You are here

Our Wild Calling: How Connecting With Animals Can Transform Our Lives―And Save Theirs

Share

They were young bulls, possibly even siblings, and their own full-fledged, testosterone-fueled combative rut was probably a full year away. Yet back and forth they jostled in our yard, testing each other not 20 feet from the backdoor, their antlers clattering against each other, steam flushing in bursts from their nostrils in the cold fall air as their gangly legs sought leverage in the not-yet-frozen ground.

Driven instinctually to demonstrate their male supremacy, the two gave and took as they shouldered their sheer bulk behind their antlers, searching for the tipping point. For more than an hour they kept at it, slowly crossing our yard, then up and over the small rise between houses, and into our neighbor’s yard.

Though I’ve seen similar battles on nature shows, seeing one waged in person had been unimaginable until that fall day. I had grown up in New Jersey, where the visible wildlife was usually restricted to deer and birds.

But as my life took me west, I encountered more and more wild animals. I’ve been treated to elk, bison, and even wolves roaming Yellowstone National Park’s northern range, humpback whales in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, a 6-foot Western rattlesnake warming itself in the morning sun in the backcountry of Zion National Park, orcas at work schooling salmon in the waters around the San Juan Islands of Washington state.

Not everyone is so fortunate.

Roughly 80 percent of Americans live in urban areas, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Moose don’t, nor grizzly bears, or herds of bison or elk. The nation’s development forced the wild life out, into smaller, more remote parts of the country. For most Americans, that urbanization also pushed away our interaction with wildlife, our connection with the wild side of the world. It is a personal connection, one more important than many of us probably realize.

Richard Louv spent four years pondering the connection he specifically, and the rest of us in general, have with wildlife. In his 2005 bestseller, Last Child in the Woods, Louv painted a disturbing picture of how we're not just losing bits and pieces of our natural landscape to that urbanization. He underscored how we're failing our children by not working harder to introduce them to nature.

Louv’s message then was that through urban sprawl, through the mesmerizing and addictive magic and wizardry of the Internet, and through fear of many of the neighborhoods we call home, we were spawning generations of kids who don't know what it's like to have warm mud squish up through their toes as they wade in creeks to catch frogs, or to hear the gentle whooshing of a forest's canopy under the breath of the wind as they play hide-and-seek.

Today, Louv warns us that for a large segment of society, that disconnect with wildlife is multiplying our societal nature deficit. Especially today, as more and more of America is being told to stay home in a hopeful bid to stanch the viral march of coronavirus, the separation is growing. To better understand that growing void, I reached out to Louv, whose latest work, Our Wild Calling: How Connecting with Animals Can Transform Our Lives―and Save Theirs, examines the importance of wildlife to humans.

“It may be more necessary than I thought it would be because of the sense of isolation now people have to endure and the loneliness epidemic that’s now been squared,” Louv said of his book when I asked what inspired it. “Our connection to other animals, even if it’s outside our window, is I think more important than ever.”

Growing up in New Jersey, what wildlife there was was largely ubiquitous, not thought provoking. But as I left the East Coast behind, and moved closer to where the wild things are, they became more important to me, took on a larger role in my life. Knowing that there are annual migrations of thousands of caribou in Alaska is important. But more important is actually being present as herds of bison move almost as one across the Hayden Valley in Yellowstone, or to float quietly in a kayak on a finger of Glacier Bay as a humpback whale and her calf circle, occasionally surfacing to exhale a frothy breath in trade for some fresh air.

“We gain meaning from these encounters with other animals,” Louv told me. “And with our relations with our (domestic) companion animals. But these things that happen when we’re with wild animals, are particularly mysterious.”

Mysterious, yes, but it also triggers something within us. At least it does for me. Experiencing wild animals in their natural settings reinforces my own tie to nature. We are descended from prehistoric cultures that lived on, and from, the land, depending on it for their food and shelter. That tie resides within all of us; deeper for some than others. We are wild at heart. And Louv wants us to remember that.

Louv is ahead of most of us in understanding how impactful wildlife can be upon us, if we open our consciousness to them. Of his ten books, four have been specifically about our human connection with nature. He’s spent years analyzing our relationships, and his own, with wild animals. And he fears that our direct connections with wildlife are in decline. 

“The question I asked in Last Child, and in the others, is what happens to us? What happens to us psychologically, what happens to us physically, what happens to our social intelligence when we disconnect from nature?” Louv asked. “All of those things are involved. And what happens to our cognitive abilities? It turns out that this disconnect from nature has real implications.”

You can see that disconnect in Yellowstone, Glacier and Grand Teton national parks every summer as visitors approach wildlife – 2,000-pound bison and mountain goats with dangerous horns – much too closely to capture a photo or a selfie. They don’t see that truly wild animal filling their viewfinder; they envision a zoo creature, domesticated livestock. That disconnect stems simply from thinking park wildlife are somewhat tame. But the disconnect with the wild side of nature is deeper these days, and affects our understanding and appreciation of the significance of a bison herd, or a wolf pack, or a pod of orcas. For Aldo Leopold, an ecologist and nature writer in the early part of the 20th century, it took the death of a wolf to understand the connection.

We reached the old wolf in time to watch a fierce green fire dying in her eyes. I realized then, and have known ever since, that there was something new to me in those eyes—something known only to her and to the mountain. I was young then, and full of trigger-itch; I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters’ paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view.”

Whether we actually realize our disconnect with wildlife is something each of us has to mull. But at the end of the day, Louv believes we long for the connection.

"I think it’s rooted in a deeper loneliness. Which is species loneliness. The urban parks, with the highest benefit for the human psychological health, turn out to be the parks with the highest biodiversity,” he told me. “I don’t think that’s an accident. We are desperate as a species, not just as individuals, but as a species to not be alone in the universe, to not feel alone in the universe. Why else would we look for Big Foot? Why else would we look for life on other planets, intelligent life, when people like Stephen Hawkin have told us that it might not be a good idea to find?”

As the human culture, we are wired to search for other life, Louv said, even when the life might be bison, or wolves, or moose.

“We’re surrounded by a larger family of life. We are surrounded by a great conversation going on all around us, wherever we are. Even in the densest urban neighborhood,” he went on. “The more we learn about other animals, the more we learn about their sentience, the more we learn about their intelligence, the more we learn about their ability to communicate with each other, and with us, between species, not only within their own species. And we can tap into that, even if we’re locked inside a house.  If we pay attention.”

I’m fortunate for where I live, that I may come into contact with wildlife … in the wild. Those two young bull moose tussling in the backyard reminded me of my fortune, and that wild connection.

You can listen to my entire conversation with Richard Louv in National Parks Traveler Episode 59 of our podcast series.

Comments

Selling Snake Oil: Last Child in the Woods ––

Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder,

by Richard Louv

Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.

November 16, 2006

 

     In this eloquent and comprehensive work, Louv makes a convincing case for ensuring that children (and adults) maintain access to pristine natural areas, and even, when those are not available, any bit of nature that we can preserve, such as vacant lots. I agree with him 100%. Just as we never really outgrow our need for our parents (and grandparents, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc.), humanity has never outgrown, and can never outgrow, our need for the companionship and mutual benefits of other species.

 

     But what strikes me most about this book is how Louv is able, in spite of 310 pages of text, to completely ignore the two most obvious problems with his thesis: (1) We want and need to have contact with other species, but neither we nor Louv bother to ask whether they want to have contact with us! In fact, most species of wildlife obviously do not like having humans around, and can thrive only if we leave them alone! Or they are able tolerate our presence, but only within certain limits. (2) We and Louv never ask what type of contact is appropriate! He includes fishing, hunting, building "forts", farming, ranching, and all other manner of recreation. Clearly, not all contact with nature leads to someone becoming an advocate and protector of wildlife. While one kid may see a beautiful area and decide to protect it, what's to stop another from seeing it and thinking of it as a great place to build a house or create a ski resort? Developers and industrialists must come from somewhere, and they no doubt played in the woods with the future environmentalists!

 

     It is obvious, and not a particularly new idea, that we must experience wilderness in order to appreciate it. But it is equally true, though ("conveniently") never mentioned, that we need to stay out of nature, if the wildlife that live there are to survive. I discuss this issue thoroughly in the essay, "Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans!", at http://mjvande.info/india3.htm.

 

     It should also be obvious (but apparently isn't) that how we interact with nature determines how we think about it and how we learn to treat it. Remember, children don't learn so much what we tell them, but they learn very well what they see us do. Fishing, building "forts", mountain biking, and even berry-picking teach us that nature exists for us to exploit. Luckily, my fort-building career was cut short by a bee-sting! As I was about to cut down a tree to lay a third layer of logs on my little log cabin in the woods, I took one swing at the trunk with my axe, and immediately got a painful sting (there must have been a bee-hive in the tree) and ran away as fast as I could.

 

     On page 144 Louv quotes Rasheed Salahuddin: "Nature has been taken over by thugs who care absolutely nothing about it. We need to take nature back." Then he titles his next chapter "Where Will Future Stewards of Nature Come From?" Where indeed? While fishing may bring one into contact with natural beauty, that message can be eclipsed by the more salient one that the fish exist to pleasure and feed humans (even if we release them after we catch them). (My fishing career was also short-lived, perhaps because I spent most of the time either waiting for fish that never came, or untangling fishing line.) Mountain bikers claim that they are "nature-lovers" and are "just hikers on wheels". But if you watch one of their helmet-camera videos, it is easy to see that 99.44% of their attention must be devoted to controlling their bike, or they will crash. Children initiated into mountain biking may learn to identify a plant or two, but by far the strongest message they will receive is that the rough treatment of nature is acceptable. It's not!

 

     On page 184 Louv recommends that kids carry cell phones. First of all, cell phones transmit on essentially the same frequency as a microwave oven, and are therefore hazardous to one's health –- especially for children, whose skulls are still relatively thin. Second, there is nothing that will spoil one's experience of nature faster than something that reminds one of the city and the "civilized" world. The last thing one wants while enjoying nature is to be reminded of the world outside. Nothing will ruin a hike or a picnic faster than hearing a radio or the ring of a cell phone, or seeing a headset, cell phone, or mountain bike. I've been enjoying nature for over 60 years, and can't remember a single time when I felt a need for any of these items.

 

     It's clear that we humans need to reduce our impacts on wildlife, if they, and hence we, are to survive. But it is repugnant and arguably inhumane to restrict human access to nature. Therefore, we need to practice minimal-impact recreation (i.e., hiking only), and leave our technology (if we need it at all!) at home. In other words, we need to decrease the quantity of contact with nature, and increase the quality.

 

References:

 

Ehrlich, Paul R. and Ehrlich, Anne H., Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearances of Species. New York: Random House, 1981.

 

Errington, Paul L., A Question of Values. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1987.

 

Flannery, Tim, The Eternal Frontier -- An Ecological History of North America and Its Peoples. New York: Grove Press, 2001.

 

Foreman, Dave, Confessions of an Eco-Warrior. New York: Harmony Books, 1991.

 

Knight, Richard L. and Kevin J. Gutzwiller, eds. Wildlife and Recreationists. Covelo, California: Island Press, 1995.

 

Louv, Richard,Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, 2005.

 

Noss, Reed F. and Allen Y. Cooperrider, Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Covelo, California, 1994.

 

Reed, Sarah E. and Adina M. Merenlender, "Quiet, Nonconsumptive Recreation Reduces Protected Area Effectiveness". Conservation Letters,2008, 1–9.

 

Stone, Christopher D., Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, California: William Kaufmann, Inc., 1973.

 

Vandeman, Michael J., http://mjvande.info, especially http://mjvande.info/ecocity3.htm, http://mjvande.info/india3.htm, http://mjvande.info/sc8.htm, and http://mjvande.info/goodall.htm.

 

Ward, Peter Douglas, The End of Evolution: On Mass Extinctions and the Preservation of Biodiversity. New York: Bantam Books, 1994.

 

"The Wildlands Project", Wild Earth. Richmond, Vermont: The Cenozoic Society, 1994.

 

Wilson, Edward O., The Future of Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.