You are here

Fatal Fall from Angels Landing in Zion National Park

Angels landing

Angels Landing in Zion National Park. NPS Photo.

A California woman died in a fall Sunday from the popular site in Zion National Park known as Angels Landing.

The victim, 55-year-old Nancy Maltez of Glendora, California, was reported to be hiking with family members early Sunday when she fell at about 8:30 a.m. The accident was reported by another hiker by cell phone.

She was believed to have stumbled and fallen from the north side of Angels Landing. Media reports indicate she fell a distance of about 1,000 feet, and search-and-rescue crews reached her body before noon.

The West Rim Trail from the Grotto to Scout Lookout, along with climbing routes on the north side of Angels Landing, are temporarily closed while an investigation by the park and the Washington County Sheriff's Department is completed.

There has been considerable discussion on theTraveler in recent months about the safety of the Angels Landing Trail. Prior to today's incident, the most recent fatal fall at that location was in 2007.

The park website includes the following information in a description of the Angels Landing Trail:

Caution: The route to Angels Landing involves travel along a steep, narrow ridge with support chains anchored intermittently along the route. Footing can be slippery even when the rock is dry Unevenly surfaced steps are cut into the rock with major cliff dropoffs adjacent. Keep off when it is wet, icy or thunderstorms are in the area. Plan to be off before dark. Younger children should skip this trail; older children must be closely supervised.

This accident will almost certainly revive the debate about the safety of the popular trail. According to the park website, "about 5 people" have died due to falls from Angels Landing in the 100 years since the park was established, but it is not the most dangerous trail in the park. Emerald Pools holds that unwelcome distinction with seven victims.


Observation Point is a great hike in and of itself. It is actually higher than Angels Landing. It has heights, but they are on one side at a time. The pathway is about four feet wide which is much more manageable than Angels Landing.

I'm amazed there aren't deaths here every month.  the last part of this hike is just too dangerous, and a cable should be rigged for the ENTIRE last 0.5 miles.  I've done canyoneering and rock climbing and I wouldn't even THINK about doing this without roping in.  but thousands of people, with no experience (mostly) do it every year.  That doesn't prove that it's safe, it just proves that a) people are stupid and b) people are stupid.  It's just not worth the risk for the endorphins or for bragging rights.  As other people have noted, the deaths here are GROSSLY under-reported.   A group from my college is doing it this weekend, 60 folks, ages from 16 to 60, and they're ALL going to feel ENORMOUS peer pressure to do this (group led by a crazy professor).  NONE are going to rope in, and I really fear that a dear friend of mine will fall  to her death because she's too macho to resist the peer pressure.

The person who says that 100% of those who stumble die, you are wrong. I am 16, and I climbed Angel's landing this summber. I stumbled not once, but twice, and because i had at least one hand in contact with a solid surface, be it the chain or the rock itself, i simply stumbled and got back up.

I have recently gotten into hiking. Heights have never scared me, though falling concerns me. Does that make sense? I enjoy pushing myself a little pass my comfort zone, though I am old enough not to have to impress any either. My question is how do you know how you will respond? If this hike is the most extreme you've done, then how do you know how your body will respond but more importantly how your mind will respond. Just asking....

My daughter is in college now, but when she just turned seven I took her on this hike. We caught the first morning tram from the lodge and what a terrific hike it was. We were almost alone on the trail because of the time of the morning. When we got to the top and sat to eat what turned out to be breakfast I wondered about people maybe falling off and the wisdom of taking my 7 year old to the top. About that time a pediatrician from New Jersey showed up with his eight year old daughter. We both took pictures of the two girls together at the top. Those pictures and the video of my daughter's entire assent are treasured. I must say that this is not a hike for all children and certainly not for more than 1 child per attentive adult.

interesting reading, was just there on 5/25/12 and while we didn't hike Angels Landing, we did hike up to Hidden Canyon and beyond into canyon. There are chains on that hike too and the canyon is beautiful.

have more chains been installed?

I hiked "almost" to the top in October 2003. There were 3 of us, early 30's and being respectful of our surroundings - kept a close eye on the weather and the inherit dangers of the trail, especially the clsoer you get to the top. We were probably less than 100 feet from the top of the trail and it began to rain .. the rock became very slippery and at that portion of the trail, I do not remember as many chains as I see in the pictures that are currently posted. Sadly, for our safety, we turned back - there were no more chains "in sight". I have always wanted to finish the hike, but now with 2 small children, I think it best to wait until they are upper teenagers. I just hope the trail will always remain open.

I hiked Angel"s Landing last Wednesday.My wife and I were the first ones up the trail.As we entered the trail a man named Cliff walked up.I asked if he minded if we hiked together.My wife had already decided to stay at Scouts Landing.I am glad Cliff went the rest of the way.I dont thnk I would have tried it alone and it was nice to have someone to hike with past Scouts Landing.I would have turned back past the first ridgeline had I been alone.It is  a breathtaking hike,and there are places with and without chains that feature sheer dropoffs on either side.I did this the first week of December it was nice having only 10 or so other people hiking the trail.I cant imagine trying to do this hike in the middle of summer with a bunch of other people to pass,or let pass.Cliff and I agreed to take it slow  since we were "fat guys".The view from the top is spectacular..I would recomend to never do this hike if it were wet or icey.Start early in the morning and take your time.If you are scared of heights dont think of doing this hike.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide

Recent Forum Comments