Is Outside Magazine promoting illegal camping in Arches National Park?/Outside's twitter feed
Careful with that "tweet" button, folks.
Last week Outside Magazine, in the daily ritual of feeding social media channels, reached back two years for a cool nighttime photograph from Arches National Park that, unfortunately, inadvertently promoted camping in an area of the park that is off-limits to camping.
What's going on? The social media-driven decay of sound journalism, perhaps. In the frenzy by countless outlets -- news sites, bloggers, conservation groups, ring-wing outlets, left-wing outlets, politicians, etc. -- to gain notice and build "followers" and "likes," we're seeing at times some playing fast and loose with the facts. Or not fully taking a moment to consider the implication of what they post.
That was Outside's mistake last week. In a "tweet" on Twitter, the magazine's social media staff posted the above 2014 photo of an illuminated tent on a ledge near Delicate Arch with a lone individual standing on an outcrop gazing at Delicate Arch. The photographer also seems to have used some lighting in the bowl beneath the iconic arch to help illuminate it.
In a few words promoting the image, Outside wrote: "This shot of Arches National Parks illustrates why it's a great place to run away to."
Sure, it's a gorgeous shot, one that convinced the magazine's online editors back in 2014 to run it on their site. But pitching a tent overlooking Delicate Arch is also against park regulations, and the photographer would have been ticketed had a ranger come upon him.
Unfortunately, with nearly a quarter-million followers on Twitter, Outside is telling folks it's OK to pitch their tents within sight of Delicate Arch.
"If this is a true picture without any 'shopped' editing, then camping is prohibited in the depicted area," Arches Chief Ranger Kevin Moore said. "Since there is a prop it maybe a commercial violation as well."
On Arches' "Backcountry Camping" page on its website, there is a clear explanation of where one can, and where one can't, pitch their tent outside of the Devils Garden Campground.
Backcountry camps at Arches must be:
* at least 1 mile (1.6km) from (and out of sight of) any designated road,
* at least 0.5 mile (0.8km) from (and out of sight of) designated trails,
* out of sight of any arch named on a USGS topographical map, and established before sundown.
The park also has posted a map that clearly shows where backcountry travelers can camp, and the area around Delicate Arch is in the 'no camping' zone.
This map on the park's website shows where backcountry travelers can camp/NPS
Jenna Giddens, the National Park Service's field operations supervisor for interpretation at Arches and Canyonlands national parks, said not only is it illegal to camp in view of Delicate Arch, but it's also against park regulations to artificially illuminate arches in the park.
“Illuminating the features is a huge problem. We have a lot of people who want to photograph the night sky, and it ruins the images," she said Friday.
Comments
You're a good man, Kurt. I'm amazed you keep responding.
Do you have evidence for that otherwise baseless assertion?
No evidence, which is why I used "likely" and didn't make an assertion. But to make you happy, Kurt provided some regs that indicated even that activity would be illegal.
Yep, anytime one sets up a prop to be used in commercial photography, which is the case here, one would definitely need to secure a permit. In this case, the NPS would not have approved of the image, since it would have promoted illegal camping in a sensitive area.
Rules, EC! I know you walk through life oblivious to almost everything in your self-righteous and deluded manner, but come on you're wearing the dunce cap again.
Gary - can you read or are you overcome by your desire to make personal attacks? My words "What regs did they violate? If they did, then no it isn't OK...."
I think it's evident that this article mentions some of the regulations they broke. I mentioned another one - using a prop for commercial photography without securing a permit. Tossing up a tent that is not permitted in a camping exclusion zone would be considered using a prop for commercial interests. If they didn't use a tent, nor lit the area, they could have took the photo without needing to secure a commercial permit. Here's the rules:
https://www.nps.gov/arch/planyourvisit/filming.htm
In the rules it states: "The project includes a portrayal of activities that are not permitted within a national park"
While you may have read this article, you obviously failed to comprehend many of the statements found within it, and so all of this back and forth banter is a waste of everyone's time, since your reading comprehension has failed you. So, please return to the corner and sit facing the wall while wearing the dunce cap.
Simple logic would dictate that the NPS would not have approved this photography crew of setting up a prop and illuminating the bowl for this image, since the shot violates quite a few of it's own rules - and promotes an idea that is against park regulations Obviously, National Park Service staff are quoted in this very article stating rules that were broken. So, it's highly doubtful they secured a permit. I'd say, no, the photographers that took this image failed to inquire, let alone secure a permit.
Once again Gary - I said if they broke the rules it was not OK. I acknowledged later, after someone showed me the rules you linked to, that they broke the rules. Of course, that is assumming they didn't get a permit. Do you know for a fact they didn't?