You are here

Home » NPCA: Why Is National Park Service Looking To Relax Hunting Regulations In Alaska Preserves?

NPCA: Why Is National Park Service Looking To Relax Hunting Regulations In Alaska Preserves?

Share
By NPT Staff - September 7th, 2018

National Parks and Conservation Association staff are wondering why, in light of the adverse impacts that will result, the National Park Service is planning to relax hunting regulations on national preserves in Alaska.

“This assessment clearly states that wildlife viewing opportunities on national parklands are likely to be diminished. It admits that baiting bears on these lands could increase conflicts, if bears become habituated to human food," said Jim Adams, the Alaska regional director for the parks advocacy group. "And it admits that the new rule would reduce natural diversity on national preserves. With such clearly identified conflicts, why is the Park Service proceeding with this unnecessary, wasteful process of replacing commonsense regulations with war on park bears and wolves?” 

The proposed regulations, which would align Alaska national preserves with state rules that were implemented to suppress carnivore numbers in order to increase game populations, were requested by the Trump administration. 

The practices, which the Park Service banned in 2015 and which are now set to be legalized, would allow:

* Taking any black bear, including cubs and sows with cubs, with artificial light at den sites

* Harvesting brown bears over bait

* Taking wolves and coyotes (including pups) during the denning season (between May 1 and August 9)

* Taking swimming caribou

* Taking caribou from motorboats under power

* Taking black bears over bait

* Using dogs to hunt black bears

An environmental assessment that looks at the changes and lays out the Park Service's preferred alternative is open for public comment through November 5 at this site.

Comments

Submitted by wild places on September 7, 2018 - 6:56pm.

From the Environmental Impact study. "due to the low level of additional take expected under the proposed action compared to current conditions, overall most opportunities to view wildlife, including predators, and opportunities for scientific studies would remain similar to those that currently exist in most areas of national preserves." Reading through the various impacts to actual numbers that too is expected to be minimal. The only thing contained in the study that provides a clue as to the "why" I could find in the report is this. "Federal subsistence users could see some beneficial impacts under the proposed action because non-rural family members would be able to help their rural family members hunt by methods of take that are currently prohibited for sport hunters" I would think simplifying regulations (aligning them with the state) should result in some savings but am not familiar enough to provide an example. Unless the overall harvest is being increased (which doesn't seem to be the case) the overall impact of this seems very minimal (if any)to all involved while perhaps offering more opportunities for hunters. Of course the anti hunting crowd will see this as a bad thing but it sounds to me that if enacted, no one is going to notice any difference other than a few hunters subsistence users.
That said it probably wasn't / isn't worth the effort already spent but I guess you don't know that until you do the study.
I'd like to think in the good old days this could have been accomplished in a 30 minute meeting with the right people sitting around a table.


Submitted by Nancy K. Socha on September 14, 2018 - 5:55pm.

We have visited Alaska's national parks & preserves on two visits- in 2016 & 2018- Denali, Lake Clark & Kenai Fjords. These visits were specifically for wildlife viewing and were sucessful. We didn't visit & spend a good bit of money to find that animals had been hunted in the parks and preserves.  The hunting practices listed above are nothing more than legalized poaching.  They are abhorrent and must be outlawed.


Submitted by argalite on September 24, 2018 - 12:10pm.

Funny, I can't find the article that questions Zike's standing to change the regs.  Where did it go?


Submitted by argalite on September 24, 2018 - 2:41pm.

Thanks Kurt, those don't seem to question Zinke's authority in their title, like the one I was looking for


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.