You are here

National Park Service Continues To Languish In "Best Places To Work" Survey

Share

Employee morale across the National Park System is about the worst in the Interior Department, according to a new survey/NPS file

National Park Service employees are not convinced the agency is succeeding with its mission, according to the latest Best Places To Work In The Federal Government rankings.

The Park Service stood 406th out of 427 federal agencies when employees were asked if their agency was accomplishing its mission, a question new to the annual survey. Within the Interior Department, only the Bureau of Indian Education and the Bureau of Indian Affairs ranked lower than the Park Service in this category of the survey that has been gauging the sentiments of federal workers since 2003. The Interior Department overall ranked 14th out of 16 agencies when that same question was asked.

National Park Service staff in Washington, D.C., did not respond Thursday when asked for comment on the survey's results.

Overall, Park Service employees' responses to the 2021 survey placed the agency 370th out of 432 agencies in terms of "engagement and satisfaction." That ranking was derived from employee responses to three questions: 

  • I recommend my organization as a good place to work.  
  • Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your job? 
  • Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your organization? 

The Park Service's score for its workforce's "engagement and satisfaction" showed a slight drop from 2020, though it was an improvement from the 2013-2019 surveys. Still, there were other troubling scores compiled from questions Park Service employees answered for the survey. Overall, the agency ranked:

  • 390th out of 431 agencies on the question of whether "leadership at all levels of the organization generates motivation and commitment, encourages integrity and manages people fairly, while also promoting the professional development, creativity and empowerment of employees;"
  • 404th out of 432 agencies on the "level of respect employees have for senior leaders, satisfaction with the amount of information provided by management and perceptions about senior leaders’ honesty, integrity and ability to motivate employees;"
  • 408th out of 432 agencies on whether "employees consider their workloads reasonable and feasible, and managers support a balance between work and life;"
  • 386th out of 428 agencies on whether employees "believe they communicate effectively both inside and outside their team organizations, creating a friendly work atmosphere and producing high-quality work products;"
  • 384th out of 428 agencies on whether employees thought they were adequately compensated for their work.

Park Service Director Chuck Sams, during his confirmation hearing last October, acknowledged morale of the agency's employees was low and that improving it would be his top priority.

At the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, Chair Mike Murray was not surprised by the survey's findings.

"It is disappointing but not surprising that the National Park Service continues to rate low in employee satisfaction," he said in an email Thursday. "The agency has been mired in the bottom 10-20% of the rankings for the past 20 years."

Why morale is so low was explored through a 2017 project, the NPS Voices Tour, which was designed to give NPS leadership a better understanding of employee concerns. The "Tour" evolved from face-to-face and web sessions, along with more than 200 anonymous submissions. Overall, the authors of the report met with or had correspondence from 1,249 Park Service employees.

A key point made in the report was that "[P]erhaps the strongest message that emerged from the Voices Tour was that participants need to see a response to what they have shared. We heard voices from people wearing thin from being asked to perform at a high level in the face of inadequate resources, competing demands, and in some cases, work environments rendered extremely stressful due to interperson behavior."

Authors of the report also stated that "[E]ven those who found the experience valuable expressed concern about whether any real action would come out of all the effort. Many expressed a sense of futility in participating as 'NPS keeps bringing people down here to get our opinion and nothing happens.' They say they have 'been through enough surveys and trainings' and now want to see tangible actions."

Sams was alerted to the contents of the report. Tim Whitehouse, executive director for Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, wrote Sams last November after he was concerned to say "the challenge of raising those dashed hopes will fall to you. It is not to late to answer the alarm sounded in the NPS Voices 2018 report."

"There is definitely an element in recent years of employees feeling overworked and undervalued as many parks have become busier than ever while budgets and staffing have not grown to meet the needs of serving visitors, maintaining facilities, and protecting park resources," Murray wrote in his email. "My observation has been that the vast majority of NPS employees are incredibly dedicated to the NPS mission of protecting park resources and serving visitors. However, these chronically low rankings sound the alarm that many in the workforce doubt that 'conserving the well being and satisfaction of its human resources' is much of a priority for the agency.

"The problem is bigger than any one leader and it will take multiple actions over a sustained period of time for the workforce to gain confidence that the agency is serious about addressing their concerns," he added.

Phil Francis, the past chair of the Coalition, agreed with Murray's points.

"I think the people who are there are working hard to achieve our mission," Francis said during a phone call. "I think people who work for the National Park Service remain dedicated public servants who love the national parks, love serving people, and are really wed to the mission of the service. The problem is we've lost over 3,000 jobs. With hundreds of millions of visitors, small staffs, budgets that are not adequate for day-to-day operations, it's hard to have good morale."

While the report said the Park Service's workforce jumped to more than 21,000 employees in 2021 from 12,556 the year before, Francis said the addition of park units in recent years necessitated even more employees.

"It's still short of the 23- or 24,000 people that once were there, even before the extra parks were added to the system," he said. "And so, you're still asking people to do more with less, and then throw in Covid, throw in inadequate housing levels. It's pretty hard to have good morale."

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE WWW.FRESHFROMFLORIDA.COM. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

The best career decision I ever made was to leave the NPS, and I thrived in another federal agency.  In the last Park I worked, I observed criminal behavior by corrupt managers who believed they were untouchable.  And they were.  Even when caught, superintendents and other high-level managers are treated with kid gloves.  The thousands of overworked, dedicated NPS employees deserve better.  The organizatonal model needs a complete overhaul, and Congress needs to adequately fund the agency.


Anther example of some of the corruption that is rampant.. 

One day I casually mentioned how much money it had cost me to get set up again in a new location in a new park.  It cost some coin to get the basics of toilet paper, paper towels, cleaning supplies,  trash can, plunger etc..  My boss gave me a funny look and said "Oh- we just take our supplies from here" Pointing to the govt housekeeping supplies..  

He said it with such casualness and lack of concern that it was clear he did not even think he was doing anything wrong at all. Of course this was one of three husband and wife workers in a small NPS district... We also had a "scrap" pile of perfectly good NPS supplies like shovels, trailors, fence posts and other metal valuable for "scrap"... I never did find out who got that money.  Perfectly good tools.  "scrapped" as junk for no reason whatsoever. 

I could go on and on.. These are the minor incidents.  I could talk about how a large NPS park got "emergency" funding for a project that cost hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars.  For no reason AT ALL...But I digress...


This is on point with my experience. I think a lot of the issues with the NPS stem from two things, a disdain of expertise and a complete reliance on guidance over good judgement. I have yet to meet a manager in the NPS who comes from a management/leadership background. All of them were rangers, landscape architects, engineers, etc. But those specialties can only advance so far so a ranger becomes a supervisor who becomes a division chief while never having any skills in leading people. And it seems to me that this kind of career path is encouraged. So we end up with people in management positions who cannot lead. What do they fall back on? Guidance. A former deputy superintendent once said at a staff meeting that the sexual assaults at Grand Canyon happened because the management there did not have the proper guidance. This statement tells me that in the higher ranks of the NPS (and maybe in all ranks) that judgement is discouraged and that all issues have to be solved with guidanced produced from a regional or national office. Of course these officers are so removed from the parks so the guidance is often of no value, other than as a cy for managers. So problems are never resolved and those in charge continue to be promoted for not ruffling feathers. Given this intractable culture, I am not sure this can ever be solved.


You make a really good point. In other agencies the non supervisory series go far higher (12-13). In NPS we have structured our career ladder to end way lower and have no mechanisms to recognize superior field level achievement with increased copensation or s sense of career progress. That leads many people who would rather just have a role as an expert to seek out management and supervision roles because it's the only way to get career progress. 


Chris, you are right on so many counts. 


Gentle reader, the park service had it too easy for too long. Every entry level permanent position advertised had hundreds of applicants. Seasonal employees would do anything to get permanent. Those days are over. Generation Z does not seem to be interested in the working for the NPS. My park recently tried to hire several entry level fee collectors and every single person on the certificate of eligibles declined. This is happening all over from what I am hearing. What would help, I think, is to create more housing and eliminate the obsolete policy of charging rent that is comparable to what is being charged in the communities nearby. The other thing would be to streamline the hiring process, it takes two weeks for an employee to resign, but it takes at least three months to replace them.


This is good news. Having hundreds of applicants for a job that is as exploitative as a gs-05 with bad or no housing devalues human dignity and leads to abuse.


I'm sorry to hear you can't fill these vital positions at the wages the NPS currently pays. What I'm surprised about this year, as I heard rumblings and have seen the effects of the NPS culture of poor pay throughout the agency on recruiting is that this is not being told to the media or Congress. For far too long agency leadership has complacently avoided telling Congress the hard truth. To save the agency they need to tell Congress what operational budget would allow them to improve the workforce and agency morale. it's time for leaders to lead 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.