet could be evidence that the Obama White House lied to Utah Gov. Gary Herbert when it wrote him to say that as of December 15 "no decision had been made about Bears Ears."

Could it be that the White House really was planning as of December 15 to designate those two monuments, as it did on December 28, and that Bryce Canyon officials were in the loop?

"When was a Bears Ears map slot created in the Bryce Canyon National Park's front desk national parks and monuments map area?" Rep. Chaffetz wrote to acting Bryce Canyon Superintendent Sue Fritzke on January 19 (attached below). 

"Who made the decision to create a Bears Ears map slot in the Bryce Canyon National Park's front desk national parks and monuments map area," he added in a follow-up question.

Finally, the congressman wondered, "(W)hen did you become aware of the Bears Ears National Monument designation and from whom?"

Bryce Canyon's celebratory tweet, Rep. Chaffetz explained in his letter, "created the appearance that officials at Bryce Canyon coordinated with the White House prior to this most recent designation."

Beyond being curious about the map slot for the new monuments, the committee chairman asked the superintendent to "identify any employees of Bryce Canyon National Park consulted regarding the Bears Ears National Monument Designation. For each employee, identify the communications, that is, when did those conversations occur and with whom?"

Why is Rep. Chaffetz, who has issues of national security to investigate, so concerned about Bryce Canyon's tweeting habits? True, the designation of Bears Ears National Monument went against plans that the congressman and his fellow Utah Republican, Rob Bishop, had for the landscape involved.

But polling shows Utahns were in favor (47+ percent for and 32 percent against) the Bears Ears designation, and a strong majority (60 percent) have no interest in seeing monuments decommissioned. And Rep. Chaffetz made a quick reversal last month when legislation he drafted to transfer 3 million acres of federal lands to the states was soundly criticized by hunters and anglers.

At day's end, we'd like to think taxpayer dollars could be better spent than on investigating a harmless 24-word tweet.

Featured Article

Comments

Enjoy retirement; I certainly am. Just put out a little less of that Trumpian party line and you'll make even more new friends.


 

I called Congressman Chaffetz's office to ask how he could be interested in when the Supt. of Bryce knew about Bear Ears and ignore the ties between the Trump administration and Russia.  As soon as I said, "I'm Rick Smith from AZ", the staffer hung up on me.  So much for chairing a committee that represents, supposedly, all of us.

 


zb39 don't expect real news here. Most stories on here have a heavy left distortion and environmental extremist spin. 


Beach, I guess you see what you want to see. 


Kurt, I call a spade a spade.


Ok, beach, then I challenge you to defend your position that "most stories on here have a heavy left distortion and environmental extremist spin."

Indeed, I'd ask the other readers out there if they agree with you?

On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being the Wall Street Journal and 10 being Huffington Post, I'd put the Traveler at about a 6. 

Indeed, just looking at the news stories for the past week, there's no spin or distortion at all. They're straightforward news stories about skiers dying or going missing in Grand Teton, a reading list for Glacier National Park or Yosemite, one about paving the road through Arches National Park, repairs on pump stations in Grand Canyon, storm damage to stairs at Cape Cod, the Outdoor Retailer Show leaving Utah, what do Santa Monica Mountains NRA coyotes eat, trout fisheries at Yellowstone, seaplane access to Isle Royale, the NPS hiring freeze, and similar. 

To support your contention, "most" of those stories would have to reflect "heavy left distortion and environmental extremist spin." Could you point to it? Heck, there was even a story back on February 3 about the back road at Cape Hatteras that you approved of, saying, "Superintendent David Hallac is turning out to be a positive for the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area. He is truly working to improve access for all."

How did we possibly manage to report that one straight enough for you?

On the feature side, what's the spin regarding the museum at Chaco Culture? Or the BLM's drilling issue near Zion? Or the views of the NPCA and Coalition to Protect America's National Parks? As for Lee Dalton's piece on National Park Diplomacy, that's an opinion column that stands on its own merits.

Quoting folks who you disagree with is not spin, it's just reporting.


Great reply, Kurt!  I find the Traveler pretty middle-of-the-road politically.  IMO, the main source of “distortion and… extremism” in America is today’s Republican party.

My old college dictionary contains the following definition.  “Fascism:  A philosophy or system of government...of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with an ideology of belligerent nationalism and religious or racial scapegoating.”

The only definition element missing from this administration is “dictatorship”, but one party rule led by a madman is pretty close.


Not wasting my time on your challenge Kurt. I will retract that "most" part and say some...


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.