You are here

Only Snow Drought Likely To Block Your Access To Yellowstone National Park This Winter

Share

Whether you choose a snowcoach or a snowmobile, you shouldn't have any trouble getting into Yellowstone National Park this winter.

Winter's fury is artistic mastery in Yellowstone National Park.

Arctic expresses that bolt out of the north sculpt shields of ice around some geysers, while bearding bison in rime. Trees bow down, weighted by overcoats of snow and ice, while drifts cause elk to flounder in their flight from wolves. Waterfowl cluster in the waning ice-free stretches of streams. No matter what the weather, the feathery upper and lower falls of the Yellowstone River captivate those who manage to reach the rim of their canyon.

This setting -- the sharp, biting cold, the clear night skies that can reverberate under the Northern Lights, the steaming geyser basins with the ever-present wildlife, the snow draping the eves of the Old Faithful Inn like so much vanilla frosting -- is what lures visitors to Yellowstone at the height of its harshest season. And yet for park managers, how to cater to those visitors continues to be a conundrum in the world's first national park, a place that begs both protection and display, reverence and celebration.

With winter now beginning to blow its cold smoke down across the Northern Rockies, the staff at Yellowstone National Park is embarking on its second decade of trying to figure out how best to welcome the public during an unforgiving season without greatly impacting the park. This has been neither a simple nor an inexpensive endeavor. With work now under way on a fourth environmental impact study weighing the pros and cons of snowmobiles versus snowcoaches, of nature's rattling of leaves and babbling of streams versus throttling of engines, of wildlife desperate to preserve calories versus visitors anxious to frame bison in their viewfinders, the cost of reaching an acceptable answer has surpassed $11 million. And there is no limit in sight.

While that fourth impact study is compiled, for the next two winters the park will operate under a temporary winter-use plan that holds snowmobiles entries to no more than 318 a day and snowcoach entries at 78 per day. In late October, the Billings Gazette editorialized about the matter, and encouraged "the Obama administration to pursue an ecologically sound plan for winter use, a plan based on solid, up-to-date scientific research that allows the public reasonable access to the wonderland that is Yellowstone in winter."

Granting the newspaper's request might not be as easy as it sounds.

While all previous winter-use studies in Yellowstone have agreed that snowcoaches are the environmentally preferred alternative for winter travel, adopting a regulation to that effect is not easy, as the political fingerprints that have smudged this process tell. Plus, park officials now say evolving science and mechanics have placed snowmobiles and snowcoaches largely on par in terms of pollution. Scattered throughout the debate are issues tied to wildlife resources, noise, air pollution, and even access. That last issue perhaps is thorniest, as it revolves around your choice of travel in winter. Few people like to be told what they have to do.

But access in terms of simply being allowed into the park really doesn't appear to be an issue at this point. Throughout the winter you can drive from Gardiner, Montana, through the mammoth stone arch of the North Entrance to Mammoth Hot Springs, and then all the way east through the wildlife-rich Lamar Valley to the tiny village of Cooke City, Montana. Through the West Entrance at West Yellowstone, the South Entrance to the north of Jackson, Wyoming, and the East Entrance to the west of Cody, Wyoming, you can snowmobile into the park, with snowcoach options available through the West and South entrances. Last winter, more than 42,300 people found their way into the park via snowcoach or snowmobile alone. It's a tiny fraction of the 3 million or more who visit throughout the year, but a goodly number when you consider the lodges that are closed (those at Canyon, Tower-Roosevelt, Lake, and most of those at Old Faithful).

In the Billings Gazette's editorial, Yellowstone spokesman Al Nash was quoted as saying that under the temporary winter-use plan "this will be the first time that we will see daily (snowmobile) numbers reach the daily limit and more demand than the daily limit will allow." In clarifying his comment for the Traveler, Mr. Nash said he wasn't bemoaning the prospect of not being able to welcome more than 318 snowmobiles into the park per day. Rather, he said, he simply was stating that the entrance gates might come down before snowmobile 319 can enter.

"During the five years of managed, limited use, whatever the number has been, we have never reached the daily limit," the park spokesman said. "That makes the prospect for this year different, that we have an expectation that there will be more demand for access on some days than the interim regulation will allow. It is a different circumstance than we have had before.”

Whether the gateway communities that rely heavily on winter visitation to Yellowstone to support their economies during the cold, snowy months of December-March will notice if that cap is reached remains to be seen. During Fiscal 2009, the town of West Yellowstone, Montana, the self-proclaimed "snowmobile capital of the world," saw resort tax collections dip just one-half percent from FY 2008 collections, which, by the way, were up more than 12 percent from FY 2007, according to a story in the West Yellowstone News. East of Yellowstone in Cody, a gateway community that sits 53 miles east of the park, officials have been beaming about their winter tourism.

“Winter was once considered the quiet season in Cody, but in the past few years we have seen a dramatic increase in the number of visitors who travel here to participate in their winter activity of choice,” Claudia Wade, executive director of the Park County Travel Council, was quoted as saying in an October 30 article in The Big Sky Weekly. “The stores along Sheridan Avenue – our main street – are already stocking crampons, thermal socks and ski goggles, and our hotels report they are already taking reservations for the upcoming season. And when our visitors are ready to move indoors they will find a wide range of museums, galleries, restaurants and entertainment options.”

While the 318-snowmobile cap on how many snowmobiles can enter the park might be reached on a handful of days this coming winter, that doesn't translate into visitors being locked out of the park and shouldn't discourage winter travel to the park if your end-goal is to see Yellowstone and its wildlife under the harshest of conditions.

Last winter, when the daily limit was 720 snowmobiles, there were just six days out of the 90-day winter season when more than 318 snowmobiles entered Yellowstone. The heaviest traffic day was December 29, when 408 sleds entered the park. When you consider that those 408 sleds carried 208 passengers, some quick math demonstrates that those 616 visitors (408 drivers + 208 passengers) still could enter Yellowstone during this coming winter on the same day if they shared a snowmobile or hopped into a snowcoach, which have never come close to their upper limit.

More so, when you consider that 78 snowcoaches can enter the park each day, it's clear that access is not soon likely to be an issue in the park, even if the 318-sleds-per-day limit is reached. Based on last year's average of 8.5 passengers per snowcoach, if the park reached its upper limit of 78 snowcoaches a day, over the course of a 90-day season they would bring 59,670 visitors into the park, a number well above last year's 42,381 visitors who came on snowmobiles (23,418) and snowcoaches (18,963) combined.

Of course, what remains to be seen is whether there will even be demand for 318 snowmobiles per day. In recent years the park has averaged 205 snowmobiles per day, and just 29 snowcoaches.

No, if there's anything that likely will limit access to Yellowstone this winter and next it will be poor snow years, not snowmobile limits.

Comments

On other Yellowstone news, a number of organizations and individuals have just sued the NPS and the USFS over their role in the bison slaughter.

See http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/media/press0910/pressreleases0910/11... and http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/article.php?art_id=5273.

Jim Macdonald
The Magic of Yellowstone
Yellowstone Newspaper
Jim's Eclectic World


No, actually the NPS blocks my access to Yellowstone, at least if I want to motor into the park on my own as I can in the main season.

As things currently stand, one needs to be herded as snowmobile sheep or crammed into a tin-can "snow coach". Since these "snow coaches" are the same vans and truck-based small buses - now equipped for the winter season with tracks - used in the park in the summertime, can I take my own wheeled vehicle into the park if I equip it similarly with tracks? Are the NPS training courses required of the commercial snow coach drivers and snowmobile sheep herders available to the general public? If not, why not? If I was still a regional resident or if I was on a week-long visit to the park, I would willingly take the class if I then was then granted unescorted motorized access to the park in winter similar to what ANY park visitor has in the main season. Why not institute such a program?


Dave, I think the NPS is blocking your mode of access, but not your ability to enter the park in winter.

As for your other questions, you can find answers to them in the park's winter planning documents: http://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/upload/final_yell_fonsi-10-15-09.pdf


Piffle. I used the word 'blocked' in the same sense you did in your article title. Therefore, one could likewise say "lack of snow is blocking your mode of access, but not your ability to enter the park in winter". In your use and mine, we both are obviously using the word 'block' to mean 'restrict' as in: "1 c : to hinder the passage, progress, or accomplishment of by or as if by interposing an obstruction d : to shut off from view (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/block (verb))".

This issue I am addressing here is motorized access to the park by independent visitors who have no need for and no desire to pay for nannies or sheepherders and whose park experience is greatly restricted and diminished when force to travel in noisy packs or while crammed in a can with a dozen others, all on a timetable and agenda not of our choosing. Independent visitors are free to access the park with their motorized vehicle on approved roadways in the summer, why not in the winter?

Yes, I read the winter planning document you posted the link to. If you have read it, you know that it does *not* address this question. This is made*very* clear in the attached comments, especially group 1. On page 11, when discussing the Preferred-vs-No Action alternative impacts on visitor access, it states "...the No Action Alternative ... would not provide as
well for the enjoyment of the park and its attractions, because much of the park would be
effectively closed to all but a few people on skis or snowshoes who are capable of travelling
many miles." I found no comparable statement on how coercing independent visitors into paying extra to be herded provides for their "enjoyment of the park"; rather, it seems to be a detriment to their enjoyment, whether by yielding to bullying of commercial employees with a timetable ("You'll see the park on MY schedule, not yours") or by restricting their motorized mobility and thereby making the park "effectively closed to all but a few people on skis or snowshoes who are capable of travelling
many miles."

Indeed, if one closely reads the report, one finds this statement (page 16): "All winter visitors to Yellowstone will be required to travel in a guided group, whether with a commercial snowmobile guide or in a guided snowcoach." While one hopes that this is an ambigously worded sentence that is refering to winter visitors travelling by over-the-snow vehicles, the context of the paragraph and section do not clarify that this is the case. As stated, it can be read as a restriction on all winter visitors whether travelling on over snow vehicles or on their own feet; a very unwelcome one in my view.


"Piffle." Now that's a word you don't hear every day.

I guess I'm not exactly sure which question of yours wasn't answered, Dave.

Regarding training to certify private citizens to go into the park without guides, the FONSI says:

The concept of non-commercial guiding or unguided access (both with training programs) has been analyzed in previous winter plans and will be evaluated in alternatives in a long-term winter plan.

Subsequent questions focus on private snowmobiles being BAT under this arrangement, to which the NPS again said such an arrangement would be evaluated in a long-term plan.

That said, winter use in Yellowstone is a cumbersome issue, perhaps more than it should be. I'm sure we'll both be much, much older before they come up with an amicable solution. Comparing winter use to summer use is a bit like apples and oranges, though, because of the different wildlife patterns and biology; in winter wildlife tends to cluster in many of the same areas that humans visit, and they're struggling to hang on until spring, thus one of the needs to be more circumspect when it comes to managing winter access to the park.


Blocking access is a matter of opinion. I feel blocked out in the winter because I can't afford to plop down a couple of hundred buck for a coach tour or four or five hundred to rent a machine and guide. The interior of Yellowstone is a rich man's playground in the winter. We common folk have Lamar Valley at least.


Your quoted passage illustrates my point (about this not being addressed in the report) nicely, at least by my standards. The official, signed FONSI report ends on page 26 which contains the signatures of Superintendent Lewis and Regional Director Snyder. Anything following their signatures is not a part of the report. This includes the comments section from which you quoted part of response 1.1 on page 28, *following* the report, and that response is one of many fine examples of bureaucratic sophistry to be found in the reponses there.

I am well aware of winter conditions in Yellowstone having lived and worked there in the early eighty's. Given the current later closing dated of park roads to wheeled vehicles and the expansion of conifer forest area blighted by pine beetles fueled in part by an insufficient number of days below -30 degrees weather, one could surmise that winter conditions are less severe now than 25 or 30 years ago. One can also refer to the recent series of studies on wildlife/OSV interactions showing that, in the vast majority of cases, wildlife showed little or no response to OSV traffic. One can also look at the current issues of bison migrating outside of the park in winter in search of sufficient winter forage, driven in part by growing populations; the hazing and/or culling efforts conducted by various agencies suggest that the bison are not unnecessarily affected by OSV traffic and are not in danger of disappearing. A recent study on declining elk population (not necessarily a bad thing to a point given the previous elk overpopulation issues) focuses on changed browsing behaviour due to wolf reintroduction as the primary contributing factor (see http://www.montana.edu/cpa/news/nwview.php?article=7324) and neither the article nor the study abstract mention human impact of any kind as a contributing factor. All in all, the animals appear to be ok; "Where there is no struggle, there is no strength"
(Oprah Winfrey). If park personnel, contractors, researchers, other partners working in the park and NPS employees (including their families and visitors) are permitted to travel in the park without a hired escort, why are park visitors not granted the same access if they are willing to take the same training?


Dave,

I can't explain why the park decided to consider individual passage into the park in winter in its now-under way fourth environmental impact statement but not for the temporary rules, other than to guess that since the rules for this winter and next are just temporary, they didn't want to investigate every possible angle. As you surely know, EISes take quite a while to prepare and finalize, and if folks didn't want the park closed to winter use this year and next the NPS had to come up with something interim.

I do think that if you accept the National Park Service Organic Act, which gives the NPS a preservation mandate foremost, one that specifies that the agency "conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations," and hew to the 2006 Management Policies, which further add that "NPS managers must always seek ways to avoid, or to minimize to the greatest degree practicable, adverse impacts on park resources and values (my emphasis)," that Yellowstone's managers should be particularly vigilant when it comes to managing not just the public's use of the park but also that of NPS employees and concessionaires, and even delivery trucks and garbage trucks.

All the changing conditions you cite -- the less severe winters, the lower snowpacks, bison movements -- as well as hotter and drier summers should certainly be taken into consideration when the park decides how to manage both winter and summer use. But whatever the circumstances, I think you have to go back to the Organic Act and Management Policies in deciding appropriate uses and how to manage impacts.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.