You are here

Appeals Court Rejects Bid To End Backcountry Fees At Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Share

Southern Forest Watch, an organization that has long fought to bring an end to backcountry user fees at Great Smoky Mountains National Park, lost its latest bid when the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the group's appeal from a lower court.

In a 16-page opinion (attached below) handed down this week, the appellate court refused to overturn the summary judgment the U.S. District Court for Eastern Tennessee granted the federal government in the case. The appellate court also rejected Southern Forest Watch's argument that the district court erred by not agreeing to grant it discovery beyond what was contained in the park's administrative record established around the move to institute a nightly fee for backcountry travelers in the park.

Southern Forest Watch built its case on grounds that Great Smoky officials violated the guidelines for establishing new fees under the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, failed to adequately get public participation in the discussions revolving around the fee, and didn't properly notify the public of the process. On each point the 6th Circuit panel disagreed.

Great Smoky officials started considering a backcountry fee in 2010, when the company that maintained their campsite reservation system announced it would no longer provide technical support. The need for a fee, then-Superintendent Dale Ditmanson explained, was an inadequate budget and the inability to charge an entrance fee for any of his roughly 9 million yearly visitors. The only way to improve visitor services and protect backcountry resources, he said in a 2012 interview with the Traveler, was to institute a fee for backcountry travelers.

New fees and higher fees in the park system are seldom popular, and so it wasn't surprising that when Superintendent Ditmanson proposed a fee for overnight use in the park's backcountry that it was met with some condemnation when the public was asked to comment on the proposal.

Part of the concern was that the proposed fees, which ranged from a low of $4 per person per night to a high of a $10 registration fee plus $2.25 per night per person, could eclipse front-country campsite fees, which ranged from $14-$20 per night, depending on how many were in your group. Other issues raised in the comments were complaints that day hikers would not be charged a fee, that those who traveled the backcountry by horse would not see a higher fee to help repair the damage hooves do to trails, that motorists traveling through the Smokies do so for free.

After taking those concerns into consideration, the park in February 2013 instituted a fee of $4 per night per person, with a $20 per person cap per trip.

Comments

Having supported this cause from the outset, i finally saw the futility of continuing the fight against a corrupt federal government agency. Especially with a two bit pro bono lawyer at the helm.
And furthermore washed my hands of Quillen after he turned vulgar towards former friends who dared not continue to go along with his vindictive ways.


The Divine Right of Kings.


Ever heard of the Roman Empire?


So if this is a "kings court" would that make SFW a mere court jester?  Seems like a logical conclusion.


I visit GSMNP often and have hiked most of the day trip trails. Why shouldn't the relatively small percentage of visitors who use backcountry sites have to pay for the privilege? The fees are minimal, and those who use the sites should be the ones who support their maintenance. The snarky comments here from "I want something for nothing" set make me doubly glad they've lost yet again. Stop whinging and spend your efforts on something worthwhle.


SmokiesBackpacker writes ""Further, the Park Service did not intend for Manual 22A to be binding." from ruling.  Nothing binds the NPS.  Including the peskier aspects of their own rules."

This is misleading.  On pages 7 and 8, the court simply affirms precedent that management policies are "not judicially enforceable at the behest of members of the public who question the agency's management". The court ruling continues on pages 9 and 10 to conclude that NPS did comply with Director's Order 22 and Reference Manual 22A, and did not violate FLREA. 

It appears nothing binds SmokiesBackpacker, including the peskier aspects of telling the whole truth.


whnging and worthwhle, Paulette?   How much have you paid to use the Smokies, Miss Dayhiker?  or should I say, Mr. Idaho alias number 3?


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.