You are here

Plan To Open Everglades National Park To Python Hunt Condemned By PEER

Share
Burmese python in Everglades National Park/NPS

Officials with Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility believe the National Park Service should block the Python Challenge 2016 from being conducted inside Everglades National Park/NPS

A plan to open Everglades National Park up to the "Python Challenge" early next year is both wrong and probably illegal, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which wants the National Park Service to prevent the hunt from being conducted within the park.

While the snake hunt is intended to reduce the number of non-native Burmese pythons in south Florida, PEER officials maintain the hunt won't likely reduce the number of pythons in the park, that it's unsupported by scientific review, and could lead to similar "hunts" in other parks with non-native species problems, such as Great Smoky Mountains National Park where a feral pig population lives.

The first Python Challenge, sponsored by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, was held in 2013 in lands outside the national park. It led to the capture of 68 snakes, including one more than 14 feet in length.

In supporting next year's hunt, Everglades Superintendent Pedro Ramos said he and his staff "look forward to expanding access into the park and to providing more opportunities for members of the public to become approved authorized python agents."

However, according to PEER, "only once in NPS history has Congress approved the use of deputized agents for removal of wildlife – back in 1950, to reduce the elk population in Grand Teton National Park."

"The Everglades python hunt of 2016 is a misguided publicity stunt that would not improve, let alone solve, the python problem,” said Jeff Ruch, PEER's executive director.  “This would set a terrible precedent for no good reason. Unfortunately, what this episode really reflects is an advancing institutional decay in the quality of national park leadership.”

The aim of the 2016 Python Challenge™ is to promote Everglades conservation through invasive species removal, and the FWC and the Fish and Wildlife Foundation of Florida, Inc., see the hunt as one way to provide training to members of the public so they can help. Training events will teach participants how to identify, report, and then safely and humanely capture Burmese pythons.

While no one disputes that pythons introduced into Everglades National Park are a non-native, invasive species that has altered the park ecosystem, PEER said in a release issued Tuesday, the organization believes some significant obstacles stand in the way of the plan:

* As in most national parks, it is illegal for anyone other than National Park Service employees or contractors to hunt animals of any kind inside Everglades National Park;

* The park has not done the environmental reviews, together with opportunities for public comment, required by federal law, and;

* Despite claiming that the snakes collected will aid scientific research, there is no study design or research proposition to be validated.

Superintendent Ramos' comments in support of the hunt, said PEER's Mr. Ruch, are misguided.

“Superintendent Ramos appears to be making this up as he goes along, but national parks are not supposed to be run from the seat of someone’s pants,” he said. “Most people already know that Everglades has a python problem, but it is utterly mysterious why putting on a contest will avert the arrival of more invasive species.

"... The Everglades python hunt of 2016 is a misguided publicity stunt that would not improve, let alone solve, the python problem,” added Mr. Ruch. “This would set a terrible precedent for no good reason. Unfortunately, what this episode really reflects is an advancing institutional decay in the quality of national park leadership.”

Comments

It's easy to criticize from a distance, and while I often agree with PEER, I have to ask if Mr. Ruch has a better idea?


Yes we do, employ a team of 6 to 10 specially trained seasonal NPS employees to actively capture kill and remove pythons from the park under the auspices of the National Park Service.  

 

The NPS has no money?  Well, PEER believes the python situation in the Everglades is too important for gimmicks.  It demands that the NPS leadership pay attention to it in a serious way and fund a real effort.  Parks like Halaeakala NP in Hawaii employ NPS staff specifically to reduce feral goats, non-native deer and other exotic species.  It can and has been done in other parks.  

 

Perhaps the NPS should devote some of its resources from the donors for the Centennial or the National Park Foundation for this very important task.

 

As good an objective as python removal is - and it is - the NPS must accomplish it without kicking away some of the most important underpinnings that support our concept of National Parks


Other than offending Mr. Ruch's distain for hunting.  What exactly is the downside of this "hunt"?


They must be removed and the issue of preventing arrival of additional Pythons depends on education, PSAs, signs, classroom programs, etc.


This is Jeff Rucks qualifications...Please note he has never held a job connected to the outdoors nor does it seem he has ever spent any time outdoors since he has been a political activist pundit his entire career.  So he is qualified to tell the professionals at NPS how to do their  job?  This is what is wrong in the US.  I bet tqxpaqyers pay his salary!

Jeff Ruch has been the Executive Director of PEER since 1997. With Jeff DeBonis, he helped to start PEER and for its first four years served as General Counsel & Program Director. Prior to that Jeff was the Policy Director and a staff attorney at the Government Accountability Project representing whistleblowers from both the public and private sector. Before coming to DC, Jeff worked in California state government for 17 years, mostly in the State Legislature as counsel to various committees where he drafted literally hundreds of laws on topics ranging from energy conservation to the rights of employed inventors. Jeff served stints as a deputy district attorney, an appellate court clerk and is a graduate of the California Correctional Officers Academy.

 

 


opportunity to reduce invasive aninimal population while educating public and getting them to experience the park. All at minimal cost and little to no liability. This is a problem how?


What does python taste like?  Might be some marketing opportunities there.

Python burgers.  Python steaks.  Hmmmm.


Great Idea. Lets get them all and send any extra pythons to PEERS.

Harry Butowsky

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.