You are here

Is The Human Footprint Strangling Old Faithful In Yellowstone National Park?

Alternate Text
Is development in the Upper Geyser Basin of Yellowstone having an impact on Old Faithful?/Kurt Repanshek

We all go through growing pains as we get older, and that seems to be the case with the Old Faithful Geyser in Yellowstone National Park, as the geyser isn't as faithful as it once was and could eventually go dormant.

In just the past five decades, the geyser whose reliable gushers earned it its name, has slowed down. While Old Faithful in the 1960s erupted on an average of every 66 minutes, in 2013 the average was more than 90 minutes.

However, whether that decrease in reliability is natural, or has been caused by human development in Yellowstone's Upper Geyser Basin, is hard, if not impossible, to say. But construction projects in the past have directly impacted some thermal features in the basin, in some cases "catastrophically," according to a report on the basin's geothermal plumbing and human infrastructure.

Seeing an Old Faithful eruption is one of the main attractions of a Yellowstone vacation, and so word that those eruptions are becoming less timely can be disconcerting. Exactly why the eruption intervals have gotten longer in recent years is difficult to say, according to members of the Old Faithful Science Review Panel that was organized to look at geothermal issues and infrastructure in the Old Faithful area.

"Decreased groundwater pressure implies a longer recharge time for a geyser eruption. In the absence of actual groundwater monitoring wells, the only indicator of groundwater elevation or pressure is the flow of the Firehole and Madison rivers," the panel wrote in its report. "There is a correlation between Old Faithful's average annual eruption interval and varitions in the flow of the Madison River, suggesting that variations in the water table may be responsible. Similar correlations were found with the eruption intervals of Daisy Aurum, and Depressions geysers in the Upper Geyser Basin. Long-term precipitation and impacts on the local water table are almost certainly factors in the behavior of Old Faithful and other geysers."

While the scientists surmise that the total mass of water spouted every time Old Faithful erupts could be diminishing over the years, there have been no measurements of that output, "and it is difficult to evaluate long-term changes of Old Faithful without a complete understanding of the total water and heat budget of the eruptions."

Nevertheless, they say, the bottom line is that Old Faithful will not erupt indefinitely.

"Future projections of the average eruption intervals are not reliable. Because of the complexity of the natural system, it can be concluded that further changes and even cessation of Old Faithful eruptions are possible. Logs and stumps found buried in sinter on the geyser mound suggest that Old Faithful was completely inactive a few hundred years ago."

Of course, a new factor has been inserted into the landscape around Old Faithful in the past two centuries: humans. And their collective footprint on the park's Upper Geyser Basin could be having an effect on Old Faithful, the scientists say.

"For example, diversion of river water for consumptive use, paving for roads and parking lots, and the footprint of new buildings can decrease the amount of recharge into the groundwater system," they point out. "Trenches for sewage, electricity, gas, and other infrastructure can change the pathways for movement of heat and groundwater."

These impacts are not theoretical, the scientists note.

"There are places in Yellowstone National Park where park infrastructure has impacted hydrothermal features, in some cases catastrophically," they stress. "For example, in the 1960s, the excavation of the footing for the main support of the Old Faithful overpass intercepted very hot water that flowed at a rate of about 40-50 gallons per minute. Nearby hot springs simultaneously dried up. Stopping this discharge of thermal water and gas with a cement plug was considered and rejected because the plug might cause H2S-rich gas to accumulate under the plug, and then leak around its sides."

The gas then might react with water to create sulphuric acid, the story went on, which would eat away at both the bridge support and cement plug, until it failed.

While it's difficult at best to gauge what effects human infrastructure in the Upper Geyser Basin is having on the geothermal plumbing system, thermal imaging done in recent years "clearly shows that trenching has altered the natural surface temperature pattern in the Old Faithful developed area," the report notes.  

Still, "at this time, scientific data do not exist that allow us to say with any degree of confidence that existing and past roads, parking lots, buildings, and subsurface infrastructure have, or have not, affected Old Faithful and other features in the Upper Geyser Basin.

Just the same, "Infrastructure and thermal ground don't easily coexist. Hot ground isn't good for buildings, roads and pipelines; conversely, parking lots and sewer lines disrupt the natural hydrology,” says USGS Geologist and Science Review Panel Co-Chair Jacob Lowenstern. “The popularity of Yellowstone is only increasing with time, so the park needs to consider means to minimize the human impact on both its cultural and natural resources."

To that point, Yellowstone Superintendent Dan Wenk says the report "serves as a starting point for management of the most intensively visited location within Yellowstone National Park."

"There may be no place on Earth that presents the challenges where such iconic natural and cultural features are within such a short distance of each other," the superintendent adds.

You can find the report here.

Featured Article


Here is a link to a news article about another "geyser" that has a lot of human-caused history.

Ignorance abounds.

Here is a link to another interesting source of information.

Also, while searching for an answer to how many acres of the geyser basin around Old Faithful have been covered by pavement or buildings, I found this link to a complete report of the geologic study that is cited in this Traveler article. It requires a lot of reading, but is extremely informative:

If anyone can learn how many acres around the geyser have been paved and built upon, we could do some math and try to determine how many gallons of water will be diverted in a good rainstorm instead of infiltrating down to recharge the aquifer that feeds the geyser. It has to be an enormous amount of water that is being sent to some other destination rather than into the ground.

Being unable to find the acreage covered by human construction in Old Faithful, I tried to compute the number of gallons of water that would be shed from just one acre of pavement or roofs of buildings.

1 acre = 6,272,591 square inches

If a quarter inch of rain falls on that acre, we have:

6,272,591 x 0.25 = 1,568,147.75 cubic inches of water.

One gallon contains 231 cubic inches, so:

1,568,147.75 / 231 = 6788.5 gallons of water from one acre.

It's not at all difficult to understand how much water is being diverted by human facilities -- and how much water is no longer able to seep downward to recharge the thermal basin's supply.

Average annual precipitation at Old Faithful is 24.43 inches of water including melted snow. Let's extend that amount flowing off our single acre of pavement:

24.43 x 6,272,591 = 153,239,398 / 143 = 1,071,604 gallons

Just a conservative wild-eyed guess at covered acreage might be 10 acres (I'm sure it's a lot more), but that would mean 10,716,040 gallons are sent annually straight into the Firehole River instead of helping to refill the plumbing system beneath Old Faithful and its neighbors.

Nice quote.

"We have a choice when we know land is sick. We can 'make believe that everything will turn out alright if Nature is left to take its course in our unhealthy wildernesses, or we can intervene - adaptively and with humility - to facilitate the healing process." ~ Aldo Leopold

Well said, Owen. As Rick mentioned above, given our track record of permanently destroying natural processes, the precautionary principle is an important guideline to follow if one cares about otherwise preserving wild phenomena.

If I found no source of fire or smoke, absolutely. False alarms are almost as common as erroneous environmental predictions.

"I'd look for the fire, I wouldn't turn on the sprinklers."

And, if you fail to find an obvious reason for the alarm, would you turn it off and go back to bed?

I agree totally with Rick Smith. We recognize that development of an infrastructure to promote tourism in parks will have some attendant impacts on the park ecosystem. The difficulty is providing hard scientific evidence of just what these impacts are, because the necessary baseline data is often absent. Also, as soon as there is an impact that is observable (and also statistically significant with respect to baseline conditions), it's very difficult to conclude with absolute certainty that the impact is directly due to a specific road, overpass, parking lot, concession facilities, etc. For this reason, it is usually prudent to set visitor use limits and development restrictions based on the precautionary principle. Unfortunately, given the importance of parks to local and regional economies, when such measures result in a perceived reduction in visitation and lost income to the concessioner and local businesses who depend on park tourism, actions to protect resources are often postponed administratively and politically into the distant future. When I worked in Yosemite in 1969, we had the definite expectation that eventually the General Master Plan for the park would propose elimination of the private automobile from Yosemite Valley. That plan was finally published in 1980, and it subsequently gathered dust for the next 34 years.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide

Recent Forum Comments