Careful with that "tweet" button, folks.
Last week Outside Magazine, in the daily ritual of feeding social media channels, reached back two years for a cool nighttime photograph from Arches National Park that, unfortunately, inadvertently promoted camping in an area of the park that is off-limits to camping.
What's going on? The social media-driven decay of sound journalism, perhaps. In the frenzy by countless outlets -- news sites, bloggers, conservation groups, ring-wing outlets, left-wing outlets, politicians, etc. -- to gain notice and build "followers" and "likes," we're seeing at times some playing fast and loose with the facts. Or not fully taking a moment to consider the implication of what they post.
That was Outside's mistake last week. In a "tweet" on Twitter, the magazine's social media staff posted the above 2014 photo of an illuminated tent on a ledge near Delicate Arch with a lone individual standing on an outcrop gazing at Delicate Arch. The photographer also seems to have used some lighting in the bowl beneath the iconic arch to help illuminate it.
In a few words promoting the image, Outside wrote: "This shot of Arches National Parks illustrates why it's a great place to run away to."
Sure, it's a gorgeous shot, one that convinced the magazine's online editors back in 2014 to run it on their site. But pitching a tent overlooking Delicate Arch is also against park regulations, and the photographer would have been ticketed had a ranger come upon him.
Unfortunately, with nearly a quarter-million followers on Twitter, Outside is telling folks it's OK to pitch their tents within sight of Delicate Arch.
"If this is a true picture without any 'shopped' editing, then camping is prohibited in the depicted area," Arches Chief Ranger Kevin Moore said. "Since there is a prop it maybe a commercial violation as well."
On Arches' "Backcountry Camping" page on its website, there is a clear explanation of where one can, and where one can't, pitch their tent outside of the Devils Garden Campground.
Backcountry camps at Arches must be:
* at least 1 mile (1.6km) from (and out of sight of) any designated road,
* at least 0.5 mile (0.8km) from (and out of sight of) designated trails,
* out of sight of any arch named on a USGS topographical map, and established before sundown.
The park also has posted a map that clearly shows where backcountry travelers can camp, and the area around Delicate Arch is in the 'no camping' zone.
Jenna Giddens, the National Park Service's field operations supervisor for interpretation at Arches and Canyonlands national parks, said not only is it illegal to camp in view of Delicate Arch, but it's also against park regulations to artificially illuminate arches in the park.
“Illuminating the features is a huge problem. We have a lot of people who want to photograph the night sky, and it ruins the images," she said Friday.
Comments
Its likely this was a planned and staged shot and after taken, everyone packed up and left. Much ado about nothing.
"Nothing", because there was forethought and planning before temporarily violating a couple of regs. OK, then, whatever you can justify.
before temporarily violating a couple of regs
What regs did they violate? If they did, then no it isn't OK but if they pitched a tent for a photo op and didn't camp, I don't see any violation.
They'd need a permit for commercial photography. Plus there's the violation for illuminating the bowl beneath Delicate Arch, as the ranger said.
Beyond that, the greater problem is that media should recognize a responsibility not to mislead, consciously or unconsciously, through their words and pictures. As I noted, Outside's Twitter feed goes to a quarter-million folks. How many might see that photo and say, "Cool, I want to camp there!" Or even want to try to get the same photo for themselves?
Would you also say it's OK to pitch a tent on the apron of Old Faithful for a cool photo? Or on top of Half Dome?
Everytime a magazine has a picture inside a national park they need a permit? Did you get a permit for every picture you have posted here? As to the illumination, given that it is time lapse photo, that could have been a flash light or lantern, certainly having a flashlight or lantern isn't against the rules. As to Old Faithful or Half Dome I don't know that either would bother me, particularly if done under the circumstances of this photo, at night with few others around.
National park pictures are the least of their sins in that regard.
Permits generally are not needed for news gathering photos, EC. At Arches, the regulations are pretty specific. For instance, the following generally will not be permitted:
I don't see Outside's reporting any less "news gathering" than some of NPT's stories. If its illegal it shouldn't be done but in this case a pretty petty complaint. By the way, this month's Outside has a picture of someone walking across Yosemite Falls. Was that illegal? Is it promoting?
There is a line, perhaps fine at times, but existent just the same between commercial photography and news gathering.
As for someone walking across Yosemite Fall, not illegal that I know of, but I wouldn't recommend it.