You are here

Has The Day Arrived For A Blackstone River Valley National Historical Park?

Should Congress redesignate the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor, or parts of it, as a national historical park? NPS photo of the Old Slater Mill.

The Blackstone River Valley runs for 46 miles through Massachusetts and Rhode Island, a bucolic ribbon (in places) that harbors stories of the country's transformation from an agrarian nation to an industrialized one.

It was in the Blackstone River Valley that the country's Industrial Revolution took grip of an entire region.

"The cotton mills themselves became the incubators of a new discipline of work, driven by clock-time and the pace of modernity," notes a special resource study the National Park Service conducted to determine whether the valley, currently designated as a national heritage corridor, should be given the more formal title of national historical park or historic site.

Although industrialization reshaped all aspects of American life, it did not follow a uniform process. The Blackstone Valley exemplifies one of several main paths to industrialization. This distinctive form was so closely associated with the area where it originated that it became known as the Rhode Island System of manufacture. In general, the Rhode Island System was characterized by its relatively small-scale mills, ownership by individuals or partnerships rather than corporations, use of families as the labor force, location in multiple detached villages in a rural setting, and a symbiotic relationship with agriculture. It represents the first successful application of the factory system of manufacturing in the U.S., employing machines driven by a central power source and tended by semi-skilled workers.


Back in 2006 Congress reauthorized the John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission for five more years. The commission is scheduled to sunset this October, although the "National Heritage Corridor" label will remain intact.

Through August 26 the Park Service's Northeast Region Office is taking public comment on whether the Blackstone River Valley is deserving of national historical park status. There are a number of consequences of such a designation. For starters, management, interpretation, and preservation of the area would be taken over by the National Park Service. Minus that change in designation, and with the decommissioning of the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, there would be no official entity in place to oversee continued preservation and interpretation of the region.

Among the options the Northeast Regional staff is considering are:

* Let the commission sunset.

Just as they do now, in the absence of the federal commission, a cadre of volunteers and docents in combination with the staff of key institutions like the state parks, the Museum of Work and Culture and Old Slater Mill would continue to offer visitor programming and exhibits. Existing visitor facilities would be maintained and made available to the public by their respective owner/operators.

Alternate Text
The Blackstone River Valley runs through parts of Massachusetts and Rhode Island. NPS graphic.

* Have Congress designate the region, or parts of it, as a national historical park, an entity managed and staffed by the Park Service.

The new unit would include specific nationally significant sites and districts located within the Valley that possess high resource integrity and effectively convey the industrial heritage themes of the Blackstone Valley. The park would engage in visitor programming and resource protection primarily for the sites and districts that would be named in the legislation establishing the park.  

* Redesignate the existing Old Slater Mill National Historic Landmark as a national historic site.

The Old Slater Mill National Historic Landmark District would continue to be owned, administered, managed, and operated by the Old Slater Mill Association (OSMA). The National Park Service would have the authority to enter into cooperative agreements with OSMA to preserve and maintain the Old Slater Mill, Wilkinson Mill, Sylvanus Brown House and other characterdefining features within the National Historic Site boundary and to assist in education programs, research, and interpretation of Old Slater Mill and other related industrial heritage sites throughout the Blackstone River Valley.


* Create a Blackstone River Valley Industrial Heritage Network

This option calls for the creation of a permanent program of the National Park Service that would be dedicated to the recognition of the nationally significant story of American industrialization as it emerged in the Blackstone Valley and provide assistance for the long-term protection and interpretation of the Valley’s industrial heritage resources. The network would consist of independently-owned, thematically-related industrial heritage sites, facilities and programs that have met established criteria for program participation.

  You can further research this proposal, and comment on it, at this site.


Just amazes me how NPS rolls on seemingly in a parallel universe from reality.  Don't get me wrong I enjoy that universe but I also enjoy the practical side that makes us all more secure...and connected.  Lets pay our bills FIRST!

Westerner, these studies are requested by Congress, not dreamed up by the NPS....

Okay, change NPS to Congress.  Particular elements of Congress.  

This, along with the the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor, is a beautiful part of New England.  Even just to drive through.  The kind of things we should be spending our money on.

Guess how it's going to work out after the loss of the charitable deduction credit on our parks, other special places and deserving causes.  You'd really have skin in the game contributing personally without the deduction.  Oh, and you need to ask your grandchildren if they would mind being burdened with the cost in a very different world. Lets just get in the black then talk about it.  Kind of a good exercise, I believe.

I'd venture that a good many of us already "have skin in the game" regardless of the April 15 tax implications, Westerner;-)

Would the lack of a deduction hurt the parks, which draw the bulk of their funds from Congress, or would it more specifically hit the friends groups that make so much happen in the parks?

You raise an interesting scenario that would make a perfect Reader Survey question: Would you stop supporting the national parks and their friends groups if there was no charitable deduction allowed?

I know of some Superintendents that court private money (major effort).  People that are in the position to be benevolent are usually smart business people (PRIVATE SECTOR). Seems logical that the interest in benevolence would diminish if there wasn't some return for the act.   I know of at least one major project locally that was funded 100% by a well heeled benefactor that I am guessing would have had second thoughts about supporting the Park and actually having to pay an additional 30+% tax on the money he was giving away.  

"Seems logical that the interest in benevolence would diminish if there wasn't some return for the act."
And here, in how it appears to you, Westerner, you've identified a major difference between those of you on the right from many of the rest of us, who often have a much less tangible or more subtle 'return for the act'.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide

Recent Forum Comments