You are here

More Fallout From Grand Canyon Sexual Harassment Complaints

Share

Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent Dave Uberuaga, acting in the wake of a tide of sexual harassment complaints, has dismantled the River District Office where the grievances arose.

The superintendent, in an email to all his employees, wrote that he takes "full responsibility for the situation the park finds itself in and I acknowledge and accept that over time, a culture was tolerated that allowed sexual harassment and created a hostile work environment."

That email, sent Wednesday, came a day after National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis sent an email to all Park Service employees stating that "no employee has the right or the power by nature of their position to inflict their will or to subject co-workers, regardless of their status, to abuse."

The emails stemmed from an Interior Department investigative report that found that for 15 years life deep in the Inner Gorge of Grand Canyon National Park at times reflected rowdy, sexually charged scenes from a frat party for some Park Service employees, with male employees pawing and propositioning female workers, some of who at times exhibited their own risqué behavior. 

The investigation by the Interior Department's Office of Inspector General generated a tawdry list of inappropriate behavior, from male employees taking photographs up under a female co-worker's dress and groping female workers to women dancing provocatively and bringing a drinking straw "shaped like a penis and testicles" to river parties. The incidents, the September 2014 letter to Secretary Jewell charged, "demonstrated evidence of 'discrimination, retaliation, and a sexually hostile work environment.'"

The report, released in January, also stated that Park Service managers, from Superintendent Uberuaga to Intermountain Regional Director Sue Masica, had been aware of the allegations prior to 2014 and yet relatively little was done to change the river culture.

According to the 13-page OIG report, Superintendent Uberuaga, when provided with the Equal Employment Opportunity report from a 2013 investigation, "did not provide the report to HR or GRCA managers, and did not request HR personnel’s opinions about potential disciplinary action against the employees named in the report. No one was disciplined for failing to properly respond to the allegations, he said, because the EEO report indicated that these failures were 'not actionable.'”

"As the superintendent of Grand Canyon National Park, I have the responsibility to take corrective action which includes rebuilding trust and credibility. To do so, I must work to ensure that the same or similar events do not occur in the future; and I must take decisive actions that demonstrate that we take such matters outlined in the OIG report seriously," Superintendent Uberuaga wrote to his staff. "As a result of considerable review of the facts and reflections of my own sense of right and wrong, I have made the decision to abolish the River District of the park and to create an opportunity for a fresh start and a total review of our mission and responsibilities on the river.

"As part of the OIG response plan, the Deputy Regional Director will engage an external, multi-disciplinary team to conduct a comprehensive top-to-bottom examination of the river operations. The findings and recommendations from this report will inform how the park will carry out its mission along the river. In the coming weeks and months we will develop the details of implementation."

In his email to the entire Park Service family, Director Jarvis acknowledged that across the system many employees "have expressed shock and dismay that the serious behavior and practices described has occurred for so long."

While he added that personnel matters and pending Equal Employment Opportunity cases require confidentiality, he wanted to "assure you that we are taking active steps in response to this situation."

"... Certainly, this type of behavior is unlawful," he wrote. "While policy, rules and regulations exist to protect all of us, treating people with respect is foundational to our culture.  The National Park Service is committed to ensuring a work environment that is free of threatening, hostile or demeaning behavior.

"The culture in this arena is of deep concern for me. I am asking every one of you to work to change this. Take it upon yourself to initiate the dialogue, as we all have the responsibility to bring these issues to the forefront. If you have concerns, discuss them first with your supervisor," the email continued. "Leadership, regardless of position, matters. If the response is inadequate, seek out a supervisor in a different discipline. Initiate the dialogue, talk to a supervisor, and if a response or mediation does not occur, seek out your local equal opportunity counselor or contact.

"Together we must create a culture of acceptance, which treats every individual with respect and provides employees with a safe and secure work environment. You deserve nothing less."

Comments

So it isn't a matter of lack of respect for women.  Its a matter of lack of respect for their co-workers, man or women.  Or it was consensual if inappropriate behavior.  


Ec, you have a point, it is a lack respect for both genders. i think it is a also a breakdown of supervisory and management oversight and responsibility. You cannot correct inappropriate behavior (also unlawful), on the job site, consensual or not, unless someone is minding the store and is held accountable for it.  


How can you equate "provocative dancing" and a joke straw to groping someone and denying them food or the ability to do their job? 


The fact that they may or may not be equal is irrelevant.  Inappropriate behavior was exhibited by both sexes.  


The Huffington Post article was mostly about sexual harrassment in the Forest Service, especially in crews fighting wildfires. What happened in the Grand Canyon was terribly wrong, and the corrective response has been inexcusably slow, but I find it interesting that all of the comments I've seen have focused on Grand Canyon, with no mention of the Forest Service's much slower response. Maybe I read the wrong publications, or the people who email me about sexual harrassment in the NPS didn't read the entire Huffington Post article. It's discouraging that despite all the training sessions out there this type of behavior contintues to occur in government, in business, in education, in the miiltary, and on and on.


It appears it went both ways, Rick B.  It's like being on another planet being on the River for a week, two weeks or even three.   You want everyone walking around with the PC police handbook.  There wouldn't be anybody on the river if you ran things, Mr. B.  


So now common decency is some kind of political correctness that is somehow a bad thing?

Gee whillikers.  I learned a great lesson about common decency when I was in eighth grade.  I made a very rude comment to one of the girls in my class and it wasn't long before I was visiting the principal.   I knew I couldn't fib my way out of it so admitted what I'd said.

Upon hearing that, he reached for the Board of Education and instructed me to bend over his desk.  Three good swats that I thought were going to send me and the desk through the wall.

I was MUCH more polite (or is that politically correct?) after that.  Looking back on it, it was one of the best lessons of my life.

 


I have to agree, Lee. Most who complain about the blanket term "policically correct" are those who are upset that the century has evolved, and that they are no longer given a pass for saying or doing the lousy things that they think inside.

 

Since I first read the article on Huff Post a day or so before Kurt highlighted it, most of the men I know have shared my reaction - shock and anger. I'd like to think I would have an identical reaction if I wasn't married to a female NPS employee. What I'm amazed at are the folks who try to minimize the horrific experiences of the women by "well, one woman did bad stuff too".

It says a lot about a person if they can read such terrible human experiences and their considered opinion nets out to be "don't blame MY gender - spread it around to everyone".


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.