You are here

OIG: National Park Service Didn't Exploit Trump Inauguration Crowd Size

Share

National Park Service personnel did not exploit the size of the crowd at President Donald Trump's inauguration, nor did agency staff discuss with the media a call from the president to acting Park Service Director Mike Reynolds that day, an Interior Department investigation has concluded.

President Trump and his staff maintained that the crowd at his inauguration was one of the largest ever -- " I looked out the field was, it looked like a million, a million and half people," the president said the day after his inauguration. -- but photos released by the Park Service showed that the crowds for both of President Obama's elections were larger.

Interior's Office of Inspector General looked into the matter after an unidentified individual complained that National Park Service "officials and employees took questionable actions during and after the 58th presidential inauguration ceremony." Specifically, the complaint alleged:

  • That an NPS National Mall and Memorial Parks (NAMA) official instructed NPS employees to alter records related to crowd size estimates for the inauguration ceremony. 
  • That two NPS public affairs employees released information to the press, without authorization, about a January 21, 2017, phone call from President Donald Trump to Acting NPS Director Michael Reynolds.
  • That one of the public affairs employees circumvented the NPS chain of command for the inauguration when responding to a request from Reynolds. (although the complainant did not know what Reynolds requested, we determined that Reynolds asked the public affairs employee to help obtain inauguration photographs after the President requested them during the January 21 phone call).
  • That a NAMA employee assigned to the inauguration engaged in personal activities at work that interfered with the performance of his duties.

"We did not find evidence to substantiate any of these allegations," the OIG report released Monday concluded. "All of the witnesses we interviewed denied that the (National Mall) official instructed staff to alter reports on the inauguration or to remove crowd size information. We also found no evidence that the public affairs employees released any information to the media about the president’s phone call, or that the employee who responded to Reynolds’ request was required to go through the chain of command."

President Obama's 2009 inauguration/NPS

President Obama's 2013 inauguration/NPS

President Trump's 2017 inauguration/NPS

The complainant, whose identify was not disclosed under guidelines of the Privacy Act, had charged that a National Mall official had ordered staff to "scrub" attendance numbers from President Trump's inauguration. However, it long has been Park Service policy not to provide crowd estimates.

"The official told us that she instructed the staff not to include crowd size estimates in the reports because she wanted to make sure that the reports did not contain nonfactual references to crowd size," the OIG report noted. "She explained that the NPS did not have the necessary methodology in place to do an accurate crowd count and, since the Million Man March in 1995, had made it a practice not to collect or provide any crowd size information for events held at the National Mall."

Had the complainant been aware of this practice, they would not have raised the issue, the report added.

The OIG investigation also could not substantiate the charge that Park Service public affairs personnel had released word that the president had called Mr. Reynolds about the inauguration crowd.

"Reynolds and NPS National Capital Region Director Bob Vogel told us that knowledge of the phone call was widespread throughout the NPS, since the initial call from the White House came in to the U.S. Park Police operations center," the OIG report pointed out, adding that, "Reynolds stated that he did not consider his conversation with the president protected information."

The OIG report was provided to acting Director Reynolds.

Comments

Only a guy with small hands (and an enormous ego) must convince others of  an incorrect size.


Rick, Trump was popular enough to be elected and is even more popular today. What you saw was Fake News. Nearly every Trump rally was interrupted by those of you that suffer from "Democrat Derangement Syndrome". The left is the party of violence. This certainly played into lower turnout.


Absolutely nothing is being gained here (nor much of anywhere else in America these days) by endlessly arguing over the same territory again and again.  Continuing to do so isn't very intelligent and does absolutely nothing to help anyone.

How about trying to look for things that might unite us instead of seeking and promoting divisions?

Here's a wise article by Peggy Noonan -- a conservative.

http://www.peggynoonan.com

Here in Utah, we're working to create and begin using an alternate party.  United Utah is for Disgusted Democrats and Repulsed Republicans.  It's for those of us who want to recognize that something like 70% of all Americans are not on either end of the radical scale.  

The problem is that many Americans have simply given up and have stopped voting.  The last election had the lowest voter turnout of any in a very long time.  Trump may have received enough votes to tip the Electoral College in his direction, but he was actually elected by a very small percentage of voters who were eligible to vote.  Something less than 18%.  Hardly a stunning victory.  Had Hillary won, it would have been something around 19% of those who SHOULD have voted.  That's pathetic. 

How about using something sensible to try to counter the extremism on BOTH sides? 

Perhaps we can agree that the swampy cesspool does need to be drained.  I'm convinced it needs to start in Congress and 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  

It could be done if we can convince moderate Americans to get out and vote. 

United Utah Party . . . . how about a United America Party?

 

 


Kurt, I am not going to go through every allegation but will start with the first two in the first article to show how off base the claims are/

1) Attacked Muslim parents - Actually they attacked him first and he responded.  Not to mention Muslim is not a race.

2) Charged with racial discrimination in renting.  The problem with that is that your intenet is to discriminate based on economics.  However, if the outcome is disproportiate to race, the government will charge you with racial discrimination.  It has nothing to do with race, it has to do with economics.  Janet Reno going after banks in the1990s was similar and a major contributor to the housing collapse.

If you want to personal cite other items, I will be glad to respond, but don't have the time to addressed a googled laundry list of false accusations and fake news.  


You asked, EC, and all of these stories were in many other newspapers, as well. If you recall the NYTimes stories on the rental practices of the Trumps it was quite clear it had little to do with economics.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/politics/donald-trump-housing-race...

Even Paul Ryan called Trump a racist after he referred to a federal judge as a "Mexican," despite the fact he was born in the United States.

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2016/jun/08/donald-trumps-ra...


Kurt, no thanks for the fake news links. We are not falling this crap anymore. You guys have lost all credibilty. Those are the same polls that had Hillary and Ossof winning by a mile. 


Calling someone "Mexican" no matter where they are born is not racist.  That is part of the problem, those that want to attack Trump, or anyone else that isn't an Alinsky disciple, throw out the racist attack for acts that have nothing to do with racism.  They have so diluted the term it has no meaning.  And after all the evidence of fabrication by the NYT you still view them as a reliable source?


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.