You are here

Fireside Read: Guidebook To American Values And Our National Parks

Share

This is not an ordinary book review. The only reason I know about this book is because I read in the news that National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis had been disciplined for writing it, so this review will also discuss that context.

As readers of National Parks Traveler know, the book was the subject of an Office of Inspector General investigation that found Mr. Jarvis had intentionally skirted the Interior Department's Ethics Office to write it, and that the director lied to Interior Secretary Jewell about some of the details.

The IG report tells us that Interior Department officials are concerned that the book looks like a government publication, which it is not. Indeed it does look like one, with a huge NPS arrowhead logo on the front cover containing the book’s title and the name of its author (Jonathan B. Jarvis), and a bison that overlaps with the arrowhead; the effect is of the NPS logo come to life.

The IG report tells us that some of the DOI officials interviewed were concerned that the use of Mr. Jarvis’s job title in the book is inappropriate, creating the appearance of government endorsement.

The report says, “Two areas in the book reference Jarvis’ government title: his biography in the back, which highlights various positions that he has held at NPS, and the book’s preface, written by writer and producer Dayton Duncan.”

In fact, there is another place Director Jarvis’s title is used, and used very prominently: the blurb on the back cover. The purpose of the blurb is, of course, to explain to people who are considering purchasing the book what the book is about. Here’s the blurb, in its entirety:

As it celebrates its centennial, the National Park Service now manages more than 400 special places. In these pages, Jonathan Jarvis, the 18th director of the National Park Service, adds a new chapter in the evolution of the national park idea. National parks, he asserts, are expressions of our values. What unites this increasingly diverse system of natural wonderlands and historic sites, in an increasingly diverse nation, are the values we share in common--and Jarvis provides an impressive list of parks and the values they illuminate. –Dayton Duncan

According to the IG report, “Jarvis stated that he purposely tried to downplay his government position in the book by limiting the use of his title and using a photo of himself not wearing his NPS uniform.”

This is disingenuous at best. Director Jarvis’s position is not downplayed, it is a central feature of the book’s narrative. That’s clear from what he said to the IG: “Jarvis said that the book ‘wasn’t about’ him; it was about what he was trying to accomplish in his tenure as Director.” But that is a distinction without a difference.

This is not just a book about American values, or a book about the relationship between those values and the national parks; it is very clearly a book about Director Jarvis’s vision of those two things—a very active vision, in which he himself “adds a new chapter in the evolution of the national park idea.”

The spotlight on Director Jarvis goes beyond the blurb and the preface. The book’s Epilogue -- which, like the blurb, is not mentioned in the IG report -- is not only written by Director Jarvis, it is written in the first person, about his experiences in the NPS. It begins: "As a young ranger during the winter of 1976-1977, I spent many a cold, windy day in the marble chamber of the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in Washington D.C. On the coldest days, hours would pass without a single visitor, so I was alone with Mr. Jefferson. His writings, carved into the porticos, became familiar verse...."

There is a very real sense in which this is a book “about” Director Jarvis. That alone seems unbecoming.

The values discussed in the book are not in themselves controversial. They include such universal values as Integrity, Honesty, Respect, Conservation, Restoration, and Science. What’s painful here is that Director Jarvis’s career reflects a marked lack of adherence to such values.

Many National Parks Traveler readers made this point in their comments on Traveler's story about the OIG investigation, saying Director Jarvis’s ethics lapse is “evidence of a culture of arrogance and abuse of power.” Readers have provided a long list of investigations and complaints that show a pattern of “gross mismanagement” and “cover-ups” under Director Jarvis, and have pointed out that “Violating agency policy and then justifying it to the Inspector General as ‘risk taking’ demonstrates he neither understands nor appreciates the burden of leadership responsibility.”

My own experience with Director Jarvis supports this perception. For almost a decade, I watched as Mr. Jarvis, first as Western Regional Director and then as National Park Service director, supported Point Reyes National Seashore in leveling serious false charges against a third-generation Point Reyes rancher who restored the historic Drakes Bay Oyster Farm only to have it snatched from the community and destroyed to create an artificial “wilderness.” There is a grotesque contrast between the actions taken against Drakes Bay Oyster Company and the values Director Jarvis claims he embraces: Enterprise, Entrepreneurship, Hard Work, Ingenuity, Science, and Working Lands.

To represent the value “Working Lands,” Director Jarvis profiles Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site in Montana. The passage reads in part: “From the family farm, forest, and ranch, Americans have formed a working-class of people tied to the lands that encompass the green pastures of the Shenandoah, to the Great Plains of the Midwest, and the fertile valleys of California. At times romanticized, Americans today are still working their lands as a family garden, or a manicured lawn, or as multigenerational farmers and ranchers. The National Park Service keeps this value alive through a variety of sites.”

Grant-Kohrs Ranch is a historic site only. It commemorates the cattle ranching of the past. Does Mr. Jarvis really think that Working Land that is no longer working “keeps this value alive”? How does Mr. Jarvis square his claim to admire Enterprise and Entrepreneurship with his agency’s ruthless and entirely unprincipled fight against a family farm that exemplified those virtues? How can Mr. Jarvis claim to believe in Science as a value when his agency has been caught red-handed committing scientific fraud?

The Guidebook to American Values and Our National Parks, by Jonathan B. Jarvis is, as Mr. Jarvis suspected, a book that should never have been published.


Sarah Rolph has closely followed the case of the Drakes Bay Oyster Co. and its fight against the National Park Service to remain in business at the seashore. She is writing a book about its last steward, Kevin Lunny. Along with other Drakes Bay supporters, Sarah created and continues to maintain the advocacy website http://savedrakesbay.com/core/

Comments

In a Nevada TV ad I watched last month, Senator Ted Cruz promised, if he is elected President, to return all of the State's Federal lands "To their rightful owners", whatever that means.  He made no distinction in that ad between BLM, Forest Service, and NPS adm. lands.  John Kasich has made a similar campaign promise.

I question your characterization of the ad.  The acutal legislation he proposed would limit Federal Land ownership to 50% of a state -which would not threaten any National Parks.  I have never seen any significant Republican (including Cruz) call for a blanket abolishment of the National Parks.

[added]  Cruz's website lists 5 major Departments and 25  agencies, bureaus, commissions and programs he would like to eliminate.  The Dept of Interior, Dept of Agriculture, BLM, NFS and NPS are not included on that list. 


Ethical,

I believe I found the ad you are referencing.  If you want to believe what you claim, I can see how you would interpret that ad in the way you did.  I believe it was a carefully worded campaign ad (i.e. "Nevada land" rather than "land in Nevada" and as you noted "returned to its rightful owners") aimed at sore points for the people of Nevada.  I believe his legislation and campaign platform explicitedly spelled out on his website are far more reflective of his position.  I'll stand by my claim that I am unaware of any major Republican that is or has proposed the elimination of the National Parks.


RodF, I love the high tone of your points, and agree completely about the meaning of Parks.  I have not read Jon Jarvis' book but intend to.

As to curation of NP Traveler's site, I also agree with those who believe Kurt and the gang can and should print whatever they want, including dripping hostility such as this review.  We know it for what it is, it is so transparent.  

And, I believe wrong headed.  

I believe it is also remarkably wrong headed on the intent of the Point Reyes legislation.

I do not agree in reading the legislation and the legislative history that a case can be made that the law required the NPS to renew the lease.  Yes, I read the statement of ONE of the sponsors saying he was shocked, shocked that his intent was so twisted.  

I find that contention insupportable.  

But I must say I did not read the original bill as originally introduced, and so it is just conceivable the Sponsor(S) had a different intent and the bill was modified in committee.  

But considering how, except for Alaska, Congress almost always listens to the desires of the local Member of Congress, and considering how absolutely well known the rules about prior existing land rights and tenant interests was to Members of Congress and their Staff at that time, I cannot believe that at the time it was his intent to permit a commercial oyster lease in perpetuity.  

It is too too easy for Congress to tell the NPS in the law, that they MUST renew in perpetuity a lease on the election of the lessee if that is what the Sponsor and Congress wanted to do.  No where does the law say that.

Plus, it is too too easy for a Sponsor to take down a bill from Committee consideration if the Sponsor did not willingly accept modifications placed on the bill, IF that is what happened.

 


I do not agree in reading the legislation and the legislative history that a case can be made that the law required the NPS to renew the lease.

And no one said it did.  The key is that the legislation did not REQUIRE the removal of the oyster farm nor was it the INTENT that the oyster farm be removed.  Some rationale, other than "your lease is up" was appropriate.  Instead, there was psuedo science and lies.  


I'm sorry.  I didn't find this "book review" to be helpful at all.  The bias of the author is quite transparent, and I am surprised that Kurt found this type of  "fireside reading" to have any merit whatsoever for posting on NPT as a featured article.


Rod and Owen -- even though the "review" may have been repugnant to many of us, isn't it important that we be given the opportunity to read things written by people whose views may clash dramatically with our own?  If we are unwilling to read and even consider thoughts from the opposition, how are we going to be able to argue effectively to try to counter it?

To my way of thinking, we should be thanking Kurt because he DID choose to publish it.


Great Review!

Thank you for the candid input, and I can completely relate to the frustration around the hipocrisy and conflict of interest of the author in writing this book.

 

Environmentalism as an American culture has certainly taken an interesting turn in the past decade or two. It seems the Environmental Non-Profit Industrial Complex has lost its way and become misguided in many aspects under the glass ceiling of capitalism.

 

Thanks again!


Perhaps my tone above and the use of strong language was too negative in response to negative.  I always try and take the the high road and in this case I did not.  One should always strive to be responsive and true rather than reactive.  We need tah more than ever now!


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.