You are here

Fireside Read: Guidebook To American Values And Our National Parks

Share

This is not an ordinary book review. The only reason I know about this book is because I read in the news that National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis had been disciplined for writing it, so this review will also discuss that context.

As readers of National Parks Traveler know, the book was the subject of an Office of Inspector General investigation that found Mr. Jarvis had intentionally skirted the Interior Department's Ethics Office to write it, and that the director lied to Interior Secretary Jewell about some of the details.

The IG report tells us that Interior Department officials are concerned that the book looks like a government publication, which it is not. Indeed it does look like one, with a huge NPS arrowhead logo on the front cover containing the book’s title and the name of its author (Jonathan B. Jarvis), and a bison that overlaps with the arrowhead; the effect is of the NPS logo come to life.

The IG report tells us that some of the DOI officials interviewed were concerned that the use of Mr. Jarvis’s job title in the book is inappropriate, creating the appearance of government endorsement.

The report says, “Two areas in the book reference Jarvis’ government title: his biography in the back, which highlights various positions that he has held at NPS, and the book’s preface, written by writer and producer Dayton Duncan.”

In fact, there is another place Director Jarvis’s title is used, and used very prominently: the blurb on the back cover. The purpose of the blurb is, of course, to explain to people who are considering purchasing the book what the book is about. Here’s the blurb, in its entirety:

As it celebrates its centennial, the National Park Service now manages more than 400 special places. In these pages, Jonathan Jarvis, the 18th director of the National Park Service, adds a new chapter in the evolution of the national park idea. National parks, he asserts, are expressions of our values. What unites this increasingly diverse system of natural wonderlands and historic sites, in an increasingly diverse nation, are the values we share in common--and Jarvis provides an impressive list of parks and the values they illuminate. –Dayton Duncan

According to the IG report, “Jarvis stated that he purposely tried to downplay his government position in the book by limiting the use of his title and using a photo of himself not wearing his NPS uniform.”

This is disingenuous at best. Director Jarvis’s position is not downplayed, it is a central feature of the book’s narrative. That’s clear from what he said to the IG: “Jarvis said that the book ‘wasn’t about’ him; it was about what he was trying to accomplish in his tenure as Director.” But that is a distinction without a difference.

This is not just a book about American values, or a book about the relationship between those values and the national parks; it is very clearly a book about Director Jarvis’s vision of those two things—a very active vision, in which he himself “adds a new chapter in the evolution of the national park idea.”

The spotlight on Director Jarvis goes beyond the blurb and the preface. The book’s Epilogue -- which, like the blurb, is not mentioned in the IG report -- is not only written by Director Jarvis, it is written in the first person, about his experiences in the NPS. It begins: "As a young ranger during the winter of 1976-1977, I spent many a cold, windy day in the marble chamber of the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in Washington D.C. On the coldest days, hours would pass without a single visitor, so I was alone with Mr. Jefferson. His writings, carved into the porticos, became familiar verse...."

There is a very real sense in which this is a book “about” Director Jarvis. That alone seems unbecoming.

The values discussed in the book are not in themselves controversial. They include such universal values as Integrity, Honesty, Respect, Conservation, Restoration, and Science. What’s painful here is that Director Jarvis’s career reflects a marked lack of adherence to such values.

Many National Parks Traveler readers made this point in their comments on Traveler's story about the OIG investigation, saying Director Jarvis’s ethics lapse is “evidence of a culture of arrogance and abuse of power.” Readers have provided a long list of investigations and complaints that show a pattern of “gross mismanagement” and “cover-ups” under Director Jarvis, and have pointed out that “Violating agency policy and then justifying it to the Inspector General as ‘risk taking’ demonstrates he neither understands nor appreciates the burden of leadership responsibility.”

My own experience with Director Jarvis supports this perception. For almost a decade, I watched as Mr. Jarvis, first as Western Regional Director and then as National Park Service director, supported Point Reyes National Seashore in leveling serious false charges against a third-generation Point Reyes rancher who restored the historic Drakes Bay Oyster Farm only to have it snatched from the community and destroyed to create an artificial “wilderness.” There is a grotesque contrast between the actions taken against Drakes Bay Oyster Company and the values Director Jarvis claims he embraces: Enterprise, Entrepreneurship, Hard Work, Ingenuity, Science, and Working Lands.

To represent the value “Working Lands,” Director Jarvis profiles Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site in Montana. The passage reads in part: “From the family farm, forest, and ranch, Americans have formed a working-class of people tied to the lands that encompass the green pastures of the Shenandoah, to the Great Plains of the Midwest, and the fertile valleys of California. At times romanticized, Americans today are still working their lands as a family garden, or a manicured lawn, or as multigenerational farmers and ranchers. The National Park Service keeps this value alive through a variety of sites.”

Grant-Kohrs Ranch is a historic site only. It commemorates the cattle ranching of the past. Does Mr. Jarvis really think that Working Land that is no longer working “keeps this value alive”? How does Mr. Jarvis square his claim to admire Enterprise and Entrepreneurship with his agency’s ruthless and entirely unprincipled fight against a family farm that exemplified those virtues? How can Mr. Jarvis claim to believe in Science as a value when his agency has been caught red-handed committing scientific fraud?

The Guidebook to American Values and Our National Parks, by Jonathan B. Jarvis is, as Mr. Jarvis suspected, a book that should never have been published.


Sarah Rolph has closely followed the case of the Drakes Bay Oyster Co. and its fight against the National Park Service to remain in business at the seashore. She is writing a book about its last steward, Kevin Lunny. Along with other Drakes Bay supporters, Sarah created and continues to maintain the advocacy website http://savedrakesbay.com/core/

Comments

Alfred - still didn't hear your "solution".  And Ron - I reject aborton as the "solution".  


Why put all the blame and responsibility for population growth only on the female side of the equation.

Ever heard of vasectomies? 


Why put all the blame and responsibility for population growth only on the female side of the equation.

Who did that.  Just another of your baseless accusations


Why put all the blame and responsibility for population growth only on the female side of the equation.

Who did that.  Just another of your baseless accusations


Golly gee whiz.  And here for most of my life I've been thinking it takes two to make a baby.  Or is that a baseless accusation?

Just read some of the previous posts talking about women and "women's choice."  Or how planned parenthood is "tough on their patients."  In general, in our American society, the burden of responsibility is upon the woman.  They even get the blame if they don't insist that their partner use precautions.  Nowhere in any of these posts do we see any mention of the other half of the equation.  It wasn't very long ago that an unmarried pregnant girl was banished into an exile of life-long shame while the young man went hunting for another to seduce.  To many males, the number of females they've conquered and notched on their bedposts are matters of pride and bragging rights down at the bar.   It appears that in our Earthly society, there's a pretty obvious double-standard world wide. 

Perhaps the idea that contraception is up to the ladies has something to do with male macho pride.  Or maybe that among many macho men vasectomy seems synonymous with castration.

One thing I think we can all be sure of is that the human race would have been extinct long ago if it was up to the boys to be the ones who became pregnant and had to endure the job of bearing our young.  I've watched my wife and one of my daughters become mothers four times each in absolute awe.  And many of them are working full time all those months of discomfort.  Then they bravely venture forth and endure the pangs of birth.

If someone asked us guys to do it, we'd be running for the hills.


Just read some of the previous posts talking about women and "women's choice."  Or how planned parenthood is "tough on their patients." 

I missed any post about "womens choice" and the comment about "tough on their patients" had nothing to do with blaming women for population growth.  In fact that was part of a comment praising the activities of an organization that accounts for as much as 40% of the abortions in the US.  

In general, in our American society, the burden of responsibility is upon the woman.

That may be your society, but it isn't mine.  I wasn't brought up thinking that and I didn't raise my kids to think that. But I think you are on the right track.  For too many, we don't make people responsible for their decisions, whether its work ethic, lifestyle, health, or sex.  When there are no consequences, people make bad decisions. That is why the "it should be free" mentality is so destructive, and no, that isn't a conservative or corporate philosphy - as your failure to back up your baseless accusations shows - it is a liberal one.  


Yes, it takes two to make a baby, but the problem worldwide is the absence of women's rights. While in the Army, my brother served two years in the Middle East. He will be glad to tell you how they treat women. I am not talking so much about the United States--unless we want to accuse ourselves of overconsumption again. I am rather talking about all of those refugees pouring into Europe--and the hundreds of millions of people that are right behind.

The West can't take them all, but it is acting as if it can. Again, political correctness wins the day. And don't give me that business about the United States being a nation of immigrants. It is rather a nation of immigrant stock--as is the entire world. Historically, foreign born immigrants hovered under ten percent. The rest were Native Americans. Oops. Can't say that either, The term is reserved for the very first immigrants.

Political correctness has destroyed all honesty when it comes to world affairs--especially population. This isn't the 19th Century anymore. In 1910, the United States had just 91 million people. In just a single century, we have added 225 million. How long can that go on before there is nothing left of the natural world?

EC says he is looking for my "solution." No, he is again just looking to make light of the problem. These days, most Americans do make light of it. Political correctness has trained us to say nothing controversial, e.g., that everything on this planet has limits. It is still a spaceship, after all.

A big one, yes, but not an unlimited one. If we want to argue about CO2, why does no one want to argue about the rest of it? Because the solutions there are difficult--impossible, some would say. But we had better start talking about population again, or kiss your national parks good-bye.


Thanks to Dr Runte for daring to raise the critical, but forbidden, issue of overpopulation again. I doubt our political and economic systems are up to the challenges ahead, which threaten our societies, let alone our parks.  EC probably would not see it as a "solution", but the Four Horseman (war, famine, disease, & ecological collapse) are still waiting to cull the human herd, as they always have.

"Basically, if everyone on Earth lived like a middle-class American, consuming roughly 3.3 times the subsistence level of food and about 250 times the subsistence level of clean water, the Earth could only support about 2 billion people...":

http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/earth-carry...


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.